The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2016-04-25 - Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Packet ora Linda Water District AGENDA YORBA LINDA WATER DISTRICT CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING Monday, April 25, 2016, 8:30 AM 1717 E Miraloma Ave, Placentia CA 92870 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL COMMITTEE MEMBERS Lindon Baker Fred Hebein Carl Boznanski Joe Holdren Rick Buck Modesto Llanos Bill Guse Cheryl Spencer-Borden 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS Any individual wishing to address the committee is requested to identify themselves and state the matter on which they wish to comment. If the matter is on this agenda, the committee Chair will recognize the individual for their comment when the item is considered. No action will be taken on matters not listed on this agenda. Comments are limited to matters of public interest and matters within the jurisdiction of the Water District. Comments are limited to three minutes. 4. DISCUSSION ITEMS This portion of the agenda is for matters such as technical presentations, drafts of proposed policies, or similar items for which staff is seeking the advice and counsel of the Committee members. This portion of the agenda may also include items for information only. 4.1. Modification to Administrative Penalty Structure Previously Established to Comply with State of California Mandate 4.2. Conservation Update and Monthly Water Supply Report 4.3. Director's Report 4.4. Future Agenda Items 5. ADJOURNMENT 5.1. The next Citizens Advisory Committee meeting is scheduled to be held Monday, May 23, 2016 at 8:30 a.m. Items Distributed to the Committee Less Than 72 Hours Prior to the Meeting Pursuant to Government Code section 54957.5, non-exempt public records that relate to open session agenda items and are distributed to a majority of the Committee less than seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting will be available for public inspection in the lobby of the District's business office located at 1717 E. Miraloma Avenue, Placentia, CA 92870, during regular business hours. When practical, these public records will also be made available on the District's internet website accessible at http://www.ylwd.com/. Accommodations for the Disabled Any person may make a request for a disability-related modification or accommodation needed for that person to be able to participate in the public meeting by telephoning the Executive Secretary at 714-701-3020, or writing to Yorba Linda Water District, P.O. Box 309, Yorba Linda, CA 92885-0309. Requests must specify the nature of the disability and the type of accommodation requested. A telephone number or other contact information should be included so the District staff may discuss appropriate arrangements. Persons requesting a disability-related accommodation should make the request with adequate time before the meeting for the District to provide the requested accommodation. ITEM NO. 4.1 AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: April 25, 2016 To: Citizens Advisory Committee From: Marc Marcantonio, General Manager Presented By: Delia Lugo, Finance Manager Prepared By: Damon Micalizzi, Public Information Manager Subject: Modification to Administrative Penalty Structure Previously Established to Comply with State of California Mandate SUMMARY: On April 7, 2016 the State Water Resources Control Board Announced new Conservation Standards for water agencies throughout the State. YLWD received an 28% Conservation Standard adjustment for indirect potable reuse (IPR) and population growth. In light of the new conservation target and the District's conservation achievements thus far, on April 14, 2016 the Board of Directors adopted Ordinance No. 16-01 repealing Ordinance No. 15-01 and adopting a flexible water shortage administrative penalty structure. The Board voted to enter stage one of penalties (no penalties), which will be reflected on all customer billings beginning the first billing cycle in June 2016. DISCUSSION: On May 28, 2015 the Board of Directors adopted Ordinance No. 15-01 which imposed administrative penalties on District customers should their consumption exceed certain amounts. This ordinance was developed in response to Governor Brown's April 1, 2015 executive order calling for a statewide reduction in potable water use by 25%, and the subsequent emergency drought regulations adopted by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) on May 6, 2015, in which a conservation mandate of 36% (comparative to 2013 consumption) was set for the District. On February 2, 2016, the SWRCB adopted an extended and revised emergency drought regulation to ensure that urban water conservation continues through October 2016 while providing urban water suppliers more flexibility in meeting their conservation requirements, including potential downward adjustments to assigned conservation mandates ranging from 2% to a maximum of 8%. Staff submitted an application to the SWRCB on February 22, 2016 requesting the maximum downward adjustment of 8% from the District's 36% conservation mandate, which may be granted in whole, in part, or not at all. However, staff is optimistic that the District has satisfied all requirements for an adjustment. Additionally, as of March 1, 2016, the District and its customers have met the State's mandated 36% reduction in water usage. In recognition of these outstanding efforts, the Board has expressed a desire to repeal Ordinance No. 15-01 and replace it with another ordinance containing a more flexible penalty structure. This new structure would allow the Board to enact or suspend an appropriate stage of penalties based on a finding regarding the District's customers' water usage, the District's water supply shortage stage under its water shortage contingency ordinance (Ordinance No. 09-01), the SWRCB's conservation mandate to the District, or any other finding consistent with the new ordinance. Funds collected pursuant to this ordinance will not be collected for the purpose of recovering the cost of providing water service to District customers and will be segregated into a fund which won't be used to pay the cost of providing water service to District customers. ATTACHMENTS: 1 Val 1 1G. Description: Type: Ordinance No. 16-01 - Ordinance Ordinance Adopting Flexible Drought Penalty Structure.docx Ordinance No. 16-01 - Exhibit A.pdf Exhibit Exhibit ORDINANCE NO. 16-01 ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE YORBA LINDA WATER DISTRICT REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 15-01 AND ADOPTING A FLEXIBLE WATER SHORTAGE ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY STRUCTURE WHEREAS, on January 17, 2014 the Governor of California proclaimed a State of Emergency due to severe drought conditions and directed state officials to take all necessary actions to prepare for these drought conditions; and WHEREAS, on April 25, 2014 the Governor of California issued an executive order that called on all Californians to redouble their efforts to conserve water; and WHEREAS, on April 1, 2015, due to persisting drought conditions, the Governor of California issued an executive order that called for a statewide reduction in potable water use by 25%; and WHEREAS, on May 6, 2015, emergency drought regulations, which were adopted by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), went into effect, setting conservation mandates for water suppliers; and WHEREAS, the SWRCB established a conservation mandate for Yorba Linda Water District to reduce its potable water use by 36%; and WHEREAS, the SWRCB may impose penalties of up to $10,000 per day against Yorba Linda Water District for its failure to meet the 36% conservation mandate; and WHEREAS, on May 11, 2015 the Board of Directors adopted Resolution No. 15-04, which determined that due to drought and other water supply conditions, a water shortage or threatened shortage exists and a consumer demand reduction is necessary to make more efficient use of water and appropriately respond to existing drought conditions; and WHEREAS, on May 28, 2015, the Board of Directors adopted Ordinance No. 15-01, which imposed administrative penalties (hereinafter referred to as penalty or penalties) on District customers should their consumption exceed certain amounts; and WHEREAS, on February 2, 2016, the SWRCB adopted an extended and revised emergency drought regulation to ensure that urban water conservation continues through October 2016 while providing urban water suppliers more flexibility in meeting their conservation requirements, including potential downward adjustments to urban water suppliers' conservation mandate that range from 2% to a maximum of 8%; and Ordinance No. 16-01 Adopting a Flexible Water Shortage Administrative Penalty Structure 1 WHEREAS, on February 22, 2016, the Yorba Linda Water District submitted an application to the SWRCB requesting the maximum downward adjustment of 8% from the District's 36% conservation mandate, which may be granted in whole, in part, or not at all, but the District is optimistic that it has satisfied SWRCB's requirements for an adjustment. WHEREAS, as of March 1, 2016, the District and its customers have met the State mandated 36% cut in water usage; and WHEREAS, in recognition of its customers significant reduction in water usage, it is the Board of Directors intent to repeal Ordinance No. 15-01 and its rigid application of penalties on District customers and replace it with a more flexible structure that will allow the Board of Directors to apply such penalties in accordance with its customers' water usage, the District's water shortage contingency ordinance (Ordinance No. 09-01), and the State's conservation mandate; and WHEREAS, the penalties established and imposed herein are not for the purpose of recovering the cost of providing water service to Yorba Linda Water District's water customers. NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED, under the authority of State law, including, but not limited to Sections 31026 and 31028 of the California Water Code and 53069.4 of the California Government Code, that the Board of Directors of the Yorba Linda Water District does hereby find that the above recitals are true and correct and therefore establish water use restrictions, and establish and impose penalties upon any customer who exceeds the water use restrictions, in order to (1) comply with the SWRCB's conservation mandate, (2) protect the District's water supplies, (3) reduce the quantity of water consumed, and (4) deter and prevent the waste or unreasonable use of valuable water resources. Section 1. Board Authority to Enact and Suspend Water Shortage Administrative Penalties by Resolution The appropriate stage of penalties may be enacted or suspended, by Board resolution, based on a Board finding regarding the District's customers' water usage, the District's water supply shortage stage under its water shortage contingency ordinance, the SWRCB's percentage of conservation mandate to the District, or any other finding consistent with this ordinance. Ordinance No. 16-01 Adopting a Flexible Water Shortage Administrative Penalty Structure 2 Section 2. Stage of Water Shortage Administrative Penalties for Exceeding Mandatory Water Use Restrictions Upon resolution of the Board of Directors, each customer who has a potable water account with the District shall be subject to either no penalties under Stage No. 1 or the following penalties under Stage Nos. 2, 3, and 4 at the end of their respective billing cycle should their usage exceed the amounts set forth below: A. Stage 1: (No Penalties) Residential Penalty Block 1 1-18 Units $ - Block 2 19-29 Units $ - Block 3 30-49 Units $ - Block 4 50-74 Units $ - Block 5 75-99 Units $ - Block 6 100+ Units $ - Commercial Penalty Block 1 1-50 Units $ - Block 2 51-75 Units $ - Block 3 76-100 Units $ - Block 4 100-150 Units $ - Block 5 151-200 Units $ - Block 6 200+ Units $ - Irrigation Penalty Block 1 1-115 Units $ - Block 2 116-200 Units $ - Block 3 201-300 Units $ - Block 4 301-400 Units $ - Block 5 401-500 Units $ - Block 6 500+ Units $ - Ordinance No. 16-01 Adopting a Flexible Water Shortage Administrative Penalty Structure 3 B. Stage 2: Residential Penalty Block 1 1-18 Units $ - Block 2 19-29 Units $ - Block 3 30-49 Units $ 20.00 Block 4 50-74 Units $ 40.00 Block 5 75-99 Units $ 80.00 Block 6 100+ Units $ 160.00 Commercial Penalty Block 1 1-50 Units $ - Block 2 51-75 Units $ - Block 3 76-100 Units $ 50.00 Block 4 100-150 Units $ 100.00 Block 5 151-200 Units $ 200.00 Block 6 200+ Units $ 400.00 Irrigation Penalty Block 1 1-115 Units $ - Block 2 116-200 Units $ - Block 3 201-300 Units $ 130.00 Block 4 301-400 Units $ 260.00 Block 5 401-500 Units $ 520.00 Block 6 500+ Units $ 1,000.00 C. Stage 3: Residential Penalty Block 1 1-18 Units $ - Block 2 19-29 Units $ - Block 3 30-49 Units $ - Block 4 50-74 Units $ 40.00 Block 5 75-99 Units $ 80.00 Block 6 100+ Units $ 160.00 Ordinance No. 16-01 Adopting a Flexible Water Shortage Administrative Penalty Structure 4 Commercial Penalty Block 1 1-50 Units $ - Block 2 51-75 Units $ - Block 3 76-100 Units $ - Block 4 100-150 Units $ 100.00 Block 5 151-200 Units $ 200.00 Block 6 200+ Units $ 400.00 Irrigation Penalty Block 1 1-115 Units $ - Block 2 116-200 Units $ - Block 3 201-300 Units $ - Block 4 301-400 Units $ 260.00 Block 5 401-500 Units $ 520.00 Block 6 500+ Units $ 1,000.00 D. Stage 4: Residential Penalty Block 1 1-18 Units $ - Block 2 19-29 Units $ 10.00 Block 3 30-49 Units $ 20.00 Block 4 50-74 Units $ 40.00 Block 5 75-99 Units $ 80.00 Block 6 100+ Units $ 160.00 Commercial Penalty Block 1 1-50 Units $ - Block 2 51-75 Units $ 25.00 Block 3 76-100 Units $ 50.00 Block 4 100-150 Units $ 100.00 Block 5 151-200 Units $ 200.00 Block 6 200+ Units $ 400.00 Ordinance No. 16-01 Adopting a Flexible Water Shortage Administrative Penalty Structure 5 Irrigation Penalty Block 1 1-115 Units $ - Block 2 116-200 Units $ 65.00 Block 3 201-300 Units $ 130.00 Block 4 301-400 Units $ 260.00 Block 5 401-500 Units $ 520.00 Block 6 500+ Units $ 1,000.00 Section 3. Payment of Penalties Any penalty imposed pursuant to Section 1 shall be collected on the customer's water bill. Failure to pay a penalty amount will be treated as nonpayment of the water bill and water service may be terminated as a result. In the event that the individual responsible for payment of the water bill is not the violator of this Ordinance, notification of penalties will go to the billing address on file, with any and all fines and associated charges. Payment of the bill will be the final responsibility of the individual named on the account. Section 4. Appeal Procedures 1. Filing an Appeal. Any customer who wishes to appeal a penalty imposed by the District pursuant to this Ordinance shall comply with the following procedures: a. The appellant shall pay all amounts due and owing on his/her water bill, including any disputed penalty(ies) imposed by the District pursuant to this Ordinance. b. The appellant shall submit an appeal request form (Exhibit A) to the General Manager or his/her designee no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of the appellant's water bill for the billing cycle in which any penalty(ies) are imposed. c. The appellant shall submit proof, as deemed necessary by the District, in support of the appeal request. Such support may take the form of invoices, photos, etc. 2. Basis for Granting an Appeal. An appeal may be granted under the following limited circumstances: a. The amount of water delivered to the appellant's property did not violate the rules and regulations as evidenced by either a demonstrable malfunction in the meter serving the customer's property or a billing error by the District. Ordinance No. 16-01 Adopting a Flexible Water Shortage Administrative Penalty Structure 6 b. The amount of water used by the appellant's property exceeded the appropriate stage of drought administrative penalties as a result of a pipe leak (or leaks), but the customer fixed the leak(s) within the fourteen (14) days provided in Section 4(1)(b) above. c. The appellant demonstrates the water use is needed for human health and/or safety reasons. 3. Denial of Appeal Request. The decision by the General Manager or his/her designee to deny a request for appeal shall be final. Section 5. Use of Penalties Penalty funds collected pursuant to this Ordinance shall not be collected for the purpose of recovering the cost of providing water service to Yorba Linda Water District's water customers and shall be segregated into a fund which is not used to pay the cost of providing water service to Yorba Linda Water District's water customers. Section 6. In order to align with the District's established meter reading and billing schedules, Ordinance No. 15-01 is hereby repealed effective 11:59 p.m. on Thursday, April 28, 2016. Furthermore, the rules and regulations contained herein shall be in full force and effect at 12:00 a.m. on Friday, April 29, 2016. Section 7. The Board Secretary is hereby instructed to publish this Ordinance pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 31027 of the California Water Code. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of April 2016, by the following called vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Ric Collett, President Yorba Linda Water District ATTEST: Marc Marcantonio, Board Secretary Yorba Linda Water District Reviewed as to form by General Counsel: Arthur G. Kidman, Esq. Kidman Law LLP Ordinance No. 16-01 Adopting a Flexible Water Shortage Administrative Penalty Structure 7 Exhibit A YORBA LINDA WATER DISTRICT Water Shortage Administrative Penalty Appeal Request Form Pursuant to Ordinance No. 16-01 Name (Printed): Account #: Bill Date: Service Address: Street City Zip Reason for request for appeal from water shortage administrative penalty: 1 understand that any information provided on this form or in supporting documentation that is found to be willfully falsified shall result in an automatic denial of the appeal. Signature: Date: Please drop-off, mail or fax completed form to: YLWD Conservation Division 1717 E Miraloma Ave Placentia CA 92870 Fax: 714-701-3058 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Approved: Denied: Exhibit A E3 YORBA LINDA WATER DISTRICT Water Shortage Administrative Penalty Appeal Procedures 1. Filing an Appeal Any customer who wishes to appeal a penalty imposed by the District pursuant to Ordinance No. 16-01 shall comply with the following procedures: a. The appellant shall pay all amounts due and owing on his/her water bill, including any disputed penalty(ies) imposed by the District pursuant to Ordinance No. 16-01. b. The appellant shall submit an appeal request form (Exhibit A) to the General Manager or his/her designee no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of the appellant's water bill for the billing cycle in which any penalty(ies) are imposed. c. The appellant shall submit proof, as deemed necessary by the District, in support of the appeal request. Such support may take the form of invoices, photos, etc. 2. Basis for Granting an Appeal An appeal may be granted under the following limited circumstances: a. The amount of water delivered to the appellant's property did not violate the rules and regulations as evidenced by either a demonstrable malfunction in the meter serving the customer's property or a billing error by the District. b. The amount of water used by the appellant's property exceeded the appropriate stage of administrative penalties as a result of a pipe leak (or leaks), but the customer fixed the leak(s) within fourteen (14) days pursuant to Ordinance No. 16-01 . c. The appellant demonstrates the water use is needed for human health and/or safety reasons. 3. Denial of Appeal Request The decision by the General Manager or his/her designee to deny a request for appeal shall be final. Exhibit A El YORBA LINDA WATER DISTRICT Water Shortage Administrative Penalty Appeal Request NOTICE OF DECISION Pursuant to Ordinance No. 16-01 Name: Account #: Bill Date: Service Address: Street City Zip Request Decision: ❑ Approved ❑ Conditionally Approved ❑ Denied Decision Reason: Reviewer's Signature: Date: The decision by the General Manager or his/her designee to deny a request for appeal shall be final. ITEM NO. 4.2 AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: April 25, 2016 Subject: Conservation Update and Monthly Water Supply Report ATTACHMENTS: Description: Type: April Water Supply Report- BB.pdf Monthly Water Supply Report Backup Material MUNICIPAL WATER • DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY Memorandum DATE: April 11, 2016 TO: Member Agencies — MWDOC Division One FROM: Brett R. Barbre, Director— Division One SUBJECT: Monthly Water Usage Data, Tier 2 Projection & Water Supply Information The attached figures show the recent trend of water consumption in Orange County (OC), an estimate of Tier 2 volume for MWDOC, and selected water supply information. Fig. 1 OC Water Usage, Monthly by Supply OCWD Groundwater water was the main supply in February. Fig. 2 OC Water Usage, Monthly, Comparison to Previous Years Water usage in February 2016 was about low compared to the last 5 years. Lower usage is primarily due to strong conservation efforts and mandatory restrictions set by the governor. Rainfall for February 2016 was below the historical average and temperatures were above average. The February weather outcome resulted in very few O.C. water agencies achieving their SWRCB goal for the month. Fig. 3 Historical OC Water Consumption OC water consumption was 571,000 AF in FY 2014-15 (this includes —17 TAF of agricultural usage and non-retail water agency Usage). This is about 50,000 AF less than FY 2013-14 but is about 16,000 AF higher than FY 2010-11 (Fiscal year with lowest usage). Water usage per person was the lowest it has been for Orange County at 164 gallons per day. Although OC population has increased 20% over the past two decades, water usage has not increased, on average. A long-term decrease in per-capita water usage is attributed mostly to Water Use Efficiency (water conservation) efforts. High Temperature, precipitation and the economy all remain indicators to O.C. water consumption. Fig. 4 MWDOC "Firm" Water Purchases, 2016 "Firm" water above the Tier 1 limit will be charged at the higher Tier 2 rate. Our current projection of Tier 2 purchases is zero in 2016. Water Supply Information Includes data on: Rainfall in OC; the OCWD Basin overdraft; Northern California and Colorado River Basin hydrologic data; the State Water Project (SWP) Allocation, and regional storage volumes. The data has implications for the magnitude of supplies from the three watersheds that are the principal sources of water for OC. Note that a hydrologic year is Oct. 1 st through Sept. 30t". • Orange County's accumulated rainfall through March was below average for this period. This continues the impact of the previous four hydrologic years' below- normal rainfall in reducing those local supplies that are derived from local runoff. El Nino conditions are present but unfortunately there has not been amounts of precipitation for Southern California. • Northern California accumulated precipitation in March was around 130% of normal for this period. The Northern California snowpack is 99% of normal. This follows three below-average hydrologic years. The State of California has been in a declared Drought Emergency since January 2014. The State Water Project Contractors Table A Allocation is only 45% as of the end of March. • Colorado River Basin accumulated precipitation in March was 94% average for this period. The Upper Colorado Basin snowpack was 94% of average for this time period. However, this follows two below-average hydrologic years, and this watershed is in a long-term drought. Lake Mead and Lake Powell combined have about 61% of their average storage volume for this time of year. If Lake Mead's level falls below a "trigger" limit at the end of a calendar year, then a shortage will be declared by the US Bureau of Reclamation (USBR), impacting Colorado River water deliveries for the Lower Basin states. As of Late July Lake Mead Levels were hovering around the "trigger" limit but fortunately levels are expecting to increase from the large amounts of precipitation that hit the Colorado River Basin this summer and spring. The USBR predicts that the "trigger" level will not be hit by the end of 2016. *1`4 Fig. 1A OC Water Usage, Monthly by Supply Surface Water Non-OCWD Groundwater Recycled (Non Potable) Import[1] with projection to end of fiscal year =projected [3] oOCWD Basin [2] 3.0 60,000 50,000 2.5 W w 40,000 Cn 2.0 � U U a 30,000 C: 1 .5 20,000 1 .0 1 0,000 0.5 0 0.0 4. L L O 2-1 Q Q (n z 0 ILL 2 [1] Imported water for consumptive use. Includes"In-Lieu"deliveries and CUP water extraction. Excludes"Direct Replenishment"deliveries of spreading water, "Barrier Replenishment"deliveries, and deliveries into Irvine Lake. [2] GW for consumptive use only. Excludes In-Lieu water deliveries and CUP water extraction that are counted with Import. BPP in FY'15-16 is 75%. [3] MWDOC's estimate of monthly demand is based on the projected FY 15-16"Retail"water demand and historical monthly demand patterns. [4] Total water usage includes IRWD groundwater agricutural use and usage by non-retail water agencies. WATER o�sTR�cr ' OF _ ORANGE - couwry •1 111 50,000 W ur 40,000 W U a 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 Fig. 1 B OC Water Usage, Monthly by Supply with projection to end of fiscal year oSurface Water oNon-OCWD Groundwater Recycled (Non Potable) oImport[1] �OCWD Basin [2] oprojected [3] --o—Hi h Temp 95 LO LO LO LO LO LO CD CD CD CD CD 0 , , �--� L L Q (n Z 0 U_ Q 90 U_ 85 c� 80 CL 75 E 9 70 = 0) 65 = a� 60 L 55 Q 611M [1] Imported water for consumptive use. Includes"In-Lieu"deliveries and CUP water extraction. Excludes"Direct Replenishment"deliveries of spreading water, "Barrier Replenishment"deliveries, and deliveries into Irvine Lake. [2] GW for consumptive use only. Excludes In-Lieu water deliveries and CUP water extraction that are counted with Import. BPP in FY'15-16 is 75%. [3] MWDOC's estimate of monthly demand is based on the projected FY 15-16"Retail"water demand and historical monthly demand patterns. [4] Total water usage includes IRWD groundwater agricutural use and usage by non-retail water agencies. W(II MI.INICIPAL WATER DISTRICT OF ORANGE couNTv 60,000 50,000 w Lu 40,000 w a 30,000 20,000 10,000 Fig. 2A OC Monthly Water Usage [1]: Comparison to Last 4 Fiscal Years ❑FY 11-12 ❑FY 12-13 o FY 13-14 ■FY 14-15 ❑FY 15-16 D Q > U M -0 L L M Q >, Partial Year Subtotals 700,000 600,000 500,000 W 400,000 W LL 300,000 a 200,000 100,000 0 [1] Sum of Imported water for consumptive use(includes"In-Lieu"deliveries; excludes"Direct Replenishment"and"Barrier Replenishment')and Local water for consumptive use (includes recycled and non-potable water; excludes GWRS production, groundwater pumped to waste, and waste brine from water treatment projects.) Recent months numbers include some estimation. -------- MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT OF ORANGE 650,000 600,000 550,000 500,000 450,000 400,000 w w 4 350,000 w a 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 Fig. 213 Orange County Cumulative Monthly Consumptive Water Usage [1]: present year compared to last 4 calendar years CY 2012,588 TAF CY 2013,605 TAF CY 2014,612 TAF tCY 2015,515 TAF ICY 2016,???TAF •_ . - 1 Lei I VV Is pIrAym Do Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec [1] Sum of Imported water for consumptive use(includes"In-Lieu"deliveries; excludes"Direct Replenishment"and"Barrier Replenishment')and Local water for consumptive use (includes recycled and non-potable water; excludes GWRS production and waste brine from water quality pumping projects). MUNICIPAL °STRICT Fig. 3A HISTORICAL WATER CONSUMPTION[1] AND POPULATION[2] IN OC oConsumptive Water Use oaAN�E CUUNTV Population 800,000 750,000 700,000 LL Q CO 650,000 M w a 600,000 550,000 500,000 450,000 ^nr),000 '90 91 91 -'92 -'93 -'94 -'95 -'96 -'97 -'98 '99 -'00 -'01 -'02 -'03 -'04 -'05 -'06 -'07 -'08 -'09 - 10 11 12 13 14 15 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 -11 -12 -13 -14 -15 -16 Fiscal Year [1] Consumption includes potable, recycled and non-potable usage; excludes Barrier and Spreading water. The most recent data involve some estimation. [2] Population estimates in the 2000s decade were revised by the State Dept. of Finance to reflect the 2010 Census counts. [3] Projection of FY 15-16 water use estimated by MWDOC based on partial-year data. 3.50 018181 2.50 c O 2.00 0 J 1.500- n I., 0.50 111 MUNICIPAL WATER CIETRICT __ ___ ORANGE _ 750,000 700,000 650,000 LL Q w 600,000 w Q �: 550,000 500,000 450,000 400,000 90 -'91 -'92 -'93 -'94 -'95 -'96 -'97 -'98 -'99 -'00 -'01 -'02 -'03 -'04 -'05 06 07 08 09 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 Fiscal Year =ig. 313 HISTORICAL WATER CONSUMPTION[1]AND Annual Rainfall12 IN OC o Consumptive Water Use --o—S.A.Rainfall 10 11 12 13 14 15 -11 -12 -13 -14 -15 -16 [1] Consumption includes potable, recycled and non-potable usage; excludes Barrier and Spreading water. The most recent data involve some estimation. [2] Rainfall data from Santa Ana Station#121 35 30 25 y a t c 20 = R w c 15 11 3 0 MUNICIPAL WATER Gw OF ORANGE 750,000 700,000 650,000 LL Q w 600,000 w Q �: 550,000 500,000 450,000 400,000 Fig. 3C HISTORICAL WATER CONSUMPTION[1] AND Annual Average High Temperature[2] IN OC oConsumptive Water Use --0— High Temp 190 -'91 -'92 -'93 -'94 -'95 -'96 -'97 -'98 -'99 -'00 -'01 -'02 -'03 -'04 -'05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 -11 -12 -13 -14 -15 -16 Fiscal Year [1] Consumption includes potable, recycled and non-potable usage; excludes Barrier and Spreading water. The most recent data involve some estimation. [2] Temperature data is from Santa Ana Fire Station, elevation 135' 85 84 83 82 81 LL 80 T L 79 78 E 77 76 75 74 73 72 71 70 " MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY 750,000 700,000 650,000 Q w U) 600,000 w Q �: 550.000 500.000 450.000 400.000 Fig. 3D HISTORICAL WATER CONSUMPTION[1] AND Average Unemployment[2] IN OC 190 -'91 -'92 -'93 -'94 -'95 -'96 -'97 -'98 -'99 -'00 -'01 -'02 -'03 -'04 -'05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 -11 -12 -13 -14 -15 -16 Fiscal Year [1] Consumption includes potable, recycled and non-potable usage; excludes Barrier and Spreading water. The most recent data involve some estimation. [2] Employment Data source Bureau of Labor Statistic for Long Beach-L.A.-Santa Ana Metro Area http://www.bIs.gov/1au/ 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% `0 a 6% J 7% e 8% 9% 10% E a 11% 12% 13% 14% 15% MUNICIPAL CWFTER Fig. 3E HISTORICAL WATER CONSUMPTION[1] AND POPULATION DENSITY[2] IN OC DISTRICT ORANGE COUNTY 750,000 700,000 650,000 LL Q W CO 600,000 M w Q 3: 550,000 500,000 450,000 400,000 190 -'91 -'92 -'93 -'94 -'95 -'96 -'97 -'98 -'99 -'00 -'01 -'02 -'03 -'04 -'05 -'06 -'07 -'08 -109 - 10 11 12 13 14 15 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 -11 -12 -13 -14 -15 -16 Fiscal Year [1] Consumption includes potable, recycled and non-potable usage; excludes Barrier and Spreading water. The most recent data involve some estimation. [2] Population estimates in the 2000s decade were revised by the State Dept. of Finance to reflect the 2010 Census counts. 4,000 3,750 a 2 rr CO 0 n 3,500.2 CL 0 a a V! C 3,250 z O 3 a O n c CIO, DImuNicip STRICT Fig. 3F HISTORICAL WATER CONSUMPTION[l] AND GPCD [2] IN OC WATER DISTRICT ORANGE "- - COUNTY 750,000 700,000 650,000 LL Q w 600,000 w Q �: 550,000 500,000 450,000 400,000 90 -'91 -'92 -'93 -'94 -'95 -'96 -'97 -'98 -'99 -'00 -'01 -'02 -'03 -'04 -'05 06 07 08 09 10 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 -11 Fiscal Year oConsumptive Water Use �GPCD 11 12 13 14 15 -12 -13 -14 -15 -16 [1] Consumption includes potable, recycled and non-potable usage; excludes Barrier and Spreading water. The most recent data involve some estimation. [2] Gallon per Capita Daily(includes all types of water usage and all type of water users). 240 230 220 210 200 a 0 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 Notes 1. "Firm"includes Full Service(both Treated and Untreated)and Barrier water. 2. Basin Pumping Percentage(BPP)is the percentage of a retail water agency's total water demand that they are limited to pump from the OCWD-managed groundwater basin. BPP pertains to Basin agencies only. For example,if a Basin agency's total demand is 10,000 AF/yr and OCWD sets the BPP at 72%,then the agency is limited to 7,200 AF of groundwater that year. There may be certain exceptions and/or adjustments to that simple calculation. OCWD sets the BPP for the Basin agencies,usually as of July 1st. MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY prepared by the Municipal Water District of Orange County *numbers are subject to change printdate 3/29/2016 Fig. 4 MWDOC's Firm Water Purchases in CY 2016 oUntreated Total .Treated Monthly Actual and Projected to CY Total =Prof Monthly Purchases —Cumulative Actual 30,000 300,000 Tier 2 Tier 1 25,000 250,000 Projected 20,000 6 Year Monthly MAX 200,000 6 Year Monthly Avq 6 Year Monthly Low — — Q Q 15,000 150,000 H R o m E 0 — — U 75 10,000 -- — -- 100,000 5,000 50,000 SS Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Notes 1. "Firm"includes Full Service(both Treated and Untreated)and Barrier water. 2. Basin Pumping Percentage(BPP)is the percentage of a retail water agency's total water demand that they are limited to pump from the OCWD-managed groundwater basin. BPP pertains to Basin agencies only. For example,if a Basin agency's total demand is 10,000 AF/yr and OCWD sets the BPP at 72%,then the agency is limited to 7,200 AF of groundwater that year. There may be certain exceptions and/or adjustments to that simple calculation. OCWD sets the BPP for the Basin agencies,usually as of July 1st. MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY prepared by the Municipal Water District of Orange County *numbers are subject to change printdate 3/29/2016 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Accumulated Precipitation for the Oct.-Sep. water year, through late March 2016 ❑This Year to date ■Average to date ❑Average End of Year = Percent of Average to Date 130% CA Snowpack on 3/28/2016 Colorado Snowpack on 99 3/28/2016 asp M M ORANGE COUNTY (SANTA ANA) 94% 94% N. SIERRAS 8- NORTHERN UPPER BASIN UPPER BASIN STATION INDEX CALIF. COLORADO COLORADO ASNOWPACK PRECIP. SNOWPACK . n�unncipAL: *The date of maximum snowpack accumulation (April 1st in Northern Calif., April 15th in the WATER of T"'°' Upper Colorado Basin) is used for year to year comparison. ORANGE GOUIVTY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT OF ORANGE COI JNTV SWP TABLE A ALLOCATION FOR STATE WATER PROJECT CONTRACTORS 65% 65% Final 2012: 65% 60% 600. 60% 60% o% 50% Final 2016: ??? 45% 40% 40% 40% 35% 35% Final 2013: 35% 30° 30°° 20% 20% 15% 15% � 10% 10% 10% 5 10° 10% 5% 5% m % 0% 0 5% % Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr 20% 20% Final 2015: 20% 5% 5% ■ May Jun. m =Water Year 2012 m =Water Year 2013 m mWater Year 2014 m =Water Year 2015 m mWater Year 2016 Final 2014: 5% 0 °0 500 0 x U 400 Q rn a� 300 �L 0 200 c 100 CL 0 CA Population Total SWP Deliveries +CRA Deliveries to MWD +CRA Deliveries to CA SWP Allocation % Vs. Station 8 Accumulated Rainfall SWP been 100%tonceshnethe 100% 100% year2000 90% 100% 100% 90% 90% 90% so% 100% 80% 70% 70% 65% 65% 60% 60% cc p 50% 50% so% 45% >Q 40% 39% 40% 35% 209 30% 30% 35% (n Due to drought conditions and California 20°/ population growth Southern California is o receiving very little waterfrom the State Water Natural Accumulated Run Project. 10% Off 0% -7--7- . 5% 'ON q OjN NN =Station 8 Accumulated Rainfall (Inches) —SWP Allocation % 55 50 0 45 40 c 35 3 Q 30 ao 25 L 20 cc U 15 100 90 80 O Z 70 a 60 0 o a� M 50 .Q tts O O L L 30 ° 20 U 10 0 Q °IS MU RIET NICIPAL O.C. Basin Accumulated Overdraft WPTECa T OF °RPNGE Annual, 1969 to Present GCI.JNTY IM 384,000 AF end of February 50,000 Basin Full in 1969 2016 100,000 150,000 z P ht' 200,000 w 250,000 Q 300,000 350,000 400,000 450,000 500,000 Ol O a-I N M Ln lD r, co cn O a-I N M Ln lD r, co cn O a-I N M Ln lD r, co Ol O a-I N M Ln lD r, co cn O a-I N M Ln lD �D I� n n n n n n n n n W 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol O O O O O O O O O O a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol M M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Accumulated Overdraft (dewatered volume)shown as white area,excluding the volume stored by Metropolitan.source:OCWD MUNICIPAL OFSTGi1GT OF ORANGE 50,000 r 100,000 r� 150,000 200,000 d L 250,000 Q 300,000 �1 1 1 350,000 � 400,000 450,000 O.C. Basin Accumulated Overdraft Vs. Annual Rainfall Stored Vol(AF) Annual, 1969 t0 Present D Dewatered Vol(AF) f `I —i i—Annual Rainfall(Inches) w Basin Full in 1969..'. i. 30 384,000 AF end of February 2016 ;1 �r 25 11 1 1 20 c 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I w 15 1 Q 1 1 10 ♦}� 5 500,000 I ° 0 cn O rq N M N l0 r, co cn O rq N M N l0 r, co cn O rq N M N l0 r, co cn O rq N M -* N l0 r, co cn O rq N M -* N l0 �O I� n n n n n n n n n W 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol O O O O O O O O O O a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I rq rq Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol M M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I rq rq N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Accumulated Overdraft (dewatered volume)shown as white area,excluding the volume stored by Metropolitan.source:OCWD -- -- MUNICIPAL O.C. Basin Accumulated Overdraft Vs. BPP % ®Stored redVo) WATER OFSTRICT of D Dewatered Vol(AF) ORANGE \ OOUNTY Annual,1999 to Present -c>- BPP% w A 90% 80%. 50,000 F 80% 75% 75. 75% 75% 100,000 %��. 69% �. �% 70` q *�' 70% F62 G] 150,000 60% 200,000 ' 50% v L 250,000 a a 40% y 300,000 30% 350,000 ' 400,000 20% 450,000 10% 500,000 0% Cn O a-I N M Ln W I, 00 Cn O a-I N M Ln W Cn O O O O O O O O O O a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I Cn O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a-I N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Accumulated Overdraft (dewatered volume)shown as white area,excluding the volume stored by Metropolitan.source:OCWD 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 v v L 250,000 `U Q 300,000 350,000 400,000 450,000 500,000 Ql Ql Ql a-I MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT pF ORANGE COI..INTY O.C. Basin Accumulated Overdraft Vs. Annual Rainfall Annual, 1999 to Present D Dewatered Vol(AF) E \ —i)—Annual Rainfall(Inches) Iwo 30 O a-I N M N W 1, 00 Cn O a-I N M N W O O O O O O O O O O a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ^'Accumulated Overdraft (dewatered volume)shown as white area,excluding the volume stored by Metropolitan.source:OCWD 25 20 C w C 15 m C C C Q 10 5 0 Jan 02 Jan 03 Jan 04 Jan 05 Jan 06 Jan 07 Jan 08 Jan 09 Jan 10 Jan 11 Jan 12 Jan 13 Jan 14 Jan 15 Jan 16 Jan 17 Jan 18 Lake Mead Levels: Historical and Projected __ MUNICIPAL olsTp;CT OF ORANGE 1,180 projection per USBR 24-Month Study ■ Historical El Projected 1,170 1,160 1,150 1,140 1,130 LL 0 1,120 f6 w 1,110 W 1,100 1,090 Shortage Trigger=1,075 ft 1,080 1,070 1,060 1,050 Jan 02 Jan 03 Jan 04 Jan 05 Jan 06 Jan 07 Jan 08 Jan 09 Jan 10 Jan 11 Jan 12 Jan 13 Jan 14 Jan 15 Jan 16 Jan 17 Jan 18 1,250 1,200 1,150 Q) LL 1,100 0 a 1,050 0 a� - 1,000 950 • II Lake Mead Historical Water Elevation Level Historic Peak July 1983 @ 1,225 Feet _ - MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY ',�35 ��p�0 ti°�� c�0 ',�c�5 ti°�� ti96� ',�� ',9g' ti()a� �OJOP ti°�(), �0p0 �0p' 20ti0 'L�tiS