HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-01-25 - Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Packet Yorba Linda
Hater District
AGENDA
YORBA LINDA WATER DISTRICT
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING
Monday, January 25, 2016, 8:30 AM
1717 E Miraloma Ave, Placentia CA 92870
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
COMMITTEE MEMBERS
Daniel Mole, Chair Fred Hebein
Rick Buck, Vice Chair Joe Holdren
Lindon Baker Modesto Llanos
Carl Boznanski Cheryl Spencer-Borden
Bill Guse
3. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Any individual wishing to address the committee is requested to identify themselves and state the matter on
which they wish to comment. If the matter is on this agenda, the committee Chair will recognize the individual for
their comment when the item is considered. No action will be taken on matters not listed on this agenda.
Comments are limited to matters of public interest and matters within the jurisdiction of the Water District.
Comments are limited to three minutes.
4. ACTION CALENDAR
This portion of the agenda is for items where staff presentations and committee discussions are needed prior to
formal committee action.
4.1. Committee Structure and Reorganization
5. DISCUSSION ITEMS
This portion of the agenda is for matters such as technical presentations, drafts of proposed policies, or similar
items for which staff is seeking the advice and counsel of the Committee members. This portion of the agenda
may also include items for information only.
5.1. President's Report
5.2. Video Presentation from CRWUA Annual Conference
5.3. Conservation Update and Monthly Water Supply Report
5.4. Future Agenda Items
6. ADJOURNMENT
6.1. The next Citizens Advisory Committee meeting is scheduled to be held
Monday, February 22, 2016 at 8:30 a.m.
Items Distributed to the Committee Less Than 72 Hours Prior to the Meeting
Pursuant to Government Code section 54957.5, non-exempt public records that relate to open session agenda items
and are distributed to a majority of the Committee less than seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting will be available
for public inspection in the lobby of the District's business office located at 1717 E. Miraloma Avenue, Placentia, CA
92870, during regular business hours. When practical, these public records will also be made available on the District's
internet website accessible at http://www.ylwd.com/.
Accommodations for the Disabled
Any person may make a request for a disability-related modification or accommodation needed for that person to be
able to participate in the public meeting by telephoning the Executive Secretary at 714-701-3020, or writing to Yorba
Linda Water District, P.O. Box 309, Yorba Linda, CA 92885-0309. Requests must specify the nature of the disability and
the type of accommodation requested. A telephone number or other contact information should be included so the
District staff may discuss appropriate arrangements. Persons requesting a disability-related accommodation should
make the request with adequate time before the meeting for the District to provide the requested accommodation.
ITEM NO. 4.1
AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: January 25, 2016
To: Citizens Advisory Committee
From: Damon Micalizzi, Public
Information Manager
Subject: Committee Structure and Reorganization
i
SUMMARY:
This is the annual opportunity for the Committee to appoint a Chair, Vice Chair and/or re-evaluate
the Committee's structure and engagement with the District.
ITEM NO. 5.3
AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: January 25, 2016
Subject: Conservation Update and Monthly Water Supply Report
ATTACHMENTS:
Description: Type:
Water Supply Report.pdf Backup Material Backup Material
MUNICIPAL
WATER
• DISTRICT
OF
ORANGE
COUNTY
Memorandum
DATE: January 11, 2016
TO: Member Agencies — MWDOC Division One
FROM: Brett R. Barbre, Director— Division One
SUBJECT: Monthly Water Usage Data, Tier 2 Projection & Water Supply Information
The attached figures show the recent trend of water consumption in Orange County (OC),
an estimate of Tier 2 volume for MWDOC, and selected water supply information.
Fig. 1 OC Water Usage, Monthly by Supply OCWD Groundwater water was the
main supply in November.
Fig. 2 OC Water Usage, Monthly, Comparison to Previous Years Water usage in
November 2015 was below average compared to past three years. Lower
usage is primarily due to strong conservation efforts and mandatory
restrictions set by the governor.
Fig. 3 Historical OC Water Consumption OC water consumption was 571,000 AF in
FY 2014-15. This is about 50,000 AF less than FY 2013-14 but is about
16,000 AF higher than FY 2010-11 (Fiscal year with lowest usage). Water
usage per person was the lowest it has been for Orange County at 164
gallons per day. Although OC population has increased 20% over the past
two decades, water usage has not increased, on average. A long-term
decrease in per-capita water usage is attributed mostly to Water Use
Efficiency (water conservation) efforts. High Temperature, precipitation and
the economy all remain indicators to O.C. water consumption.
Fig. 4 MWDOC "Firm" Water Purchases, 2015 "Firm" water above the Tier 1 limit
will be charged at the higher Tier 2 rate. Our current projection of Tier 2
purchases is zero in 2015.
Water Supply Information Includes data on: Rainfall in OC; the OCWD Basin overdraft.,
Northern California and Colorado River Basin hydrologic data; the State Water Project
(SWP) Allocation, and regional storage volumes. The data has implications for the
magnitude of supplies from the three watersheds that are the principal sources of water for
t"
OC. Note that a hydrologic year is Oct. 1 st through Sept. 30 .
• Orange County's accumulated rainfall through December was below average for this
period. This continues the impact of the previous three hydrologic years' below-
normal rainfall in reducing those local supplies that are derived from local runoff. El
Nino conditions are present and 2015-16 winter is developing into a very strong El
Nino event. .
• Northern California accumulated precipitation in December was around 94% of
normal for this period. The Northern California snowpack is 105% of normal. This
follows three below-average hydrologic years. The State of California has been in a
declared Drought Emergency since January 2014. The State Water Project
Contractors Table A Allocation is only 10% as of the end of December.
• Colorado River Basin accumulated precipitation in November was 104% average for
this period. The Upper Colorado Basin snowpack was 107% of average as of April
15th. However, this follows two below-average hydrologic years, and this watershed
is in a long-term drought. Lake Mead and Lake Powell combined have about 60% of
their average storage volume for this time of year. If Lake Mead's level falls below a
"trigger" limit at the end of a calendar year, then a shortage will be declared by the
US Bureau of Reclamation (USBR), impacting Colorado River water deliveries for
the Lower Basin states. As of Late July Lake Mead Levels were hovering around the
"trigger" limit but fortunately levels are expecting to increase from the large amounts
of precipitation that hit the Colorado River Basin this summer and spring. The USBR
predicts that the "trigger" level will not be hit by the end of 2015.
MUNICIPAL
WATER
"_" olsrRlcr
-- OF
ORANGE
60,000
W
ur 40,000
W
U
a
30,000
20,000
10,000
7
Fig. 1A OC Water Usage, Monthly by Supply
with projection to end of fiscal year
Surface Water =Non -OCWD Groundwater
Recycled (Non Potable) =Import [1]
=pr nfaled [3] =OCWD Basin [2]
�.v
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
U
O
Q
N
(n
O
z
N
0
M
N
U_
Q
1.4
iceA
Cn
1.0
0.8-
0.6 �
M
0.4 ry
0.2
we
[1] Imported water for consumptive use. Includes "In- Lieu" deliveries and CUP water extraction. Excludes "Direct Replenishment" deliveries of spreading water, "Barrier Replenishment"
deliveries, and deliveries into Irvine Lake.
[2] GW for consumptive use only. Excludes In -Lieu water deliveries and CUP water extraction that are counted with Import. BPP in FY'14 -15 is 72 %.
[3] MWDOC's estimate of monthly demand is based on the projected FY 15 -16 "Retail" water demand and historical monthly demand patterns.
MUNICIPAL
-- - -- WATER
- - MISTRICT
_ OF
ORANGE
•1 111
50,000
W
ur 40,000
w
U
a
30,000
20,000
10,000
A
Fig. 1 B OC Water Usage, Monthly by Supply
with projection to end of fiscal year
Surface Water =Non -OCWD Groundwater
Recycled (Non Potable) =Import [1]
=OCWD Basin [2] =projected [3]
--o--High Temp
95
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
,
,
,
,
�--1
L
L
Q
(n
Z
0
U_
Q
90 U_
85
80
CL
75 E
9
70 =
0)
65 =
a�
60 2
L
55 Q
50
[1] Imported water for consumptive use. Includes "In- Lieu" deliveries and CUP water extraction. Excludes "Direct Replenishment" deliveries of spreading water, "Barrier Replenishment"
deliveries, and deliveries into Irvine Lake.
[2] GW for consumptive use only. Excludes In -Lieu water deliveries and CUP water extraction that are counted with Import. BPP in FY'14 -15 is 72 %.
[3] MWDOC's estimate of monthly demand is based on the projected FY 15 -16 "Retail" water demand and historical monthly demand patterns.
wDISTRICT
MUNICIPAL
WATER
OF
ORANGE
COUNTY
70,000
60,000
50,000
W
Lu
1
40,000
W
a
30,000
20,000
10,000
Fig. 2A OC Monthly Water Usage [1]: Comparison to Last 4 Fiscal Years
❑ FY 11 -12 ❑ FY 12 -13 ❑ FY 13 -14 ❑ FY 14 -15 ❑ FY 15 -16
D Q >
y U U L L (13 Q CU
Q (n Z 0 li � Q �
Partial Year
Subtotals
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
W
W
LL
W
300,000
a
200,000
100,000
0
1 ] Sum of Imported water for consumptive use (includes "In- Lieu" deliveries; excludes "Direct Replenishment "and "Barrier Replenishment') and Local water for consumptive use
MUNICIPAL
WATER
DISTRICT
OF
ORANGE
" COUNTY
650,000
600,000
550,000
500,000
450,000
400,000
w
w
4 350,000
w
Q 300,000
250,000
200,000
150,000
100,000
50,000
Fig. 213 Orange County Cumulative Monthly Consumptive Water Usage [1]:
present year compared to last 4 calendar years
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
[1 ] Sum of Imported water for consumptive use (includes "In- Lieu" deliveries; excludes "Direct Replenishment "and "Barrier Replenishment") and Local water for consumptive use
MUNICIPAL
- WATER
DIG RIC T
OF
ORANGE
COUNTY
Fig. 3A
HISTORICAL WATER CONSUMPTION[l] AND POPULATION[2]
IN OC
800,000
750,000
700,000
LL
Q
CO 650,000
M
w
600,000
550,000
500,000
450,000
400,000
90 -'91 -'92 -'93 -'94 -'95 -'96 -'97 -'98 -'99 -'00 -'01 -'02 -'03 -'04 -'05 06 07 08 09 10
91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 -11
Fiscal Year
o Consumptive Water Use
Population
11 12 13 14 15
-12 -13 -14 -15 -16
[1 ] Consumption includes potable, recycled and non - potable usage; excludes Barrier and Spreading water. The most recent data involve some estimation.
[2] Population estimates in the 2000s decade were revised by the State Dept. of Finance to reflect the 2010 Census counts.
[3] Projection of FY 15 -16 water use estimated by MWDOC based on partial -year data.
0181',
2.50 c
O
2.00 0
3
a
1.500
1.00
0.50
Me
- MUNICIPAL
WATER
DISTRICT
OF
ORANGE
COUNTY
700,000
675,000
650,000
625,000
Q 600,000
LU 575,000
D
w 550,000
W
Q 525,000
500,000
475,000
450,000
425,000
400,000
:ig. 313 HISTORICAL WATER CONSUMPTION[1] AND Annual Rainfall[,
IN OC
'08 -09 109 -10 10 -11 11 -12 12 -13 13 -14 14 -15 15 -16
Fiscal Year
[1 ] Consumption includes potable, recycled and non - potable usage; excludes Barrier and Spreading water. The most recent data involve some estimation.
[2] Rainfall data from Santa Ana Station #121
25
O
N
N
s
15
w
10 12
5
0
E L Fig. 3C HISTORICAL WATER CONSUMPTION[1] AND Annual Average High Temperature[2] IN
OC
80.93
700,000 —
o Consumptive Water Use
675,000 --0— High Temp
650,000
625,000 79.17
78.02
Q 600,000
< 76.93 77.63
LU 575,000 76.38
D
w 550,000 75.50
W
>Q 525,000
500,000 25 Year Low
for Water Projected
475,000 Usage in O.C.
450,000
425,000
400,000
'08 -09 109 -10 10 -11 11 -12 12 -13 13 -14 14 -15 15 -16
Fiscal Year
[1] Consumption includes potable, recycled and non - potable usage; excludes Barrier and Spreading water. The most recent data involve some estimation.
[2] Temperature data is from Santa Ana Fire Station, elevation 135'
81
80
79
78 u_
77 io
CL
76 aEi
H
t
75 z
74 a
73
72
71
MUNICIPAL
WATER
DISTRICT
OF
ORANGE
COUNTY
800,000
750,000
700,000
LL
a
w 650,000
CO
a600,000
550,000
500,000
450,000
400,000
Fig. 3D HISTORICAL WATER CONSUMPTION[l] AND Average Unemployment[2] IN
OC
190 -'91 -'92 -'93 -'94 -'95 -'96 -'97 -'98 -'99 -'00 -'01 -'02 -'03 -'04 -'05 -'06 -'07 -'08 -'09 - 10 11 12 13 14 15
91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 -11 -12 -13 -14 -15 -16
Fiscal Year
[1] Consumption includes potable, recycled and non - potable usage; excludes Barrier and Spreading water. The most recent data involve some estimation.
[2] Employment Data source Bureau of Labor Statistic for Long Beach - L.A. -Santa Ana Metro Area
http://www.bls.gov/1au/
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
2
5%
6% Q
J
7% e
8% N
9% p'
a
10% E
c
11%
12%
13%
14%
15%
wa ER,Pa`
oisraicr Fig. 3E HISTORICAL WATER CONSUMPTION[1] AND POPULATION DENSITY[2] IN OC
OF
ORANGE
COUNTY
800,000
750,000
700,000
LL
Q
w 650,000
CO
M
a600,000
550,000
500,000
450,000
400,000
190 -'91 -'92 -'93 -'94 -'95 -'96 -'97 -'98 -'99 -'00 -'01 -'02 -'03 -'04 -'05 -'06 -'07 -'08 -'09 - 10 11 12 13 14 15
91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 -11 -12 -13 -14 -15 -16
Fiscal Year
[1] Consumption includes potable, recycled and non - potable usage; excludes Barrier and Spreading water. The most recent data involve some estimation.
[2] Population estimates in the 2000s decade were revised by the State Dept. of Finance to reflect the 2010 Census counts.
4,000
3,750
a
a
CO
a
a
3,500.2 CL
0
a
a
V!
C
N
0
3,250 z
O
3,000
Q
J
M
M
O
n
MUNICIPAL Fig. 3F HISTORICAL WATER CONSUMPTION[l] AND GPCD [2] IN OC
WA 013TRICT TE R
OF
ORANGE
COUNTY
800,000
750,000
700,000
LL
a
w 650,000
CO
a600,000
550,000
450,000
400,000
90 -'91 -'92 -'93 -'94 -'95 -'96 -'97 -'98 -'99 -'00 -'01 -'02 -'03 -'04 -'05 -'06 -'07 -'08 -'09
91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10
Fiscal Year
o Consumptive Water Use
—.o—GPCD
10 11 12 13 14 15
-11 -12 -13 -14 -15 -16
[1] Consumption includes potable, recycled and non - potable usage; excludes Barrier and Spreading water. The most recent data involve some estimation.
[2] Gallon per Capita Daily (includes all types of water usage and all type of water users).
240
230
220
210
200 no
0
190
Wit
170
160
150
140
130
120
30,000
25,000
20,000
Q 15,000
m
0
H
s
0 10,000
75
5,000
Fig. 4 MWDOC's Firm Water Purchases in CY 2015
Monthly Actual and Projected to CY Total
oUntreated Total Treated
oProj Monthly Purchases — Cumulative Actual
300,000
Tier 2
Tier 1
r-
Jan -15 Feb -15 Mar -15 Apr -15 May -15 Jun -15 JUI -15 Aug -15 Sep -15 Oct -15 Nov -15 Dec -15
250,000
200,000
m
0
H
150,000
E
Z)
100,000 U
50,000
Notes
1. "Firm" includes Full Service (both Treated and Untreated) and Barrier water.
2. Basin Pumping Percentage (BPP) is the percentage of a retail water agency's total water demand that they are limited to pump from the OCWD- managed groundwater basin. BPP pertains to Basin agencies only. For
example, if a Basin agency's total demand is 10,000 AF /yr and OCWD sets the BPP at 72 %, then the agency is limited to 7,200 AF of groundwater that year. There may be certain exceptions and /or adjustments to that
simple calculation. OCWD sets the BPP for the Basin agencies, usually as of July 1st. Import demands for Jan. -Jun. were with BPP of 72% for Basin agencies; for Jul. -Dec. they are projected with BPP of 70 %.
MUNICIPAL
WATER prepared by the Municipal Water District of Orange County printdate 1/4/2016
DISTRICT
OF *numbers are subject to change
ORANGE
COUNTY
Jan -15 Feb -15 Mar -15 Apr -15 May -15 Jun -15 JUI -15 Aug -15 Sep -15 Oct -15 Nov -15 Dec -15
250,000
200,000
m
0
H
150,000
E
Z)
100,000 U
50,000
Notes
1. "Firm" includes Full Service (both Treated and Untreated) and Barrier water.
2. Basin Pumping Percentage (BPP) is the percentage of a retail water agency's total water demand that they are limited to pump from the OCWD- managed groundwater basin. BPP pertains to Basin agencies only. For
example, if a Basin agency's total demand is 10,000 AF /yr and OCWD sets the BPP at 72 %, then the agency is limited to 7,200 AF of groundwater that year. There may be certain exceptions and /or adjustments to that
simple calculation. OCWD sets the BPP for the Basin agencies, usually as of July 1st. Import demands for Jan. -Jun. were with BPP of 72% for Basin agencies; for Jul. -Dec. they are projected with BPP of 70 %.
MUNICIPAL
WATER prepared by the Municipal Water District of Orange County printdate 1/4/2016
DISTRICT
OF *numbers are subject to change
ORANGE
COUNTY
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Accumulated Precipitation
for the Oct. -Sep. water year, through early January 2016
41%
This Year to date ■ Average to date Average End of Year
= Percent of Average to Date
94%
ORANGE
Colorado
Snowpack on
12/28/2015
COUNTY
COLORADO
(SANTA ANA)
SNOWPACK
PRECIP.
SNOWPACK
MUNICIPAL
WATER
O[STRICT
OF
ORANGE
CC VNTY
94%
105% U1104%1 11 107%
N. SIERRAS 8- NORTHERN
UPPER BASIN
Colorado
Snowpack on
12/28/2015
CA Snowpack
on 12/28/2015
COLORADO
105% U1104%1 11 107%
N. SIERRAS 8- NORTHERN
UPPER BASIN
UPPER BASIN
STATION INDEX CALIF.
COLORADO
COLORADO
SNOWPACK
PRECIP.
SNOWPACK
* The date of maximum snowpack accumulation (April 1st in Northern Calif. , April 15th in
the Upper Colorado Basin) is used for year to year comparison.
" N MUNICIPAL
WATER
019TRICT
OF
ORANGE
"Um7V
SWP TABLE A ALLOCATION
FOR STATE WATER PROJECT CONTRACTORS
Final 2016: ? ??
Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun.
m mWater Year 2012 m mWater Year 2013 m mWater Year 2014 m mWater Year 2015 m mWater Year 2016
65%
65% Final 2012: 65%
60% 60%.
60%
60
0%
50%
40%
40% 40%
35% 350% 35%
35%
Final 2013: 35%
20% 20% 20%
20%
Final 2015: 20%
15% 15%
10% 10%
1 °
10%
°
5% 5 °
5%
Final 2014: 5%
5% o% o%
5%
0%
Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun.
m mWater Year 2012 m mWater Year 2013 m mWater Year 2014 m mWater Year 2015 m mWater Year 2016
0
°0 500
0
x
L 400
Q
rn
2 300
L
0 200
N
c 100
Q
E
0
Imported Water Deliveries Vs. California Population Growth
- 2003, CRA QSA is signed lowering
1,—cL A /---, CRA usage to 4.4 MAF
2008,ESA results in Delta Pumping
restrictions
40
rn
r_
O
35
r_
30.2
Q
25 a°
t�
20 0
4-
15
CA Population Total SWP Deliveries }CRA Deliveries to MWD —CRA Deliveries to CA
llocaion "' SWP Allocation % Vs. Station 8 Accumulated Rainfall ben 100 %tonceshnthe
100% t00% 100% year2000
900/0 100% 100% g0% 90% 90%
100% 90
80%
70% -
60%
p 50%
Q 40%
a
30%
Cn
20%
10%
0%
LJ Due to drought conditions and California
population growth Southern California is
receiving very little water from the State Water
Natural Accumulated Run Project.
Off
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
���� ,�°�1� �o�1`L �o�'l �°��6 �0�14� �°��� ��q�`L �°��� �°� (6( �°, ,886 ,���� ,���`L ��q� ��qb ��46 ���� ti��� ��p� 6b ti���
=Station 8 Accumulated Rainfall (Inches) —SWP Allocation %
M
U
100
90
80 O
Z
70 E N
60 0 o
M
50
.Q
40
L L
30 a �°
20 U
cc
10 M
E
0
Q
waNq;Pa` O.C. Basin Accumulated Overdraft
GF
GRANGC
50,000 Basin Full in 1969
100,000
15
200,000
v
v
w 250,000
`u
Q
300,000
350,000
400,000 0 \
W
�A
filled with water GWRSOnIineJan2008
M O a-1 N M M W 1, 00 M O a-1 N M * N W 1, 00 M O a-1 N M* N W 1, 00 M O a-1 N M-* N W 1, 00 M O a-1 N M* N W
W 1, n n n n n n n n n 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Cn Cn Cn Cn Cn Cn Cn M M M O O O O O O O O O O a-1 a-1 a-1 a-1 a-1 a-1 a-1
M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
a-1 a-1 a-1 a-1 a-1 a-1 a-1 a-1 a-1 a-1 a-1 a-1 a-1 a-1 a-1 a-1 a-1 a-1 a-1 a-1 a-1 a-1 a-1 a-1 a-1 a-1 a-1 a-1 a-1 a-1 a-1 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Accumulated Overdraft (dewatered volume) shown as white area, excluding the volume stored by Metropolitan. source: OCW D
-
MUNICIPAL
OF
(7RAMMM
�nuuTv
D Dewatered Vol (AF)
50,000
—i;— Annual Rainfall (Inches)
100,000
35
150,000
395,000 AF end of
200,000
v
w
250,000
25
Q
1
20 c
300,000
350,000
400,000
`
�1
450,000
O.C. Basin Accumulated Overdraft Vs. Annual Rainfall
Annual, 1969 to Present
Stored Vol (AF)
D Dewatered Vol (AF)
f
—i;— Annual Rainfall (Inches)
�^ m
35
:r 30
395,000 AF end of
November 2015
1 1
25
1 1
\ r
1
1
20 c
tA�
°1
�
Q
1 %� 1 / 1
lip' 1
1\ •r. -1 \
1
v 1 I
11 1 I
O.C. Basin volume
-• 11
_ 1
/ 5
500,000 ° 0
cn O a-1 N M N l0 I, co cn O a-1 N M N l0 I, co cn O a-1 N M N l0 I, co cn O a-1 N M-* N l0 I, co cn O a-1 N M N l0
O1 O1 O1 O1 O1 O1 O1 O1 O1 O1 O1 O1 O1 O1 O1 O1 O1 O1 O1 O1 O1 O1 O1 O1 O1 O1 O1 O1 O1 M M O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Accumulated Overdraft (dewatered volume) shown as white area, excluding the volume stored by Metropolitan. source: OCWD
MUMCIPAL Stored Vol (AF)
WATEC O.C. Basin Accumulated Overdraft Vs. BPP
DISTLi1GT
o❑ D Dewatered Vol (AF) �^.
[7RANGE
Annual, 1999 to Present -�:- BPP% w
80q
50,000 80%
?:
75% 75q 75% 75% 74% i��,`%♦
100,000 `` 69% ♦` 69% 68%
% 150,000 �_..
60%
200,000 _
a 50%
L 250,000 �. a
40%
300,000
30%
350,000
20%
400,000
O.C. Basin volume 450,000 ;
filled with water
10%
500,000 0%
Cn O a-I N M Ln W I, 00 Cn O a-I N M Ln W
Cn O O O O O O O O O O a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I
Cn O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
a-I N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Accumulated Overdraft (dewatered volume) shown as white area, excluding the volume stored by Metropolitan. source: OCW D
:;A UNICIPAL O.C. Basin Accumulated Overdraft Vs. Annual Rainfall �Stored Vol (AF)
rMin
OIBTRIGT
OF
ORAN[i! D Dewatered Vol (AF)
Annual, 1999 to Present
—s �— Annual Rainfall (Inches) w
r. 35
50,000
e « ? 30
r16
100,000
150,000 1. + 25
1:
200,000 - 1
v 1 20
w 250,000 1 w
1 s_
`u 1
Q 1 15 c-
300,000 1 1
1 1 �
350,000
400,000
450,000
500,000
Ql
Ql
Ql
a-I
O a-4 N M In W r, 00 Cn O a-4 N M In W
O O O O O O O O O O a-4 a-4 a-4 a-4 a-4 a-4 a-4
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Accumulated Overdraft (dewatered volume) shown as white area, excluding the volume stored by Metropolitan. source: OCWD
10
5
0
State Water Pro]ect, Colorado River, and MWD Reservoir Storage
as of January 6th, 2016
Lake Shasta
4.0 -
d
3.0 - LL
2.0 -
1.0 -
0.0 -
San Luis Resv.
2.5
2.0
1.5 2
1.0 a
o
0.5
0.0
Diamond Valley
1.0 39
0.5
0.0
DC
4.0 Lake Oroville
3.0 LL
2.0
a"
1.0 ; ,
0.0
Lake Mathews
0
0 .5
0.0
25
20
15
10
5
0
25
20
v
v
15
a
10 0
5
0
d
d
0
2
c
Lake Powell
Lake Mead
Lake Mead Levels: Historical and Projected
- W --_ -- MIUNICIPAL
ml--w
--- -
1,1so
projection per USBR 24 -Month Study
ORANGE
_- - �..Nr,r
■ Historical 91 Projected
1,170
1,160
1,150
1,140
1,130
0 1,120
w 1,110
1,100
1,090
Shortage Trigger = 1,075 ft
1,080
1,070#
1,060
1,050
Jan 02 Jan 03
Jan 04 Jan 05 Jan 06 Jan 07 Jan 08 Jan 09 Jan 10 Jan 11 Jan 12 Jan 13 Jan 14 Jan 15 Jan 16 Jan 17
MUNICIPAL
WATER
O16TRl-
OF
ORANGC
W]
GG l3NTY
1,090
1,085
1,080
1,075
c
1,070
a,
W
1,065
1,060
1,055
1,050
Jul 14
Lake Mead Levels: Historical and Projected
projection per USBR 24 -Month Study
■ Historical ❑ Projected
Jan 15
Jul 15
Jan 16
Jul 16