HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-10-26 - Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Packet Yorba Linda
Hater District
AGENDA
YORBA LINDA WATER DISTRICT
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING
Monday, October 26, 2015, 8:30 AM
1717 E Miraloma Ave, Placentia CA 92870
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
COMMITTEE MEMBERS
Daniel Mole, Chair Bill Guse
Rick Buck, Vice Chair Fred Hebein
Lindon Baker Joe Holdren
Carl Boznanski Modesto Llanos
Oscar Bugarini, Sr. Cheryl Spencer-Borden
3. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Any individual wishing to address the committee is requested to identify themselves and state the matter on
which they wish to comment. If the matter is on this agenda, the committee Chair will recognize the individual for
their comment when the item is considered. No action will be taken on matters not listed on this agenda.
Comments are limited to matters of public interest and matters within the jurisdiction of the Water District.
Comments are limited to three minutes.
4. DISCUSSION ITEMS
This portion of the agenda is for matters such as technical presentations, drafts of proposed policies, or similar
items for which staff is seeking the advice and counsel of the Committee members. This portion of the agenda
may also include items for information only.
4.1. Drought Response, Water Conservation and Community Outreach Efforts
4.2. Monthly Water Supply Report
4.3. President's Report
4.4. Future Agenda Items
5. ADJOURNMENT
5.1. The next Citizens Advisory Committee meeting is scheduled to be held
Monday, December 7, 2015 at 8:30 a.m.
Items Distributed to the Committee Less Than 72 Hours Prior to the Meeting
Pursuant to Government Code section 54957.5, non-exempt public records that relate to open session agenda items
and are distributed to a majority of the Committee less than seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting will be available
for public inspection in the lobby of the District's business office located at 1717 E. Miraloma Avenue, Placentia, CA
92870, during regular business hours. When practical, these public records will also be made available on the District's
internet website accessible at http://www.ylwd.com/.
Accommodations for the Disabled
Any person may make a request for a disability-related modification or accommodation needed for that person to be
able to participate in the public meeting by telephoning the Executive Secretary at 714-701-3020, or writing to Yorba
Linda Water District, P.O. Box 309, Yorba Linda, CA 92885-0309. Requests must specify the nature of the disability and
the type of accommodation requested. A telephone number or other contact information should be included so the
District staff may discuss appropriate arrangements. Persons requesting a disability-related accommodation should
make the request with adequate time before the meeting for the District to provide the requested accommodation.
ITEM NO. 4.2
AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: October 26, 2015
Subject: Monthly Water Supply Report
ATTACHMENTS:
Description: Type:
Water Supply Report- BB.pdf Monthly Water Supply Report Backup Material
MLJNICIRAL
WATER
DISTRICT
OF
ORANGE
--- -- --- COUNTY
Memorandum
DATE: October 12, 2015
TO: Member Agencies — MWDOC Division One
FROM: Brett R. Barbre, Director— Division One
SUB ECT: Monthly Water Usage Data, Tier 2 Projection & Water Supply Information
The attached figures show the recent trend of water consumption in Orange County (OC),
an estimate of Tier 2 volume for MWDOC, and selected water supply information.
Fig. 1 OC Water Usage, Monthly by Supply OCWD Groundwater water was the
main supply in August.
Fig. 2 OC Water Usage, Monthly, Comparison to Previous Years Water usage in
August 2015 was well below average compared to past usage. Lower usage
is primarily due to strong conservation efforts and mandatory restrictions set
by the governor.
Fig. 3 Historical OC Water Consumption OC water consumption was 571,000 AF in
FY 2014-15. This is about 50,000 AF less than FY 2013-14 but is about
16,000 AF higher than FY 2010-11 (Fiscal year with lowest usage). Water
usage per person was the lowest it has been for Orange County at 164
gallons per day. Although OC population has increased 20% over the past
two decades, water usage has not increased, on average. A long-term
decrease in per-capita water usage is attributed mostly to Water Use
Efficiency (water conservation) efforts. High Temperature, precipitation and
the economy all remain indicators to O.C. water consumption.
Fig. 4 MWDOC "Firm" Water Purchases, 2015 "Firm" water above the Tier 1 limit
will be charged at the higher Tier 2 rate. Our current projection of Tier 2
purchases is zero in 2015.
Water Supply Information Includes data on: Rainfall in OC; the OCWD Basin overdraft-,
Northern California and Colorado River Basin hydrologic data-, the State Water Project
(SWP) Allocation, and regional storage volumes. The data has implications for the
magnitude of supplies from the three watersheds that are the principal sources of water for
t"
OC. Note that a hydrologic year is Oct. 1 st through Sept. 30 .
• Orange County's accumulated rainfall through September was below average for
this period. This continues the impact of the previous three hydrologic years' below-
normal rainfall in reducing those local supplies that are derived from local runoff.
Santa Ana received about an inch and a half of rain which is extremely rare for
September. NOAA is predicted that there is a 95% chance of El Nino conditions for
this winter and 85% chance of El Nino next spring.
• Northern California accumulated precipitation in August was around 75% of normal
for this period. The Northern California snowpack was 5% of normal as of April 1 st
the date used for year-to-year comparison. This follows three below-average
hydrologic years. The State of California has been in a declared Drought
Emergency since January 2014. The State Water Project Contractors Table A
Allocation is only 20% as of the end of July.
• Colorado River Basin accumulated precipitation in September was 92% average for
this period. The Upper Colorado Basin snowpack was 64% of average as of April
15th. However, this follows two below-average hydrologic years, and this watershed
is in a long-term drought. Lake Mead and Lake Powell combined have about 59% of
their average storage volume for this time of year. Lake Mead is the largest
reservoir in the United States and as of now the Lake is at its lowest levels since
filling in the late 1930's. If Lake Mead's level falls below a "trigger" limit at the end of
a calendar year, then a shortage will be declared by the US Bureau of Reclamation
(USBR), impacting Colorado River water deliveries for the Lower Basin states. As of
Late July Lake Mead Levels were hovering around the "trigger" limit but fortunately
levels are expecting to increase from the large amounts of precipitation that hit the
Colorado River Basin this summer and spring. The USBR predicts that the "trigger"
level will not be hit by the end of 2015.
MUNICIPAL
WATER
DISTRICT
OF
ORANGE
= _- -- COUNTY
80,000
70,000
w 60,000
w
Lu 50,000
U
a 40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
0
Fig. 1A OC Water Usage, Monthly by Supply
with projection to end of fiscal year
Assuming SWRCB
reduction from August
to February
Surface Water =Non-OCWD Groundwater
Recycled (Non Potable) =Import[1]
®projected [3] =OCWD Basin [2]
--c--Rainfall
1 .6
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
--
L
L
Q
(n
O
z
C
U
Q
1 .4
IA
Cn
1 .0
0.8 -
0.6 �
M
ry
0.4
0.2
11
[1] Imported water for consumptive use. Includes"In-Lieu"deliveries and CUP water extraction. Excludes"Direct Replenishment'deliveries of spreading water, "Barrier
Replenishment"deliveries, and deliveries into Irvine Lake.
[2] GW for consumptive use only. Excludes In-Lieu water deliveries and CUP water extraction that are counted with Import. BPP in FY'14-15 is 72%.
[3] MWDOC's estimate of monthly demand is based on the projected FY 15-16"Retail"water demand and historical monthly demand patterns.
prepared by the Municipal Water District of Orange County
numbers are subject to change
MUNICIPAL
_.0 WATER
01 RIOT
OF
Fig. 1 B
OC Water Usage, Monthly Supply
=Surface Water
Recycled (Non Potable)
=Non-OCWD Groundwater
=Import[1]
w°= =o..G.
with projection to end of fiscal year
=OCWD Basin [2]
=projected [3]
--c—High Temp
95
80,000
70,000
Assuming SWRCB
90
LLI
reductions from August to
85
w 60,000
February
LU
$�
LU50,000
a 40,000
75
E
70
30,000
65
=
20,000
60
C
L
10,000
55
Q
0
50
,
, , , ,
=
N U Q
N
O
O Q
M
Q
U) z 0 ILL
�
[1] Imported water for consumptive use. Includes"In-Lieu"deliveries and CUP water extraction. Excludes"Direct Replenishment'deliveries of spreading water, "Barrier
Replenishment"deliveries, and deliveries into Irvine Lake.
[2] GW for consumptive use only. Excludes In-Lieu water deliveries and CUP water extraction that are counted with Import. BPP in FY'14-15 is 72%.
[3] MWDOC's estimate of monthly demand is based on the projected FY 15-16"Retail"water demand and historical monthly demand patterns.
prepared by the Municipal Water District of Orange County
numbers are subject to change
Fig. 2A OC Monthly Water Usage [1]: Comparison to Last 4 Fiscal Years
❑FY 11-12 ❑FY 12-13 o FY 13-14 ■FY 14-15 ❑FY 15-16
Z Q
y U > U L L(13 Q (U
Q U) O Z 0 li � Q
Partial Year
Subtotals
700,000
600,000
500,000
F 400,000
w
W
4-
LU
300,000
a
200,000
100,000
0
[1] Sum of Imported water for consumptive use (includes"In-Lieu"deliveries; excludes"Direct Replenishment"and"Barrier Replenishment')and Local water for consumptive use
prepared by the Municipal Water District of Orange County
numbers are subject to change
MUNICIPAL
WATER
olsrPlcr
OF
ORANGE
COUNTY
80,000
70,000
60,000
w 50,000
w
u_
Lu 40,000
U
a
30,000
20,000
10,000
Fig. 2A OC Monthly Water Usage [1]: Comparison to Last 4 Fiscal Years
❑FY 11-12 ❑FY 12-13 o FY 13-14 ■FY 14-15 ❑FY 15-16
Z Q
y U > U L L(13 Q (U
Q U) O Z 0 li � Q
Partial Year
Subtotals
700,000
600,000
500,000
F 400,000
w
W
4-
LU
300,000
a
200,000
100,000
0
[1] Sum of Imported water for consumptive use (includes"In-Lieu"deliveries; excludes"Direct Replenishment"and"Barrier Replenishment')and Local water for consumptive use
prepared by the Municipal Water District of Orange County
numbers are subject to change
MUNICIPAL
WATER
DISTRICT
OF
ORANOE
COUNTY
650,000
600,000
550,000
500,000
450,000
400,000
w
w
350,000
w
a 300,000
250,000
200,000
150,000
100,000
50,000
Fig. 213 Orange County Cumulative Monthly Consumptive Water Usage [1]:
present year compared to last 4 calendar years
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
[1] Sum of Imported water for consumptive use (includes"In-Lieu"deliveries; excludes"Direct Replenishment"and"Barrier Replenishment')and Local water for consumptive use
prepared by the Municipal Water District of Orange County
numbers are subject to change
MUNICIPAL
WATER Fig. 3A HISTORICAL WATER CONSUMPTION[1] AND POPULATION[2] IN OC
DISTRICT
OORANGE F
COUNTY
800,000
750,000
700,000
LL
Q
CO 650,000
_
o!
w
a 600,000
550,000
500,000
450,000
400,000
90 -'91 -'92 -'93 -'94 -'95 -'96 -'97 -'98 -'99 -'00 -'01 -'02 -'03 -'04 -'05 -'06 -'07 -'08 -'09 - 10 11
91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 -11 -12
Fiscal Year
Consumptive Water Use
E.!Population
3.50
12 13 14 15
13 -14 -15 -16
[1] Consumption includes potable, recycled and non-potable usage; excludes Barrier and Spreading water. The most recent data involve some estimation.
[2] Population estimates in the 2000s decade were revised by the State Dept. of Finance to reflect the 2010 Census counts.
[3] Projection of FY 15-16 water use estimated by MWDOC based on partial-year data.
prepared by the Municipal Water District of Orange County
numbers are subject to change
i 11
2.50..
c
O
2.00 0
3
1.500-
n
II17
0.50
111
MUNICIPAL
WATER
013TRICT
� i C
ORANGE
CGLINTY
700,000
675,000
650,000
625,000
Q600,000
LU 575,000
D
W 550,000
W
>Q 525,000
500,000
475,000
450,000
425,000
400,000
=ig. 313 HISTORICAL WATER CONSUMPTION[1]AND Annual Rainfall[
IN OC
'08 -09 109 -10 10 -11 11 -12 12 -13 13 -14 14 -15 15 -16
Fiscal Year
[1] Consumption includes potable, recycled and non-potable usage; excludes Barrier and Spreading water. The most recent data involve some estimation.
[2] Rainfall data from Santa Ana Station#121
prepared by the Municipal Water District of Orange County
numbers are subject to change
25
20
N
N
s
15
w
10
0
M_ MU N'°'PAL Fig. 3C HISTORICAL WATER CONSUMPTION[1] AND Annual Average High Temperature[2] IN
WATER
DISTRICT
OF
ORANGE OC
COUNTY
80.93
700,000
o Consumptive Water Use
675,000 --0— High Temp
650,000
625,000 79.17
78.02
LL
Q
600,000
LU 575,000
D
w 550,000
W
Q525,000
500,000
475,000
450,000
425,000
400,000
'08 -09 109 -10
76.93
76.38
25 Year Low
for Water
Usage in O.C.
75.50
77.63
10 -11 11 -12 12 -13 13 -14
Fiscal Year
14 -15
Projected
15 -16
[1] Consumption includes potable, recycled and non-potable usage; excludes Barrier and Spreading water. The most recent data involve some estimation.
[2] Temperature data is from Santa Ana Fire Station, elevation 135'
prepared by the Municipal Water District of Orange County
numbers are subject to change
81
80
79
78 u-
L
77 R
CL
76 E
H
t
75
Ch
74 <
73
72
71
MUNICIP
WATER
DISTRICT
OF
w ORANGE
COUNTY AL
800,000
750.000
700,000
LL
Q
w 650,000
CO
... 600,000
550,000
500.000
450,000
400.000
Fig. 3D HISTORICAL WATER CONSUMPTION[l] AND Average Unemployment[2] IN
OC
190 -'91 -'92 -'93 -'94 -'95 -'96 -'97 -'98 -'99 -'00 -'01 -'02 -'03 -'04 -'05 -'06 -'07 -'08 -'09 - 10 11 12 13 14 15
91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 -11 -12 -13 -14 -15 -16
Fiscal Year
[1] Consumption includes potable, recycled and non-potable usage; excludes Barrier and Spreading water. The most recent data involve some estimation.
[2] Employment Data source Bureau of Labor Statistic for Long Beach-L.A.-Santa Ana Metro Area
http://www.bls.gov/lau/
prepared by the Municipal Water District of Orange County
numbers are subject to change
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5% 2 0
a
6%
Q
J
7% e
8% 5
9%
10% E
a
11%
12%
13%
14%
15%
'""` WATERIPAL Fig. 3E HISTORICAL WATER CONSUMPTION['] AND POPULATION DENSITY[2] IN OC
DISTRICT
OF
==
800,000
750,000
700,000
LL
Q
w 650,000
CO
... 600,000
a
550,000
500.000
450,000
400,000
190 -'91 -'92 -'93 -'94 -'95 -'96 -'97 -'98 -'99 -'00 -'01 -'02 -'03 -'04 -'05 -'06 -'07 -'08 -'09 - 10 11 12 13 14 15
91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 -11 -12 -13 -14 -15 -16
Fiscal Year
[1] Consumption includes potable, recycled and non-potable usage; excludes Barrier and Spreading water. The most recent data involve some estimation.
[2] Population estimates in the 2000s decade were revised by the State Dept. of Finance to reflect the 2010 Census counts.
prepared by the Municipal Water District of Orange County
numbers are subject to change
4,000
3,750
a
Cr
rn
a
a
3,500.2
a
0
a
a
V!
C
N
3,250 z
O
3
a
O
n
BIZ
-TRI T Fig. 3F HISTORICAL WATER CONSUMPTION[l] AND GPCD [2] IN OC
WATER
DISTRICT
OF
ORANGE
COI INTY
800,000
750,000
700,000
LL
a
w 650,000
CO
... 600,000
a
550,000
500.000
450,000
400,000
90 -'91 -'92 -'93 -'94 -'95 -'96 -'97 -'98 -'99 -'00 -'01 -'02 -'03 -'04 -'05 -'06 -'07 -'08 -'09 - 10
91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 -11
Fiscal Year
o Consumptive Water Use
GPCD
11 12 13 14 15
-12 -13 -14 -15 -16
[1] Consumption includes potable, recycled and non-potable usage; excludes Barrier and Spreading water. The most recent data involve some estimation.
[2] Gallon per Capita Daily(includes all types of water usage and all type of water users).
prepared by the Municipal Water District of Orange County
numbers are subject to change
240
230
220
210
200 a
0
190
180
170
160
150
140
130
120
30,000
25,000
20,000
Q 15,000
m
0
F-
t
c
0 10,000
5,000
Fig. 4 MWDOC's Firm Water Purchases in CY 2015
Monthly Actual and Projected to CY Total
o Untreated Total Treated
o Proj Monthly Purchases —Cumulative Actual
300,000
Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15
250,000
200,000
Q
m
0
F-
150,000
E
U
100,000
50,000
Notes
1. "Firm"includes Full Service(both Treated and Untreated)and Barrier water.
2. Basin Pumping Percentage(BPP)is the percentage of a retail water agency's total water demand that they are limited to pump from the OCWD-managed groundwater basin. BPP pertains to Basin agencies only. For
example,if a Basin agency's total demand is 10,000 AF/yr and OCWD sets the BPP at 72%,then the agency is limited to 7,200 AF of groundwater that year. There may be certain exceptions and/or adjustments to that
simple calculation. OCWD sets the BPP for the Basin agencies,usually as of July 1st. Import demands for Jan.-Jun.were with BPP of 72%for Basin agencies; for Jul.-Dec.they are projected with BPP of 70%.
MUNICIPAL
WATER prepared by the Municipal Water District of Orange County printdate 10/8/2015
DISTRICT
OP *numbers are subject to change
ORANGE
COUNTY
Page 1
50
45
40
35
30
25
ce
15
10
Accumulated Precipitation
for the Oct.-Sep. water year, through Early October 2015
CA Snowpack
on 4/1/2015
Colorado Snowpack
on 4/15/2015
A
5 55% 57% 60%
0
ORANGE COUNTY
N. SIERRAS NORTHERN UPPER BASIN UPPER BASIN
8-STATION INDEX CALIF. COLORADO COLORADO
SNOWPACK PRECIP. SNOWPACK
❑This Year to date ■Average to date
*The date of maximum snowpack accumulation (April 1st in Northern Calif. , April 15th in
the Upper Colorado Basin) is used for year to year comparison.
prepared by the Municipal Water District of Orange County
*numbers are subject to change
(SANTA ANA)
MUNICIPAL
WATER
A
DISTRICT
OF
ORANGE
COUNTY
N. SIERRAS NORTHERN UPPER BASIN UPPER BASIN
8-STATION INDEX CALIF. COLORADO COLORADO
SNOWPACK PRECIP. SNOWPACK
❑This Year to date ■Average to date
*The date of maximum snowpack accumulation (April 1st in Northern Calif. , April 15th in
the Upper Colorado Basin) is used for year to year comparison.
prepared by the Municipal Water District of Orange County
*numbers are subject to change
WATER PA
DISTRICT
GF
ORANGE
COUNTY
SWP TABLE A ALLOCATION
FOR STATE WATER PROJECT CONTRACTORS
Final 2016: ???
65% 5% Final 2012: 65%
60° p° 60% 60%
50%
40% 40% 40%
35/°
° 35% 35%
35/° ° Final 2013: 35%
30°
20% 20% 20% 20%
15% 15% Final 2015: 20%
5% 10% 5% 5% 5/° Final 2014: 5%
0% 0% 0% .0000000000
Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun.
w mWater Year 2012 w mWater Year 2013 a mWater Year 2014 w mWater Year 2015 a mWater Year 2016
prepared by the Municipal Water District of Orange County
'numbers are subject to change
MCA Population —Total SWP Deliveries —CRA Deliveries to MWD —CRA Deliveries to CA
SWP %SWP Allocation % Vs. Station 8 Accumulated Rainfall been 100%t once since the
100% year2000
100% FC'% 100%
900/0 � 100% g0% 90%100% 90% /r A Q
70%
60%
0 50%
Q 40%
a
30%
Cn
20%
Natural Accumulated Run
10% Off
0%
Due to drought conditions and California �J
population growth Southern California is
receiving very little water from the State Water
Project.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
�����°���������� ������������ �������� ��!��()o�����������N�������b ti0��ti0��ti ti���V��
=Station 8 Accumulated Rainfall (Inches) —SWP Allocation %
prepared by the Municipal Water District of Orange County
'numbers are subject to change
100
90
80 O
Z
70 a N
60 0
50
.Q
40 E
L L
30 a ,°_
20 y U`)
cc
�
10 n
E
0
Q
WA NICIPAL
I� OF TRICT
COIJNTV
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
v
v
w 250,000
V
a
300,000
350,000
400,000
450,000
500,000
O.C. Basin Accumulated Overdraft
Annual, 1969 to Present
Basin Full in 1969
*_1
A
GWRS Online Jan
Mo n n n n n n n n n 00 N00 00 00 00 00 O0NM000 ^ 00O O O O O O O rq rq rq rq rq rq r 00 00 00 00 Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol O O O O
ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci of of of of of O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I
Accumulated Overdraft (dewatered volume)shown as white area,excluding the volume stored by Metropolitan.source:OCWD
prepared by the Municipal Water District of Orange County
*numbers are subject to change
O.C. Basin Accumulated Overdraft Vs. Annual Rainfall
Annual, 1969 to Present
50,000
�G
MLNIGIPRL
WOTER
D Dewatered Vol(AF)
OFSTRFGT
o�
—<D— Annual Rainfall(Inches) U
ORANGE
COUNTY
O.C. Basin Accumulated Overdraft Vs. Annual Rainfall
Annual, 1969 to Present
50,000
Basin Full in 1969
D Dewatered Vol(AF)
—<D— Annual Rainfall(Inches) U
U
5
30
393,000 AF end of
August 2015
100,000
11
r
I I
I I
150,000
II
)
I 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1�
11
11
I I
I I
I
I
200,000
1 1
1 >
it
1 1
11
1 1
11
1
1 1
1 1
1 1
I
I
I
1 1
1 1
11
1 1
I
1
LL
250,000 1
1
I 1
1 1
1 1
I
1
1 1
1 1
I 1
1 1
I
i 1
U
1 1
1 1
I
1 1 1
1
I
300,000
;�
/-
350,000
400,000
\1
11
450,000
•
r'
•
500,000
Stored Vol(AF)
D Dewatered Vol(AF)
—<D— Annual Rainfall(Inches) U
U
5
30
393,000 AF end of
August 2015
Gl O rl N M Ln W IN 00 M O rl N M -* Ln W IN 00 M O rl N M -* Ln W IN 00 M O rl N M -* Ln W IN 00 M O rl N M -* Ln W
t0 I� n n n n n n n n n 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl O O O O O O O O O O rl rl rl rl rl rl rl
Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl Gl O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Accumulated Overdraft (dewatered volume)shown as white area,excluding the volume stored by Metropolitan.source:OCWD
prepared by the Municipal Water District of Orange County
*numbers are subject to change
I
WATERMUNICIPAL
DISTRICT
• of
O.C. asin Accumulated Overdraft Vs.
'
BPP %
�StoredVol(AF)
D Dewatered Vol(AF)
JIM
�
ORANGE
COVNTY
Annual, 1999 to
Present
-0- BPP%
\
11!111 ILI
50,000
�%
80%
75%
100,000
��
69%
.�j
%
�%
70%
o �r-
150,000
•-,----�-yam
60%
200,000
v
50%
w
w 250,000
o
a
a
40%m
300,000
350,000
o:=
30%
400,000
20%
450,000
•
•
•
•••
10%
•
500,000
0%
0) O
ri N en
Ln
00
0)
O ri N
en Ln
l0
Gl O
O O O O
O O
O
O
O
O O O
O O O
O
Accumulated Overdraft (dewatered volume)shown as white area,excluding the volume stored by Metropolitan.source:OCWD
prepared by the Municipal Water District of Orange County
*numbers are subject to change
MVNIGIPAL O.C. Basin Accumulated Overdraft Vs. Annual Rainfall Stored Vol(AF)
WATeR
MISTR[GT
• °� 7 Dewatered Vol(AF)
°FiAN°E Annual, 1999 to Present
a°u ATV —i)— Annual Rainfall(Inches) w
- 35
t�
50,000
30
II
100,000 j
I 1
1 1
150,000 1 1 25
1 1
/ 1
1 1
1
200,000
20 s
250,000
U
15
300,000 / 1 ! 1 1 3
/ %
/ %
% %%
350,000 / % I 1 1
1
400,000 / %% %%
450,000 • IL
500,000 0
0) O ri N en Ln 00 0) O ri N en V1 to
Gl O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
Accumulated Overdraft (dewatered volume)shown as white area,excluding the volume stored by Metropolitan.source:OCWD
prepared by the Municipal Water District of Orange County
*numbers are subject to change
State Water Protect, Colorado River, and MWD Reservoir Storage
as of September 29th,2015
Lake Shasta
4.0 -
3.0 LL
2.0 a"
1.0 - °
0.0 -
z.s -
San Luis Resv.
2.0 -
1.5 - d
1.0 -
0.5 - _2 ,
0.0 -
Diamond Valley
1.0 39%
0.5 -
0.0
% of Caaacity
m
4.0 Lake Oroville
3.0
2.0 a
1.0
0.0
Lake Mathews
1.0 3
68%
0.5
0.0
•4..
25
20
15
10
5
0
25
20
15
10
5
0
v
v
v
a
0
5
d
LL
d,
a"
0
2
Lake Mead
ML.INIC.-
MJATER
OISTRIGT
OF
ORANGE
CO NTY
1,090
1,085
1,080
1,075
LL
C
0
i+
M 1,070
N
W
1,065
1,060
1,055
1,050
Jul 14
Lake Mead Levels: Historical and Projected
projection per USBR 24-Month Study
❑Historical ❑Projected
Jan 15
Jul 15
Jan 16
Jul 16
Jan 17