HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011-03-03 - Planning-Engineering-Operations Committee Meeting Agenda Packet
Yorba Linda
Water District
AGENDA
YORBA LINDA WATER DISTRICT
PLANNING-ENGINEERING-OPERATIONS COMMITTEE MEETING
Thursday, March 3, 2011, 4:00 PM
1717 E Miraloma Ave, Placentia CA 92870
COMMITTEE STAFF
Director Gary T. Melton, Chair Ken Vecchiarelli, General Manager
Director Ric Collett Steve Conklin, Engineering Manager
Lee Cory, Operations Manager
1. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Any individual wishing to address the committee is requested to identify themselves and state the matter on
which they wish to comment. If the matter is on this agenda, the committee Chair will recognize the individual for
their comment when the item is considered. No action will be taken on matters not listed on this agenda.
Comments are limited to matters of public interest and matters within the jurisdiction of the Water District.
Comments are limited to five minutes.
2. ACTION CALENDAR
This portion of the agenda is for items where staff presentations and committee discussions are needed prior to
formal committee action.
2.1. Change Order No. 1 - Water Quality Mixer for Hidden Hills Reservoir
Recommendation: That the Committee recommend the Board of Directors approve
Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $8,656, for the installation of a Tank Shark
Water Management System at the Hidden Hills Reservoir.
2.2. Ohio Street Pipeline Replacement Project - Amendment 3 to Professional Services
Agreement with Tetra Tech Inc.
Recommendation: That the Committee recommend the Board of Directors
authorize approval of Engineering Services Amendment No. 3 with Tetra Tech, Inc.
for a fee increase not to exceed $17,280, resulting in a total fee of $167,380.
2.3. Sewer Master Plan Update 2010 - Receipt of Final Report
Recommendation: That the Committee recommend the Board of Directors receive
and file the Sewer Master Plan Update 2010.
3. DISCUSSION ITEMS
This portion of the agenda is for matters such as technical presentations, drafts of proposed policies, or similar
items for which staff is seeking the advice and counsel of the Committee members. This portion of the agenda
may also include items for information only.
3.1. Monthly Groundwater Production and Purchased Import Water Report (To be provided
at the meeting.)
3.2. Monthly Preventative Maintenance Program Report (To be provided at the meeting.)
3.3. Groundwater Producers Meeting Report
3.4. Status Report on Capital Projects in Progress
3.5. Future Agenda Items and Staff Tasks
4. ADJOURNMENT
4.1. The next regular meeting of the Planning-Engineering-Operations Committee will be held
April 7, 2011 at 4:00 p.m.
Items Distributed to the Committee Less Than 72 Hours Prior to the Meeting
Pursuant to Government Code section 54957.5, non-exempt public records that relate to open session agenda items
and are distributed to a majority of the Committee less than seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting will be available
for public inspection in the lobby of the District's business office located at 1717 E. Miraloma Avenue, Placentia, CA
92870, during regular business hours. When practical, these public records will also be made available on the District's
internet website accessible at http://www.ylwd.com/.
Accommodations for the Disabled
Any person may make a request for a disability-related modification or accommodation needed for that person to be
able to participate in the public meeting by telephoning the Executive Secretary at 714-701-3020, or writing to Yorba
Linda Water District, P.O. Box 309, Yorba Linda, CA 92885-0309. Requests must specify the nature of the disability and
the type of accommodation requested. A telephone number or other contact information should be included so the
District staff may discuss appropriate arrangements. Persons requesting a disability-related accommodation should
make the request with adequate time before the meeting for the District to provide the requested accommodation.
ITEM NO. 2.1
AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: March 3, 2011 Budgeted: Yes
Total Budget: $80,000
To: Planning-Engineering- Cost Estimate: $80,906
Operations Committee
Funding Source: Water Capital
Reserves
From: Ken Vecchiarelli, General
Manager
Job No: 2010-25
Presented By: Steve Conklin, Engineering Dept: Engineering
Manager
Reviewed by Legal: N/A
Prepared By: Derek Nguyen, Water Quality CEQA Compliance: N/A
Engineer
Subject: Change Order No. 1 - Water Quality Mixer for Hidden Hills Reservoir
SUMMARY:
On January 13, 2011, the Board of Directors approved a contract for the installation of a Tank Shark
Reservoir Management System at the Hidden Hills Reservoir for a total cost of $72,250.
Upon further review of the mixing system and the operational changes required to achieve our
water quality goals for Hidden Hills Reservoir, staff recommends that the District install a booster
pump and chlorine analyzer for each of the two reservoir bays instead of one combined unit. The
cost for this change order work is $8,656, which is greater than 10% of the approved project cost
and therefore, requires Board of Directors approval, in accordance with the District's purchasing
policy.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Committee recommend the Board of Directors approve Change Order No. 1 in the amount
of $8,656, for the installation of a Tank Shark Water Management System at the Hidden Hills
Reservoir.
DISCUSSION:
The Hidden Hills Reservoir has been in operation since July 2010, providing gravity-fed water
storage for the 125 homes in the upper Hidden Hills area. The District is addressing low-demand
water quality concerns for this area with the installation of a small pump, mixer and chlorine residual
analyzer for the reservoir.
Upon further review of the mixing system and the operational changes required to improve water
quality at Hidden Hills, Engineering and Operations staff recommend that the new system be
modified to provide a booster pump and chlorine analyzer for each of the two bays instead of one
combined unit. With this new configuration, the District will have a wider range of flexibility to
operate one or both reservoir bays and to track water quality consistently. The cost for this change
is $8,656, which will be added to the original cost of $72,250. A copy of the change order proposal
is attached. Installation work will begin in March and will be completed within a month.
PRIOR RELEVANT BOARD ACTION(S):
The Board of Directors approved a Purchase Agreement to install the Tank Shark Reservoir
Management System for Hidden Hills on January 13, 2011, for a total cost of $72,250.
ATTACHMENTS:
Name: Description: Type:
HHills Mixer CO#1.pdf HHills Mixer Co#1 Backup Material
1077 Dell Avenue, Suite A, Campbell, CA 95008
S1 - Tel: (408) 370-6540 • Fax: (408) 86+6-4660
Email: mail@4psi.net www.4psi.net
P rQCess SQlLItlOnS, inc. Contractor's Licenses: Arizona ROC217727, California 877235
February 24, 20111 Proposal No.: P-1230-COI-REV 1
Subject: Proposed Change Order Number One For Yorba Ueda Water District -
Hidden Hills Reservoir
Process Solutions, Inc. (PSI) will provide the following major system subcomponents:
Change Order # 1 consists of the following:
• Two (2) 30 GPM Booster Pumps to replace single 60GPM Booster Pump
• One (1) Additional 't'otal Chlorine Analyzer, this additional analyzer will be for
outgoing water monitoring.
• One (1) Sample switching solenoid Assembly and Relay Logic Controls
• Above Fault HOA Switches for Booster Pump Control
Change Order cost including use tax:
Fight Thousand, Six Hundred and Fifty Six Dollars ($8,656.00)
Exclusions:
• Diver
• Pipe Taps
• SCADA Interface
• Permitting or Regulatory Approval
Warranty
Process Solutions, Inc. (PSI) warrants the parts supplied as part of the Tank Shark system to be
free from defects in materials and workmanship for a period of three (3) years from the date of
shipment or start up if Process Solutions is performing the start up.
Acceptance of Proposal by
Title Date
ITEM NO. 2.2
AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: March 3, 2011 Budgeted: Yes
Total Budget: $775,000
To: Planning-Engineering- Cost Estimate: $17,280
Operations Committee
Funding Source: All Water Funds
From: Ken Vecchiarelli, General Account No: 101-2700-201006
Manager
Job No: 201006
Presented By: Steve Conklin, Engineering Dept: Engineering
Manager
Reviewed by Legal: N/A
Prepared By: Anthony Manzano, Senior CEQA Compliance: Exempt
Project Manager
Subject: Ohio Street Pipeline Replacement Project - Amendment 3 to Professional
Services Agreement with Tetra Tech Inc.
SUMMARY:
Due to additional design work requirements, a change in the design scope and fee is requested.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Committee recommend the Board of Directors authorize approval of Engineering Services
Amendment No. 3 with Tetra Tech, Inc. for a fee increase not to exceed $17,280, resulting in a total
fee of $167,380.
DISCUSSION:
On May 27, 2010, the Board ratified issuance of a Professional Services Agreement for engineering
services with Tetra Tech, Inc., for the Ohio Street Pipeline Replacement Project, for a fee of
$85,400.
On July 8, 2010, the Board of Directors approved Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services
Agreement with Tetra Tech, Inc., to include engineering design of Oriente Drive Pipeline
Replacement, from Lakeview Avenue to Ohio Street, for a total fee increase not to exceed $63,300,
increasing the total contract to $148,700.
Amendment 2 for $1,400 was recently approved by staff for Corrosion Engineering services to
provide pipeline protection design guidelines resulting from recently discovered aggressive soil
conditions. This amount was within the signing authority of the Engineering Manager. This
increased the total to $150,100.
Subsequently, after completing a detailed site walk and preliminary design work, staff determined
that other waterline replacement improvements are needed and require additional design work
including:
. details for abandonment of an existing 14 inch diameter waterline, constructed in the 1920's,
in easements within private residential properties
. revised pipeline sizing for Ohio Street north of Oriente Drive
. re-alignment in Ohio Street, north of Villa Terrace, to accommodate a narrow construction
work area and a traffic lane for residents.
. additional meetings attended by Tetra Tech, Inc.
. detailed easement research
. detailed water meter relocation design work
The above design work is not within Tetra Tech's original scope of work, resulting in this request to
increase the design fee by $17,280. Tetra Tech's proposal for additional services (copy attached)
was reviewed by staff and determined to be necessary and appropriate for the required work. Staff
recommends approval.
PRIOR RELEVANT BOARD ACTION(S):
On May 27, 2010, the Board ratified issuance of a Professional Services Agreement for engineering
services with Tetra Tech, Inc., for the Ohio Street Pipeline Replacement Project, for a fee of
$85,400.
On July 8, 2010, the Board of Directors approved Amendment No. 1 to the Professional Services
Agreement with Tetra Tech, Inc., to include engineering design of Oriente Drive Pipeline
Replacement, from Lakeview Avenue to Ohio Street, for a total fee increase not to exceed $63,300,
increasing the total contract to $148,700.
ATTACHMENTS:
Name: Description: Type:
Ohio _St._Pipeline _Replacement _Amendment _3 02
Ohio Street Pipeline Replacement -Amendment No. 3 Backup Material
02-201 1. pdf
TETRATECH
February 2, 2011
Mr. Steve Conklin, P.E.
Engineering Manager
Yorba Linda Water District
1717 East Miraloma Avenue
Placentia, CA 92870
Reference: Ohio Street and Oriente Drive Pipeline Replacement Project
Contract No. 2010-06
Additional Services Request
Dear Mr. Conklin:
Tetra Tech has been providing professional engineering services for this project since April 2010 and
has completed 90% plans and is now working on the 100% submittal. Tetra Tech has been working
diligently in partnership with the District on this challenging project to resolve the impacts to the
public. During the execution of the work, we have expended additional effort that was not planned for
in our original scope and fee. In addition, the District is requesting changes to the design after the 90%
submittal and is also requesting additional work that is outside of our current scope. We respectfully
request the District review these additional services and provide a corresponding increase to our
approved budget.
Please do not hesitate to contact me via telephone at (949) 809-5156 should you have any questions
relative to the scope or fee for the additional services. If the request is acceptable to the District, please
provide written authorization.
Sincerely/
r
bU '
Tom Epperson, P.E.
Divisional Vice President
TLE/MWB/cg
P.^09270' 1 ',4-09270- 1000 1 Tioftmf ( orrespondence`'It002-201 1-02-02.doc(100)
Attachment
Tetra Tech, Inc.
17885 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 500, Irvine, CA 926 9 4-62 1 3
Tel 949.809.5000 Fax 949.809. 50 10 www.tetratech.com
YORBA LINDA WATER DISTRICT
Ohio Street and Oriente Drive Pipeline Replacement Project
REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SERVICES
The following correspondence Summarizes our request for an increase in the budget authorization to
compensate us for the services that will be or have been required to be performed during the execution
of the project.
Additional Items of Work
Item I - Abandonment of Existing 14-inch Cast Iron Pipe: The District has requested that the
abandonment of approximately 1,800 feet of existing 14-inch cast iron pipe be included in the project.
The District has indicated four areas along the pipeline that the District wants the pipeline
disconnected from other water mains and the water main filled with grout and the ends plugged. Tetra
Tech performed a site visit with the District to review these areas and the replacement requirements.
These areas will require replacement of landscape, hadscape (sidewalks) and street pavement. Tetra
Tech will utilize the District's atlas sheets and create a new sheet to show the location and length of
the pipeline to be abandoned. A second sheet will be added to the plan set and will use photographs,
one of each area, to provide call-outs for the removal and replacement requirements.
Item 2 - Revise Pipe Size front 8-inch to 12-inch PVC from Oriente Drive to Approximately 100 feet
north of J&J Lane: The District has requested that the 8-inch PVC pipeline between Oriented Drive
and approximately 100 feet north of J&J Lane be upsized to 12-inch PVC pipe. The District has been
directed to make this change in order to move water more effectively from a pressure reducing vault
located in Maple Leaf Lane. This will result in the following changes:
1. Minor revisions to the profile design on Sheets C-106 and C-107.
2. Change of construction call outs on the plan and profile sheets from 8-inch to 12-inch.
3. Minor Revisions to the following details: Details 1, 2, 3, and 4 on Sheet C-505.
Item 3 - Realignment of Water Main North of Villa Terrace: Based on discussions with the District,
it is desirable to adjust the pipe alignment such that a temporary travel lane can be provided to
accommodate residents north of Oriente Drive. The pipe alignment will need to be adjusted to the
west, a cross-section added to the plans to provide delineation of work area and removal and
replacement of existing features. This results in minor revisions to the horizontal alignment on Sheet
C-106 and the addition of the cross-section to the sheet.
Item 4 - Additional Meetings: Our scope (original plus the amendment for Oriente Drive) included
attending six (6) meetings: three review meetings, one additional meeting for the preliminary
alignment for Oriente Drive and two field walks. To date we have attended eight (8) meetings: 50%
review of Ohio, 50% review of Oriente, two field walks, two meetings with the City of Yorba Linda, a
90% review meeting and a meeting to discuss work areas, traffic control and production rates. We are
anticipating one additional meeting will be required for the project to review the 100% design.
Therefore we are requesting compensation for three (3) additional meetings.
Item 5 - Easements: During the preparation of the plans, we realized that several of the roads
connecting to Ohio Street and Oriente Drive are private streets. In addition to that the District has
easements to cover their facilities within these private streets, as well as easements for their utilities
P 09270'.134-09270-10001'1'i jM,,,,A C rrespon t-- 1100'_--3011 02 03.d- - I - TETRA TECH
YORBA LINDA WATER DISTRICT
Ohio Street and Oriente Drive Pipeline Replacement Project
outside of the public right-of-way and not within these private streets. We did not plan on this effort to
obtain and plot approximately 15 easements for the District and approximately 13 City/roadway
easements that overlay this project area. There was also a question about the disposition of the north
end of Ohio Street, north of Shadow Ridge Lane which was eventually clarified through the efforts of
ourselves, the District and the City. It is important to reflect these easements so that the District can
perform their coordination and access agreements with the private owners for the construction and that
the final improvements are located within the existing easements.
Item 6 - Relocation of Water Meters: During our field walks of both preliminary alignments, the
District directed us to relocate several existing water meters that were located in undesirable areas (e.g.
top of walls, behind walls, in concrete driveways or located back-off the limits of the paved street in
back lots). This resulted in special design for 16 water meters including the following: 1) additional
field work to verify the work required to reconnect the service and abandon the existing water meters,
and 2) additional construction notes and notations to describe the work required by the Contractor.
Schedule
Tetra Tech has been working on the 100% submittal and responding to the District's comments. With
the recent request to add the abandonment of the 14-inch pipeline and change the pipeline size
between Oriente Drive and J&J Lane we are anticipating submitting the 100% submittal by
February 7, 2011. While the City is perforining their final review, we will also be performing our final
internal QA/QC which will take two weeks to complete.
Summary
We are requesting an increase to our budget authorization of $17,280 for this project. The total
contract amount will increase from S85,400 (original budget) plus 563,300 (Amendment 1 for Oriente
Drive), plus 51,400 (Amendment 2 for Corrosion Engineer) and $17,280 (Amendment 3) to a total of
$167,380.
Please do not hesitate to call me should you have any questions relative to the scope or fee.
P 01)'70'.134-09270-10001'1'i jM,,,,A C - pon t--1100'_--3011 02 01cf- - TETRA TECH
Price Proposal Labor Plan Price Summary /Totals
7 Labor Resources Task Pricing Totals 17,280
Ohio/Oriente Pipeline Replacement Project Bill Rate> z6o.oo 2-0 161M 127.0 117.0 117.0 s7M Specify Add'I Fees on Setup 0
Technology Use Fee
Additional Services Request ProiA- Total Price 17,280
Submitted to: Yor a Linda Water District
Pricing by Resource
E
Contract Type: T&M - _ g
d - r Task Pricing
Total
a a
abor
2 -28
Schedule Labor Hrs 3 a Rate Esc. Labor Subs Travel Mat'ls & Equip ODCs Totals
Project Phases / Tasks From Thm Mo.th6 3 0 3 118 a v w 24 a w zz az 0.00% 17,064 96 120 17,280
Item 1 Abadonment of Existing 14-inch Cl Pipe 31 1 4 10 - 4 12 - 4,582 - 18 - 80 4,680
Field Visit 2 2 - 330 18 348
Plan Sheet of Abandonment 15 1 z 4 4 4 - 2,126 40 2,166
Detail of Abandonment Areas (4) 15 1 2 4 8 - 2,126 40 2,166
Item 2 Revise Pipe Size from Oriente to J8d Lane 18 - 2 - - 8 8 - 2,272 - - - 28 2,300
Revise Sheets C-106 and C-107 9 1 4 4 - 1,136 14 1,150
Revise Details on Sheet C-505 9 1 4 4 - 1,136 14 1,150
Item 3 Realignment of Water Main north of Villa Terrace 5 - 1 - - 2 2 - 568 - - - 12 580
Revise Sheet C-107 5 1 2 2 - 568 12 580
Item 4 Additional Meetings 10 2 6 2 - - - - 2,050 - 50 - - 2,100
Three (3) Additional Meetings 10 2 6 2 - 2,050 50 2,100
Item 5 Easements 27 1 2 4 8 - 12 - 3,740 - - - - 3,740
Additional effort to add easements 27 1 2 4 8 12 - 3,740 3,740
Item 6 Relocation of Water Meters 27 1 2 8 - 8 8 - 3,852 - 28 - - 3,880
Relocation of 16 water meters 27 1 2 8 8 8 - 3,852 28 3,880
Totals 118 s 17 24 a zz 42 0.00% 17,064 96 120 17,280
Tetra Tech - Confidential and Proprietary Page 1 of 1 Printed 2/2/2011
ITEM NO. 2.3
AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: March 3, 2011 Budgeted: Yes
Total Budget: $350,000
To: Planning-Engineering- Cost Estimate: $300,000
Operations Committee
Funding Source: Sewer Operating
Fund
From: Ken Vecchiarelli, General Account No: 2-2720
Manager
Job No: 2009-16
Presented By: Steve Conklin, Engineering Dept: Engineering
Manager
Reviewed by Legal: N/A
Prepared By: Anthony Manzano, Senior CEQA Compliance: N/A
Project Manager
Subject: Sewer Master Plan Update 2010 - Receipt of Final Report
SUMMARY:
The Sewer Master Plan Update (SMPU) project for 2010 is complete. The final report was received
on the District's sewer collection system, evaluating and determining system deficiencies and
capacity needs for existing and future flow conditions. This staff report presents the SMPU 2010
findings and recommendations. A copy of the Executive Summary is attached.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Committee recommend the Board of Directors receive and file the Sewer Master Plan
Update 2010.
DISCUSSION:
On December 10, 2009, the Board authorized execution of a Professional Services Agreement with
IDModeling (Consultant) in the amount of $300,210 to prepare the SMPU.
On February 16, 2011, the Consultant completed and submitted the SMPU. The report results
indicate that the vast majority of the District's sewer system is in good to excellent condition and will
not require any major improvements. The SMPU identified three potential sewer collection system
capital improvement locations with deficient sewer line capacities under estimated build-out and
peak-flow conditions, as follows:
1. Kellogg Drive Capital Improvement; between Crestline Drive and Orangethorpe Avenue, and
near Imperial Highway
2. Lynbrook Plaza Capital Improvement; Lynbrook Plaza south of Parkview Terrace and one
small reach of downstream sewerline in Brookmont Drive
3. Brookmont Drive Capital Improvement; west of Canyon Drive
The proposed Kellogg Drive Capital Improvement involves the lowering or removal of a weir that
controls the flow-split between parallel 10-inch and 12-inch sewer lines in Kellogg Drive. District
staff will continue to monitor flow conditions and determined if modifications in the weir are
necessary.
The proposed Lynbrook Plaza and Brookmont Drive Capital Improvements were identified based on
a very conservative peak flow analysis under build out conditions. Due to the building slowdown,
build out may be three to five years out, or later. In the interim and as build out approaches, staff will
monitor flow conditions and determine if sewer surcharging is developing. If so, a recommendation
will be made to proceed with the described improvements. The consultant's estimated capital
improvement costs are $428,000 for the Lynbrook Plaza upgrade and $101,000 for the Brookmont
Drive upgrade.
PRIOR RELEVANT BOARD ACTION(S):
On December 10, 2009, the Board authorized execution of a Professional Services Agreement with
IDModeling in the amount of $300,210 to prepare the Sewer Master Plan Update.
ATTACHMENTS:
Name: Description: Type:
SMPU Exec Summary Exhibit.pdf SMPU Exec Summ & Exhibit Backup Material
IDM.odeling and Psornas were retained to develop a new hydraulic model of the sewer
collection system (sewer model) and prepare a Sewer Master Plan Update (SMPU) for
the Yorba Linda Water District (District). The primary purpose of this report ^s to
summarize the development of the sewer model and prepare a SMFU that evaluates and
provides recommendations regarding the District's existing and fiusure sewer collection
system- This rem}r4 contains the planning methodology, criteria, and assumptions used to
develop the SMPU. as well as the results o`' the hydraulic modeAing and the
recommended capital improvement plan for the District's wastewater collection system.
The S'+IPU also includes reco emendations for maintenance, repair and rehabilitation of
the existing sewer collectian system developed froth, on-going closed circuit television
(CC°TV) inspection and condition assessment being conducted by district staff or the
existing collection system.
. aa1 t:iicatl System Description
The existing wastewater collection system consists primarily of vitrified clay pipe (VC'P)
with a small port=or, of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe, ductile iron pipe (DIP), cast iron
pipe (CIP) and asbestos cement pipe (ACP). The diameters range in size from 4-inch to
24-inch. The District owns and maintains approximately 159 miles of pipeline,
approximately 4.157 manholes. and one (1) sewer lift station within its service area. The
District also maintains approximately 26 miles of pipeline owned by the City of Yorba
Linda on the District's eastern border.
Wastewater generated within the system flows by gravity to the Orange County
Sanitation District (OCSD) trunk sewers. "These tnan'_k sewers rout=. the flow to OCSD
wastewater treatment plants in Fountain Valley and. Huntington Beach.
1.3 Pion^r "Ill witortrty
As a part of this SMPU, a temporary flow monitoring program was conducted during the
months of January through April. 2010, in three phases. The primary purpose of this
program was to measure and determine the relative flow from different areas of the
wastewater collection system. The flow measurement data collected during the flow
rnonitcring program established a benchmark for sewer model calibration. including
information on wet weather impacts can the sewer collection system.
1.4 Plranrrirar_i -)ata
The Yorba Linda Water District wastewater collection system has approximately 14,800
serv.cc connections. The majority of these customer connections are residential.
Within the YLWD sewer se-vice area, the land use is comprised of 66.0% residential,
23% commercial, 0.3% industrial, 16.0% open space and 15.5% planned community.
i bi" lc c: ilia c
1 February 2011
PSOMAS
YORRd 1 INDA WA TER DISTRICT
2010 SF_ WF, R ,WzI STER PI A))1 UPDATE
For protecting future population, information provided by the District was used to
estimate build-out connections and population for the sewer system. Four future
residential development categories were identified and population projections were
developed.
Criteria
Sewer pipe; capacities are dependent upon many factors. These inciade the roughness of
the pipe., the chaser maximum allowable depth of `low, and limiting velocity and slope.
the Continuity Equation and the Manning's Equation for steady state flow are used for
gravity sewer hydrauFc calculations.
'he capacity criteria for gravity sewers are typically evaiumeci by a ratio of flow depth
over pipe diameter (d1D). Sewers for this analysis were sized so the d/D ratios (specified
below) are not exceeded while flowing under the peak dry-weather flow (11D W F)
conditions.
® Pipe Size 12-inches: din { 50%a
Pipe Size > 12-incites: d/D 75%
Model Develooniont and GaIR)rJtioll
As part of the SMPU, a hydraulic model of the sewer collection syste;n (sewer model)
was constructed from the Districts sewer Geographic Information: System (GIS)
geodatabase. lie ydr UHC modeling software identified for the computer model is
lnfoSewer. which runs inside of l sri's ArcGIS Software.
The average dry weather flows were a located and calibrated in the wastewater model
based upon historical metered water sales records. land use data, and the results of a flaw
monitoring program conducted in January throu0i April 2010.
Peak dry weather flowrs were determined using a peaking equation which was developed
based on an analysis of the average and peak dry weather flows monitored during the
temporary flow monitoring program. The results of the flow calibration are similar to
those typically observed in the District's system under dry weather conditions_
1. all llf,~ System Analysis
The District's existing wastewater collection system was evaluated using existing water
meter data and return -to-sewer ratios to generate flow's. These flows were then calibrated
to the wastewater floe, monitoring data and compared to existing pipeline system,
capacity using the design criteria discussed above.
An analysis of existing conditions identified 40 sewer segntent (nianhole to manhole)
deficiencies in the existing collection system facilities totaling approximately 9,600 linear
feet (LF) in length. An analysis under build-out conditions revealed seine additional sewer
segment deficiencies totaling approximately 12,200 LF.
` N-1 It 2 February 2011
P S 0 M A
YORBA LI:V DA WA TER DI.S1RIOT
1010 S -TrR MA TER PLAN UPDATE
~u;l€i-ou* conditions assumed all undeveloped parcels, Including currenly u sewered
parcels, will eventually be Connected to the sewer systems, which is a conservative
assumption for the purpose of'developing recommended seiner si yes. This is also the
District's desire, to eliminate customers on septic systems and connt:ct them to the sewer
collection system. However, accomplishing; this is a difficult task as residents currently
on septic systems carat be forced to connect, and new development can still construct
septic systems in certain instances. The parameters affecting whether or not new
construction or development must connect to the sewer system are rmnimutn lot size,
distance to an existing server, and the ability of tie soil to percolate the effluent as
determined by a perc test. These parameters are discussed :n more detail in Section 5.
Assessment District financing has typically been the primary method used to convert
existing devcloped areas with septic systems over to a sewer system but getting through
this process is difficult since the costs are high and a majority app:7oval of the property
owners voting, on a dollar-weighted assessment basis, rnust be obtained.
Since 'hc City ultimately co ntro?s the issuance of building= permits for new construction,
it .nay be possible for the District to woof with City officials to develop a program to
encourage septic system conversions to sewers. It may also be possible to obtain grants or
ow-interest loans to kelp defer some of the costs of this program or to help reduce
assessment distr-ct financing costs.
l.0 ~ 1?1,ac 3wm1 ) )ded ""mol"e m
The Capital Improvements established im this SMPU are provided to the District as
recommender solutions to deal with existing and future wastewater collection system
deficiencies discovered using the above methodologies, and as described in more detail
later in this SMPU. Three sewer collection system improvement projects are
recommended: for implementation to correct the hydraulically deficient servers:
1) Kellogg Drive Capital Improvement
2) Lynnibrook Plaza Capital Improvement
3) Brookrnont Drive Capital Improvement
These three capacity deficiencies and the recommended capital improvement projects to
correct the deficiencies are summarized below and described in inorts detail in Chapters 8
and 9, with capital cost estimates shown on Tables 9-3 and 9-4. Additionally, 37 sewer
pipeline segments were included on a Watch List to monitor the deficient pipeline
segments which were slightly above their recommended flow depth to pipe diameter
ratio.
The Kellogg Drive Capital Improvement will correct the deficiencies in the 12-inch
pipeline along Kellogg Drive. The improvement involves the removal of the weir in the
upstream diversion manhole located near the intersection of Kellogg Drive and Imperial
Highway. The inverts of the 12-inch pipeline and its parallel 10-inch pipeline at this
M ~i'.j
3 February 2011
P S 0 M A
20111 SHO"ER ISTER PLAN UPDATE.
manhole are the same once the weir is removed and will result in an even slit of the
sewer flows. No capital cast is included for this improvement as District maintenance
crews shou:d be able to complete this weir rrodifcation.
The Lyr.nbrook Plaza Capital Improvement has been proposed to correct the deficiencies
in the 8-inch pipelines in ;i ynnbrook Flaza south of Parkview Terrace. The recommended
improvement is upsizing the pipelines to 12-inches. The capital improvement has an
estimated project cost of $428,000, which inclades estimated construction costs plus 40%
for Profession: Services and Contingencies (10% for design and tecl'nica'. services; 15%
for adrnir_istratior., construction management, inspection and protect administration; and
15% for contingencies).
The proposed Brookmont Drive Capital improvement inc,udcs a diE crsion pipeline and
the upsicing of the deficient 8-inch pipeline in Brookrnont Drive to 12-inches. I'he
proposed 8-inch sewer diversion will connect to the existing parallel 5-inch pipeline and
will also correct, e manhole configuration in the downstream pipeline, where the flow
crakes are undes rable acute angle turn. The capital improvement has an estimated project
cost of $10 :.1100.
1R
Ili 4 February 2011
PS0MA'
_ - Yorba Linc# Y lvM1d . _h I~isirir:
2010 Sewer rlr 3stev
F - --t, - _ -
Ler, :r;
z
Streets Linda City I.im's
F7 YL?V:D Boxidary
YLL"J7 Se erklanhote
7.,
e•, YLy"J'J S .:orF'ipei,ne
Existing Sewer betic;encies
C ~ J ' •f '~aI 0. Y i ' . ...Y , a . ~ . ,
i~ . if ° • .r{ I~ C. 1,000 2,000
Fee',
} l_A7_A
t >,I rA . FIGURE 801
ALT" "'OSI'A ST
r are ~oN'r EHISTIN(-i
SEWER
DEFICIENCIES
= r v';
Wei RI IL
CRa P1GETHG3iEi.V
a II
PSOMAh
ITEM NO. 3.1
AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: March 3, 2011
Subject: Monthly Groundwater Production and Purchased Import Water Report (To be
provided at the meeting.)
ATTACHMENTS:
Nam
GW Production and Purchased Water Report.pdf Monthly Report Backup Material
YLWD SOURCE WATER SUMMARY
FY 2010-2011
TOTAL MONTHLY YTD BUDGET
GW IMPORT DEMAND GW GW (Demand Est.) DELTA
MONTH (AF) (AF) (AF) (AF)
Jul-10 793.2 1,476.0 2,269.2 35.0% 35.0% 2,483.5 -8.6%
Aug-10 817.3 1,529.5 2,346.7 34.8% 34.9% 2,443.4 -4.0%
Sep-10 753.6 1,404.8 2,158.4 34.9% 34.9% 2,143.8 0.7%
Oct-10 449.1 936.4 1,385.5 32.4% 34.5% 1,808.3 -23.4%
Nov-10 427.8 917.5 1,345.2 31.8% 34.1% 1,428.5 -5.8%
Dec-10 226.2 694.7 920.8 24.6% 33.3% 1,285.0 -28.3%
Jan-11 873.5 281.1 1,154.6 75.7% 37.5% 1,120.4 3.0%
Feb-11 813.2 336.5 1,149.7 70.7% 40.5% 1,071.9 7.3;0
Mar-11 1,270.2
Apr-11 1,588.8
May-11 2,101.6
Jun-11 2, 354.8
FYTD 5,153.8 7,576.4 12,730.2 40.5% 13,784.6 -7.6%
Allowable GW (YTD) 5,840.6 (AF)
Underpumped 686.8 (AF)
Conservation Percentage
Since July 1, 2009 -19.1%
GROUNDWATER PERCENTAGE
80.0%
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
MONTHLY GW )
30.0%
YTD GW
BPP GOAL 45.9%
20.0%
Jul-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Nov-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Feb-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 May-11 Jun-11
Month
WATER SUPPLY
FY 2010-2011
February 2011 Water Supply
IMPORT
29.3%
GW
70.7%
2010-2011 YTD Water Supply
GW
40.5%
IMPORT
59.5%
GW BPP GOAL
45.9%
TOTAL WATER USE
FY 2010-2011
3,000
Monthly Average Mean Temperature (°F) ■09-10GW
73.6 009-10 IMPORT
72.2
■08-09 GW
2,500 72.1 008-09IMPORT
69.8 ■10-11 GW
74.0 74.373.2
69.7 74.1 010-11 IMPORT
70.8 65.9 67.2
2,000 62.9 66.4
61.6
66.1
62.6
L% I
Q
1,500 62.6 58.2 59.3
E 65.4
E 61.5
60.2
55.8
54 .3 58 60.0 55.2
.2
1,000 56.3
56.4
57.2
500
0
o~ o~' 0300 NQ, oo' e NQ1 (Z' NQ1 o~' e NQ) o° N° NN NQ5 NQ) N° NN
~A' ~A ~A'
Month
FY 2010-2011 YTD Water Supply
22,000
Budgeted Total GW + Import
20,000
Actual Total GW + Import
18,000 --rrBPP GW Goal 45.9%
16,000 Actual GW Production
14,000 -
U-
Q 12,000
m
E
0 10,000
8,000
6,000 0000~
4,000
2,000
0
Jul-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Nov-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Feb-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 May-11 Jun-11
Month
February 2011 Daily Average Demand (MG)
16.0 14.9
14.0 12.1 12.9 13.3 13.6 13.5 13.5
~ - -
12.0 -
10.0
8.0
6.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
5~~a~a °~aaa ~~~aa~ ~~~a~a ~~yaaa c~~a ~~aaa
ITEM NO. 3.2
AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: March 3, 2011
Subject: Monthly Preventative Maintenance Program Report (To be provided at the
meeting.)
ATTACHMENTS:
Nang:
PM Report.pdf Monthly Report Backup Material
PM PROGRAM
20010/2011
Fiscal 20010-11 JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN
Percent of target 8% 17% 25% 33% 42% 50% 58% 67% 75% 83% 92% 100%
HYDRANTS (3,881) Target; all hydrants to be serviced annually.
INSPECTED THIS MONTH 55 293 160 446 552 589 337 4191 1
INSPECTED THIS YEAR 55 348 508 954 1,506 2,095 2,432 2,851
% OF TOTAL 1.4% 9.0% 13.1% 24.6% 38.8% 54.0% 62.7% 73.5%1 1
VALVES (10,706/2=5,353) Target; all valves to be operated every two years
OPERATED THIS MONTH 536 378 380 457 343 315 414 5171 1
OPERATED THIS YEAR 536 914 1,294 1,751 2,094 2,409 2,823 3,340
% OF TOTAL 10.0% 17.1% 24.2% 32.7% 39.1% 45.0% 52.7% 62.4%
DEAD ENDS (155 X 2 = 310) Target; all dead ends to be flushed twice each year.
FLUSHED THIS MONTH 0 0 0 0 155 0 0 91 1
FLUSHED THIS YEAR 0 0 0 0 155 155 155 1641 1
% OF TOTAL 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50% 53%1 1
AIR VACS (309) Target; all air/vacs to be serviced annually.
INSPECTED THIS MONTH 296 13 2 0 0 0 0 01 1
INSPECTED THIS YEAR 296 309 311 311 311 311 311 3111 1
% OF TOTAL 95.8% 100.0% 100.7% 100.7% 100.7% 100.7% 100.7% 100.7%1 1
PRVs (150) 40 STATIONS Target; all PRVs to be serviced annually.
INSPECTED THIS MONTH 0 12 16 31 42 38 34 1
INSPECTED THIS YEAR 0 12 28 59 101 139 173 174
% OF TOTAL 0.0% 8.0% 18.7% 39.3% 67.3% 92.7% 115.3% 116.0%1 1
PM PROGRAM
20010/2011
Fiscal 20010-11 JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN
Percent of target 8% 17% 25% 33% 42% 50% 58% 67% 75% 83% 92% 100%
SEWER CLEANING (802,560) Target; all sewers to be cleaned annually.
CLEANED THIS MONTH 126,497 68,133 38,676 46,790 73,169 82,782 97,798 79,855
CLEANED THIS YEAR 126,497 194,630 233,306 280,096 353,265 436,047 533,845 613,700
% OF TOTAL 15.8% 24.3% 29.1% 34.9% 44.0% 54.3% 66.5% 76.5%1 1
SEWER TELEVISING (200,640) Target; all sewers to be televised every 4 years.
TELEVISED THIS MONTH 12,176 18,676 6,524 14,128 - 201 - 7,508
TELEVISED THIS YEAR 12,176 30,852 37,376 51,504 51,504 51,705 51,705 59,213
% OF TOTAL 6.1% 15.4% 18.6% 25.7% 25.7% 25.8% 25.8% 29.5%1 1
OTHER SEWER WORK.
S.S. OVERFLOWS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SERVICE CALLS 1 0 0 1 1 2 0 0
REHAB FOOTAGE 0 0 0 319 629 346 225 320
MAIN REPAIRS 0 0 0 3 0 2 2 1
MANHOLE REPAIRS 0 4 16 1 2 1 0 2
ITEM NO. 3.3
AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: March 3, 2011
Subject: Groundwater Producers Meeting Report
ATTACHMENTS:
Name: cv, i~a$icri: a ype:
GWP MtgNotes 09Feb2011.pdf GWP Meeting Report for February 2011 Backup Material
Yorba Linda
Water District
MEMORANDUM
[SATE: February 11, 2011
TO: Ken Vecchiarell, General Manager
FROM: Steve Conklin, Engineering Manager
COPY. Lee Cory, Operations Manager
John DeCriscio, Chief Plant Operator
SUBJECT: Groundwater Producers Meeting, February 9, 2011
1 attended the Groundwater Producers (GWP) Meeting on February 9 at OCWD. The
primary purpose of the meeting was to conduct "Annexation Workshop #4-Financial
Impacts." That is, to present information and to discuss the perceived financial impacts
to the Groundwater Producers from the proposed annexation of additional territory in
YLWD, IRWD and the City of Anaheim to OCWD. The annexation, if approved, would
result in additional demands on the groundwater basin by these three entities, which
would have to be offset by reduced groundwater demands by the existing producers.
The loss of groundwater by the existing producers would have to be made up by
purchasing import water from MWD, at a greater cost.
A list of four questions previously raised by the groundwater producers relating to
financial impacts was handed out at the meeting, and is attached.
OCWD staff provided handouts at the meeting to address the issues raised in the four
questions. The information presented noted that the proposed additional demand of
15,100 AFlyr, at a Basin Production Percentage (BPP) of 62%, would result in 9,361
AF1yr of new groundwater pumping. This would require existing pumping to be reduced
by the same amount (to maintain the basin), resulting in the BPP being approximately
2% lower than it would have been otherwise. Per OCD's preliminary calculation, this
reduction in the BPP would increase the combined annual water cost from $150 million
to $152.6 million for the other 16 pumping agencies. This would require the average
groundwater producer to raise water rates approximately 0.8%, or approximately 35
cents per month on a typical monthly residential water bill. OCWD asked the
groundwater producers to review this information and provide comments at the meeting
in March.
In Question #2 attached, it was asked to consider the impact to the producers if they do
not have the capability to take the additional demand from existing import water
1
connections and have to construct new facilities. OCWD noted that information was
provided in handouts at the GWP meeting in January on the import water connection
capacity of each producer compared to the annual water demand of each. This
information, compiled by MW DOC, showed that each producer had import water
connection capacity greater than water demand. OCWD asked the producers to review
this information and provide comments at the meeting in March.
There was further general discussion regarding potential impacts of additional
groundwater pumping, financial and otherwise. This included the magnitude of
additional pumping due to future infill versus that for the annexation demand. Previous
discussions on this by OCWD have indicated that additional demand from infill may be
three times larger than that for the proposed annexation.
In concluding the discussion on financial impacts, OCWD asked that the producers
review the information provided and discussed at the meeting, and provide their final
comments at the March meeting. This will form the basis for the information on financial
impacts to be included in the program EIR being prepared.
The final item on the GWP meeting agenda was OCWD reserves. A handout was
provided (copy attached) showing the Operating Reserves at the beginning and end of
FY 09-10. As shown, the reserves increased from $149.5 million to $171.1 million, with
the two largest line items being the Refurbishment and Replacement (R&R) Fund and
the Water Replenishment Fund. The latter fund is for the purchase of water for
recharge, if and when available at a good price, from MWD or other potential sources.
2
AGENDA
GROUNDWATER PRODUCERS MEETING
Sponsored by the
ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
(714) 378-3200
Wednesday, February 9, 2011, 10 AM
Annexation Workshop ##4
Previously provided questions are listed below
February 9, 2011 Annexation Workshop - Financial Impacts
1. Financial impact of the 15,100 AF proposed annexation on existing rate payers.
How is the matter of a nearly $3 million impact to existing rate payers offset by
only $504,000 in annexation fees being addressed. How does an annexation
become "cost neutral" to existing rate payers? Annexation fees equivalent to
impact? Two-tiered RA? Growth pays its way?
2. What is the impact to the cumulative drop in the BPP due to annexations
(cumulative of all potential annexations) not only financially but also from a
production standpoint when considering each agency's import capability? What is
the cost to construct new capabilities or enhance existing facilities?
3.. Buena Park (4-23-2007). On behalf of its community and residents, the City
of Buena Park respectfully requests that the Board of Directors reject the
Irvine Ranch Water District's (IRWD) proposed annexation of new territory.
We are concerned with all the statements that allude to changes in the
distribution of pumping due to annexation. Some projections indicate a
basin pumping percentage reduction of four to five percent with the IRWD
and other annexations. Other projections estimate annual fiscal impacts
amounting to millions of dollars that annexation fees would not address.
Any annexation should be revenue neutral for the producers, including
Buena Park. We would support a variety of measures that can accomplish
this. (Financial impact)
4. Golden State Water Company (01/16/2007): Specifically GSWC is concerned
that the proposed annexation will permit new lands to draw upon local
groundwater and thereby reduce the reliability of GSWC's existing water
supply by forcing GSWC to either import larger quantities of less reliable
water or make other costly investments to mitigate the impacts associated
with IRWD's increased demands on the basin. GSWC's water ratepayers in
Orange County are understandably concerned that they will bear the
financial burden, in the form of increased water rates, of an annexation that
benefits this growth. In effect, the annexation would shift the cost of
securing adequate supplies to meet new water demands form those lands
without access to groundwater to those that have historically relied upon
and paid to develop the local supply, namely, GSWC's water ratepayers.
ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
OPERATING DESERVES
For The Twelve Months Ended June 30, 2010
Beginning Ending
Year Balance Year Balance
R & R Fund 45,392,962 54,341,462
Toxic Clean Up 4,000,000 4,920,797
Clean Up Projects (453,039) (4,489,404)
General Contingencies 3,000,000 3,000,000
Water Replenishment Fund 44,397,764 56,287,735
Operating Reserve (15% of Op. Budget) 17,278,980 16,181,613
Sub Total 113,616,667 130,242,203
Operating (Cash) Fund 35,915,487 40,928,092
Totals $ 149, 532,154 $ 171,170,295
MTBE, North and South Basin Protection Projects
Attachment C
ITEM NO. 3.4
AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: March 3, 2011
Subject: Status Report on Capital Projects in Progress
ATTACHMENTS:
Name: Dosciiption: a ype:
CIP Rept Mar2011.pdf Status Report on Capital Projects in Progress Backup Material
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS STATUS REPORT
Date: March 1, 2011
New Information since Last Report is Shown in Red
IN CONSTRUCTION
Project Current Status Next Actions Comments
1 Wells 1, 5 and 12 Upgrade W-5 & -12 refurbishments W 1 expected to be refurbished Staff will discuss feasibility of
Budget: $190,000 Job No. 200813 complete. W-1: Contractor to and operational by mid March. refurbishing an additional on-site
Project Contact: Anthony Manzano install new pump and drive Will analyze other well well and completing an overall well
Project Completion: TBD assembly by early March. refurbishments next.. analysis/operational study.
2 Highland Booster Station Upgrade Contractor completed exterior Contractor will excavate meter Project construction period is 13.5
Budget: $5,000,000 Job No. 200814 reservoir staircase. Continue to for vault and associated months, with completion estimated
Project Contact: Joe Polimino set pump cans, intake and piping. Will also continue December 2011.
Planned Completion Date: Dec. 2011 discharge piping and prepare with pipe installation under
and pour concrete encasements. the building.
3 VDV Valve Replacement Ph 2 & 3 Valves scheduled to arrive Schedule pre-construction Construction expected to last no
Budget: $600,000 Job No. 200908 within a few weeks. District meeting with Contractor and more than 6 weeks. Anticipated
Project Contact: Derek Nguyen will witness pressure testing at plan for const. to begin on completion in early April.
Planned Completion Date: May 2011 Supplier's facility. March 7, 2011.
4 Emergency Pump-out Facilities & A pre-construction meeting was Issue Notice to Proceed as Construction completion is expected
Anaheim Intertie Connection held Feb. 8d'. Shop drawing soon as materials are available by summer of 2011.
Budget: $500,000 review complete. Contractor and permitting is complete, by
Job No. 200903 & 200906 completing per ni-its & material approximately Mar. 1't
Project Contact: Joe Polimino acquisition.
Planned Compl. Date: Summer 2011
5 Mixers in Hidden Hills Reservoir Met with Contractor to finalize GM to sign Agreement upon Plan to complete installation by late
Budget: $75,000 Job No. 2010-25 details of installation. Awaiting receipt from Attorney. Staff to March 2011.
Project Contact: Derek Nguyen proposal from Contractor to consider approval of change
Planned Completion Date: Feb 2011 add 2nd pump and 2nd chlorine order and schedule for
analyzer. construction in early March.
1
IN DESIGN
Project Current Status Next Actions Comments
1 Ohio/Oriente Pipeline Replacement City issued permit conditions March 8r' pre-bid mtg. and Construction completion anticipated
Budget: $530,000 Job No. 201005 & approved project at Jan. March 23rd bid opening. by October 2011.
Project Contact: Anthony Manzano 27th Traffic Commission Mtg.
Planned Completion Date: Sept. 2011 Plans & specs 100% complete.
2 Well 20 Equipping 90% design reviewed and re- 100% design submittal due late Anticipate going out to bid in April
Budget: $2,000,000 Job No.200711 submitted to consultant. March. or May, with construction
Project Contact: Anthony Manzano completion fall 2011.
Planned Completion Date: Sept. 2011
3 Lakeview Grade Separation Staff reviewing prior-rights Resolve prior-rights issues and 100% design submittal from OCTA
Budget: TBD Job No. 201002 issue with counsel. Submitted complete cost-sharing expected in April or May.
Project Contact: Anthony Manzano 65% design review comments Agreement w/OCTA.
Planned Completion Date: Sept. 2013 to OCTA's consultant.
4 2010 Waterline Replacement Project Plumosa Dr. 70% submittal Plumosa Dr. 100% design Plumosa Dr. construction expected
Budget: $2M Job No. 201012 reviewed. Design underway submittal due late March. summer 2011. Const. for other sites
Project Contact: Anthony Manzano for remainder of six sites. Preliminary design for other expected to start fall 2011.
Planned Completion Date: Dec. 2011 sites due in May.
5 YL Blvd. BPS & Pipeline Lee & Ro working on alternate Present pump station sketches No Conditional Use Permit required
Budget: TBD Job No. 200817 sketches for pump station and to city to move forward. by City. Contact SCE for location
Project Contact: Hank Samaripa preliminary design report. Review design schedule. and size of pad mount transformer.
Planned Completion Date: Dec 2012 Begin CEQA.
2
IN PLANNING
Project Current Status Next Actions Comments
1 Fairmont BPS & Site Improvements Final agreement being Confirm Fairmont site May have agreement for
Budget: TBD Job No. 200803 executed by Shapell for partial redevelopment plan and consideration by PEO and Board in
Project Contact: Anthony Manzano payment for construction of prepare RFP for design. April.
Planned Completion Date: TBD site improvements.
2 Recycled Water Study Draft report approved by Work on incorporating review District applied for 50% grant
Budget: $1,800,000 Job No. 200807 SWRCB. District meeting with comments from the State into disbursement in the amount of
Project Contact: Derek Nguyen potential users to solicit letters Final Report and submit to the $37,500 as approved by State.
Planned Completion Date: TBD of interest as part of study. State for mid-course review, Remaining balance disbursed upon
prior to finalizing report. approval of Final Report.
3 West Wellfield Project Preliminary discussions Meet w/OCWD to determine if May retain a Property Acquisition
Budget: $9,000,000 Job No. 2009-22 w/OCWD for W21 site. they'll provide small well site Firm for assistance and explore
Project Contact: Anthony Manzano near La Palma Ave. other sites.
Planned Completion Date: TBD
4 Sewer Master Plan Update SMPU finalized and being Board receipt and approval of Staff reviewed SMPU proposal for
Budget: $350,000 Job No. 200916 presented at March PEO. final SMPU. addition of City of YL's sewer
Project Contact: Anthony Manzano system.
Planned Completion Date: Oct. 2010
5 Elk Mountain Site Improvm't Study Webb Assoc. to prepare an Finalize the feasibility report Webb will provide YTD costs and
Budget: $300,000 Job No. 200522 alternate sketch for a basic based on basic concept for provide a design proposal for
Project Contact: Hank Samaripa synthetic turf practice field and practice field over our construction documents for the
Planned Completion Date: Dec 2011 maximum parking. reservoir. practice field on Elk Mountain.
6 OC-51 Connection Upgrade District awaiting breakdown of Staff to review and discuss Will consider next steps after
Budget: $242,000 Job No. 200815 MWD's cost estimate. plans regarding decision to receipt of MWD's cost and
Project Contact: Derek Nguyen move forward with project. discussion with GM and consultant.
Planned Completion Date: TBD
7 Urban Water Management Plan Awaiting comments from Staff to review final 2010 Submit final 2010 UWMP by July
Budget: $20,000 Job No. 2201013 review team. Submit UWMP Plan. Present to PEO L 2011 to State Dept. of Water
Project Contact: Hank Samaripa comments to Malcolm Pirnie and Board. Resources.
Planned Completion Date: June 2011 by March 7"'.
3