Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-05-09 - Board of Directors Meeting Agenda Packet AGENDA YORBA LINDA WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING Thursday, May 9, 2013, 8:30 AM 1717 E Miraloma Ave, Placentia CA 92870 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL Gary T. Melton, President Robert R. Kiley, Vice President Michael J. Beverage Ric Collett Phil Hawkins 4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS Any individual wishing to address the Board is requested to identify themselves and state the matter on which they wish to comment. If the matter is on the agenda, the Board will recognize the individual for their comment when the item is considered. No action will be taken on matters not listed on the agenda. Comments are limited to matters of public interest and matters within the jurisdiction of the Water District. Comments are limited to five minutes. 6. SPECIAL RECOGNITION 6.1. Recognition of Employees for Their Service to the District · Jorge Lopez, Maintenance Distribution Operator II (5 Years) · Cody Nottingham, Maintenance Distribution Operator II (5 Years) · Matt Ostiz, Maintenance Worker I (5 Years) · Cheryl Kielty, Customer Service Representative II (15 Years) 6.2. Recognize Staff for Receipt of Distinguished Budget Presentation Award for FY 2012/13 from the Government Finance Officers Association 7. COMMITTEE REPORTS 7.1. Citizens Advisory Committee (Beverage) · Minutes of meeting held April 22, 2013 at 8:30 a.m. · Meeting scheduled May 20, 2013 at 8:30 a.m. 8. CONSENT CALENDAR All items listed on the consent calendar are considered to be routine matters, status reports, or documents covering previous Board instructions. The items listed on the consent calendar may be enacted by one motion. There will be no discussion on the items unless a member of the Board, staff, or public requests further consideration. 8.1. Minutes of the Board of Directors Workshop Meeting held April 18, 2013 Recommendation: That the Board of Directors approve the minutes as presented. 8.2. Minutes of the Board of Directors Special Meeting held April 19, 2013 Recommendation: That the Board of Directors approve the minutes as presented. 8.3. Minutes of the Board of Directors Regular Meeting held April 25, 2013 Recommendation: That the Board of Directors approve the minutes as presented. 8.4. Payments of Bills, Refunds, and Wire Transfers Recommendation: That the Board of Directors ratify and authorize disbursements in the amount of $605,622.15. 8.5. Progress Payment No. 1 for the Yorba Linda Blvd. Pump Station Project Recommendation: That the Board of Directors approve Progress Payment No. 1 in the net amount of $80,197.10 to ECI, Inc. for construction of the Yorba Linda Blvd. Pump Station Project, Job No. 2008-17B. 8.6. Investment Report for Period Ending March 31, 2013 Recommendation: That the Board of Director's receive and file the Investment Report for the Period Ending March 2013. 9. ACTION CALENDAR This portion of the agenda is for items where staff presentations and Board discussions are needed prior to formal Board action. 9.1. Approval of Change Order No. 1 for the 2012 Waterline Replacement Phase II Project Recommendation: That the Board of Directors approve Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $29,764.11 and no additional days to TBU Construction Inc., for construction of the 2012 Waterline Replacement Phase II Project, Job No. 2011-20. 9.2. Draft 2013 Water Quality Report Recommendation: That the Board of Directors approve the 2013 Water Quality Report and authorize staff to make this report available on the District's website pursuant to the new State and Federal law regarding CCR's electronic delivery. 9.3. Implementation of a Consolidated Storage and Backup Solution Recommendation: That the Board of Directors authorize the Acting General Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with MR2 Solutions in the amount of $69,976.87, for the hardware, software and installation costs for a Consolidated Storage and Backup Solution. 9.4. Award of Contract for Operations and Efficiency Study Recommendation: That the Board of Directors approve a Professional Services Agreement with Koff & Associates, Inc., for preparation of an Operations and Efficiency Study, for a total fee not to exceed $31,900, in accordance with the attached proposal, dated March 18, 2013, and updated project schedule dated April 23, 2013. 9.5. Adopting a Public Investment Policy Recommendation: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 13-06 Setting Forth a Public Funds Investment Policy and Rescinding Resolution No. 11-24. 10. DISCUSSION ITEMS This portion of the agenda is for matters that cannot reasonably be expected to be concluded by action of the Board of Directors at the meeting, such as technical presentations, drafts of proposed policies, or similar items for which staff is seeking the advice and counsel of the Board of Directors. Time permitting, it is generally in the District’s interest to discuss these more complex matters at one meeting and consider formal action at another meeting. This portion of the agenda may also include items for information only. 10.1. Well #18 Engine Overhaul 11. REPORTS, INFORMATION ITEMS, AND COMMENTS 11.1. President's Report 11.2. Directors' Report · Anaheim Water Sustainability Campus Dedication Ceremony - May 7, 2013 (Kiley) 11.3. Acting General Manager's Report 11.4. General Counsel's Report 11.5. Future Agenda Items and Staff Tasks 12. COMMITTEE REPORTS CONTINUED 12.1. Executive-Administrative-Organizational Committee (Melton/Kiley) · Meeting scheduled May 21, 2013 at 4:00 p.m. 12.2. Finance-Accounting Committee (Hawkins/Melton) · Minutes of meeting held April 22, 2013 at 12:00 p.m. · Meeting scheduled May 31, 2013 at 8:30 a.m. 12.3. Personnel-Risk Management Committee (Collett/Beverage) · Minutes of meeting held May 8, 2013 at 4:00 p.m. (To be provided at the next regular Board meeting.) · Meeting scheduled May 14, 2013 at 4:00 p.m. 12.4. Planning-Engineering-Operations Committee (Kiley/Hawkins) · Minutes of meeting held May 6, 2013 at 4:00 p.m. (To be provided at the next regular Board meeting.) · Meeting scheduled June 6, 2013 at 3:00 p.m. 12.5. Public Affairs-Communications-Technology Committee (Beverage/Collett) · Minutes of meeting held May 7, 2013 at 4:00 p.m. (To be provided at the regular Board meeting.) · Meeting scheduled May 22, 2013 at 3:00 p.m. 12.6. YLWD-City of Placentia Joint Agency Committee (Melton/Hawkins) · Meeting scheduled June 17, 2013 at 9:30 a.m. 12.7. YLWD-City of Yorba Linda Joint Agency Committee (Kiley/Beverage) · Minutes of meeting held April 17, 2013 at 6:00 p.m. (To be provided at the next regular Board meeting.) · Meeting scheduled June 19, 2013 at 6:00 p.m. 12.8. YLWD-MWDOC-OCWD Joint Agency Committee (Beverage/Melton) · Meeting scheduled May 28, 2013 at 4:00 p.m. 13. INTERGOVERNMENTAL MEETINGS 13.1. MWDOC/MWD Workshop Board - May 1, 2013 (Melton/Staff) 13.2. OCWD Board - May 1, 2013 (Kiley) 13.3. WACO - May 3, 2013 (Hawkins/Kiley) 13.4. YL City Council - May 7, 2013 (Kiley) 14. BOARD OF DIRECTORS ACTIVITY CALENDAR 14.1. Meetings from May 10, 2013 - June 30, 2013 15. CLOSED SESSION The Board may hold a closed session on items related to personnel, labor relations and/or litigation. The public is excused during these discussions. 15.1. Conference with Legal Counsel – Pending Litigation Pursuant to Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9 of the California Government Code Name of Case: ACWA/JPIA, et al. vs. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, et al. (OC Superior Court - Case No. 00486884) 15.2. Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation Significant Exposure to Litigation Pursuant to Paragraph (2) of Subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9 of the California Government Code Related to Line Break at 1301 North Rose Drive, Placentia CA 92870 Number of Potential Cases: One 16. ADJOURNMENT 16.1. The next Regular Board of Directors Meeting will be held Thursday, May 23, 2013 at 8:30 a.m. Items Distributed to the Board Less Than 72 Hours Prior to the Meeting Pursuant to Government Code section 54957.5, non-exempt public records that relate to open session agenda items and are distributed to a majority of the Board less than seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting will be available for public inspection in the lobby of the District’s business office located at 1717 E. Miraloma Avenue, Placentia, CA 92870, during regular business hours. When practical, these public records will also be made available on the District’s internet website accessible at http://www.ylwd.com/. Accommodations for the Disabled Any person may make a request for a disability-related modification or accommodation needed for that person to be able to participate in the public meeting by telephoning the Executive Secretary at 714-701-3020, or writing to Yorba Linda Water District, P.O. Box 309, Yorba Linda, CA 92885-0309. Requests must specify the nature of the disability and the type of accommodation requested. A telephone number or other contact information should be included so the District staff may discuss appropriate arrangements. Persons requesting a disability-related accommodation should make the request with adequate time before the meeting for the District to provide the requested accommodation. ITEM NO. 7.1 AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: May 9, 2013 Subject:Citizens Advisory Committee (Beverage) · Minutes of meeting held April 22, 2013 at 8:30 a.m. · Meeting scheduled May 20, 2013 at 8:30 a.m. ATTACHMENTS: Name:Description:Type: 042213_-_CAC_Minutes.docx CAC Mtg Minutes 04/22/13 Backup Material 1 MINUTES OF THE YORBA LINDA WATER DISTRICT CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING Monday, April 22, 2013 8:30 a.m. 1717 E Miraloma Ave, Placentia CA 92870 1. CALL TO ORDER The April 22, 2013 meeting of the Yorba Linda Water District’s Citizens Advisory Committee was called to order by Chair Daniel Mole at 8:30 a.m. The meeting was held in the Training Room at the District’s Administration Building located at 1717 East Miraloma Avenue, Placentia, California 92870. 2. ROLL CALL COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT Daniel Mole, Chair Bill Guse Rick Buck, Vice Chair Fred Hebein Lindon Baker Joe Holdren Carl Boznanski Modesto Llanos Oscar Bugarini, Sr. Cheryl Spencer-Borden YLWD DIRECTORS PRESENT YLWD STAFF PRESENT Michael J. Beverage, Director Steve Conklin, Acting General Manager Damon Micalizzi, Public Information Officer OTHER VISITORS Mark Shock 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS Mr. Mole suggested that the District look into having consultants and contractors carry identification or credentials that identify them as doing official work for the District, as residents are being extra vigilant in the wake of recent burglaries in North Orange County. Mr. Shock announced that he attended the Joint Agency meeting between the City of Yorba Linda and the District on April 17th and noted that he was pleased to see the two entities collaborate for the better of the Community. Some discussion ensued regarding the items considered and discussed by the Joint Committee including the Cielo Vista / Esperanza Hills Developments. Mr. Shock also mentioned that he attended MWDOC’s State Water Project Inspection Trip and suggested that Committee Members take advantage of future opportunities to attend. Mr. Micalizzi informed the Committee that the Southern California Edison will be sending a representative to the Board meeting on April 25th to provide an update 2 on the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station and potential energy issues for the upcoming summer months. The Committee was encouraged to attend. Ms. Borden requested that the Committee be provided monthly updates on current projects. The Committee will now receive via e-mail the monthly status report on projects, prepared for the Planning-Engineering-Operations Committee. 4. PRESENTATIONS 4.1. YLWD Public Affairs – 2013 and Beyond Mr. Micalizzi presented to the Committee a recap of the District’s Public Affairs accomplishments over the past year. This included a look at some of the initiatives, as well as a synopsis of the District’s strategic communications plan for the future, highlighting the importance of the CAC in assisting the District with disseminating information and educating the community on issues pertaining to water supply locally and regionally. The Committee suggested the District remind the public that District Board Meetings are videotaped and audio-recorded and that copies of these are available upon request. 5. DISCUSSION ITEMS 5.1. Committee Structure and Bylaws Mr. Mole opened a discussion about the future of the CAC. After some discussion, the Committee decided to collaborate via email about several matters over the next months, including the number of Committee members, whether or not to impose term limits and mandates for attendance. The Committee will revisit this item in the coming meetings and implement any changes when the District moves into the next Fiscal Year. The Committee once again reviewed their Mission Statement and post Mr. Micalizzi’s presentation, looked ahead at pending items that will be coming before the Committee, as well as the CAC’s role in providing feedback to the Board and assisting with informing the greater Community. 5.2. Rescheduling of May CAC Meeting With the next CAC Meeting scheduled to fall on a District holiday, Director Beverage proposed that the next meeting be moved forward one week, to May 20th, so that the Committee could receive a presentation on the draft budget and provide input before it is presented for final approval to the Board. The Committee unanimously approved this scheduling change. 5.3. Future Agenda Items Budget for FY 2013/14 OCTA Lakeview Grade Separation Project Organizational and Efficiency Study Findings 3 6. ADJOURNMENT 6.1. The meeting was adjourned at 10:45 a.m. The next Citizens Advisory Committee meeting is scheduled to be held Monday, May 20, 2013 at 8:30 a.m. ITEM NO. 8.1 AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: May 9, 2013 Subject:Minutes of the Board of Directors Workshop Meeting held April 18, 2013 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors approve the minutes as presented. ATTACHMENTS: Name:Description:Type: 041813_BOD_Workshop_-_Minutes.doc BOD Mtg Minutes 04/18/13 Minutes Approved by the Board of Directors of the Yorba Linda Water District 5/9/2013 RC/RK 5-0 1 MINUTES OF THE YORBA LINDA WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS WORKSHOP MEETING Thursday, April 18, 2013, 8:30 a.m. 1717 E Miraloma Ave, Placentia CA 92870 1. CALL TO ORDER The April 18, 2013 Yorba Linda Water District Board of Directors Workshop Meeting was called to order by President Melton at 8:30 a.m. The meeting was held in the Board/Training Room at the District’s Administration Building located at 1717 East Miraloma Avenue in Placentia, California 92870. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE President Melton led the pledge. 3. ROLL CALL DIRECTORS PRESENT STAFF PRESENT Gary T. Melton, President Steve Conklin, Acting General Manager Robert R. Kiley, Vice President John DeCriscio, Acting Operations Manager Michael J. Beverage Gina Knight, HR and Risk Manager Ric Collett Stephen Parker, Finance Manager Phil Hawkins Art Vega, Acting IT Manager Damon Micalizzi, Public Information Officer Cindy Botts, Management Analyst Annie Alexander, Executive Secretary ALSO PRESENT Gene Hernandez, Councilmember, City of Yorba Linda 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS None. 5. DISCUSSION ITEMS 5.1. Budget Workshop Presentation for FYs 2013/14 thru 2016/17 Mr. Conklin opened the presentation, describing the status of the draft proposed budget at this time, the forecast for the next two fiscal years, and that borrowing may be needed, along with further rate increases starting in FY 2015/16. Mr. Parker continued the presentation, describing budget assumptions and the various elements that make up the budget. A brief recess was declared at 10:40 a.m. The meeting was reconvened at 10:50 a.m. Following an extensive discussion, the Board directed staff to use the District’s existing $7 million Line of Credit to pay for charges relating to 2 capital improvement projects in progress, and to notify the Board when the Line of Credit has been drawn down to approximately $4 million. Further, the Board requested staff to return to the May 23, 2013 regular Board meeting and further discuss the request to fund and hire a Safety Officer. At that same meeting, staff will present the draft budget document for FY 2013/14, with the goal of bringing the final budget document to the Board for approval on June 13, 2013. 6. ADJOURNMENT 6.1. The meeting was adjourned at 11:37 a.m. A Special Board of Directors Meeting has been scheduled Friday, April 19, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. The next Board of Directors regular meeting will be held Thursday, April 25, 2013 at 8:30 a.m. Steve Conklin Board Secretary ITEM NO. 8.2 AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: May 9, 2013 Subject:Minutes of the Board of Directors Special Meeting held April 19, 2013 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors approve the minutes as presented. ATTACHMENTS: Name:Description:Type: 041913_BOD_Special_-_Minutes.doc BOD Mtg Minutes 04/19/13 Minutes Approved by the Board of Directors of the Yorba Linda Water District 5/9/2013 RC/RK 5-0 1 MINUTES OF THE YORBA LINDA WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS SPECIAL MEETING Friday, April 19, 2013, 2:00 p.m. 1717 E Miraloma Ave, Placentia CA 92870 1. CALL TO ORDER The April 19, 2013 Special Meeting of the Yorba Linda Water District Board of Directors was called to order by President Melton at 2:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Training Room at the District’s Administration Building located at 1717 East Miraloma Avenue in Placentia, California 92870. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE President Melton led the pledge. 3. ROLL CALL DIRECTORS PRESENT STAFF PRESENT Gary T. Melton, President Steve Conklin, Acting General Manager Robert R. Kiley, Vice President Art Vega, Acting IT Manager Michael J. Beverage Annie Alexander, Executive Secretary Ric Collett Phil Hawkins OTHER ATTENDEES Kurt Sjoberg, Principal, Sjoberg Evashenk Consulting, Inc. Georg Krammer, Chief Executive Officer, Koff & Associates, Inc. Katie Kaneko, President, Koff & Associates, Inc. 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS None. 5. ACTION CALENDAR 5.1. Operations and Efficiency Study Consultant Interviews Mr. Sjoberg introduced himself and provided the Board with an overview of his background and work experience. He also spoke about other members of the project team including his partner, Ms. Marianne Evashenk, and Ms. Lynda McCallum, the firms Project Manager. Mr. Sjoberg then explained the firm’s approach to the project. The first phase would primarily consist of information gathering which would take approximately 3 weeks to complete and cost 20-25% of the District’s total budget for the project. The firm would present its results to the Board along with recommended areas of focus. The Board would then be asked to provide direction as to which areas or issues the firm should concentrate on during the second phase of the project. Following completion of this phase, the resulting product would be a work plan listing short-, mid- and long-term goals for improvement and increased efficiency 2 within the District. Mr. Sjoberg then responded to questions from the Board regarding matters that would be examined during the first phase, the interview process, the number of other projects the firm was currently working on, and the time and budget estimated to complete the second phase. Mr. Sjoberg left the meeting following his presentation. A recess was declared at 3:20 a.m. The meeting was reconvened at 3:25 p.m. Ms. Kaneko and Mr. Krammer joined the meeting and began their presentation. They took turns introducing themselves and provided an overview of their individual background and work experience. They also provided additional background information regarding the other members of their project team. Ms. Kaneko and Mr. Kramer explained the firm’s approach to the project including data collection, the interview and survey process, review and comparison of the District’s organizational structure, and implementation of the resulting recommendations. They both then responded to questions from the Board regarding the interview process, the number of other projects the firm was currently working on, and the time and budget estimated to complete the project. Ms. Kaneko and Mr. Krammer left the meeting following their presentation. The Board and staff then discussed the proposals presented by the two firms as well as their qualifications, focus, and cost estimates for completion of the study. Following this discussion, it was the consensus of the majority of the Board to select Koff & Associates to perform the study. Director Collett made a motion, seconded by Director Kiley, determining that Koff & Associates was the firm most qualified to prepare the Study, directing staff to meet with the firm to negotiate the final scope and fee for the Study, and to return to the Board for consideration of award of a Professional Services Agreement for preparation of the Study. Motion carried 5-0. 6. ADJOURNMENT 6.1. The meeting was adjourned at 4:35 p.m. The next Regular Board of Directors Meeting will be held Thursday, April 25, 2013 at 8:30 a.m. Steve Conklin Board Secretary ITEM NO. 8.3 AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: May 9, 2013 Subject:Minutes of the Board of Directors Regular Meeting held April 25, 2013 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors approve the minutes as presented. ATTACHMENTS: Name:Description:Type: 042513_BOD_-_Minutes.doc BOD Mtg Minutes 04/25/13 Minutes Approved by the Board of Directors of the Yorba Linda Water District 5/9/2013 RC/RK 5-0 1 MINUTES OF THE YORBA LINDA WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING Thursday, April 25, 2013, 8:30 a.m. 1717 E Miraloma Ave, Placentia CA 92870 1. CALL TO ORDER The April 25, 2013 Regular Meeting of the Yorba Linda Water District Board of Directors was called to order by President Melton at 8:30 a.m. The meeting was held in the Board Room at the District’s Administration Building located at 1717 East Miraloma Avenue in Placentia, California 92870. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE President Melton led the pledge. 3. ROLL CALL DIRECTORS PRESENT STAFF PRESENT Gary T. Melton, President Steve Conklin, Acting General Manager Robert R. Kiley, Vice President John DeCriscio, Operations Manager Michael J. Beverage Gina Knight, HR and Risk Manager Ric Collett Stephen Parker, Finance Manager Phil Hawkins Art Vega, Acting IT Manager Damon Micalizzi, Public Information Officer Annie Alexander, Executive Secretary ALSO PRESENT Eddy Beltran, Senior Counsel, Kidman Law LLP Pat Buttress, Government Affairs Manager, Southern California Edison Mark Schock 4. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA None. 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments made at this time. Mr. Conklin stated that he wanted to recognize Mr. DeCriscio as the District’s new Operations Manager. Mr. Conklin explained that Mr. DeCriscio had gone through the evaluation process and had been the unanimous choice of the outside review panel. Mr. Conklin stated that Mr. DeCriscio brought 20 years of experience with him and that he was thrilled that Mr. DeCriscio had chosen to accept the position. The Board congratulated Mr. DeCriscio on his promotion to this position. Mr. DeCriscio thanked the Board and Mr. Conklin for giving him this opportunity and provided a brief summary of his work history with the District. Mr. DeCriscio then concluded his comments and expressed his enthusiasm for being selected to serve in this new position. 2 6. PRESENTATIONS 6.1. San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) – Provided by Pat Buttress, Government Affairs Manager, Southern California Edison (SCE) Ms. Buttress introduced herself and provided an overview of her background and 29 years of work experience with SCE. She then provided the Board with a short video and PowerPoint presentation regarding grid reliability and the role that the San Onofre station plays in providing electricity throughout Southern California. Following the video, Director Beverage asked if staff could obtain a copy of the presentation to be shared with the District’s Citizen Advisory Committee. Ms. Buttress explained that while she may be unable to provide the District with a copy due to copyright concerns, she would be happy to provide the presentation to the Committee at a future meeting. Ms. Buttress continued her presentation and commented on the benefits of renewable power as well as the need for alternate power sources like the San Onofre station to help maintain an electrical base load. She noted that when this plant was on line, it provided 24% of the power used to serve SCE’s customers throughout the state. Combined with the Diablo Canyon plant in San Luis Obispo, these two nuclear facilities can provide 37% of the state’s electricity. Ms. Buttress then provided additional details related to the recent voluntary shutdown of Unit 3 at the San Onofre station and the considerable efforts being made to get the plant back online. Ms. Buttress concluded her presentation and responded to questions from the Board regarding the opinions of various legislators on the matter. The Board expressed their appreciation for Ms. Buttress’ presentation. 7. CONSENT CALENDAR Director Beverage requested to remove Item No. 7.4. from the Consent Calendar. Director Beverage made a motion, seconded by Director Kiley, to approve the remainder of the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0. 7.1. Minutes of the Board of Directors Regular Meeting held April 11, 2013 Recommendation: That the Board of Directors approve the minutes as presented. 7.2. Payments of Bills, Refunds and Wire Transfers Recommendation: That the Board of Directors ratify and authorize disbursements in the amount of $1,370,136.70. 3 7.3. Progress Payment No. 2 for the 2012 Waterline Replacement Project, Phase II Recommendation: That the Board of Directors approve Progress Payment No. 2 in the net amount of $416,052.50 to TBU, Inc. for construction of the 2012 Waterline Replacement Project, Phase II, Job No. 2011-20. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION 7.4. Terms and Conditions for Water and Sewer Service with the City of Yorba Linda Director Beverage asked for clarification as to why the construction cost of 540 feet of a 39” steel water main on the property was going to be at the District’s expense. Mr. Conklin explained that per a pre-annexation agreement between the District and the property owner (Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School District (PYLUSD)), YLWD would be responsible for the design and construction costs for relocation of the Bryant Cross Feeder pipeline prior to construction of a park on this land. This stipulation is not part of the Terms and Conditions being presented to the Board for consideration. Mr. Conklin further explained that the City of Yorba Linda was working in conjunction with PYLUSD on this project as the City plans to maintain the landscape following construction of the park. Director Collett made a motion, seconded by Director Hawkins, to approve the Terms and Conditions for Water and Sewer Service with the City of Yorba Linda, Job No. 201302. Motion carried 5-0. 8. ACTION CALENDAR 8.1. Sole-Source Proposal for Fairmont Booster Station Upgrade Project (FBSU) SCADA Integration Services Mr. Conklin explained that a critical part of this project was the SCADA integration services. Due to time constraints, this matter is being presented directly to the Board for consideration without prior review by the Planning-Engineering-Operations (PEO) Committee. Director Hawkins stated that the PEO Committee members had previously advised staff to continue to do what they could to move the FBSU project forward as quickly as possible. Director Beverage made a motion, seconded by Director Hawkins, to authorize execution of a Professional Services Agreement with RKI for a not-to-exceed amount of $35,000 to provide SCADA Integration Services for the FBSU Project, in accordance with RKI’s proposal of April 15, 2013. Motion carried 5-0. 9. REPORTS, INFORMATION ITEMS, AND COMMENTS 9.1. President’s Report President Melton did not have any comments at this time. 4 9.2. Directors’ Report MWD/MWDOC State Water Project Inspection Trip – April 12-13, 2013 (Collett) Director Collett reported on his attendance at this event and noted that it had been a very enlightening tour, especially in relation to the issues with the Delta. He also commended MWD on the maintenance of their facilities. 9.3. Acting General Manager’s Report Mr. Conklin stated that he had also had the opportunity to attend the MWD/MWDOC inspection trip last year. He then reported on the topics discussed during the initial Joint Agency Committee meeting with the City of Yorba Linda. The next Committee meeting has been scheduled for June 19, 2013 at 6:00 p.m. Mr. Conklin then reported on the status of negotiations with the firm selected to perform the District’s Operations and Efficiency Study. Staff plans to present a Professional Services Agreement with Koff & Associates (K&A) for consideration by the Board at the meeting on May 9, 2013. Staff has also requested a revised project schedule from K&A based on that start date. Mr. Conklin stated that the District would be participating in a business expo at Costco scheduled May 4, 2013. Staff will be providing an information booth and water station for the event. Mr. Micallizzi noted that even though the event is a fundraiser for the Children’s Miracle Network, the District was not charged an entrance fee as it is a public agency and would be providing bottled water for the event. Mr. Conklin further reported that Mr. Jim Wiezel, lead counsel for ACWA/JPIA, would be here April 26 to tour the District’s facilities in the Hidden Hills area. Mr. DeCriscio will lead the tour and will be accompanied by Mr. Andrew Gagen from Kidman Law LLP. Mr. Conklin concluded his report and asked Mr. DeCriscio to provide the Board with a status update of the repair work at the Placentia-Yorba Linda Hospital. Mr. DeCriscio explained that while putting in the service lines, staff had to hire a professional plumber to run some additional plumbing. During this process, a State inspector stopped by and requested that the District perform additional or “super-chlorination.” Staff expects to be able to bring the service back online on Friday following receipt and evaluation of the test results. Mr. Conklin then responded to questions from the Board regarding the working relationship between District and hospital staff. 9.4. General Counsel’s Report Mr. Beltran stated that he did not have anything to report and that the Closed Session would not be needed. 5 9.5. Future Agenda Items and Staff Tasks Director Kiley requested that a discussion regarding the District’s gift policy be added to the agenda for the next Executive-Administrative- Organizational Committee meeting. 10. COMMITTEE REPORTS 10.1. Executive-Administrative-Organizational Committee (Melton/Kiley) Minutes of the meeting held April 16, 2013 at 4:00 p.m. were provided in the agenda packet. Next meeting is scheduled to be held May 21, 2013 at 4:00 p.m. 10.2. Finance-Accounting Committee (Hawkins/Melton) Minutes of the meeting held April 22, 2013 at 12:00 p.m. will be provided at the next regular Board meeting. Date and time of meeting in May yet determined. (The next meeting was subsequently scheduled for May 31, 2013 at 8:30 a.m.) 10.3. Personnel-Risk Management Committee (Collett/Beverage) Minutes of the meeting held April 9, 2013 at 4:00 p.m. were provided in the agenda packet. Next meeting is scheduled to be held May 8, 2013 at 4:00 p.m. 10.4. Planning-Engineering-Operations Committee (Kiley/Hawkins) Minutes of the meeting held April 8, 2013 at 3:00 p.m. were provided in the agenda packet. Next meeting is scheduled to be held May 2, 2013 at 3:00 p.m. (This meeting was subsequently rescheduled to May 6, 2013 at 4:00 p.m.) 10.5. Public Affairs-Communications-Technology Committee (Beverage/Collett) Next meeting is scheduled to be held May 7, 2013 at 4:00 p.m. 6 10.6. YLWD-City of Placentia Joint Agency Committee (Melton/Hawkins) Date and time of meeting in May yet to be determined. 10.7. YLWD-City of Yorba Linda Joint Agency Committee (Kiley/Beverage) Minutes of the meeting held April 17, 2013 at 6:00 p.m. will be provided at the next regular Board meeting. Directors Beverage and Kiley provided a brief summary of the matters discussed during the meeting. Date and time of next meeting yet to be determined. (The next meeting was subsequently scheduled for June 19, 2013 at 6:00 p.m.) 10.8. YLWD-MWDOC-OCWD Joint Agency Committee (Beverage/Melton) Next meeting is scheduled to be held May 28, 2013 at 4:00 p.m. 10.9. Citizens Advisory Committee (Beverage) Minutes of the meeting held April 22, 2013 at 8:30 a.m. will be provided at the next regular Board meeting. Date and time of meeting in May yet to be determined. (The next meeting was subsequently scheduled for May 20, 2013 at 8:30 a.m.) 11. INTERGOVERNMENTAL MEETINGS 11.1. YL City Council – April 16, 2013 (Collett) Director Collett attended and remarked on two presentations related to wildfires provided during the meeting. The first was provided by the Orange County Fire Authority regarding Wildfire Awareness Week and the second was provided by an organization called Hills for Everyone regarding the history of fires in the wildfire interface zone. Director Collett further commented on a status update of the Cielo Vista/Esperanza Hills Project, the Landscape Maintenance Assessment District (LMAD), and City landscape easements in the Bryant Ranch area which were also discussed during the meeting. Director Kiley noted that at the Joint Agency Committee meeting with the City of Yorba Linda, Director Beverage had made the suggestion that a staff member be assigned as a District liaison to work with the LMAD Committee. 7 11.2. MWDOC Board – April 17, 2013 (Melton/Staff) Director Melton attended but did not have any District related business to report. 11.3. OCWD Board – April 17, 2013 (Staff) Mr. Conklin reported that staff had attended the meeting. During the meeting, the OCWD Board voted to set the Replenishment Assessment at $276 per acre foot and the Basin Production Percentage (BPP) at 70%. Mr. Conklin noted that if the BPP is raised to 75% as projected, it may help soften some of the opposition to the Environmental Impact Report for the District’s request for annexation. 11.4. YL Planning Commission – April 24, 2013 (Hawkins) Director Hawkins attended and commented on a presentation regarding future projects, including the construction of a gas station at Costco, which was provided during the meeting. 12. BOARD OF DIRECTORS ACTIVITY CALENDAR 12.1. Meetings from April 26, 2013 – May 31, 2013 The Board reviewed the activity calendar and made no changes. 13. CONFERENCES, SEMINARS, AND SPECIAL EVENTS 13.1. Anaheim Public Utilities Water Sustainability Campus Dedication Ceremony – May 7, 2013 Director Kiley expressed an interest in attending this event. Director Hawkins made a motion, seconded by Director Collett, to authorize Director attendance at this event if desired. Motion carried 5-0. (No Closed Session was held.) 14. CLOSED SESSION 14.1. Conference with Legal Counsel – Pending Litigation Pursuant to Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9 of the California Government Code Name of Case: ACWA/JPIA, et al vs. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, et al (OCSC – Case No. 00486884) 14.2. Conference with Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation Significant Exposure to Litigation Pursuant to Paragraph (2) of Subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9 of the California Government Code Related to Line Break at 1301 North Rose Drive, Placentia CA 92870 Number of Potential Cases: One 8 15. ADJOURNMENT 15.1. The meeting was adjourned at 9:47 a.m. The next Regular Board of Directors Meeting will be held Thursday, May 9, 2013 at 8:30 a.m. Steve Conklin Board Secretary ITEM NO. 8.4 AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: May 9, 2013 Budgeted:Yes To:Board of Directors Cost Estimate:$605,622.15 Funding Source:All Funds From:Steve Conklin, Acting General Manager Presented By:Stephen Parker, Finance Manager Dept:Finance Prepared By:Maria Trujillo, Accounting Assistant I Subject:Payments of Bills, Refunds, and Wire Transfers SUMMARY: Section 31302 of the California Water Code says the District shall pay demands made against it when they have been approved by the Board of Directors. Pursuant to law, staff is hereby submitting the list of disbursements for Board of Directors' approval. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors ratify and authorize disbursements in the amount of $605,622.15. DISCUSSION: The wire and major items on this disbursement list are as follows: A wire of $93,777.07 to ACWA/JPIA for May 2013 health premium; a check of $80,197.10 to Environmental Construction Inc for Yorba Linda Blvd Booster Station progress payment; and, a check of $48,073.48 to Southern California Edison for April services rendered on various sites. The balance of $154,787.54 is routine invoices. The Accounts Payable check register total is $376,835.19; Payroll No. 9 total is $228,786.96; and, the disbursements of this agenda report are $605,622.15. A summary of the checks is attached. STRATEGIC PLAN: FR 1-F: Continue to Record and Report the Fairly Stated Financial Activities of the District in a Timely and Transparent Manner to the Board of Directors and Member Agencies PRIOR RELEVANT BOARD ACTION(S): The Board of Directors approves bills, refunds and wire transfers semi-monthly. ATTACHMENTS: Name:Description:Type: CkReg50913_BOD.pdf Check Register Backup Material 13-CS_509.doc Cap Sheet Backup Material 13_CC_509.xls Credit Card Summary Backup Material Approved by the Board of Directors of the Yorba Linda Water District 5/9/2013 RC/RK 5-0 RC abstained from voting on the payment made to Placentia Disposal as listed on the Credit Card Summary as he has a financial interest with the vendor. . May 9, 2013 CHECK NUMBERS: Void Check 61100 $ (440.93) Computer Checks 61185—61254 $ 283,499.05 $ 283,058.12 WIRES: W-42613 ACWA/JPIA $ 93,777.07 TOTAL OF CHECKS AND WIRES $ 376,835.19 PAYROLL NO. 9: Direct Deposits $ 144,481.74 Third Party Checks 5563—5573 $ 44,803.14 Payroll Taxes $ 39,502.08 TOTAL OF PAYROLL $ 228,786.96 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DISBURSEMENT TOTAL: $ 605,622.15 ================================================================== APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MINUTE ORDER AT BOARD MEETING OF MAY 9, 2013 ==================================================================. Date Vendor Name Amount Description 04/16/13 Online Information Svcs 398.63 ONLINE Utility Exchange 04/16/13 Staples 1,220.38 Surface Pro Tablet 04/16/13 Home Depot 48.28 Rock Chips 04/17/13 AWWA 28.00 Dues Maldonado 04/17/13 Stefano's 42.16 Lunch/OPS Mgr Interview panel 04/18/13 PayPal 39.00 Webinar/Affordable Care HR-Hansen 04/18/13 Light Bulbs Etc 83.92 Light bulbs 04/18/13 Home Depot 48.28 Rock Chips 04/22/13 OCWD 1,500.00 OC Wtr Summ/Directors,Admin,CAC 04/22/13 Orange County Hose Co 2,076.60 Fire Hose etc 04/22/13 Westside Bldg Material 259.54 Chip brush etc 04/22/13 Harrington Industrial 1,066.17 CL2 parts 04/23/13 Cleverbridge Inc 99.95 Spector Pro software/Monitor PC 04/23/13 C.Wells Pipeline 1,890.66 Cla-Valve parts 04/23/13 Wells Supply 10.80 Gasket 04/24/13 Los Angeles Times 176.80 Delivery through 4/14 04/24/13 Costco Online 337.34 Coffee etc/District 04/24/13 Mail Finance 313.93 Postage meter lease May-Aug 04/24/13 Inland Group 3,911.31 Spring Newsletter 04/24/13 Placentia Disposal 480.66 Disposal March 04/24/13 Wells Supply 12,452.74 WHS stock Cal Card Credit Card U S Bank 04/16/2013-04/29/13 04/24/13 Wells Supply 12,452.74 WHS stock 04/29/13 Graybar 1,432.57 SCADA component 04/29/13 C.Wells Pipeline 277.56 Gasket 04/29/13 C.Wells Pipeline 49.14 Hydrant part TOTAL 28,244.42 ITEM NO. 8.5 AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: May 9, 2013 Budgeted:Yes Total Budget:$2.6M To:Board of Directors Cost Estimate:$2.3M Funding Source:All Water Funds From:Steve Conklin, Acting General Manager Account No:101-2700 Job No:200817B Presented By:Steve Conklin, Acting General Manager Dept:Engineering Reviewed by Legal:No Prepared By:Joe Polimino, Project Engineer CEQA Compliance:MND Subject:Progress Payment No. 1 for the Yorba Linda Blvd. Pump Station Project SUMMARY: Work has begun on the construction of the Yorba Linda Blvd. Pump Station Project. The project consists of three electric motor driven vertical turbine pumps, flow control valves, a motor control center, various yard piping and a new masonry block building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors approve Progress Payment No. 1 in the net amount of $80,197.10 to ECI, Inc. for construction of the Yorba Linda Blvd. Pump Station Project, Job No. 2008-17B. DISCUSSION: In accordance with the contract documents, ECI Inc. submitted a request for Progress Payment No. 1, in the amount of $84,418.00 for completed work through April 30, 2013. During this period, the contractor mobilized equipment on site, surveyed in various control points and began excavation of the building footing and transformer pad. They also began excavation for the pump cans and meter vault. The status of the construction contract with ECI Inc. is as follows: The current contract is $1,581,179.00 and 365 calendar days starting April 1, 2013. If approved, Progress Payment No. 1 is $84,418.00 (5.3% of the total contract amount), less 5% retention of $4,220.90 for a net payment of $80,197.10. If approved, total payments to date including retention will be $84,418.00 (5.3% of the total contract amount). As of April 30, 2013, 30 calendar days were used (8.2% of the contract time). Staff reviewed the contractor's progress payment and recommend approval. A copy of Progress Payment No. 1 is attached for your reference. PRIOR RELEVANT BOARD ACTION(S): On December 20, 2012, the Board of Directors authorized the President and Secretary to execute a construction agreement between Environmental Construction, Inc. (ECI), and the Yorba Linda Water District for the Construction of the Yorba Linda Blvd Pump Station Project in the amount of $1,581,179.00. ATTACHMENTS: Name:Description:Type: ECI_YL_Blvd._PS_Progress_Pay_Request_1.pdf ECI Progress Pay Request No 1 YL Blvd PS Project Backup Material Approved by the Board of Directors of the Yorba Linda Water District 5/9/2013 RC/RK 5-0 ITEM NO. 8.6 AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: May 9, 2013 To:Board of Directors From:Steve Conklin, Acting General Manager Presented By:Stephen Parker, Finance Manager Dept:Finance Prepared By:Delia Lugo, Senior Accountant Subject:Investment Report for Period Ending March 31, 2013 SUMMARY: Government Code Section 53607, et, seq., requires the person delegated to invest funds to make a quarterly report of the investments to the legislative body. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Director's receive and file the Investment Report for the Period Ending March 2013. DISCUSSION: Staff is submitting the Investment Report for the Period Ending March 2013 for your review and approval. This report ends the third quarter for FY 2012/13. The Investment Portfolio Report presents the market value and percent yield for all the District investments by institution. The Investment Report Summary includes budget and actual interest and average term portfolio information as well as market value broken out by reserve categories. The total average portfolio yield for the month of March 2013 was 0.66%. PRIOR RELEVANT BOARD ACTION(S): Investment reports are presented to the Board of Directors on a quarterly basis. The Investment Report for the Period Ending December 31, 2012, was received and filed by the Board of Directors on February 14, 2013. ATTACHMENTS: Name:Description:Type: Invst_Rpt_3-13.xlsx Investment Report for Period Ending March 2013 Backup Material Invst_Agenda_Backup_-Mar_2013.xlsx Investment Agenda Backup - March 2013 Backup Material Approved by the Board of Directors of the Yorba Linda Water District 5/9/2013 RC/RK 5-0 Market %Percent Value Cost of Total Institution Yield Checking Account: 117,495$ 117,495$ Wells Fargo Bank 117,495$ 117,495$ 0.70%Total0.00% Money Market Accounts: 54,950$ 54,950$ Wells Fargo Money Market0.05% 1,539,760 1,539,760 Bank of the West0.35% 1,594,710$ 1,594,710$ 9.45%Total0.34% Federal Home Loan Bank: 2,146,2522,147,096$ US Bank (2008 Bond Reserve)1.35% 2,146,252$ 2,147,096$ 12.71%1.35% Pooled Investment Accounts: 2,034,493$ 2,034,493$ Local Agency Investment Fund0.29% 740,874 740,874 CalTRUST Short Term0.30% 10,250,100 10,224,874 CalTRUST Medium Term0.67% 13,025,466$ 13,000,240$ 77.15%0.59% Yorba Linda Water District Investment Portfolio Report March 31, 2013 13,025,466$ 13,000,240$ 77.15%0.59% 16,883,923$ 16,859,542$ 100%Total Investments 0.66% Per Government Code requirements, the Investment Report is in compliance with the Yorba Linda Water District's Investment Policy, and there are adequate funds available to meet budgeted and actual expenditures for the next six months. 3/31/13 ________________________________ Delia Lugo, Senior Accountant Below is a chart summarizing the yields as well as terms and maturities for the month of March 2013: Avg. PortfolioAvg. Portfolio# of Month Yield WithoutYield WithDays to of 2013 CalTRUST CalTRUST Maturity March0.61%0.66%72 Below is are charts comparing operating fund interest for current and prior fiscal years. Actual Interest 3/31/20123/31/2013 Monthly - March 29,417$ 8,058$ Year-to-Date 189,289$ 85,729$ Budget 2011/20122012/2013 Interest Budget, March YTD 142,500$ 112,500$ Interest Budget, Annual 190,000$ 150,000$ Interest earned on investments is recorded in the fund that owns the investment. The distribution of investments in the portfolio both in dollars and as a percentage of the total portfolio by funds is as follows: February 2013% AllocMarch 2013% Alloc Fund DescriptionBalance2/28/2013Balance3/31/2013 Water Operating Reserve2,425,961$ 14.14%2,913,971$ 17.38% Water Emergency Reserve1,006,8045.87%1,007,5096.01% Water Capital Project Reserve 7,923,881 46.19%7,759,937 46.28% Investment Summary Report Investment Summary Comparison Between Current and Previous Month Water Capital Project Reserve 7,923,881 46.19%7,759,937 46.28% Water Reserve for Debt Service1,329,8817.75%619,3023.69% Maintenance Reserve187,0291.09%200,5291.20% COP Revenue Bond 2008 - Reserve2,164,39812.62%2,146,25212.80% Sewer Operating16,2310.09%16,2420.10% Sewer Emergency Reserve1,005,7975.86%1,006,5026.00% Sewer Capital Project Reserve1,095,4336.39%1,096,1846.54% 17,155,415$ 100.00%16,766,428$ 100.00% Water Operating186,157 (60,565) Sewer Operating154,692 178,060 340,849 117,495 Totals 17,496,264$ 16,883,923$ Wells Fargo Bank Checking ITEM NO. 9.1 AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: May 9, 2013 Budgeted:Yes Total Budget:$1.12 M To:Board of Directors Cost Estimate:$1.5 M Funding Source:Water Capital Reserves From:Steve Conklin, Acting General Manager Account No:101-2700 Job No:2011-20 Presented By:Steve Conklin, Acting General Manager Dept:Engineering Reviewed by Legal:No Prepared By:Joe Polimino, Project Engineer CEQA Compliance:Exempt Subject:Approval of Change Order No. 1 for the 2012 Waterline Replacement Phase II Project SUMMARY: Work is proceeding on construction of the 2012 Waterline Replacement Phase II Project. Submitted for consideration is construction Change Order No. 1. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors approve Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $29,764.11 and no additional days to TBU Construction Inc., for construction of the 2012 Waterline Replacement Phase II Project, Job No. 2011-20. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Planning-Engineering-Operations Committee will discuss this matter at its meeting scheduled May 6, 2013 and will provide its recommendation at the Board meeting. DISCUSSION: In accordance with the contract documents, TBU Construction, Inc. has submitted Change Order No. 1 due to changed additions and modifications, as well as District-initiated changes requested during the course of construction to date. A copy of Change Order No. 1 is attached for your review and details are provided below for items resulting in a substantial cost change to the contract. Item 1: While excavating the trench for the new waterline, at the location of Tamarisk Dr./ Fircrest Dr., the contractor encountered unforeseen wet soil conditions. The existing material proved to be too wet to use for backfill material, therefore, Class II material had to be purchased and imported for suitable pipeline backfill. The cost of this item is $10,923.47 and no additional days. Item 4: While reviewing the approved plans for the Cresthill PRV, the Operations Department requested the following changes be made to the design, for an additional $15,983.60 and no additional days: Requested upsized piping from 2” Copper to 4” Ductile Iron Pipe (DIP) to match existing piping arrangement and to maximize flow. Changed pipe material from Copper to DIP because of soil conditions in the area. Changed all 2” gate valves to 4” Gate valves to match upsized piping. Added a 4” Pressure Relief Valve at the downstream side of the PRS to replace and relocate an existing 4” Pressure Relief Valve, to protect 17 residences not protected before from high pressure that could damage existing house plumbing. Added vault vents, for ventilation to help prevent moisture buildup inside vault to protect piping from corrosion and added two pressure gauges for pressure readings of the upstream and downstream sides of the pressure reducing valve. The status of the construction contract with TBU Construction Inc. is as follows: The current contract is $1,359,300.11 and 370 calendar days starting February 1, 2013. If approved, Change Order No. 1 adds $29,764.11 (2.2% of the current contract amount) and 0 calendar days. If approved, the revised construction contract amount is $1,389,064.22 and 370 calendar days. Staff and RBF Engineers, the District's design engineer, reviewed the change order request items and recommend approval. STRATEGIC PLAN: SR 3-A: Complete Implementation of Five Year Capital Improvement Plan from FY 2011-2015 with adopted amendments PRIOR RELEVANT BOARD ACTION(S): The Board authorized the President and Secretary to execute a construction agreement in the amount of $1,359,300.11 for the 2012 Waterline Replacement Project, Phase II with TBU Inc., on November 21, 2012. The Board has approved two progress payments to date for this project, the last of which was approved on April 25, 2013. ATTACHMENTS: Name:Description:Type: Signed_CO_1_Cover_Sheet.pdf Change Order 1 TBU Construction, Phase II Project Backup Material Approved by the Board of Directors of the Yorba Linda Water District 5/9/2013 RK/RC 5-0 ITEM NO. 9.2 AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: May 9, 2013 Budgeted:Yes Total Budget:$900 To:Board of Directors Cost Estimate:$900 Funding Source:All Water Funds From:Steve Conklin, Acting General Manager Presented By:Steve Conklin, Acting General Manager Dept:Engineering Reviewed by Legal:N/A Prepared By:Derek Nguyen, Water Quality Engineer CEQA Compliance:N/A Subject:Draft 2013 Water Quality Report SUMMARY: Since 1990, California public water utilities have been required to provide annual water quality reports to their customers. This report is also known as the Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) which covers water quality testing and analysis from January to December of the previous calendar year. State and Federal laws require that this annual water quality report be provided to every customer by July 1 to ensure that customers are informed of the quality of their drinking water. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors approve the 2013 Water Quality Report and authorize staff to make this report available on the District's website pursuant to the new State and Federal law regarding CCR's electronic delivery. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Public-Affairs-Communications-Technology-Committee considered this item at its May 7, 2013 meeting and will provide its recommendation to the Board. DISCUSSION: State and Federal laws require that the District prepare an annual water quality report and make it available to its customers by July 1 of each year. This annual water quality report covers water quality monitoring, testing and analysis conducted from January to December of the previous calendar year. The purpose of this report is to inform customers of the quality of the water they are receiving. in March 2013, State and Federal laws allow electronic delivery of the annual water quality report. As a result, the District will save cost in printing and distribution and will make the report available via District's website. Hard copies of the report are still available upon request. In 2012, the District conducted over 23,000 analyses to ensure that its water met all State and Federal drinking water regulations. In some cases, the District goes beyond what is required by State and Federal laws, by providing additional monitoring for contaminants of concern. Staff is pleased to report that the District has never violated any drinking water regulation from both the State and Federal standards. Attached is a draft copy of the District's 2013 Water Quality Report. PRIOR RELEVANT BOARD ACTION(S): In May 2012, the Board of Directors approved and authorized distribution of the District's 2012 Water Quality Report to its customers. ATTACHMENTS: Name:Description:Type: 330685_WaterQualityReport_R1.pdf Backup Material Backup Material 000000_WaterQualityReport_Inside.pdf Backup Material Backup Material Approved by the Board of Directors of the Yorba Linda Water District 5/9/2013 MB/PH 5-0 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT Pr i n t e d o n r e c y c l e d p a p e r Yo r b a L i n d a W a t e r D i s t r i c t w i l l p r o v i d e r e l i a b l e , h i g h q u a l i t y w a t e r a n d s e w e r s e r v i c e s in a n e n v i r o n m e n t a l l y r e s p o n s i b l e m a n n e r , w h i l e m a i n t a i n i n g a n e c o n o m i c a l c o s t a n d un p a r a l l e l e d c u s t o m e r s e r v i c e t o o u r c o m m u n i t y . What are Water Quality Standards? Drinking water standards established by the U.S. EPA and CDPH set limits for substances that may affect consumer health or aesthetic qualities of drinking water. The chart in this report shows the following types of water quality standards. • Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): The highest level of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. Primary MCLs are set as close to the PHGs (or MCLGs) as is economically and technologically feasible. • Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level (MRDL): The level of a disinfectant added for water treatment that may not be exceeded at the consumer’s tap. • Secondary MCLs are set to protect the odor, taste, and appearance of drinking water. • Primary Drinking Water Standard: MCLs for contaminants that affect health along with their monitoring and reporting requirements and water treatment requirements. • Regulatory Action Level (AL): The concentration of a contaminant, which, if exceeded, triggers treatment or other requirements that a water system must follow. How are Contaminants Measured? The District samples and tests it water sources throughout the year. Contaminants are measured in: • Parts per million (ppm) or milligrams per liter (mg/l) • Parts per billion (ppb) or micrograms per liter (µg/l) • Parts per trillion (ppt) or nanograms per liter (ng/l) Parts per million: Parts per billion: Parts per trillion: 1 second in 12 days 1 second in 32 years 10 drops in a Rose Bowl-sized pool 1 penny in $10,000 1 penny in $10 million 1-second in 32,000 years 1 inch in 16 miles 1 inch in 16,000 miles 1 inch in 16 million miles What is a Water Quality Goal? In addition to mandatory water quality standards, U.S. EPA and CDPH have set voluntary water quality goals for some contaminants. Water quality goals are often set at such low levels that they are not achievable in practice and are not directly measurable. Nevertheless, these goals provide useful guidance and directions for water management practices. The chart in this report includes three types of water quality goals: • Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG): The level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MCLGs are set by U.S. EPA. • Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level Goal (MRDLG): The level of a disinfectant added for water treatment below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MRDLGs are set by U.S. EPA. • Public Health Goals (PHG): The level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. PHGs are set by the California Environmental Protection Agency – Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. Imported Water Assessment In December 2002, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) completed a source water assessment of its Colorado River and State Water Project supplies. Colorado River supplies are considered to be most vulnerable to contamination by recreational uses, urban/storm water runoff, industrial runoff, increasing urbanization in the watershed and wastewater contamination. State Water Project supplies are considered to be most vulnerable to urban/storm water runoff, and wildlife, agriculture, recreation and wastewater contamination. A copy of the assessment can be obtained by contacting MWD by phone at 213.217.6850 Groundwater Assessment The District completed an assessment of its Wells No. 1, 5, 7, 10, and 12 in January 1999. The wells are considered most vulnerable to contaminants produced by the following activities: gas stations; dry cleaners; metal plating/finishing/ fabricating plants; plastic/synthetic producers; underground injection of commercial/industrial discharges; underground storage tanks; agricultural drainage; fertilization, pesticide and herbicide application; automobile-body and repair shops; and chemical/petroleum processing/storage. YOUR 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT Since 1990, California public water utilities have been providing annual Water Quality Reports to their customers. This year’s report also known as the “Consumer Confidence Report,” covers water quality testing from January to December 2012. The Yorba Linda Water District’s annual Water Quality Report is prepared in compliance with the regulations called for in the 1996 reauthorization of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). The reauthorization charged the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) with updating and strengthening the tap water regulatory program. USEPA and the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) are the agencies responsible for establishing water quality standards. To ensure that your tap water is safe to drink, USEPA and CDPH prescribe regulations that limit the amount of certain contaminants in water provided by water systems. The State and Federal governments require that this annual water quality report be provided to every customer to insure that you are informed of the quality of your water. The District is committed to safeguarding its water supply and, as in years past, the water delivered to your home meets the standards required by the state and federal regulatory agencies. In 2012, we conducted over 23,000 analyses to ensure that your water is clean and safe to drink. We are proud to report that our water system has never violated any water quality standard from both the State and Federal drinking water regulations. In some cases, the District goes beyond what is required by providing additional monitoring for contaminants that may have health risks. We encourage you to read this report and to contact us with any questions you may have. Contaminants That May Be Present In Source Water: • Microbial contaminants, such as viruses and bacteria, which may come from sewage treatment plants, septic systems, agricultural livestock operations, and wildlife. Cryptosporidium is a microscopic organism that when ingested can cause diarrhea, fever, and other gastrointestinal maladies. The organism comes from animal and/or human waste and may be found in surface (imported) water. A standard treatment process that includes sedimentation, filtration, and disinfection can eliminate cryptosporidium contamination. • Pesticides and herbicides that may come from a variety of sources such as agriculture, urban storm water runoff and residential uses. • Inorganic contaminants, such as salts and metals that can be naturally occurring or result from urban storm water runoff, industrial or domestic wastewater discharges, oil and gas production, mining or farming. • Organic chemical contaminants, including synthetic and volatile organic chemicals that are by-products of industrial processes and petroleum production, and can also come from gas stations, urban storm water runoff, agricultural application and septic systems. • Radioactive contaminants that can be naturally occurring or be the result of oil and gas production and mining activities. To learn more about the potential health effects of contaminants listed in this report, call the EPA’s Safe Drinking Water Hotline at 1-800-426-4791 or by accessing the EPA’s internet web site at www.epa.gov/safewater WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT YOUR WATER, AND HOW IT MAY AFFECT YOU Water System Information Yorba Linda Water District is an independent special district that provides water and sewer service to most of the City of Yorba Linda and to portions of Anaheim, Brea, Placentia and unincorporated Orange County. For more information about the District or your water service, please call Water Quality Engineer Derek Nguyen at 714. 701.3115. The Yorba Linda Water District Board of Directors’ regularly scheduled meetings are held on the second and fourth Thursday of each month at 8:30 a.m. in the District boardroom located at 1717 E. Miraloma Avenue, Placentia, California 92870 Sources of Supply The District’s water supply is a blend of groundwater from our own wells and water imported from Northern California and the Colorado River by the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD). The source water for our wells is a natural aquifer that is replenished with water from the Santa Ana River, local rainfall and imported water. Managed by the Orange County Water District, the groundwater basin is approximately 350 square miles in area and lies beneath most Radon Advisory Radon is a radioactive gas that you cannot see, taste, or smell. It is found throughout the world. Radon can move through the ground and into homes through cracks and holes in the foundation. Radon can build up to high levels in all types of homes. Radon can also get into indoor air when released from tap water from showering, washing dishes, and other household activities. Compared to radon entering the homes through soil, radon entering the home through tap water will, in most cases, be a minor source of radon in indoor air. Radon is a known human carcinogen. Breathing air containing radon can lead to lung cancer. Drinking water containing radon may also cause increased risk of stomach cancer. If you are concerned about radon, test the air in your home. Testing is inexpensive and easy. You may want to consider modification to your home if the level of radon in your air is 4 picoCuries per liter of air (pCi/L) or higher. There are simple ways to fix a radon problem that are not too costly. For additional information, you can call the EPA’s Radon Hotline (800-SOS-Radon). The EPA proposed MCL for radon is 300 pCi/L. The proposal will provide flexibility to the states on how to limit exposure to radon by allowing states to focus efforts on the greatest radon risks-those in indoor air-while also reducing the risks from radon in drinking water. The states’ option for radon compliance is as follows: First Option: States can choose to develop enhanced state programs to address the health risks from radon in indoor air. These programs are known as Multimedia Mitigation (MMM) Programs. Individual water systems reduce radon levels in drinking water to 4,000 pCi/L or lower. EPA is encouraging states to adopt this option because it is the most cost effective way to achieve the greatest radon risk reduction. Second Option: If a state chooses not to develop an MMM program, individual water systems in that state would be required to either reduce radon in their system’s drinking water to 300 pCi/L or develop individual local MMM programs and reduce levels in drinking water to 4,000 pCi/L. Fluoride The District does not add fluoride to its groundwater supplies. Naturally occurring fluoride is present in the aquifer, but not at a level that provides dental health benefits. In 1995, the California Legislature passed a bill mandating that all large water agencies fluoridate their supplies, but only if the state or “somebody” provided the agencies with the funds to do so. To date, the state has not come up with the funds to implement fluoridation. MWD commenced fluoridation of the drinking water it supplies to Southern California in November of 2007. The District purchases approximately half of its water from MWD. Because of MWD’s decision and the District’s dual sources of water (groundwater and import), YLWD is faced with a situation where some of its customers will receive water fluoridated by MWD, some will receive non-fluoridated water, and some will receive a blend of fluoridated and non-fluoridated water. If you wish to know the approximate level of fluoride in your tap water, or specific water service area, please call Derek Nguyen, Water Quality Engineer, at 714.701.3115. Additional information about the fluoridation of drinking water can be found through the following sources:  • U.S, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1-888-CDC-2306   www.cdc.gov/Oralhealth/factsheet/fl-background.html  • American Dental Association www.ada.org/public/topics/fluoride/fluor-links.html  • American Water Works Association  www.awwa.org Special Risk Populations Some individuals may be more vulnerable to the effects of possible contaminants in drinking water than the general population. Persons who are undergoing chemotherapy, persons who have undergone organ transplants, some elderly persons, infants, persons infected with HIV/AIDS, or persons with other immune system disorders can be particularly at risk. These persons should seek advice from their health care providers about drinking water. The USEPA/Center for Disease Control guidelines on appropriate means to lessen the risks of infection by cryptosporidium or other microbial contaminants are available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline (1-800-426-4791). of northern and central Orange County. The Yorba Linda Water District and more than 20 cities and retail water districts pump from the groundwater basin to provide water to homes and businesses. Your water source depends on where you live or work within the boundaries of our community. To find out which water source is provided to your home or business, please visit the District’s website: http://www.ylwd.com. Local Groundwater (chlorine disinfection) The District obtains approximately half of its water supplies from wells located with- in the District. The District’s groundwater sources include: Well No. 1, Well No. 5, Well No. 7, Well No. 10, Well No. 12, Well No. 18 and Well No. 19, which are located within Placentia city limits; and Well No. 11, Well No. 15 and Well No. 20 which are located within Anaheim city limits Imported Water (chloramine disinfection) The District obtains the remainder of the water from local wholesaler Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC). MWDOC obtains water from regional supplier Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD). MWD obtains water from Northern California via the California Aqueduct, and from the Colorado River via the Colorado River Aqueduct. MWD owns and operates the Robert B. Diemer water treatment plant located just north of western Yorba Linda where the water is treated to meet drinking water standards. Basic Information about Drinking Water Contaminants The sources of drinking water (both public tap water and bottled water) include rivers, lakes, streams, ponds, reservoirs, springs, and groundwater. As water travels over the surface of the land or through the ground, it dissolves naturally occurring minerals and, in some cases, radioactive material. Water also picks up substances resulting from the presence of animals or from human activity. Drinking water, including bottled water, may reasonably be expected to contain at least small amounts of some contaminants. The presence of contaminants does not necessarily indicate that water poses a health risk. Chemical MCL PHG (MCLG) YLWD Average Groundwater Range of Detections Most Recent Sampling Date MCL Violations?Typical Source of Contaminant RADIOLOGICALS Gross Alpha (pCi/L)15 0 8.31 5.95 - 13.0 2012 No Erosion of natural deposits Uranium (pCi/L)20 0.43 8.27 6.68 – 12.80 2012 No Erosion of natural deposits Total Radon 222 (pCi/L) NS n/a ND ND – 449.0 2012 No “see note related to radon” Total Radium 228 (pCi/L)5 0.019 0.1 ND – 2.31 2012 No Erosion of natural deposits ORGANIC CHEMICALS Bromoform NS n/a 0.02 ND – 1.20 2012 No Chlorination of water Chloroform NS n/a 0.32 ND – 4.40 2012 No Chlorination of water INORGANIC CHEMICALS Arsenic (ppb)10 0.004 3.81 ND – 12.10 2012 No Erosion of natural deposits Barium 1000 2000 11.22 ND – 101.00 2012 No Erosion of natural deposits Fluoride (ppm)2 1 0.49 0.43 – 0.61 2012 No Erosion of natural deposits Perchlorate (ppb)6 6 2.5 ND – 3.46 2012 No Rocket fuel and military applications Nitrate as NO3 (ppm)45 45 9.77 4.10 – 13.69 2012 No Fertilizers, Septic Tanks Nitrate+Nitrite as N (ppm)10 10 2.21 0.92 – 3.10 2012 No Fertilizers, Septic Tanks SECONDARY STANDARDS Color (units)15 n/a 0.89 ND – 5.0 2012 No Natural Organic Materials Chloride (ppm)500*n/a 116.96 110.0 – 137.0 2012 No Erosion of natural deposits Manganese (ppb)50 n/a 8.96 ND – 97.50 2012 No Erosion of natural deposits Specific Conductance (µmho/cm)1600*n/a 1056.67 1010.0 – 1140.0 2012 No Erosion of natural deposits Sulfate (ppm)500*n/a 147.56 135.0 – 165.0 2012 No Erosion of natural deposits Total Dissolved Solids (ppm)1000*n/a 646.00 600.0 – 726.0 2012 No Erosion of natural deposits Turbidity (ntu)5*n/a 0.3 ND – 1.3 2012 No Erosion of natural deposits Odor (TON)3*n/a ND ND < 1 2012 No Natural Organic Materials Zinc (ppm)5*n/a ND ND – 161.0 2012 No Erosion of natural deposits UNREGULATED CONTAMINANTS REQUIRING MONITORING Alkalinity, total (ppm as CaCO3)n/r n/a 218.67 209.0 – 243.0 2012 No Erosion of natural deposits Bicarbonate (as HCO3) (ppm)n/r n/a 266.44 255.0 – 296.0 2012 No Erosion of natural deposits Boron (ppb)NL = 1000 n/a 0.26 0.21 – 0.29 2012 No Erosion of natural deposits Calcium (ppm)n/r n/a 99.77 85.10 – 122.0 2012 No Erosion of natural deposits Hardness, total (grains/gal)n/r n/a 19.0 17.8 – 21.5 2012 No Erosion of natural deposits Chromium 6 (ppb)n/a 0.02 0.1 0.2 – 1.0 2012 No Industrial discharge, natural deposits Hardness, total (ppm as CaCO3)n/r n/a 337.11 304.0 – 410.0 2012 No Erosion of natural deposits Total Organic Carbon (ppm)n/r n/a 1.02 0.76 – 1.57 2012 No Natural Organic Materials Magnesium (ppm)n/r n/a 21.36 18.40 – 24.90 2012 No Erosion of natural deposits pH (pH units)n/r n/a 7.81 7.60 – 7.90 2012 No Erosion of natural deposits Bromide (ppm)n/r n/a 0.16 0.14 – 0.20 2012 No Erosion of natural deposits Potassium (ppm)n/r n/a 5.32 4.50 – 8.10 2012 No Erosion of natural deposits Sodium (ppm)n/r n/a 91.84 84.80 – 103.00 2012 No Erosion of natural deposits Vanadium (ppb)50 n/a 3.67 3.10 – 4.50 2012 No Erosion of natural deposits ABBREVIATIONS: ppb = parts-per-billion; ppm = parts-per-million; pCi/L = picocuries per liter; ntu = nephelometric turbidity units; ND = not detected; n/a = not applicable; n/r = not regulated; < = average less than detection limit for reporting purposes; MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level; MCLG = federal MCL Goal; PHG = California Public Health Goal; TON = Threshold Odor Number; *Contaminant is regulated by a secondary standard to maintain aesthetic qualities (taste, odor, color). Disinfection-by-Products MCL (MRDL/MRDLG) Average Amount Range of Detections MCL Violations? Typical Source of Contaminant Chlorine Residual (ppm)(4/4)1.58 0.06 – 2.50 No Disinfectant Added for Treatment Haloacetic Acids (ppb)60 20.1 12.3 – 26.3 No Byproducts of Chlorine Disinfection Total Trihalomethanes (ppb) 80 49.8 38.2 – 60.6 No Byproducts of Chlorine Disinfection Aesthetic Quality Color (units)15*ND ND – 3.00 No Erosion of natural deposits Turbidity (ntu)5*0.11 ND – 1.21 No Erosion of natural deposits Odor (TON)3*ND ND – 1.00 No Erosion of natural deposits Microbiological Total Coliform (non-fecal coliform)5%ND ND No Naturally present in environment 2012 YORBA LINDA WATER DISTRICT DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM WATER QUALITY Chemical Action Level (AL) Health Goal 90th Percentile Value Sites Exceeding AL Sample AL Violation?Typical Source of Contaminant Lead (ppb)15 2 ND None No Internal corrosion of plumbing system, discharge from industrial manufacturers, erosion of natural deposits. Copper (ppm)1.3 0.17 0.48 None No Internal corrosion of plumbing system, discharge from industrial manufacturers, erosion of natural deposits. Chemical MCL PHG or (MCLG) Average Amount Range of Detections MCL Violation?Typical Source of Contaminant RADIOLOGICALS Alpha Radiation (pCi/L)15 (0)3.0 ND – 3.0 No Erosion of natural deposits Beta Radiation (pCi/L)50 (0)ND ND – 4.0 No Decay of natural and man-made deposits Uranium (pCi/L)20 0.43 2.0 ND – 2.0 No Erosion of natural deposits DISINFECTION-BY-PRODUCTS Total Trihalomethanes (ppb)80 n/a 45 40 – 50 No By-product of drinking water chlorination Haloacetic Acids (ppb)60 n/a 16 1.3 – 23 No By-product of drinking water chlorination Total Chlorine Residual (ppm)4 4 2.3 1.5 – 2.8 No Drinking water disinfectant added for treatment INORGANIC CHEMICALS Aluminum (ppb)200 600 150 ND – 340 No Residual from water treatment process; natural deposits erosion Arsenic (ppb)10 0.004 ND ND No Erosion of natural deposits, glass and electronic wastes Barium (ppb)1000 2000 ND ND No Erosion of natural deposits, oil and metal refineries discharge Fluoride (ppm)2 1 0.8 0.7– 0.8 No Water additive for dental benefits Perchlorate (ppb)6 6 ND ND No Industrial waste discharge Nitrate as Nitrogen (ppm)10 10 ND ND No Fertilizers, septic tank or natural deposits SECONDARY STANDARDS Chloride (ppm)500 n/a 90 87 - 93 No Natural deposits, seawater influence Color (units)15 n/a 1 ND - 1 No Naturally-occurring organic materials Odor Threshold (TON)3 n/a 2 ND - 2 No Naturally-occurring organic materials Specific Conductance (µS/cm)1600 n/a 780 340 - 930 No Substances form ions in water, seawater influence Sulfate (ppm)500 n/a 160 150 - 170 No Natural deposits, industrial wastes Total Dissolved Solids (ppm)1000 n/a 500 490 - 520 No Natural deposits, seawater influence Turbidity (NTU)5 n/a ND ND No Soil runoff UNREGULATED CHEMICALS Alkalinity (ppm)NL = 1000 n/a 98 53 - 120 No Naturally present in water Boron (ppb)NL = 1000 n/a 130 130 No Natural deposits, industrial wastes Calcium (ppm)n/a n/a 51 49 - 53 No Natural deposits Chlorate (ppb)NL = 800 n/a 55 ND - 80 No By-product of drinking water chlorination, industrial processes Chromium VI (ppb)n/a 0.02 ND ND No Industrial waste discharge, natural deposits Corrosivity (Al)n/a n/a 12.2 12.2 No Elemental balance in water, affected by temperature, other factors Hardness (ppm)n/a n/a 210 84 - 270 No Naturally dissolved minerals Magnesium (ppm)n/a n/a 21 21 No Natural deposits pH (pH Units)n/a n/a 8.1 7.9 – 8.4 No Hydrogen Ion Concentration Potassium (ppm)n/a n/a 4 4 No Natural deposits Sodium (ppm)n/a n/a 80 80 - 81 No Natural deposits Total Organic Carbon (ppm)n/a n/a 2.4 2.0 – 2.7 No Man-made and natural deposits Vanadium (ppb)NL = 50 n/a ND ND No Naturally-occurring, industrial discharge N-Nitrosodimethylamine NL = .01 0.003 ND ND – 6.7 No By-product of drinking water chloramination 2012 METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TREATED SURFACE WATER 2012 YORBA LINDA WATER DISTRICT GROUNDWATER QUALITY LEAD AND COPPER ACTION LEVELS AT RESIDENTIAL TAPS NOTE: Every three years, at least 37 residences are tested for lead and copper at-the-tap. The most recent set of samples were collected in September 2012. None of the samples collect- ed exceeded the Action Levels for both Lead and Copper. The regulatory action level is the concentration at which, if exceeded in more than ten percent of homes tested, triggers treatment or other requirements that a water system must follow. The Yorba Linda Water District complied with the lead and copper action levels. ABBREVIATIONS: AI = aggressive index; AL = action level; MCL = maximum contaminant level; MCLG = maximum contaminant level goal; n/a = not applicable; ND = not detected; NL = notification level; NTU = nephelometric turbidity units; NL = Notification Level; pCi/L = picocuries per liter; PHG = Public Health Goal; ppb = parts per billion or micro- grams per liter (µg/L); ppm = parts per million or milligrams per liter (mg/L); ppt = parts per trillion or nanograms per liter (ng/L); µS/cm = microSiemen per centimeter or micromho per centimeter (µmho/cm) ABBREVIATIONS AND FOOTNOTES: 8 locations in the distribution system are tested quarterly for total Trihalomethanes and Haloacetic acids; 37 locations are tested monthly for color, odor and turbidity. MRDL = Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level; ND = not detected; MRDLG = Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level Goal; ntu = nephelometric turbidity units; *Contaminant is regulated by a secondary standard to maintain aesthetic qualities (taste, odor, color). ABBREVIATIONS: AI = aggressive index; AL = action level; MCL = maximum contaminant level; MCLG = maximum contaminant level goal; n/a = not applicable; ND = not detected; NL = notification level; NTU = nephelometric turbidity units; NL = Notification Level; pCi/L = picocuries per liter; PHG = Public Health Goal; ppb = parts per billion or micrograms per liter (µg/L); ppm = parts per million or milligrams per liter (mg/L); ppt = parts per trillion or nanograms per liter (ng/L); µS/cm = microSiemen per centimeter or micromho per centimeter (µmho/cm) Vulnerability assessments of potential sources of contamination for Wells 11 and 15 were completed in April 2003. These groundwater sources are considered most vulnerable to the following activities not associated with detected contaminants: chemical/petroleum processing/storage; metal plating/finishing/fabricating; and plastics/synthetics production. A vulnerability assessment of potential sources of contamination for Well 19 and Well 18 were completed in May 2004 and September 2005, respectively. A vulnerability assessment study for Well 20 was completed in June 2011. The groundwater sources are considered most vulnerable to the following activities not associated with detected contaminants: gas stations; dry cleaners; metal plating/finishing/fabricating plants; plastic/synthetic producers; underground injection of commercial/industrial discharges; underground storage tanks; agricultural drainage; fertilization, pesticide and herbicide application; automobile-body and repair shops; sewer collection systems; food processing, and chemical/petroleum processing/storage. A copy of the complete assessment is available at Department Public of Health District Office at 605 West Santa Ana Blvd., Building 28, Room 325, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Measurements In order to ensure that tap water is safe to drink, EPA and CDPH prescribe regulations that limit the amount of certain contaminants in water provided by public water systems. The tables below list all the drinking water contaminants that the District detected during the 2012 calendar year. The presence of these contaminants in the water does not necessarily indicate that the water poses a health risk. Unless otherwise noted, the data presented in this table is from testing done for the period January 1 through December 31, 2012. The CDPH requires monitoring for certain contaminants less often than every year because the concentrations of these contaminants are not expected to vary significantly from year to year. Thus, some of the data, though representative of current water quality, is more than one year old. The District contracts with state certified, independent laboratories to perform most of the District’s water quality testing. ITEM NO. 9.3 AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: May 9, 2013 Budgeted:Yes Total Budget:$70,000 To:Board of Directors Cost Estimate:$69,977 Funding Source:Water Operating Fund From:Steve Conklin, Acting General Manager Account No:1-0010-2120-00 Presented By:Art Vega, Acting IT Manager Dept:Information Technology Reviewed by Legal:Pending Prepared By:Rick Walkemeyer, SCADA Administrator CEQA Compliance:N/A Subject:Implementation of a Consolidated Storage and Backup Solution SUMMARY: For the Board's review and consideration is the Implementation of a Consolidated Storage and Backup Solution. This project was discussed in the IT Workshop held in December 2011 as a future project and budgeted this fiscal year under capital outlay. The benefits of this project would be: Improved performance reading data for servers Simplified and more reliable backups. Reduced cost for new servers using this storage method. The ability to quickly allocate more storage to a server when needed. A scalable solution in which more storage capacity can be readily added. A centralized more reliable data store with redundant components in case of failure. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors authorize the Acting General Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with MR2 Solutions in the amount of $69,976.87, for the hardware, software and installation costs for a Consolidated Storage and Backup Solution. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Public Affairs-Communications-Technology Committee will discuss this matter at its meeting scheduled May 7, 2013 and will provide its recommendation at the Board meeting. DISCUSSION: The District currently has multiple servers each hosting its own files/databases depending on its function. When a new server is purchased, the amount of storage needed to store files / databases needs to be determined. At times, this has been a problem as not enough storage was purchased and IT has to scramble for solutions. Furthermore, our current backup solution is nearing the end of expected useful life and no longer meets our needs. The District's file server, which stores shared District staff and departmental files, has had multiple storage failures in the past 2 years with multiple hard disks failing. IT staff on these occasions worked late into the next morning to replace and restore the files to ensure District staff would have access to these files. This file server was purchased in June 2005, is running out of space and is well past the end of expected useful life. With this proposed technology update, data would be stored in a centralized location in what is known as a Storage Area Network (SAN). The SAN would be used to store the files in the District's file server so the existing server can be retired from service. Further, when a new server is purchased, the storage needed for its files/databases would be allocated in the SAN. If the amount allocated is not enough, more can easily be allocated. When the SAN runs out of space, a new SAN can be purchased and stacked with existing, working as one storage solution. Using this method, servers will be able to obtain data faster, providing improved performance. Most District servers would be setup using this new method. Lastly, the backup solution would be directly connected to that SAN instead of multiple servers making this solution less complicated and more reliable. In order to determine the District's storage requirements and allowing for future growth, a storage- needs assessment was performed. Specialized software was used to monitor, calculate and assist District staff in determining storage needs. The storage-needs assessment findings were shared with four different IT consulting vendors, which offerred solutions from three different hardware vendors. IT staff discussed our needs with Nexus and their recommendation was the NetApp SAN and backup solution. MR2's recommendation was an EqualLogic SAN and a Dell backup and storage solution. Finally, Xiologix recommended EMC's VNCe series solution. Below are the cost quotes from the vendors for the purchase, installation and training of District IT staff in the use of the SAN. * Missing some of the required backup software. MR2 was able to provide the District with the best priced solution within our budget. They also seemed to better understand our needs compared to the other vendors. District IT staff is also more familiar with their solution. As such, MR2 Solutions is the recommended provider. Should the PACT Committee support Staff's recommendation followed by Board approval on May 9, the goal would be to complete the implementation of this solution by the end of this fiscal year, June 30 2013. Staff believes this a achievable, subject to committee and Board approval. Quote From: Item Total Cost: Nexus *NetApp FAS2220 HA, $ 79,644.01 MR2 Solutions EqualLogic PS6100X, AppAssure Backup software for VMware & servers, Dell DL2200 Backup-storage. $ 69,976.87 XioLogix *EMC VNCe3150,Veeam Backup, EMC Data Domain DD620-12 Backup storage. $ 79,299.68 XioLogix EMC VNC 5300, Veeam Backup software, EMC Data Domain DD620-12Backup storage. (Alternative Quote). $ 96,821.47 STRATEGIC PLAN: OE 1-A: Identify the Current Functionality of Existing Technology and Determine if it is Being Utilized to Full Capacity ATTACHMENTS: Name:Description:Type: PSA_MR2_Work_Signed_-_REVISED.pdf PSA with MR2 Solutions Backup Material Approved by the Board of Directors of the Yorba Linda Water District 5/9/2013 RC/PH 5-0 1 of 7 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE YORBA LINDA WATER DISTRICT AND MR2 Solutions, Inc. PROJECT/SITE: Storage Consolidation, and/or Back-up Software & Hardware Solution DATE: 3/15/2013 THIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made and entered into on November 14, 2012 by and between the YORBA LINDA WATER DISTRICT, a local public agency, created and operating under authority of Division 12 of the California Water Code (“District”), and MR2 Solutions, Inc. (“Consultant”) (collectively referred to herein as the “Parties”). RECITALS WHEREAS, District is engaging in the Project described in the Scope of Work attached as Exhibit “A”; and WHEREAS, District requires a professional consultant with the requisite knowledge, skill, ability and expertise to provide the necessary services for District during all phases of the Project to which the specialized services of Consultant are appropriate; and WHEREAS, Consultant represents to District that it is fully qualified and available to perform the services for and as requested by District; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants, and terms and conditions herein, the Parties agree as follows: AGREEMENT 1.0. SCOPE OF WORK. The services to be provided by Consultant (“Work”) are called out in the Scope of Work attached as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by reference. All such Work shall be performed in accordance with the highest professional standards and in such a prompt and continuous fashion as not to impede or delay the overall completion of the Project. 1.1. Project Manager. Consultant acknowledges that continuous and effective communication between District, Consultant, and other consultants (as appropriate) is necessary to the successful completion of the Project. Consultant may also be required to furnish copies of its work product and communications to others as requested by District. Consultant’s primary contact with District shall be through District’s Project Manager. District’s primary contact with Consultant shall be through the Consultant’s Project Manager, designated on Consultant’s Proposal for Professional Design Services attached as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by reference. When requested by District, Consultant’s Representative shall attend Project meetings and will undertake, as a part of its professional responsibility under this Agreement, to coordinate its activities with all appropriate individuals and consultants. 2 of 7 1.2. Use of Designs and Drawings. All work product of Consultant, whether created solely by Consultant or in cooperation with others, is prepared specifically and expressly for District and all right, title, and interest therein shall be owned by District. District shall make available to Consultant such information, documents, graphs, studies, etc., which District possesses or has access to, which are relevant to Consultant’s Work pursuant to this Agreement. 1.3. Review. Consultant shall furnish District with reasonable opportunities from time to time to ascertain whether the Work of Consultant is being performed in accordance with this Agreement. All Work done and materials furnished shall be subject to final review and approval by District. District’s interim review and approval of Consultant’s work product shall not relieve Consultant of its obligations to fully perform this Agreement. 1.4. Commencement of Work. The Project start date is to be determined. 1.5. Time Is Of The Essence. Consultant shall perform all Work with due diligence as time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. Time limits applicable for the performance of Consultant’s Work are established in proposal. 2.0 COMPENSATION. As compensation for performance of the Work specified under the Scope of Work (Exhibit “A”), District shall pay Consultant an amount not to exceed that contained in Consultant’s Cost of Support and Services (Exhibit “B”). Payment will be made at the rates set forth in Consultant’s Fee Schedule, which is also attached on Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein by reference. Costs or expenses not designated or identified in the Fee Schedule shall not be reimbursable unless otherwise provided in this Agreement. 2.1. Invoicing. Consultant shall submit an invoice within ten (10) days after the end of each month during the term of this Agreement describing the Work performed for which payment is requested. District shall review and approve all invoices prior to payment. District shall pay approved invoices within thirty (30) days of receipt. Consultant agrees to submit additional documentation to support the invoice if requested. If District does not approve an invoice, District shall send a notice to Consultant setting forth the reason(s) the invoice was not approved. Consultant may re-invoice District to cure the defects identified by District. The revised invoice will be treated as a new submittal. District’s determinations regarding verification of Consultant’s performance, accrued reimbursable expenses, if any, and percentage of completion shall be binding and conclusive. Consultant’s time records, invoices, receipts and other documentation supporting the invoices shall be available for review by District upon reasonable notice and shall be retained by Consultant for three (3) years after completion of the Project. 2.2. Extra Services. Before performing any services outside the scope of this Agreement (“Extra Services”), Consultant shall submit a written request for approval of such Extra Services and receive written approval from District. District shall have no responsibility to compensate Consultant for any Extra Services provided by Consultant without such prior written approval. 3.0 TERMINATION. District may terminate this Agreement at any time upon ten (10) days written notice to Consultant. Should District exercise the right to terminate this Agreement, District shall pay Consultant for any Work satisfactorily completed prior to the date of termination, based upon Consultant’s Fee Schedule. Consultant may terminate this Agreement upon ten (10) days written notice to District in the event of substantial failure by District to 3 of 7 perform in accordance with the terms hereof through no fault of Consultant; or in the event District fails to pay Consultant in accordance with the terms in Section 2.0; or if Consultant’s Work hereunder is suspended for a period of time greater than ninety (90) days through no fault of Consultant. 3.1. Withholding Payment. In the event District has reasonable grounds to believe Consultant will be materially unable to perform the Work under this Agreement, or if District becomes aware of a potential claim against Consultant or District arising out of Consultant’s negligence, intentional act or breach of any provision of this Agreement, including a potential claim against Consultant by District, then District may, to the fullest extent allowed by law, withhold payment of any amount payable to Consultant that District determines is related to such inability to complete the Work, negligence, intentional act, or breach. 4.0. SAFETY. Consultant shall conduct and maintain the Work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. Consultant shall at all times exercise all necessary safety precautions appropriate to the nature of the Work and the conditions under which the Work is to be performed, and be in compliance with all applicable federal, state and local statutory and regulatory requirements including State of California, Department of Industrial Relations (Cal/OSHA) regulations. Consultant is responsible for the safety of all Consultant personnel at all times during performance of its Work, including while on District property. 5.0 INDEMNIFICATION. 5.1. When the law establishes a professional standard of care for the Consultant’s services, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant will defend, indemnify and hold harmless District, its directors, officers, employees, and authorized volunteers from and against all claims and demands of all persons that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the Consultant’s negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct in the performance (or actual or alleged non-performance) of the Work under this agreement. Consultant shall defend itself against any and all liabilities, claims, losses, damages, and costs arising out of or alleged to arise out of Consultant’s performance or non-performance of the Work hereunder, and shall not tender such claims to District nor to its directors, officers, employees, or authorized volunteers, for defense or indemnity. 5.2. Other than in the performance of professional services, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant will defend, indemnify and hold harmless District, its directors, officers, employees and authorized volunteers from and against all claims and demands of all persons arising out the performance of the Work (including the furnishing of materials), including but not limited to claims by the Consultant, Consultant’s employees and any subconsultants for damages to persons or property, except for damages resulting from the willful misconduct or active negligence of District, its directors, officers, employees, or authorized volunteers. 5.3. Consultant shall defend, at Consultant's own cost, expense and risk, any and all such aforesaid suits, actions or other legal proceedings of every kind that may be brought or instituted against District or any of its directors, officers, employees, or authorized volunteers, with legal counsel reasonably acceptable to District. Consultant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against District or any of its directors, officers, employees, or authorized volunteers, in any and all such aforesaid suits, actions, or other legal proceedings for which Consultant is obligated to defend, indemnify 4 of 7 and hold harmless District, its directors, officers, employees and authorized volunteers under this Agreement. 5.4. Consultant shall reimburse District or its directors, officers, employees, and authorized volunteers, for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Consultant’s obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by District or its directors, officers, employees, or authorized volunteers. 6.0 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Prior to execution of this Agreement, and at any time thereafter on request, Consultant shall provide executed certificates of insurance and policy endorsements acceptable to District evidencing the required coverage and limits for each insurance policy. Each insurance policy shall be primary insurance as respects District, its affiliated organizations and its and their respective officers, directors, trustees, employees, agents, consultants, attorneys, successors and assigns (collectively, the “Covered Parties”) for all liability arising out of the activities performed by or on behalf of Consultant. Any insurance, pool coverage, or self-insurance maintained by Covered Parties shall be excess of Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute to it. Each insurance policy shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, a waiver of rights of subrogation against Covered Parties. Each insurance policy shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that coverage shall not be cancelled except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by U.S. Mail (ten (10) days for non-payment of premium) has been given to District. Unless otherwise approved by District, each insurance provider shall be authorized to do business in California and have an A.M. Best rating (or equivalent) of not less than “A: VII.” Consultant shall provide and maintain at all times during the performance of this Agreement the following insurance: (1) Commercial General Liability (“CGL”) insurance; (2) Automobile Liability insurance; (3) Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability insurance; and (4) Errors and Omissions (“E&O”) liability insurance. 6.1. Commercial General Liability. Each CGL policy shall identify Covered Parties as additional insured, or be endorsed to identify Covered Parties as additional insured using ISO policy form “CG 00 01” with an edition date prior to 2004, or the exact equivalent. Coverage for additional insured shall not be limited to vicarious liability. Defense costs must be paid in addition to limits. Each CGL policy shall have liability coverage limits of at least $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage, and either at least (a) $2,000,000 aggregate total bodily injury, personal injury and property damage applied separately to the Project; or at least (b) $5,000,000 general aggregate limit for all operations. CGL insurance and endorsements shall be kept in force at all times during the performance of this Agreement and all coverage required herein shall be maintained after the term of this Agreement so long as such coverage is reasonably available. 6.2. Automobile Liability. Each Automobile Liability policy shall require coverage for “any auto” and shall have limits of at least $1,000,000 for bodily injury and property damage, each accident, and shall use ISO policy form “CA 00 01,” including owned, non-owned and hired autos, or the exact equivalent. If Consultant owns no vehicles, this requirement may be satisfied by a non-owned auto endorsement to the CGL policy described above. Automobile Liability insurance and endorsements shall be kept in force at all times during the performance of this Agreement and all coverage required herein shall be maintained after the term of this Agreement so long as such coverage is reasonably available. 5 of 7 6.3. Workers’ Compensation/Employer’s Liability. Consultant shall cover or insure the existence of coverage under the applicable laws relating to Workers’ Compensation insurance, all of their employees employed directly by them or through subconsultants at all times in carrying out the Work contemplated under this Agreement, in accordance with the “Workers’ Compensation and Insurance Act” of the California Labor Code and any amendatory Acts. Consultant shall provide Employer’s Liability insurance with limits of at least $1,000,000 each accident, $1,000,000 disease policy limit, and $1,000,000 disease each employee. By Consultant’s signature hereunder, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code, which requires every employer to be insured against liability for Workers’ Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and that Consultant will comply with such provisions before commencing Work under this Agreement. Upon the request of District, subconsultants must provide certificates of insurance evidencing such coverage. 6.4. Errors and Omissions. Each E&O policy shall have limits of at least $1,000,000 per claim and $1,000,000 aggregate. Architects’ and Engineers’ coverage is to be endorsed to include contractual liability. E&O insurance and endorsements shall be kept in force at all times during the performance of this Agreement and all coverage required herein shall be maintained after the term of this Agreement so long as such coverage is reasonably available. 7.0. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The Parties agree that the relationship between District and Consultant is that of an independent contractor and Consultant shall not, in any way, be considered to be an employee or agent of District. Consultant shall not represent or otherwise hold out itself or any of its directors, officers, partners, employees, or agents to be an agent or employee of District. District will not be legally or financially responsible for any damage or loss that may be sustained by Consultant because of any act, error, or omission of Consultant or any other consultant, nor shall Consultant make any claim against District arising out of any such act, error, or omission. 7.1. Taxes and Benefits. Consultant shall be solely responsible for the payment of all federal, state and local income tax, social security tax, Workers’ Compensation insurance, state disability insurance, and any other taxes or insurance Consultant, as an independent contractor, is responsible for paying under federal, state or local law. Consultant is not eligible to receive Workers’ Compensation, medical, indemnity or retirement benefits through District, including but not limited to enrollment in CalPERS. Consultant is not eligible to receive overtime, vacation or sick pay. 7.2. Permits and Licenses. Consultant shall procure and maintain all permits, and licenses and other government-required certification necessary for the performance of its Work, all at the sole cost of Consultant. None of the items referenced in this section shall be reimbursable to Consultant under the Agreement. 7.3. Methods. Consultant shall have the sole and absolute discretion in determining the methods, details and means of performing the Work required by District. Consultant shall furnish, at its own expense, all labor, materials, equipment, tools and transportation necessary for the successful completion of the Work to be performed under this Agreement. District shall not have any right to direct the methods, details and means of the Work; however, Consultant must receive prior written approval from District before assigning or changing any assignment of Consultant’s project manager or key personnel 6 of 7 and before using any subconsultants or subconsultant agreements for services or materials under this Agreement and any work authorizations. 8.0. NOTICES. Any notice may be served upon either Party by delivering it in person, or by depositing it in a U.S. Mail Deposit Box with the postage thereon fully prepaid, and addressed to the Party at the address set forth below: District: Steven Conklin, Interim General Manager Yorba Linda Water District P.O. Box 309 Yorba Linda, California 92885-0309 Primary Consultant: Basil Buencamino - MR2 Solutions Secondary (Backup) Consultant: Hugo Nieto – MR2 Solutions Any notice given hereunder shall be deemed effective in the case of personal delivery, upon receipt thereof, or, in the case of mailing, at the moment of deposit in the course of transmission with the United States Postal Service. 9.0 ASSIGNMENT. Neither Consultant nor District may assign or transfer this Agreement, or any part thereof, without the prior written consent of the other Party, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. 10.0 ATTORNEY’S FEES. In the event of any action arising out of, or in connection with, this Agreement, or the Work to be performed hereunder, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to have and recover, in addition to damages, injunctive or other relief, its reasonable costs and expenses, including without limitation, its attorney’s fees. 11.0. BINDING ARBITRATION. Within thirty (30) days after service of a civil action on either Party arising out of, or in connection with, this Agreement, either Party may elect to submit the action to binding arbitration before the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Service (“JAMS”), located in Orange County. The Parties agree that upon an election to arbitrate, any civil action filed will be stayed until arbitration proceedings have concluded. Upon submission of the matter to JAMS, the submitting Party shall obtain from JAMS a list of three (3) randomly selected arbitrators and serve said list upon the other Party. In the event that there are more than two parties to the action, the number of arbitrators randomly selected and included in the list shall be increased by two for each additional party involved. Upon service of the randomly selected list of arbitrators, each party shall have twenty (20) days to eliminate two arbitrators from the list and return it to JAMS, with the selected arbitrator being the remaining name on the list. Should more than one name remain on the list, JAMS will randomly select the arbitrator from the names remaining on the list. Arbitration shall be scheduled for hearing on the merits no later than six (6) months after the date the arbitrator is selected. All parties shall be permitted to conduct discovery as provided by the current rules of the California Code of Civil Procedure. All costs of JAMS or of the arbitrator for Work shall be divided equally among the Parties, unless otherwise ordered by the arbitrator. In an arbitration to resolve a dispute under this provision, the arbitrator’s award shall be supported by law and substantial evidence. 12.0 WARRANTY. Consultant warrants that the Work to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with the standards customarily provided by an experienced and competent professional rendering the same or similar services. 13.0 FORCE MAJEURE. Upon written notice by the owing Party, the respective duties and obligations of the Parties hereunder (except District’s obligation to pay Consultant such sums as 7 of 7 may become due from time to time for Work rendered by it) shall be suspended while and so long as performance thereof is prevented or impeded by strikes, disturbances, riots, fire, governmental action, war acts, acts of God, or any other cause similar or dissimilar to the foregoing which are beyond the reasonable control of the Party from whom the affected performance was due. 14.0 ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement, and the attached Exhibits, represent the entire and integrated agreement between District and Consultant and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements, either written or oral. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both District and Consultant. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be entered into as of the day and year written above. District: Consultant: Yorba Linda Water District By: By: Steve Conklin, Interim General Manager Ron Salazar –General Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: McCormick, Kidman and Behrens, LLP By: Arthur G. Kidman, General Counsel Attachments: Exhibit A: Scope of Work/Services Exhibit B: Fee Schedule Exhibit C: Hardware & Software Quote MR2 Solutions, Inc. 18662 MacArthur Blvdl, Suite 390 Irvine Ca 92612 Tel: (949) 474-4495 Fax: (949) 474-4435 Tuesday, April 30, 2013 STATEMENT OF WORK (EXHIBIT A) Rick Walkmeyer Yorba Linda Water District 1717 East Miraloma Avenue Placentia Ca 92870 Network Virtualization Proposal & Technology Refresh Based on previous meetings and conversations, the purpose of this project is to accomplish the following objectives: 1) Refresh servers and storage technology 2) Design a virtualized network environment for enhanced data protection strategy and provide business continuity solution for the company. This service provides for the installation of VMWare ESX software on up to three (3) hosts; integration with Dell external storage device, integration into a Virtual Center Console with the creation of up to 6-8VMs utilizing pre-defined image templates which is a function of the virtual center 3) Consolidate and centralize storage to a robust, scalable and high performance SAN 4) Consolidate old, stand-alone servers to a redundant, high availability and virtualized server environment with automatic server fail-over. The services outlined above will be provided during the hours of 8:00am to 6:00pm – Monday through Friday. Not Included with this Service are as follows: • De-installation or re-installation of product(s) or business application(s) • Installation and support of all business applications running on existing network infrastructure. We may assist and support the end-user in installing & configuring business applications in the VMWare environment. The following tasks will be performed as part of the proposed services for Yorba Linda Water District. 1) Data Consolidation and Centralized Storage Implementation (Dell EQUALLOGIC) a. Initialized both SANs by providing (Member name, Group name, IP SAN addresses and define storage pool(s)). b. Create volumes based on a consolidated data requirements including (SQL, Exchange, Linux, ERP, CRM, File & Print, etc.) c. Create schedules for volume snapshots and/or volume collections d. Install and configure switches for high-data processing environment including the following parameters (Flow control, Jumbo Frame, Unicast, etc.) e. Plan for data migration from multiple server sources to the SAN. f. Setup and install Microsoft iSCSI initiator on servers to enable SAN volumes to be mounted back to the physical servers. g. Assist end-user in the initial stages of the actual data migration. Customer to complete the entire data migration. h. Setup and configure both EqualLogic arrays for data replication. Perform side by side replication between the two SAN for initial seeding of data to be replicated off-site. 2) Server Consolidation and Virtualization (Dell PowerEdge servers) a. Setup and install three (3) VMWare Vsphere ESX host servers – Vanilla installation b. Setup and install VMware Virtual Center software (Separate physical box recommended) c. Create virtual server machines based on newly defined network infrastructure schematics d. Configure server Vmotion / DRS to setup automatic server fail-over between ESX hosts. MR2 Solutions, Inc. 18662 MacArthur Blvdl, Suite 390 Irvine Ca 92612 Tel: (949) 474-4495 Fax: (949) 474-4435 e. Prepare for server migration of the following server functions (Domain controller, print servers, MS Exchange server, Blackberry Server, SQL Server, CRM, File & Print servers, Engineering apps, Citrix or MS Terminal Server) f. Determine any other existing servers that can be virtualized and identify existing physical servers not eligible for virtualization g. Create dedicated volume for VMWare for centralized storage of all virtual machine images including VMDKs & VMFS data for enhanced management h. Configure Host Clustering 3) Integrate Dell EqualLogic data volumes with the virtualized servers a. Connect external Dell EqualLogic volume to VMs through iSCSI initiator b. Test new network environment with virtualized servers and SAN EqualLogic c. Make necessary adjustment d. Plan and schedule for final network cutover. e. Conduct product orientation session and review the associated documentation with the customer. This overview does not replace system overview (sanity check) to be conducted by Dell team f. Obtain customer acknowledgement of the services performed. g. Perform System Documentation on configured parameters covering ESX Hosts servers, Dell EqualLogic array & Switches 4) Re-architecting the Network Backup Equipment a. Design various VLANs network structures according to the various requirements of the applications including, SAN, telephone, DMZs, production network, etc. b. Configure each VLAN according to the required parameters of various applications (if necessary) c. Methodically consolidate and migrate existing port connections from old equipment to the new Switching equipment if necessary. MR2 Solutions, Inc. 18662 MacArthur Blvdl, Suite 390 Irvine Ca 92612 Tel: (949) 474-4495 Fax: (949) 474-4435 EXHIBIT B CONSULTANTS’S FEE SCHEDULE Standard Terms: • Estimated days for setup and installation: 8 business days ($12,000) • Project Daily Rate: $1500 • Travel fee (waived) • Net 30 Invoice term • 4-hour work (billing) increment • In addition MR2 will include 8 hour of training workshop on Dell EqualLogic Auto-snapshot Manager, Replication workshop, Group Manager Administration (free of charge) • Dell Channel Team will provide a post installation review with customer for some Q&A session Billing Term: T&M Service Contract Billing Rate: $1500/ per Engineer Full Day Scheduled visit Emergency Call Date Scheduled: Customer Authorization Signature Date: / / MR2 Solutions, Inc. 18662 MacArthur Blvdl, Suite 390 Irvine Ca 92612 Tel: (949) 474-4495 Fax: (949) 474-4435 EXHIBIT C HARDWARE & SOFTWARE PROPOSAL Q U O T E Number YLWD42213 Date 04/22/1318662 MacArthur Blvd, Suite 400, Irvine, Ca 92612 t. 949-474-4495 f. 949-474-4435 BillTo Ship To Your Sales Rep Yorba Linda Water District Yorba Linda Water District Rick Walkemeyer Rick Walkemeyer 1717 East Miraloma Avenue Placentia, CA 928701717 East Miraloma Avenue Placentia, CA 92870 714-701-3086PhonePhone 714-701-3086 FaxFax Terms P.O. Number Ship Via NET 30 Line Qty Description Unit Price Ext. Price 1 Storage Virtualization Data Protection Project 2 1 $37,198.00 $37,198.00STORAGE Dell EqualLogic PS6100X, Mainstream Performance, 10K SAS Drives 21.6TB capacity, 10K SAS, 24x 900GB Dual Controllers, HA with failover INFO Channel Partner Installation Required Asynchronous Replication Snaps/Clones with integration for MS SQL, Exchange, Hyper V and VMware SAN HQ multi group monitoring software RackRails, RapidRails for Dell Rack Power Cord, C13 to C14, PDU Style, 12 Amps, 2 meter, Qty 1 Power Cord, C13 to C14, PDU Style, 12 Amps, 2 meter, Qty 1 3 1 $6,216.48 $6,216.48SUPPORT ProSupport: 7x24 HW / SW Tech Support and Assistance, 3 Year NBD 4 $43,414.48 SubTotal 5 1 $9,800.00 $9,800.00BACKUP STORAGE DL2200 Perf, 2xE5620 Proc, 2x500GB HD, H700i (224-9308) 32GB Memory (8x4GB), 1333MHz Dual Rank RDIMMs for 2 Processors LV (317-5908) 6 x 3TB 7200RPM NL SAS 3.5 inch Hard Drives (342-3025) Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1, Standard Edition, Includes 5 CALS (421-5425) PRICES SUBJECT TO CHANGE - PRICES BASED UPON TOTAL PURCHASE - ALL DELIVERY, TRAINING OR CONSULTING SERVICES TO BE BILLED AT PUBLISHED RATES FOR EACH ACTIVITY INVOLVED - GENERALLY ALL HARDWARE COMPUTER COMPONENTS PROPOSED ABOVE ARE COVERED BY A LIMITED ONE YEAR WARRANTY, COVERING PARTS AND LABOUR FOR HARDWARE ONLY AND ON A DEPOT BASIS - WE SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OR WITH REGARD TO ANY LICENSED PRODUCTS. WE SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY LOSS OF PROFITS, BUSINESS, GOODWILL, DATA, INTERRUPTION OF BUSINESS, Page 1 of 2 Line Qty Description Unit Price Ext. Price CommVault Simpana 9.0 Advanced Dedupe Edition with No License (421-4793) ReadyRails Sliding Rails with Cable Management Arm (330-6276) Dell Hardware Limited Warranty Plus On Site Service Initial Year (922-5857) Pro Support : Next Business Day Onsite Service After Problem Diagnosis, 2Year Extended (927-1232) ProSupport : 7x24 HW / SW Tech Support and Assistance , 3 Year (927-1272) Dell Hardware Limited Warranty Plus On Site Service Extended Year (929-6508) Pro Support : Next Business Day Onsite Service After Problem Diagnosis, Initial Year (931-4970) Dell ProSupport. For tech support, visit http://support.dell.com/ProSupport or call 1-800-945-3355 (989-3439) Power Cord, NEMA 5-15P to C13, 15 amp, wall plug, 10 feet / 3 meter (310-8509) Power Cord, NEMA 5-15P to C13, 15 amp, wall plug, 10 feet / 3 meter (310-8509) 6 3 $575.52 $1,726.56APPASSURE LICENSE AppAssure Backup and Replication for Windows Server Version 5 - Physical Servers 7 12 $617.18 $7,406.16 AppAssure Backup and Replication for VMWare (Priced per Socket) Version 5 - Virtual Servers *3 Temporary 90 day keys for Windows Servers* 8 1 $2,158.20 $2,158.20MAINTENANCE Dell Pro Support for Appassure 9 1 $288.00 $288.00SERVICES Remote Installation Services - Basic 10 *Contact Sales Rep: Chris Moynier 949-474-4495 x230 SubTotal $64,793.40*Sales tax and fees applicable upon order Name ______________________________ Date _____________ Purchase Order # _______________________________________ Signature _____________________________________________ *Tax $5,183.47 $0.00*Shipping Total $69,976.87 PRICES SUBJECT TO CHANGE - PRICES BASED UPON TOTAL PURCHASE - ALL DELIVERY, TRAINING OR CONSULTING SERVICES TO BE BILLED AT PUBLISHED RATES FOR EACH ACTIVITY INVOLVED - GENERALLY ALL HARDWARE COMPUTER COMPONENTS PROPOSED ABOVE ARE COVERED BY A LIMITED ONE YEAR WARRANTY, COVERING PARTS AND LABOUR FOR HARDWARE ONLY AND ON A DEPOT BASIS - WE SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OR WITH REGARD TO ANY LICENSED PRODUCTS. WE SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY LOSS OF PROFITS, BUSINESS, GOODWILL, DATA, INTERRUPTION OF BUSINESS, Page 2 of 2 ITEM NO. 9.4 AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: May 9, 2013 Budgeted:Yes Total Budget:$45,000 To:Board of Directors Cost Estimate:$32,000 Funding Source:All Water Funds From:Steve Conklin, Acting General Manager Account No:1-2010-0780-00 Presented By:Steve Conklin, Acting General Manager Dept:Administration Reviewed by Legal:Yes Prepared By:Steve Conklin, Acting General Manager CEQA Compliance:N/A Subject:Award of Contract for Operations and Efficiency Study SUMMARY: In its April 18, 2013 Special Board Meeting, following interviews of two firms, the Board selected Koff & Associates, Inc.(K&A), as the firm to prepare the Operations and Efficiency Study for the District. In response, staff of the District and K&A have come to terms for a Professional Services Agreement for the Study for the Board's consideration. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors approve a Professional Services Agreement with Koff & Associates, Inc., for preparation of an Operations and Efficiency Study, for a total fee not to exceed $31,900, in accordance with the attached proposal, dated March 18, 2013, and updated project schedule dated April 23, 2013. DISCUSSION: In accordance with the Board's direction, a process was developed and completed to identify a professional firm with the necessary experience and qualifications to prepare an Operations and Efficiency Study. That process started with 20 firms and culminated in a Special Board meeting on April 18, 2013, in which two short-listed firms made presentations to the Board on their qualifications, experience and approach to the preparation of the Study. Following consideration of the two firms and their presentations, the Board selected Koff & Associates for the project. STRATEGIC PLAN: OE 2-A: Identify Core Inefficiencies ATTACHMENTS: Name:Description:Type: Koff_Proposal.pdf Koff Proposal Backup Material UPDATED_Project_Schedule_04_23_13.pdf Updated Project Schedule Backup Material Approved by the Board of Directors of the Yorba Linda Water District 5/9/2013 MB/PH 5-0 KOFF & ASSOCIATES, INC. Human Resource Consulting Since 1984 PROPOSAL For An ORGANIZATIONAL AND EFFICIENCY STUDY FOR THE YORBA LINDA WATER DISTRICT Submitted by: KOFF & ASSOCIATES, INC. 6400 Hollis Street, Suite 5 Emeryville, CA 94608 510.658.KOFF (5633) - voice 800.514.5195 - toll free 510.652.5633 - fax E-mail: gkrammer@koffassociates.com Contact Person Georg Krammer Chief Executive Officer 6400 Hollis Street, Suite 5, Emeryville, CA 94608 TEL 510-658-KOFF (5633) FAX 510-652-KOFF (5633) www.KoffAssociates.com 6400 Hollis Street, Suite 5, Emeryville, CA 94608 TEL 510-658-KOFF (5633) FAX 510-652-KOFF (5633) www.KoffAssociates.com KOFF & ASSOCIATES, INC. Human Resource Consulting Since 1984 March 18, 2013 Mr. Steve Conklin Acting General Manager Yorba Linda Water District 1717 E. Miraloma Avenue Placentia, CA 92870 Dear Mr. Conklin: Thank you for the opportunity to respond to your Request for Proposals. We are most interested in assisting your District with this important study and are committed to giving this project the highest priority. Meeting your needs is our number one goal. Koff & Associates, Inc., a California corporation, is a woman-owned experienced public-sector consulting firm that has been conducting similar studies for special districts (water, wastewater, community services, education, library, fire, air quality management, housing, transportation, solid waste, hospital, and higher education districts), cities, counties, and courts for almost thirty years. Koff & Associates has achieved a reputation for working successfully with management, employees, and union representatives. We believe in a high level of dialogue and input from employees and management and our proposal speaks to that level of effort. That extra effort has resulted in close to 100% implementation of all of our organizational studies. Koff & Associates is a small firm that accepts only as much work as our own staff can handle. This assures a high level of quality control, excellent communication between clients and our office, commitment to meeting timelines and budgets, and a consistent high-caliber work product. As Chief Executive Officer of the firm, I would assume the role of Project Director and be responsible for the successful completion of this project. I can be reached at the Emeryville address and phone number listed below. My e-mail address is: gkrammer@koffassociates.com. Please call if you have any questions or wish additional information. We look forward to the opportunity to provide professional service to your District. Sincerely, Georg S. Krammer Chief Executive Officer 6400 Hollis Street, Suite 5, Emeryville, CA 94608 TEL 510-658-KOFF (5633) FAX 510-652-KOFF (5633) www.KoffAssociates.com KOFF & ASSOCIATES, INC. Human Resource Consulting Since 1984 PROPOSAL For An ORGANIZATIONAL AND EFFICIENCY STUDY FOR THE YORBA LINDA WATER DISTRICT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. 1. Understanding of the Project 1 2. Study Objectives 2 3. Firm Profile and Qualifications 3 4. Project Team 4 5. Work Plan and Methodology 9 6. Expectations of District Support 15 7. Project Schedule 15 8. Proposed Project Cost 16 9. Insurance Requirements 18 KOFF & ASSOCIATES, INC. Human Resource Consulting Since 1984 UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROJECT The Yorba Linda Water District desires consulting assistance to conduct an organizational review of the entire District in order to identify areas where the District might be able to operate more efficiently and effectively. The District seeks to take under advisement the consultant’s recommendations and implementation plan and initiate changes that will result in improvements to organizational effectiveness, internal and external communications, and workflow between departments. The District is interested in an evaluation of organizational structure and chain of command. The District is comprised of six (6) departments, including 1) Administration, 2) Engineering, 3) Finance, 4) Human Resources, 5) Information Technology, and 6) Operations. The District has a staff of seventy-six (76) full-time and three (3) part-time employees. The study’s purpose is to initially conduct an analysis of the District’s organizational structure to ensure operational efficiency. This will include studying reporting relationships, span of control, staffing levels, and comparing the District’s organizational structure to that of other comparable districts. The final work product will be an integrated organizational structure that will allow for potential future District growth, career growth, and effective customer service delivery. A second level of effort will be to analyze process and operational efficiencies, including studying available resources, deficiencies, and redundancies. The process includes orientation and briefing sessions with employees, management, and employees; the completion of a position assessment questionnaire by employees; interviews/focus group meetings with a representative sample of employees in each assignment/classification within the District; and interviews with supervisors and managers to obtain additional information. Finally, the study will look at options and make recommendations for improved efficiencies and customer service, including the potential integration of functions between the District’s departments, identification of synergies, a review of staffing ratios against work load, and various aspects of customer service provision by the District. The study will also include a trend analysis regarding the results of a comprehensive survey to identify industry best practices within the above-mentioned comparator agencies. The study will contain specific recommendations for organizational and operational changes, an analysis of cost impacts associated with the proposed changes, a suggested timeline for implementation, and an implementation plan. 6400 Hollis Street, Suite 5, Emeryville, CA 94608 TEL 510-658-KOFF (5633) FAX 510-652-KOFF (5633) www.KoffAssociates.com Organizational Study Proposal Page 2 of 18 March 18, 2013 6400 Hollis Street, Suite 5, Emeryville, CA 94608 TEL 510-658-KOFF (5633) FAX 510-652-KOFF (5633) www.KoffAssociates.com The study includes a significant number of meetings with the District’s project team, management, staff, and employees, as well as the Executive Committee of the Board, and the full Board of Directors. We have expertise in labor/management relations and understand the importance of active participation by all stakeholders to ensure a successful outcome. The meetings and “stakeholder touch-points” that we recommend ensure understanding of the project parameters, enhance accurate intake and output of information and improve a collaborative and interactive approach that will result in greater buy-in for the study recommendations. This interactive approach, although time- consuming, has resulted in almost 100% implementation success of Koff & Associates’ studies. STUDY OBJECTIVES Operational Objectives  To carefully analyze the scope and level of duties and responsibilities, processes and assignments, requirements for successful work performance (including required competencies), and other factors of the District’s assignments/positions/ classifications;  To conduct a comprehensive position assessment, including review of existing documentation, position assessment questionnaire completion, employee interviews/focus groups, management interviews, analysis of existing positions and working situations, and other professional methods, as appropriate;  To identify organizational and workload issues during interviews with employees/ focus groups including consideration of technology and automation potential and improvements as well as the addition of other operational tools;  To provide for growth and flexibility of assignment, where feasible, as well as adequate career paths that will foster career service within the District and provide a clearly designed organizational structure, reporting relationships, and logical classification series/job families that are reflective of industry best practices;  To review and make recommendations to update the District’s employee performance management system that holds employees accountable to the core competencies and values the organization’s wishes to instill, as well as, established annual goals and objectives; and  To identify operational issues by analyzing financial results of the District against industry and market trends; specifically related to operating revenue and expenses. Best Management Practices and Performance Measures Objectives  To review and make recommendations regarding a pool of comparator agencies that are not only similar in size, resources, and service provision to the Yorba Linda Water District, but also reflect the high level of forward thinking and ingenuity, diversity, customer service, and community engagement that the District is looking to model itself after; Organizational Study Proposal Page 3 of 18 March 18, 2013 6400 Hollis Street, Suite 5, Emeryville, CA 94608 TEL 510-658-KOFF (5633) FAX 510-652-KOFF (5633) www.KoffAssociates.com  To collect accurate organizational and operational data from the approved group of comparator agencies and to ensure that this information is analyzed in a manner that is clear and comprehensible to the Executive Committee, Board of Directors, management, and employees;  To collect information from each of the comparator agencies regarding organizational structure, position allocations, work assignments, resources used (including human, financial, and technology resources), operational and customer service data;  To prescribe best management practices that are reflective of industry knowledge and the approved group of comparator agencies;  To recommend strategies to incorporate industry and market best practices into day-to-day operations; and  To identify opportunities to leverage departmental efforts to improve overall synergy throughout the District. Overall Objectives  To review and understand all current documentation, policies, procedures, practices, organizational charts, budgetary and financial data, and related information so that the recommended implementation plan(s) can be operationally incorporated with a minimum of disruption;  To review, analyze, and make recommendations that will enhance organizational effectiveness and improve customer service;  To ensure sufficient documentation throughout the study and to develop a sound and realistic implementation strategy so that the plan can be implemented and maintained in a competent and fair manner.  To conduct a start-up meeting with the Project Team to finalize study plans and timetables; conduct briefing and orientation sessions with employees and management in order to educate and explain the scope of the study and describe what are and are not reasonable study expectations and goals;  To work collaboratively and effectively with the District and its stakeholders while at the same time maintaining control and objectivity in the conduct of the study;  To ensure sufficient documentation of the study processes and methodologies so that the District can integrate, maintain, and administer the plans after the initial implementation in a competent and fair manner; and  To provide effective ongoing communications throughout the duration of the project. FIRM PROFILE AND QUALIFICATIONS Koff & Associates, Inc. is a majority woman-owned, State-registered small business, public sector human resources consulting firm that was founded in 1984 and has been assisting special districts, cities, and counties for almost thirty years. We are familiar with the various organizational structures, agency missions, operational and budgetary requirements, and staffing expectations. Organizational Study Proposal Page 4 of 18 March 18, 2013 6400 Hollis Street, Suite 5, Emeryville, CA 94608 TEL 510-658-KOFF (5633) FAX 510-652-KOFF (5633) www.KoffAssociates.com We have extensive experience working in both union and non-union environments (including serving as the management representative in negotiation meetings), working with City Councils, Boards of Supervisors, Merit Boards, Joint Power Authorities, and Boards of Directors. The firm’s areas of focus are organizational, classification, and compensation studies and industry/market surveys (approximately 70% of our workload); development of strategic management tools; performance management; best practices policy/procedure development and employee handbooks; executive search and staff recruitments; human resources audits; public agency mergers and separations; and serving as off-site HR Director for our smaller public agencies that need the expertise of an HR Director but do not need a full-time, on-site professional. Without exception, all of our organizational, classification, and compensation studies have successfully met all of our intended commitments; communications were successful with employees, supervisors, management, and union representatives; and we were able to assist each agency in successfully implementing our recommendations. All studies were brought to completion within stipulated time limits and proposed budgets. The firm’s growing list of clients is indicative of its reputation as being a quality organization that can be relied upon for producing comprehensive, sound, and cost- effective recommendations and solutions. Koff & Associates, Inc. has a reputation for being "hands-on" with the ability and expertise to implement its ideas and recommendations through completion in both union and non-union environments. Koff & Associates, Inc. relies on our stellar reputation and on the recommendations and referrals of current clients to attract new clients. Our work speaks for itself and our primary goal is to provide professional and technical consulting assistance with integrity, honesty, and a commitment to excellence. PROJECT TEAM Project chart and professional qualifications of staff that will be included in this study are: Organizational/Project Chart Georg Krammer, CEO Catherine Kaneko, President (Principals of K&A) Gail Koff, Managing Director Mike Harary, Project Manager Alyssa Thompson, Project Manager Anne Hayes, Associate Kathy Crotty, Administrative Assistant Lori Worden, Associate Patty Howard, Senior Associate Organizational Study Proposal Page 5 of 18 March 18, 2013 6400 Hollis Street, Suite 5, Emeryville, CA 94608 TEL 510-658-KOFF (5633) FAX 510-652-KOFF (5633) www.KoffAssociates.com K&A’s team consists of nine (9) members, as shown above in our organizational structure. All members of our team have worked on multiple comprehensive organizational, classification, and/or compensation studies and are well acquainted with the wide array of organizational structures, as well as the challenges and issues that arise when conducting studies like this. No portion of this engagement will be assigned to subcontractors. Georg S. Krammer, M.B.A., S.P.H.R. Chief Executive Officer Georg brings over fifteen (15) years of management-level human resources experience to Koff & Associates with an emphasis in organizational development; classification and compensation design; market salary studies; executive and staff recruitment; performance management; and employee relations, in the public sector, large corporations and small, minority-owned businesses. After obtaining a Master of Arts in English and Russian and teaching credentials at the University of Vienna, Austria, Georg came to the United States to further his education and experience and attained his Master of Business Administration from the University of San Francisco. After starting his HR career in Wells Fargo’s college recruiting department, he moved on to HR management positions in the banking and high-tech consulting industries. With his experience as a well-rounded senior HR generalist, his education in business and teaching, and his vast experience with public sector HR programs and functions, Georg’s contribution to K&A’s variety of projects greatly complements our consulting team. Georg joined K&A in 2000 and has been the firm’s Chief Executive Officer since 2005. Georg will be key personnel for this project and assigned as Project Director for this project and coordinate all of K&A’s efforts. He will attend all meetings with the District and be responsible for all work products and deliverables. Catherine “Katie” Kaneko, C.P.A., P.H.R. President Katie brings over twenty (20) years of management level human resources experience to Koff & Associates, Inc., both as a human resources director and as a management consultant in the hi-tech industry as well as the public sector. She has extensive experience in compensation including equity plans and performance incentive programs, survey design and reporting, recruitment in both the public and private sector; staffing; classification and job analysis; compensation and job evaluation techniques, employee relations, retention strategies, infrastructure development; coaching; policy and procedure development; mergers and acquisitions; change management and employee training. Organizational Study Proposal Page 6 of 18 March 18, 2013 6400 Hollis Street, Suite 5, Emeryville, CA 94608 TEL 510-658-KOFF (5633) FAX 510-652-KOFF (5633) www.KoffAssociates.com With a Bachelor in Business Administration, Katie started her career as a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) in an international accounting/consulting firm. She transitioned into Human Resources within the firm to become the Human Resources Director of the San Francisco office. She then moved into the hi-tech industry where she served in leadership positions for high-growth, startup, and organizations in transition. Her primary focus in recent years has been in classification, compensation, and recruitment services in the public sector. Katie’s experience provides a broad knowledge of human resource management within diverse organizations. Her background provides her a strong ability to understand the big picture, identify problems and solutions, and effectively implement them. Her skill set complements our current consultant base with additional levels of service areas. Katie joined K&A in 2000 and has been the firm’s President since 2005. Katie will provide consultant support throughout the study, including internal organizational analyses, the external market survey, development of recommendations, and implementation strategies. Gail Koff Managing Director Gail Koff, Principal of Koff & Associates, Inc. for 21 years and now the Managing Director, has over thirty-five (35) years of human resource management experience, most of which have been serving the needs of public agencies. Gail’s prior experience, after receiving her degree from Boston University, includes serving as the Personnel Director for one of California's largest sanitary districts, Central Contra Costa Sanitary District as well as the Personnel Director for the California College of Arts and Crafts. She has spent twenty-one (21) years in her own firm providing consulting assistance to cities, counties and special districts. She specializes in strategic development; labor/management issues; classification and job analysis; compensation design and pay for performance strategies; executive search; employee handbooks and policy direction; performance management; and organizational efficiency issues. Gail is familiar with the unique problems of public agencies and has worked extensively with publicly elected Councils, Boards, Commissions, numerous unions, and management and employee groups. Gail works closely with the staff throughout the entire process to ensure success. She is actively engaged throughout the study’s progress to ensure quality control, ti meliness, and meeting client expectations. Organizational Study Proposal Page 7 of 18 March 18, 2013 6400 Hollis Street, Suite 5, Emeryville, CA 94608 TEL 510-658-KOFF (5633) FAX 510-652-KOFF (5633) www.KoffAssociates.com Alyssa Thompson Project Manager Alyssa earned her bachelor’s degree in Psychology with a minor in Sociology- Organization Studies from the University of California, Davis and is currently working on her PhD in Organizational Psychology from Alliant International University. She brings with her over ten (10) years of human resources experience in compensation data gathering and analysis, classification analysis and development, performance management, affirmative action program development, and recruitment. Alyssa also has experience in designing and conducting quantitative and qualitative research studies. Since joining the firm in 2007, Alyssa has worked on over sixty (60) organizational, classification, compensation, recruitment, and other special human resources projects. She has worked on classification and/or compensation projects for numerous clients, such as the Cities of Monterey, Palo Alto, Campbell, Piedmont, El Cerrito, Emeryville, Sausalito, Novato, Napa, Santa Rosa, Tracy, Madera, Ione, Newman, Patterson, Orange, Menifee, Poway, Tigard (OR), and the Towns of Windsor, Danville and Apple Valley, as well as, the Marin Municipal Water District, Dublin San Ramon Services District, Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District, Central Contra Costa Sanitary District, Mid-Peninsula Water District, Purissima Hills Water District, South Tahoe Public Utility District, Orange County Sanitation District, South Coast Water District, Moulton Niguel Water District, Ventura Regional Sanitation District, Truckee Donner Recreation and Park District, Berkeley Unified School District, California School Boards Association, Housing Authority of Texarkana Texas, Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino, San Diego Housing Commission, San Francisco Housing Authority, and the Counties of San Mateo and Tehama. Alyssa has also participated in several recruitment efforts for various positions ranging from entry-level to executive management. Alyssa has participated in various special projects like conducting exit interviews, retirement benefits studies, and human resources audits. Mike Harary Project Manager Mike Harary brings over twenty-five (25) years of HR experience “to the table,” currently serving as the Assistant Human Resources Director for the City of Orange and working of our team on a part-time basis. For the past 15 years, Mike has been involved in all aspects of HR for Orange, including serving as Chief Negotiator for the City. Mike manages the City’s recruitment and selection, employee benefits, labor relations, classification and compensation, and general Human Resources functions. Prior to Orange, Mike worked for the City of La Mirada for almost 10 years, working his way up from Personnel Intern to Personnel Analyst. Mike possesses a Bachelor’s Degree in Business Administration emphasizing in Human Resources Management from Organizational Study Proposal Page 8 of 18 March 18, 2013 6400 Hollis Street, Suite 5, Emeryville, CA 94608 TEL 510-658-KOFF (5633) FAX 510-652-KOFF (5633) www.KoffAssociates.com California State University, Long Beach, and a Masters of Business Administration also from Cal State Long Beach. Mike has played a key role in developing and implementing CalPACS, a regional, internet-based, comprehensive salary and benefits survey website for local agencies. For his efforts in this successful venture, Mike received the 2005 “Moving Forward Award” by the California Public Employers Labor Relations Association (Cal-PELRA). Mike also served as the President of the Orange County Employee Relations Committee. Anne Hayes Firm Associate Anne is the newest member to our team and earned a Bachelor’s degree in Mathemat ics and Economics from the University of California, Santa Barbara. Before joining Koff & Associates, she worked in the private sector for more than 10 years, with 5 years in a management role. She transitioned to a non -profit organization, which specialized in providing labor relations representation to public sector employers, where she gained extensive experience in data gathering and analysis, specifically in the areas of classification, compensation and benefit analysis for public sector agencies. Since joining K&A one year ago, Anne has been an integral part of project teams working on classification and/or compensation studies for the Mount San Antonio Community College District, Cutler Orosi Joint Unified School District, Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority, Orange County Transportation Authority, Alameda County Waste Management Agency, South Tahoe Public Utility District, Purissima Hills Water District, City of El Cerrito, and City of Novato. Patty Howard Senior Associate Patty’s 21 years of public sector, management-level Human Resources experience includes 14 years with the County of El Dorado and 7 years with the City of Rocklin. She has worked in all areas of human resources management including recruitment & selection, classification & compensation, employee relations, labor negotiations, and EEO investigations. She is also a seasoned trainer having developed and presented Supervisory and Lead Worker training (multiple training modules), harassment and discrimination prevention, and new employee orientation for employees in all job classifications. She has also obtained specialized training and certification in order to conduct Stephen Covey’s “7 Habits of Highly Effective People”. Patty has a Masters Degree in Public Administration with an emphasis in Human Resources Management. In addition, she has been earned her IPMA-CP, a certification awarded specifically to Human Resources professionals in the public sector from the International Public Management Association – Human Resources (IPMA-HR) and holds Organizational Study Proposal Page 9 of 18 March 18, 2013 6400 Hollis Street, Suite 5, Emeryville, CA 94608 TEL 510-658-KOFF (5633) FAX 510-652-KOFF (5633) www.KoffAssociates.com a Masters in Labor Relations Certificate from the California Public Employers Labor Relations Association (CALPELRA). Lori Worden Firm Associate Lori is the newest member of our team. Prior to joining Koff & Associates, she spent over a decade in internal HR consulting roles for a number of large public agencies, including the Administrative Office of the Courts and the University of California system. Lori obtained her Master’s degree in Industrial & Organizational Psychology from CSU Long Beach and went on to earn a Juris Doctorate degree (emphasis in employment and labor law) at Golden Gate University. Lori learned tricks of the trade on a job classification consolidation project within the California courts system, spurred by the unification of the Municipal and Superior Courts. Lori’s career path led her from the courts to the University of California system, where she conducted total compensation and organizational studies, developed and analyzed compensation and benefits data for collective bargaining, and contributed to improvements to the position management and HRMIS system. One of her career highlights was the development of a new campus-wide classification and compensation structure for UC Merced. The project was based on pioneering work in the area of classification and compensation using a market based model created by UC Berkeley. Kathy Crotty Administrative Assistant Kathy is our resident data entry, office administrative, and technical “guru” and has been with the firm for over five years. She will be heavily involved with the technical aspects of the project and assist our professional staff at each phase of each project. WORK PLAN AND METHODOLOGY This section of the proposal identifies the actual work scope. We believe that our detailed explanation of methodology and work tasks clearly identifies our approach and comprehensiveness. A. INITIAL DOCUMENTATION REVIEW/MEETING WITH PROJECT TEAM This phase includes identifying the key client project team, contract ad ministrator, and reporting relationships. Our team will meet with the client team to create the specific work plan and work schedule; reaffirm the primary objectives; determine deadline dates; determine who will be responsible for coordinating/scheduling communications with employees and management; and develop a timetable for conducting the same. Also included will be the gathering of written documentation including assembling the current organizational charts, class descriptions, operational budgets, documentation on current Organizational Study Proposal Page 10 of 18 March 18, 2013 6400 Hollis Street, Suite 5, Emeryville, CA 94608 TEL 510-658-KOFF (5633) FAX 510-652-KOFF (5633) www.KoffAssociates.com operational practices, information regarding in-house and outsourced/contracted services, and any other relevant documentation. This initial step will also include a discussion of our methodology and the components of the survey instrument that will be used when comparing the Yorba Linda Water District to other, comparable agencies. We recommend meeting with District management as well as an employee focus group and/or employee representation to discuss the major elements of the study and which areas (organizational, operational, etc.) will be studied. We are flexible in regards to the inclusion of employees and/or employee representation but have found that their buy-in through the process usually avoids conflict at the end of the study. We will respond to any questions. B. DETERMINE COMPARATOR AGENCIES The selection of comparator agencies is considered a critical step in the study process. Using the following factors to identify appropriate comparators, we will receive approval before proceeding with the survey. The factors that we review when selecting and recommending appropriate comparator agencies include:  Organizational type and structure – While various agencies may provide overlapping services and employ some staff having similar duties and responsibilities, the role of each agency is somewhat unique, particularly in regard to its relationship to the citizens it serves and level of service expectation. During this iterative process, previous comparator agencies that have been utilized and the advantages and disadvantages of including them and/or others will be discussed.  Similarity of population served, agency demographics, agency staff, and operational and capital improvement budgets – These elements provide guidelines in relation to resources required (staff and funding) and available for the provision of agency/departmental services. They also speak to the diversity of the community that they serve and the common issues that the District might face to best serve that community.  Scope of services provided – While having an agency that provides all of the services at the same level of citizen expectation is ideal for comparators, as long as the majority of services are provided in a similar manner, sufficient data should be available for analysis. C. DEVELOPMENT OF POSITION ASSESSMENT AND SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRES The study will contain two major surveys: 1) an analysis of current roles, duties, responsibilities, and processes within the District and 2) a study of organizational and operational best practices of agencies that are comparable. Organizational Study Proposal Page 11 of 18 March 18, 2013 6400 Hollis Street, Suite 5, Emeryville, CA 94608 TEL 510-658-KOFF (5633) FAX 510-652-KOFF (5633) www.KoffAssociates.com For both surveys, we will develop a survey instrument/questionnaire to ensure that the right questions are asked. The internal District survey will be structured similar to a position assessment questionnaire and include questions regarding roles, duties, responsibilities; processes, efficiencies, and time/frequency; and competencies, knowledge, skills, and abilities required to perform jobs successfully. The industry/market study will include questions regarding organizational structure, ratios of staffing, and other resources to assignments and expected work products, best management practices, and performance measures. It is our recommendation to review the two survey instruments/questionnaires in a collaborative manner including management and employees (and/or employee representation, if the District is open to this approach). Again, the more stakeholder buy- in that can be obtained at the front-end regarding the structure and process of the study, the more successful the final outcome of the study will be. D. ORIENTATION MEETINGS WITH EMPLOYEES AND DISTRIBUTION OF POSITION ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRES We will facilitate several orientation meetings with employees (within the same timeframe, for cost containment purposes) and distribute the Position Assessment Questionnaires for purposes of the internal survey. While this meeting may not be mandatory, it is highly recommended, as it forms the beginning of the educational process that continues throughout the study. Project processes will be explained, expectations will be clarified, and elements that are not a part of the study will also be covered. Questions will be answered and hints for completing the questionnaire will be given. The questionnaires shall be handed out with the incumbents’ current class descriptions attached so employees can use them as a tool for completing the questionnaires. We recommend that employees complete separate questionnaires but giving employees in the same classification the option of collaborating on completing a questionnaire together, if the employees feel that their daily assignments are similar enough. However, one critical piece we hope to determine through this process is whether certain employees’ duties and tasks have changed compared to their peers in the same classification. If so, we want to be able to analyze those separately. While we realize that individual questionnaires per employee will be a time-consuming process, our goal is to analyze the questionnaires and identify trends regarding processes, efficiencies, staffing, and what works and what doesn’t work within each functional area of assignment. Employees complete the questionnaire, send it to their supervisor/ manager for rev iew, comment, and signature, and then send it to our office for analysis. Organizational Study Proposal Page 12 of 18 March 18, 2013 6400 Hollis Street, Suite 5, Emeryville, CA 94608 TEL 510-658-KOFF (5633) FAX 510-652-KOFF (5633) www.KoffAssociates.com E. POSITION ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW AND EMPLOYEE/ SUPERVISORY/MANAGEMENT FOCUS GROUPS/INTERVIEWS Upon receipt of the questionnaires, they will be reviewed and analyzed along with other documentation, including any information regarding time keeping, efficiency measurements, and process descriptions. As mentioned above, the goal is to identify certain trends regarding processes, efficiencies, staffing, and what works and what doesn’t work within each functional area of assignment. Based on those trends, we would then design which types of focus groups will be needed to delve into those trends and obtain more information. The assumption is that some individual employee interviews may be needed to clarify certain information that was contained, or perhaps we found to be missing, in the position assessment questionnaires. Focus group meetings/interviews will also be held with supervisory and management staff, who will clarify their own responsibilities as well as confirm the information we have received in the focus groups/interviews with their staff. Some focus groups may include both employees and management, depending on what the goal for that particular focus group is. Interviews will include the eighteen (18) senior and mid-managers referenced in the RFP. The goal of the focus groups/interviews and the review additional documentation is to identify/determine the following:  Assignments, responsibilities, duties, and tasks;  Process efficiencies, time spent, and frequency of the above;  Competencies, knowledge, skills, and abilities required to perform the above;  Reporting relationships and span of control;  Staffing ratios;  Available resources, including deficiencies and redundancies; and  Equipment, computer and automation technologies used. F. INDUSTRY/MARKET DATA COLLECTION Our firm does not collect market data by merely sending out a written questionnaire. We find that such questionnaires are often delegated to the individual in the department with the least experience in the organization and given a low priority. We conduct all of the data collection and analysis ourselves to ensure validity of the data and quality control. Typically, we collect organizational charts, classification descriptions, employee allocation lists, policies and procedures, performance measurement plans, and other information via websites or in person, by telephone, email, or facsimile. With this prior knowledge and our experience in the public human resources field, our professional staff will then schedule appointments preferably in person, with knowledgeable individuals to answer specific questions. We find that the information collected using these methods Organizational Study Proposal Page 13 of 18 March 18, 2013 6400 Hollis Street, Suite 5, Emeryville, CA 94608 TEL 510-658-KOFF (5633) FAX 510-652-KOFF (5633) www.KoffAssociates.com has a very high validity rate and is generally substantiated before management, employees, as well as governing bodies. The goal of the industry/market survey is to obtain information on the following:  Organizational structure, reporting relationships, span of control, and staffing levels;  Operational requirements, infrastructure, services and ratios of staffing to population served and other productivity measures;  Outsourcing and in-sourcing practices per functional area of assignment;  Resources available, including human, financial, technological resources;  Computer and automation technologies used to improve operating efficiencies and/or customer service, including an evaluation of existing systems (i.e., pros and cons);  Best management practices and standards; and  Performance measures and measurement tools per functional area of assignment; G. DATA AND TREND ANALYSIS Surveying approximately eight (8) comparator agencies should yield sufficient data and information to identify industry/market trends. Especially including agencies in the study that are known to be on the cutting edge of providing the highest quality services will uncover trends for best management practices that will be invaluable to the District. We will analyze the data and trends from the market survey and incorporate tho se into our recommendations for organizational and operational changes for the District. H. DEVELOPMENT OF RECOMMENDATIONS AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES Depending on the results of the internal and external assessments, we will develop specific recommendations for organizational and operational changes for the District. Recommendations and implementation strategies will include the following (as appropriate):  Organizational restructuring, including re-assigning reporting relationships, streamlining classification series/progressions, and re-organizing functional areas of assignment;  Staffing levels, including ratios of staff to workloads, as well as, ratios of “rank- and-file” staff to supervisory and management staff;  Outsourcing and in-sourcing opportunities, including areas of assignment at the divisional, functional, and specific task levels;  Process efficiencies, including redundancies and deficiencies, as well as, assignments of functions and tasks;  Equipment and computer and automated technologies: while we are not management information systems or information technology experts, we will Organizational Study Proposal Page 14 of 18 March 18, 2013 6400 Hollis Street, Suite 5, Emeryville, CA 94608 TEL 510-658-KOFF (5633) FAX 510-652-KOFF (5633) www.KoffAssociates.com report the results of the market survey and identify any trends in this area, including feedback regarding the successfulness of current and/or newly implemented systems used by the comparator agencies;  Best management practices, including trends observed in the identified survey market, as well as, a transition roadmap from current practices to industry best practices, as appropriate; and  Performance measures, including how to develop a balanced scorecard between organizational goals, departmental goals, and work productivity goals and how individual performance measures for all District staff should relate to those. It should be noted that the development of recommendations and, especially, implementation strategies will be as collaborative a process with District management, as the District wishes. We are most receptive to District input, especially when it comes to the organizational and operational realities of addressing potential District deficiencies and implementing new policies/procedures/rules/practices, etc. Especially, when it comes to developing timelines, input from the District will be elicited to create realistic roadmaps. Our suggested plans for changes will be prioritized based on importance/urgency, will include suggested timelines for implementation, and will also include an analysis of potential cost impacts associated with the proposed changes. Draft recommendations and implementation plans will be discussed with the management team prior to developing an Interim Report. I. MANAGEMENT REVIEW/REANALYSIS AND FEEDBACK We will share our findings and recommendations with departmental stakeholders before our report, recommendations, and implementation plans are finalized. Our experience has been that this can be one of the most critical phases of the project to ensure that deliverables are vetted through the individuals who are most familiar with departmental operations. J. PREPARATION OF DRAFT FINAL AND FINAL REPORT AND DELIVERABLES A Draft Interim Report of the Organizational Study will be completed and submitted to the District for review and comments. The report will provide detailed internal and external survey findings, documentation, and recommendations. The report will include a set of all survey instruments and documentation, data and trend analysis results, as well as recommendations and the implementation issues surrounding our recommendations. Once all of the District’s questions/concerns are addressed and discussed, a Final Organizational Study Report will be created and submitted in bound format. Organizational Study Proposal Page 15 of 18 March 18, 2013 6400 Hollis Street, Suite 5, Emeryville, CA 94608 TEL 510-658-KOFF (5633) FAX 510-652-KOFF (5633) www.KoffAssociates.com K. PRESENTATION TO THE PROJECT TEAM AND/OR DISTRICT MANAGER/COUNCIL In addition to ongoing periodic meetings and communication with the Project Team, The Executive Committee, management, employees, and other stakeholders throughout the various phases of the study, as well as continuous status reports per email and conference calls, our proposal includes one final presentation to the Board of Directors. EXPECTATIONS OF DISTRICT SUPPORT In order to conduct this study in the most timely and cost-effective manner, we expect support in the following areas:  Timely provision of written documentation, such as current organizational charts, employee allocation lists, class specifications, budget documents, operational procedures and records, work assignments and schedules, requests for audits, etc.;  Assistance in the notification and scheduling of orientation and other meetings with management and employees, and the provision of adequate space for employee focus groups/interviews;  Assistance in the compilation of current class descriptions with the Position Assessment Questionnaire; collecting and forwarding questionnaires; and in ensuring that materials are completed and returned in a timely manner;  Assistance in scheduling Project Team, management, employee audit, and other meetings; and  Meeting agreed to timelines. PROJECT SCHEDULE Our professional experience is that an organizational study for this siz e organization/department and the desired scope of work will take approximately four to five (4-5) months to complete, allowing for adequate Position Assessment Questionnaire completion, time for focus groups and interviews, market survey data collection and analysis, development of recommendations and implementation strategies, review steps by the District, the development of final reports, and presentations. The following is a suggested timeline based on contract award around mid-April: Project Task Date of Completion 2013 A. Initial Meeting with Project Team/Document Review by April 19 B. Determination of Comparator Agencies by April 26 C. Development of Survey Questionnaires by May 3 D. Employee Orientation Meetings by May 10 E. Position Assessment Questionnaire Review and Employee/ Supervisory/Management Focus Groups/Interviews by June 7 F. Industry Market Data Collection by June 7 Organizational Study Proposal Page 16 of 18 March 18, 2013 6400 Hollis Street, Suite 5, Emeryville, CA 94608 TEL 510-658-KOFF (5633) FAX 510-652-KOFF (5633) www.KoffAssociates.com G. Data and Trend Analysis by June 21 H. Development of Recommendations/Implementation Strategies by July 12 I. Management Review, Reanalysis/Feedback by July 26 J. Draft Final Report and Final Report and Recommendations by August 23 K. Final Presentations to Executive Committee and Board of Directors As Scheduled PROPOSED PROJECT COSTS We have found that, often times, our proposals address a very high level of time commitment, which sometimes results in a higher proposal cost. We believe that our methodology and implementation success rate is attributable to the significantly greater level of contact we have with the Board of Directors, employees, and management. The time we commit to working with the stakeholders (Project Team meetings, orientations, meetings with employees and managers via interviews/focus groups, etc.) results in a significantly greater buy-in throughout the process and with the final study results and recommendations. Our firm has never had a formal appeal to any of our studies in almost thirty years. It has been our experience that the money and time invested in stakeholder touch-points throughout the study are money and time saved during implementation. Numerous times our firm has been hired after an agency has gone through an unsuccessful study with another consultant, whose results were rejected or appealed and whose implementation was very controversial. The result was a divided organization with hostility and animosity between employees/employee representation and management. Every time our firm was hired after such a bad experience, study stakeholders were amazed at our open and all-inclusive process, our efforts to elicit equal stakeholder input, and our development of recommendations that were accepted as fair and reasonable and understood by employees, management, union representation, and the governing body. In these economic times, the tendency may be to select the firm with the lowest cost proposal but it has been our experience that ultimately the price can be much higher considering the additional time and lost goodwill that can result from utilizing a less involved process. Our clients always provide us feedback that our process was professional, comprehensive, understandable, timely, and inclusive. Employees, although not necessarily always happy with our recommendations, have always indicated that we listened to their issues and concerns and were available for discussion, as required. Although time consuming, we also drive the process to ensure that timelines are met and schedules are maintained. We want to emphasize that we provide an all-inclusive lump-sum cost amount for the entire study and do not believe in under-pricing the effort or change orders along the way, unless the District requests an obvious and identifiable additional level of effort. Organizational Study Proposal Page 17 of 18 March 18, 2013 6400 Hollis Street, Suite 5, Emeryville, CA 94608 TEL 510-658-KOFF (5633) FAX 510-652-KOFF (5633) www.KoffAssociates.com However, we’re also aware that budgets are often limited and that public agencies must be economically conservative. As mentioned in the scope of work, we recommend an informal employee review and appeals process but are providing two cost options below in case the District decides against undergoing this step of the process. Option 1 Option 2 Organizational Study Hours Hours A. Initial Meeting with Project Team/Document Review 20 20 B. Determination of Comparator Agencies 10 10 C. Development of Survey Questionnaires 20 20 D. Employee Orientation Meetings 16 16 E. Position Assessment Questionnaire Review and Employee/ Supervisory/Management Focus Groups/Interviews Option 1: assuming that most employees will be involved Option 2: only the 18 senior and mid-managers will be interviewed, depending on the District’s preferences 40 20 F. Survey Market Data Collection: assuming 8 comparator agencies 50 50 G. Data and Trend Analysis 20 20 H. Development of Recommendations/Implementation Plans 40 40 I. Management Review, Reanalysis/Feedback Option 1: Senior and Mid-management Option 2: Senior Management only 18 12 J. Final Reports and Recommendations 24 24 K. Final Presentation 10 10 Additional meetings with the Project Team, Management, Executive Committee and/or the Board of Directors 12 12 Total Professional Hours 280 254 Combined composite rate: $105/Hour $29,400 $26,670 Expenses: $2,500 $2,500 Expenses include but are not limited to duplicating and binding documents and reports, phone, supplies, FAX, postage, mileage, hotels, air fare, per diem, etc. TOTAL LUMP SUM FOR PROJECT: $31,900 $29,170 *Additional consulting will be honored at composite rate of $105/hr. Organizational Study Proposal Page 18 of 18 March 18, 2013 6400 Hollis Street, Suite 5, Emeryville, CA 94608 TEL 510-658-KOFF (5633) FAX 510-652-KOFF (5633) www.KoffAssociates.com INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS We will submit support of this level of coverage and endorse the District with our General Liability insurance coverage upon award of contract if desired: Workers’ Compensation: Statutory Limits Automobile Insurance: $1 Million per accident Errors and Omissions: $1Million per occurrence General Liability: $1Million per occurrence This proposal is valid for 90 days. Respectfully Submitted, By: KOFF & ASSOCIATES, INC. State of California March 18, 2013 Georg S. Krammer Date Chief Executive Officer KOFF & ASSOCIATES, INC. Human Resource Consulting Since 1984 UPDATED PROJECT SCHEDULE For An ORGANIZATIONAL AND EFFICIENCY STUDY FOR THE YORBA LINDA WATER DISTRICT Submitted by: KOFF & ASSOCIATES, INC. 6400 Hollis Street, Suite 5 Emeryville, CA 94608 510.658.KOFF (5633) - voice 800.514.5195 - toll free 510.652.5633 - fax E-mail: gkrammer@koffassociates.com Contact Person Georg Krammer Chief Executive Officer 6400 Hollis Street, Suite 5, Emeryville, CA 94608 TEL 510-658-KOFF (5633) FAX 510-652-KOFF (5633) www.KoffAssociates.com PROJECT SCHEDULE Our professional experience is that an organizational study for this size organization/department and the desired scope of work will take approximately four to five (4-5) months to complete, allowing for adequate Position Assessment Questionnaire completion, time for focus groups and interviews, market survey data collection and analysis, development of recommendations and implementation strategies, review steps by the District, the development of final reports, and presentations. The following is a suggested timeline based on contract award on May 9, 2013: Project Task Date of Completion 2013 A. Initial Meeting with Project Team/Document Review by May 17 B. Determination of Comparator Agencies by May 24 C. Development of Survey Questionnaires by May 31 D. Employee Orientation Meetings by June 14 E. Interview Board Members, Managers, and Mid-managers by June 14 F. Position Assessment Questionnaire Review and Employee/ Supervisory/Management Focus Groups/Interviews by August 2 G. Industry Market Data Collection by July 19 H. Data and Trend Analysis by August 2 I. Development of Recommendations/Implementation Strategies by August 23 J. Management Review, Reanalysis/Feedback by September 6 K. Draft Final Report and Final Report and Recommendations by September 20 L. Final Presentations to Executive Committee and Board of Directors As Scheduled ITEM NO. 9.5 AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: May 9, 2013 To:Finance-Accounting Committee From:Steve Conklin, Acting General Manager Presented By:Stephen Parker, Finance Manager Dept:Finance Reviewed by Legal:Yes Prepared By:Stephen Parker, Finance Manager Subject:Adopting a Public Investment Policy STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 13-06 Setting Forth a Public Funds Investment Policy and Rescinding Resolution No. 11-24. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Finance-Accounting Committee discussed this item at its meeting held April 22, 2013 and supports staff's recommendation. DISCUSSION: The California Government Code says "the treasurer or chief fiscal officer of a local agency may annually render to the legislative body of that local agency and any oversight committee of that local agency, a statement of investment policy, which should be considered at a public meeting." As such, the attached resolution is being presented to the Board. This fiscal year, the California Municipal Treasurer's Association (CMTA) came out with an Investment Policy Certification Program. As staff investigated what it would take to have the District's policy meet the standards of the certification program, it became apparent that considerable changes were necessary, as the previous policy had not had a significant "makeover" in well over a decade. Staff believes that this proposed policy will meet the standards of CMTA's Certification Program. The majority of the changes to the policy offer clarity of District policies and procedures and have the District's policy conforming with best practices. The policy reflects the California Government Code's (CGC) allowable investments and the Districts' allowable investments side by side. As the majority of the District's previously authorized investments had limits at the CGC threshold, there were no significant changes to authorized investments. The exception being that CD Placement Service was added as an authorized investment. CD Placement Service allows the District to place money in one investment that then splits that investment into CD's within FDIC limits at a number of financial institutions. Legal counsel has completed a review of the new policy, and a number of minor corrections were made to ensure that the District's policy was written as clearly as possible, clear of inconsistencies and had correct references to the CGC. The current policy includes all changes that were made based on legal counsel's recommendation. A red-line version of the policy that was submitted to and supported by the Finance-Accounting Committee is attached to highlight the changes proposed by legal counsel. STRATEGIC PLAN: FR 2-C: Implement an Approach to Ensure Reserves are Responsibly Funded PRIOR RELEVANT BOARD ACTION(S): The District's current investment policy was adopted by Resolution No. 11-24 on December 22, 2011. ATTACHMENTS: Name:Description:Type: Resolution_No__13-06_Investment_Policy.docx Resolution Backup Material Investment_Policy_May_2013.docx Investment Policy Backup Material Investment_Policy_May_2013_red-line.pdf Investment Policy - red line Backup Material Approved by the Board of Directors of the Yorba Linda Water District 5/9/2013 PH/RK 5-0 Roll Call Resolution No. 13-06 Setting Forth Public Funds Investment Policy and Rescinding Resolution No. 11-24 1 RESOLUTION NO. 13-06 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE YORBA LINDA WATER DISTRICT SETTING FORTH PUBLIC FUNDS INVESTMENT POLICY AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 11-24 WHEREAS, California Government Code (CGC) Section 53600 sets forth guidelines for the investment of public funds and WHEREAS, the current Yorba Linda Water District (Yorba Linda Water District or District) Investment Policy was adopted by Resolution No. 11-08 on December 22, 2011; and WHEREAS, the District is in possession of public funds that are not required for immediate expenditure, and are available for investment; and WHEREAS, a policy setting forth guidelines for the investment of said funds is necessary for compliance with the principles of sound financial management; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Yorba Linda Water District desire to adopt the Investment Policy set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by Board of Directors of the Yorba Linda Water District as follows: Section 1. Exhibit 1 (Investment Policy – Yorba Linda Water District) is hereby adopted and deemed implemented concurrent with passage and adoption of this Resolution. Section 2. That Resolution 11-24 is hereby rescinded immediately upon adoption of this Resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of May 2013 by the following called vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Gary Melton, President Yorba Linda Water District Resolution No. 13-06 Setting Forth Public Funds Investment Policy and Rescinding Resolution No. 11-24 2 ATTEST: Steven R. Conklin, Secretary Yorba Linda Water District Reviewed as to form by General Counsel: Arthur G. Kidman, Esq. Kidman Law, LLP INVESTMENT POLICY BOARD OF DIRECTORS Gary T. Melton, President Robert R. Kiley, Vice President Michael J. Beverage, Board Member Ric Collett, Board Member Phil Hawkins, Board Member Steven R. Conklin, Acting General Manager May 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 Policy Section 2 Scope Section 3 Delegation of Authority Section 4 Investment Objectives Section 5 Prudence Section 6 Ethics and Conflicts of Interest Section 7 Authorized Broker/Dealers Section 8 Authorized Investments Section 9 Review of Investment Portfolio Section 10 Investment Pools Section 11 Collateralization Section 12 Safekeeping and Custody Section 13 Diversification and Maximum Maturities Section 14 Internal Controls Section 15 Performance Standards Section 16 Reporting Section 17 Investment Policy Adoption Appendix “A” Description of Authorized Investments and Restrictions Appendix “B” Glossary Investment Policy – May 2013 1 SECTION 1: POLICY 1.1 It is the policy of the Yorba Linda Water District (“District”) to invest public funds in a manner which ensures the safety and preservation of capital while meeting reasonably anticipated operating expenditure needs, achieving a reasonable rate of return and conforming to all state and local statutes governing the investment of public funds. 1.2 The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines for the prudent investment of funds of the District and to outline the policies for maximizing the efficiency of the District’s cash management. The District’s goal is to enhance the economic status of the District consistent with the prudent protection of the District’s investments. This investment policy has been prepared in conformance with all pertinent existing laws of the State of California. SECTION 2: SCOPE 2.1 This Investment Policy applies to all funds and investment activities of the District, except for the proceeds from capital project financing instruments, which are invested in accordance with provisions of their specific documents. These funds are accounted for as Enterprise Funds and are identified in the District’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. SECTION 3: DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY 3.1 The authority of the Board of Directors to invest funds is derived from Section 53601 of the California Government Code (“CGC”). Section 53607 of the CGC grants the Board of Directors the authority to delegate that authority, for a one-year period, to the District’s Treasurer. Therefore, management responsibility for the investment program is hereby delegated to the District’s Treasurer, who shall be responsible for all transactions undertaken and shall establish a system of controls to regulate the activities of subordinate officials and their procedures in the absence of the Treasurer. The Treasurer shall establish procedures for the management of investment activities, including the activities of staff consistent with this Policy. 3.2 The Treasurer may retain the services of an outside investment advisor or manager as approved by the Board to assist with the District’s investment program. Any investment advisor selected shall make all investment Investment Policy – May 2013 2 decisions and transactions in strict accordance with State law, and this Policy. SECTION 4: INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES 4.1 The primary objectives, in priority order, of the District’s investment activities shall be: 4.1.1 Safety: Safety and preservation of principal is the foremost objective of the investment program. Investments shall be selected in a manner that seeks to ensure the preservation of capital in the District’s overall portfolio. This will be accomplished through a program of diversification and maturity limitations, more fully described in Section 13, in order that potential losses on individual securities do not exceed the income generated from the remainder of the portfolio. 4.1.2 Liquidity: The District’s investment portfolio will remain sufficiently liquid to enable the District to meet all operating requirements which might be reasonably anticipated. Securities should mature concurrent with cash needs to meet anticipated demands. 4.1.3 Return on Investments: The District’s investment portfolio shall be designed with the objective of attaining the best yield or returns on investments, taking into account the investment risk constraints and liquidity needs. Return on investment is of secondary importance compared to the safety and liquidity objectives. SECTION 5: PRUDENCE 5.1 The standard of prudence to be used by the designated representative shall be the “prudent investor” standard and shall be applied in the context of managing the overall portfolio. The meaning of the standard of prudent investor is explained in CGC Section 53600.3, which states that “when investing, reinvesting, purchasing, acquiring, exchanging, selling or managing public funds, a trustee shall act with care, skill, prudence, and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing, including, but not limited to, the general economic conditions and the anticipated needs of the agency, that a prudent person acting in a like capacity and familiarity with those matters would use in the conduct of funds of a like character and with like Investment Policy – May 2013 3 aims, to safeguard the principal and maintain the liquidity needs of the agency.” 5.2 The Treasurer and delegated investment officers, acting in accordance with District procedures and the Policy and exercising due diligence, shall be relieved of personal responsibility for an individual security’s credit risk or market price changes, provided deviations from expectations are reported in a timely fashion and appropriate action is taken to control adverse developments. 5.3 Investments shall be made with judgment and care - under circumstances then prevailing - which persons of prudence, discretion and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived. SECTION 6.0: ETHICS AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST 6.1 Officers and employees involved in the investment process shall refrain from personal business activity that could conflict with proper execution of the investment program, or which could impair their ability to make impartial investment decisions. Employees and investment officials shall disclose to the District’s General Manager any material financial interests in financial institutions that conduct business with the District’s boundaries, and they shall further disclose any large personal financial/investment positions that could be related to the performance of the District. SECTION 7: AUTHORIZED BROKER/DEALERS 7.1 The Treasurer will maintain a list of authorized broker/dealers and financial institutions that are approved for investment purposes. Broker/dealers will be selected for credit worthiness and must be authorized to provide investment services in the State of California. These may include “primary” dealers or regional dealers that qualify under Securities & Exchange Commission Rule 15(C)3-1 (uniform net capital rule). No public deposit will be made by the broker/dealer except in a qualified public depository as established by the established state laws. Before a financial institution or broker/dealer is used, they are subject to investigation and approval by the Treasurer or his/her designated representative, and must submit the following: Investment Policy – May 2013 4 7.1.1 Certification of having read and understood this investment policy resolution and agreeing to comply with the District’s investment policy; 7.1.2 Proof of Federal Investment Regulatory Authority certification; 7.1.3 Proof of State of California registration; 7.1.4 Audited financial statements for the institution’s three (3) most recent fiscal years; 7.1.5 References of other public-sector clients that similar services are provided to. 7.2 If a third party investment advisor is authorized to conduct investment transactions on the District’s behalf, the investment advisor may use their own list of approved independent broker/dealers and financial institutions. The investment advisor’s approved list must be made available to the District upon request. SECTION 8: AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS 8.1 The District is provided a broad spectrum of eligible investments under the CGC Sections 53601 et seq. Authorized investments shall also include, in accordance with CGC section 16429.1 et seq., investments into the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) and the Orange County Treasurer’s Commingled Investment Pool in accordance with CGC section 53684. Within the investments permitted by the CGC, the District seeks to further restrict eligible investment to the investments listed in Section 8.3 below. Percentage holding limits listed in this section apply at the time the security is purchased. Ratings, where shown, specify the minimum credit rating category required at purchased without regard to +/- or 1,2,3 modifiers, if any. 8.2 The purchase of any investment permitted by the CGC, but not listed as an authorized investment in this Policy is prohibited without the prior approval of the Board of Directors. Investment Policy – May 2013 5 8.3 Within the context of these limitations, the following investments are authorized: TABLE 1 Permitted Investments*/ Deposits CA Government Code % of Portfolio Limits / Maturity Limits YLWD % of Portfolio Limits / Maturity Limits Bank Deposits# No % limit, 5 years No % limit, 5 years CD Placement Service# 30% limit, 5 years 30% limit, 5 years Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)^ No % or maturity limit No % or maturity limit County Pooled Investment Funds^ No % or maturity limit No % or maturity limit Joint Powers Authority Funds (CalTRUST & CAMP)^ No % or maturity limit No % or maturity limit U.S. Treasury Obligations No % limit, 5 years No % limit, 5 years U.S. Agency Obligations No % limit, 5 years No % limit, 5 years Negotiable Certificates of Deposit# 30% portfolio, 5 years 30% portfolio, 5 years Money Market Funds* 20%, 10% per issuer, no limit 20%, 10% per issuer, no limit Medium-Term (or Corporate) Notes* 30% portfolio, 5 years 30% portfolio, 5 years Bankers Acceptances* 40%, 30% per issuer, 180 days 10% max, 5% per issuer, 180 days Commercial Paper* 25%, 10% per issuer, 270 days 25% max, 5% per issuer, 270 days * Please see Appendix A for more detailed descriptions and additional restrictions ^ Please see Section 10 for additional restrictions # Please see Section 11 for additional restrictions Investment Policy – May 2013 6 SECTION 9: REVIEW OF INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO 9.1 The securities held by the District must be in compliance with Section 8 Authorized Investments at the time of purchase. The Treasurer shall at least quarterly review the portfolio to verify that all securities are in compliance with Section 8 Authorized Investments. In the event a security held by the District is subject to a credit rating change that brings it below the minimum credit ratings specified in Appendix A Authorized Investments, the Treasurer should notify the Finance-Accounting Committee - and through the Committee’s minutes, the Board - of the change. The course of action to be followed will then be decided on a case-by-case basis, considering such factors as the reason for the change, prognosis for recovery or further rate drops, and the market price of the security. SECTION 10: INVESTMENT POOLS 10.1 A thorough investigation of any investment pool or mutual fund is required prior to investing, and on a continual basis. The investigation will, at a minimum, obtain the following information: 10.1.1 A description of eligible investment securities, and a written statement of investment policy and objectives; 10.1.2 A description of interest calculations and how it is distributed, and how gains and losses are treated; 10.1.3 A description of how the securities are safeguarded (included the settlement processes), and how often the securities are priced and the program audited; 10.1.4 A description of who may invest in the program, how often and what size deposit and withdrawal are allowed; 10.1.5 A schedule for receiving statements and portfolio listings; 10.1.6 Are reserves, retained earnings, etc. utilized by the pool/fund; 10.1.7 A fee schedule and when and how it is assessed; Investment Policy – May 2013 7 10.1.8 Is the pool/fund eligible for bond proceeds and/or will it accept such proceeds. SECTION 11: COLLATERALIZATION 11.1 Bank Deposits: Under provisions of the CGC, California banks and savings and loan associations are required to secure the District’s deposits by pledging eligible securities with a value of 110% of principal and accrued interest. State law also allows financial institutions to secure District deposits by pledging first trust deed mortgage notes having a value of 150% of the District’s total deposits. 11.2 Waiver of Security: The Treasurer, at his/her discretion and in accordance with CGC section 53653, may waive security for the portion of any deposits as is insured pursuant to federal law. SECTION 12: SAFEKEEPING AND CUSTODY 12.1 All security transactions entered into by the District shall be conducted on a delivery-versus-payment basis. Securities will be held by a third party custodian designated by the Treasurer and evidenced by safekeeping receipts. The only exception to the foregoing shall be depository accounts and securities purchases made with (i) local government investment pools, and (ii) money market mutual funds, since those purchased securities are not deliverable. SECTION 13: DIVERSIFICATION AND MAXIMUM MATURITIES 13.1 The District will diversify its investments by security type and institution. With the exception of U.S. Treasuries, U.S. Agency Securities, FDIC Insured Certificates of Deposit and authorized pools, no more than 30% of the District’s total investment portfolio will be invested in a single security type or with a single financial institution. 13.2 To the extent possible, the District will attempt to match its investments with anticipated cash flow requirements. Unless matched to a specific cash flow and approved in advance by the Board of Directors, the District will not directly invest in securities maturing more than 5 years from the date of purchase. Investment Policy – May 2013 8 SECTION 14: INTERNAL CONTROLS 14.1 The external auditors will annually review the investments and general activities associated with the investment program. This review will provide internal control by assuring compliance with the Investment Policy and District policies and procedures. SECTION 15: PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 15.1 The investment portfolio will be designed with the objective of obtaining a rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles, commensurate with the investment risk constraints and the cash flow needs. 15.2 The District’s investment strategy is passive. The performance of the District’s investment portfolio will be evaluated and compared to an appropriate benchmark in order to assess the success of the investment portfolio relative to the District’s Safety, Liquidity and Return on Investments objectives. This review will be conducted annually with the Finance-Accounting Committee. SECTION 16: REPORTING 16.1 Subject to CGC sections 53607 and 53646(b), the Treasurer will provide monthly investment reports to the District’s Finance-Accounting Committee (and through the Committee’s minutes, to the Board of Directors) and quarterly reports to the Board of Directors which provide a clear picture of the status of the current investment portfolio. The reports shall comply with the reporting requirements of CGC sections 53607 and 53646(b), respectively. SECTION 17: INVESTMENT POLICY ADOPTION 17.1 The District’s Investment Policy will be adopted by resolution of the Board of Directors. The policy will be reviewed on an annual basis and modification, if any, must be approved by the Board of Directors. Investment Policy – May 2013 9 APPENDIX “A” DESCRIPTION OF AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS The following descriptions of authorized investments, maximum maturities and limits are included here to assist in the administration of this policy. 1) BANK DEPOSITS The District may make bank deposits in accordance with California Government Code section 53630 et seq., which requires collateral. Per California Government Code Section, there are three classes of deposits: (a) inactive deposits, (b) active deposits and (c) interest-bearing active deposits. The collateral requirements apply to both active deposits (checking and savings accounts) and inactive deposits (non-negotiable time certificates of deposit). The maximum maturity shall be five years. No limit will be placed on the percentage total invested in this category. 2) CD PLACEMENT SERVICE – Government Code Sections 53601.8 and 53653.8 The District may invest in collateralized certificates of deposits in accordance with the requirements in California Government Code Sections 53601.8 and 53635.8. Purchases of certificates of deposit pursuant to Government Code Sections 53601.8, 53653.8, and 53601 shall not, in total, exceed 30 percent of District’s investment portfolio. The maximum maturity is limited to five years. 3) THE STATE LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF) – Government Code Section 16429.1 The LAIF is a special fund in the California State Treasury and an investment alternative for California’s local governments and special districts created and governed pursuant to CGC Section 16429.1 et seq. and managed by the State Treasurer’s Office. The District, with the consent of the Board of Directors, is authorized to remit money not required for the District’s immediate need, to the State Treasurer for deposit in this fund for the purpose of investment. Principal may be withdrawn on one day’s notice. The fees charged by LAIF are limited by statute. Investment of District funds in LAIF shall be subject to investigation and due diligence prior to Investment Policy – May 2013 10 investing, and on a continual basis to a level of review described in Section 10 Investment Pools. No limit will be placed on the percentage total in this category. 4) ORANGE COUNTY TREASURER’S COMMINGLED INVESTMENT POOL (OCCIP) – Government Code Section 53684 The OCCIP is a money market investment pool managed by the Orange County Treasurer’s Office. OCCIP is more fully described in the glossary at Appendix B. The District has no funds invested in OCCIP at this time. Investment of District funds in OCCIP would be subject to investigation and due diligence prior to investing, and on a continual basis to a level of review described in Section 10 Investment Pools. There is no maturity limit. No limit will be placed on the percentage total in this category. 5) THE INVESTMENT TRUST OF CALIFORNIA (CALTRUST) – Government Code Section 53601(p) The Investment Trust of California (CalTRUST) is a local government investment pool organized as a joint powers authority pursuant to California Government Code Section 6509.7. Wells Capital Management, a wholly- owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo, is the portfolio manager for each of the CalTRUST funds. Investment of District funds in CalTRUST shall be subject to investigation and due diligence prior to investing, and on a continual basis to a level of review described in Section 10 Investment Pools. No limit will be placed on the percentage total in this category. 6) CALIFORNIA ASSSET MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CAMP) – Government Code Section 53601(p) The Trust is currently governed by a Board of five Trustees, all of whom are officials or employees of Public Agencies. The Trustees are responsible for setting overall policies and procedures for the Trust. The Program’s Investment Adviser and Administrator is Public Financial Management, Inc. The amounts deposited in this category shall be limited to bond proceeds and are to be invested for the purpose of arbitrage management only. The District has no funds invested in CAMP at this time. Investment of District funds in OCCIP would be subject to investigation and due diligence prior to investing, and on a continual basis to a level of review described in Section 10 Investment Pools. Proceeds may be invested in the Treasury Portfolio Investment Policy – May 2013 11 and/or the Money Market Portfolio. There is no maturity limit. No limit will be placed on the percentage total in this category. 7) U.S. TREASURY OBLIGATIONS – Government Code Section 53601(b) United States Treasury notes, bonds, bills or certificates of indebtedness, or those for which the faith and credit of the United States are pledged for the payment of principal and interest. The maximum maturity shall be limited to five years. No limit will be placed on the percentage total invested in this category. 8) U.S. AGENCY OBLIGATIONS – Government Code Section 53601(f) Federal agency or United States government-sponsored enterprise senior debt obligations, participations, mortgaged-backed securities or other instruments, including those issued by or fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by Federal agencies or United States government-sponsored enterprises. Examples of these securities include Federal National Mortgage Association, Federal Farm Credit Bank, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and Federal Home Loan Bank. The maximum maturity shall be limited to five years with no limit placed on the percentage total in this investment category. 9) NEGOTIABLE CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT – Government Code Section 53601(i) Investments are limited to deposits issued by a nationally or state-chartered bank, a savings association or a federal association (as defined by Section 5102 of the Financial Code), a state or federal credit union, or by a state- licensed branch of a foreign bank. Individual investments shall be limited to Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation-insured limits of $250,000. Purchases of certificates of deposit pursuant to Government Code Sections 53601.8, 53653.8, and 53601 shall not, in total, exceed 30 percent of District’s investment portfolio. The maximum maturity is limited to five years. Investment Policy – May 2013 12 10) MONEY MARKET FUNDS – Government Code Section 53601(l)(2) Shares of a beneficial interest issued by diversified management companies that are money market funds registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The company shall have met either of the following criteria: (A) attained the highest ranking or the highest letter and numerical rating provided by not less than two nationally recognized rating services and (B) retained an investment adviser registered or exempt from registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission with not less than five years of experience managing money market mutual funds with assets under management in excess of five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000). There is no maturity limit. A maximum of 20 percent of the portfolio may be invested in this category, and a maximum of 10 percent of the portfolio may be invested in any single issuer. If the District has funds invested in a money market fund, a copy of the fund’s information statement shall be maintained on file. In addition, the Treasurer should review the fund’s summary holdings on a quarterly basis. 11) MEDIUM-TERM (OR CORPORATE) NOTES – Government Code Section 53601(k) Medium-term notes are defined as all corporate and depository institution debt securities with a maximum remaining maturity of five years or less. The corporation must be domestic, the notes must be domestic and the notes must be issued in the United States. The corporation must be rated A or its equivalent or better by a nationally recognized rating service. The maximum maturity is limited to five years and the maximum percentage allowable for investment is 30 percent of the investment portfolio in the aggregate. 12) BANKERS’ ACCEPTANCES – Government Code Section 53601 (g) Bankers’ acceptances, otherwise known as bills of exchange or time drafts, are drawn on and accepted by a commercial bank. Purchases are limited to bankers’ acceptances issued by domestic or foreign banks, which are eligible for purchase by the Federal Reserve System. Eligible bankers’ Investment Policy – May 2013 13 acceptances are restricted to issuing financial institutions with a short-term debt rating of at least “A-1” or its equivalent by a nationally recognized rating service. The maximum term may not exceed 180 days and the maximum percentage allowable for investment is 10 percent of the portfolio in the aggregate, and 5% for an individual issuer. 13) COMMERCIAL PAPER – Government Code Section 53601(h) Commercial paper rated the highest ranking or of the highest letter and number ratings as provided for by a nationally recognized rating service. The entity that issues the commercial paper shall meet either of the following two sets of criteria: (1) The corporation shall be organized and operating within the United States, shall have total assets in excess of $500,000,000, and shall have debt, other than commercial paper, if any, that is rated A or higher by a nationally recognized rating service. (2) The corporation shall be organized within the United States as a special purpose corporation, trust, or limited liability company, has program wide credit enhancements including, but not limited to, over collateralization, letters of credit, or surety bond; has commercial paper that is rated “A-1” or higher, or equivalent by a nationally recognized statistical-rating organization. Eligible commercial paper may not exceed 270 days’ maturity and may not represent more than the 25 percent of the investment portfolio in the aggregate, and 5% for an individual issuer. Investment Policy – May 2013 14 APPENDIX “B” GLOSSARY AGENCIES: Federal agency securities and/or Government-sponsored enterprises. ASKED: The price at which securities are offered. BANKERS’ ACCEPTANCE (BA): A draft or bill or exchange accepted by a bank or trust company. The accepting institution guarantees payment of the bill, as well as the issuer. BENCHMARK: A comparative base for measuring the performance or risk tolerance of the investment portfolio. A benchmark should represent a close correlation to the level of risk and the average duration of the portfolio’s investments. BID: The price offered by a buyer of securities. (When you are selling securities, you ask for a bid.) See Offer. BROKER: A broker brings buyers and sellers together for a commission. CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT (CD): A time deposit with a specific maturity evidenced by a Certificate. Large-denomination CD’s are typically negotiable. COLLATERAL: Securities, evidence of deposit or other property, which a borrower pledges to secure repayment of a loan. Also refers to securities pledged by a bank to secure deposits of public monies. COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT (CAFR): The official annual report of the District. It includes five combined statements for each individual fund and account group prepared in conformity with GAAP. It also includes supporting schedules necessary to demonstrate compliance with finance- related legal and contractual provisions, extensive introductory material, and a detailed Statistical Section. Investment Policy – May 2013 15 COUPON: (a) The annual rate of interest that a bond’s issuer promises to pay the bondholder on the bond’s face value. (b) A certificate attached to a bond evidencing interest due on a payment date. DEALER: A dealer, as opposed to a broker, acts as a principal in all transactions, buying and selling for his own account. DEBENTURE: A bond secured only by the general credit of the issuer. DELIVERY VERSUS PAYMENT: There are two methods of delivery of securities: delivery versus payment and delivery versus receipt. Delivery versus payment is delivery of securities with an exchange of money for the securities. Delivery versus receipt is delivery of securities with an exchange of a signed receipt for the securities. DERIVATIVES: (1) Financial instruments whose return profile is linked to, or derived from, the movement of one or more underlying index or security, and may include a leveraging factor, or (2) financial contracts based upon notional amounts whose value is derived from an underlying index or security (interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equities or commodities). DISCOUNT: The difference between the cost price of a security and its maturity when quoted at lower than face value. A security selling below original offering price shortly after sale also is considered to be at a discount. DISCOUNT SECURITIES: Non-interest bearing money market instruments that are issued a discount and redeemed at maturity for full face value (e.g., U.S. Treasury Bills.) DIVERSIFICATION: Dividing investment funds among a variety of securities offering independent returns. DURATION: A measure of the sensitivity of the price (the value of principal) of a fixed-income investment to a change in interest rates. Duration is expressed as a number of years. Rising interest rates mean falling bond prices, while declining interest rates mean rising bond prices. FEDERAL CREDIT AGENCIES: Agencies of the Federal government set up to supply credit to various classes of institutions and individuals, e.g., S&L’s, small business firms, students, farmers, farm cooperatives, and exporters. Investment Policy – May 2013 16 FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION (FDIC): A federal agency that insures bank deposits, currently up to $250,000 per entity. FEDERAL FUNDS RATE: The rate of interest at which Fed funds are traded. This rate is currently pegged by the Federal Reserve through open-market operations. FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS (FHLB): Government sponsored wholesale banks (currently 12 regional banks), which lend funds and provide correspondent banking services to member commercial banks, thrift institutions, credit unions and insurance companies. The mission of the FHLBs is to liquefy the housing related assets of its members who must purchase stock in their district Bank. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION (FNMA): FNMA, like GNMA was chartered under the Federal National Mortgage Association Act in 1938. FNMA is a federal corporation working under the auspices of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). It is the largest single provider of residential mortgage funds in the United States. Fannie Mae, as the corporation is called, is a private stockholder-owned corporation. The corporation’s purchases include a variety of adjustable mortgages and second loans, in addition to fixed-rate mortgages. FNMA’s securities are also highly liquid and are widely accepted. FNMA assumes and guarantees that all security holders will receive timely payment of principal and interest. FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM: The central bank of the United States created by Congress and consisting of a seven member Board of Governors in Washington, D.C., 12 regional banks and about 5,700 commercial banks are members of the system. GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION (GNMA or Ginnie Mae): Securities influencing the volume of bank credit guaranteed by GNMA and issued by mortgage bankers, commercial banks, savings and loan associations, and other institutions. Security holder is protected by full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. Ginnie Mae securities are backed by the FHA, VA or FHA mortgages. The term “pass-throughs” is often used to describe Ginnie Maes. LIQUIDITY: A liquid asset is one that can be converted easily and rapidly into cash without a substantial loss of value. In the money market, a security is said to Investment Policy – May 2013 17 be liquid if the spread between bid and asked prices is narrow and reasonable size can be done at those quotes. LOCAL GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT POOL (LGIP): The aggregate of all funds from political subdivisions that are placed in the custody of the State Treasurer for investment and reinvestment. MARKET VALUE: The price at which a security is trading and could presumably be purchased or sold. MASTER REPURCHASE AGREEMENT: A written contract covering all future transactions between the parties to repurchase—reverse repurchase agreements that establishes each party’s rights in the transactions. A master agreement will often specify, among other things, the right of the buyer-lender to liquidate the underlying securities in the event of default by the seller borrower. MATURITY: The date upon which the principal or stated value of an investment becomes due and payable. MONEY MARKET: The market in which short-term debt instruments (bills, commercial paper, bankers’ acceptances, etc.) are issued and traded. OFFER: The price asked by a seller of securities. (When you are buying securities, you ask for an offer.) See Asked and Bid. OPEN MARKET OPERATIONS: Purchases and sales of government and certain other securities in the open market by the New York Federal Reserve Bank as directed by the FOMC in order to influence the volume of money and credit in the economy. Purchases inject reserves into the bank system and stimulate growth of money and credit; sales have the opposite effect. Open market operations are the Federal Reserve’s most important and most flexible monetary policy tool. PORTFOLIO: Collection of securities held by an investor. PRIMARY DEALER: A group of government securities dealers who submit daily reports of market activity and positions and monthly financial statements to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and are subject to its informal oversight. Primary dealers include Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)-registered securities broker-dealers, banks, and a few unregulated firms. Investment Policy – May 2013 18 PRUDENT PERSON RULE: An investment standard. In some states the law requires that a fiduciary, such as a trustee, may invest money only in a list of securities selected by the custody state—the so-called legal list. In other states the trustee may invest in a security if it is one which would be bought by a prudent person of discretion and intelligence who is seeking a reasonable income and preservation of capital. QUALIFIED PUBLIC DEPOSITORIES: A financial institution which does not claim exemption from the payment of any sales or compensating use or ad valorem taxes under the laws of this state, which has segregated for the benefit of the commission eligible collateral having a value of not less than its maximum liability and which has been approved by the Public Deposit Protection Commission to hold public deposits. RATE OF RETURN: The yield obtainable on a security based on its purchase price or its current market price. This may be the amortized yield to maturity on a bond the current income return. REPURCHASE AGREEMENT (REPO): A holder of securities sells these securities to an investor with an agreement to repurchase them at a fixed price on a fixed date. The security “buyer” in effect lends the “seller” money for the period of the agreement, and the terms of the agreement are structured to compensate him for this. SAFEKEEPING: A service to customers rendered by banks for a fee whereby securities and valuables of all types and descriptions are held in the bank’s vaults for protection. SECONDARY MARKET: A market made for the purchase and sale of outstanding issues following the initial distribution. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION: Agency created by Congress to protect investors in securities transactions by administering securities legislation. SEC RULE 15(C)3-1: See Uniform Net Capital Rule. Investment Policy – May 2013 19 STRUCTURED NOTES: Notes issued by Government Sponsored Enterprises (FHLB, FNMA, SLMA, etc.) and Corporations, which have imbedded options (e.g., call features, step-up coupons, floating rate coupons, derivative-based returns) into their debt structure. Their market performance is impacted by the fluctuation of interest rates, the volatility of the imbedded options and shifts in the shape of the yield curve. TREASURY BILLS: A non-interest bearing discount security issued by the U.S. Treasury to finance the national debt. Most bills are issued to mature in three months, six months, or one year. TREASURY BONDS: Long-term coupon-bearing U.S. Treasury securities issued as direct obligations of the U.S. Government and having initial maturities of more than 10 years. TREASURY NOTES: Medium-term coupon-bearing U.S. Treasury securities issued as direct obligations of the U.S. Government and having initial maturities from two to 10 years. UNIFORM NET CAPITAL RULE: Securities and Exchange Commission requirement that member firms as well as nonmember broker-dealers in securities maintain a maximum ratio of indebtedness to liquid capital of 15 to 1; also called net capital rule and net capital ratio. Indebtedness covers all money owed to a firm, including margin loans and commitments to purchase securities, one reason new public issues are spread among members of underwriting syndicates. Liquid capital includes cash and assets easily converted into cash. YIELD: The rate of annual income return on an investment, expressed as a percentage. (a) INCOME YIELD is obtained by dividing the current dollar income by the current market price for the security. (b) NET YIELD or YIELD TO MATURITY is the current income yield minus any premium above par or plus any discount from par in purchase price, with the adjustment spread over the period from the date of purchase to the date of maturity of the bond. INVESTMENT POLICY BOARD OF DIRECTORS Gary T. Melton, President Robert R. Kiley, Vice President Michael J. Beverage, Board Member Ric Collett, Board Member Phil Hawkins, Board Member Steven R. Conklin, Acting General Manager May 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 Policy Section 2 Scope Section 3 Delegation of Authority Section 4 Investment Objectives Section 5 Prudence Section 6 Ethics and Conflicts of Interest Section 7 Authorized Broker/Dealers Section 8 Authorized Investments Section 9 Review of Investment Portfolio Section 10 Investment Pools Section 11 Collateralization Section 12 Safekeeping and Custody Section 13 Diversification and Maximum Maturities Section 14 Internal Controls Section 15 Performance Standards Section 16 Reporting Section 17 Investment Policy Adoption Appendix “A” Description of Authorized Investments and Restrictions Appendix “B” Glossary Investment Policy – May 2013 1 SECTION 1: POLICY 1.1 It is the policy of the Yorba Linda Water District (“District”) to invest public funds in a manner which ensures the safety and preservation of capital while meeting reasonably anticipated operating expenditure needs, achieving a reasonable rate of return and conforming to all state and local statutes governing the investment of public funds. 1.2 The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines for the prudent investment of funds of the Yorba Linda Water District (“District”) and to outline the policies for maximizing the efficiency of the District’s cash management. The District’s goal is to enhance the economic status of the District consistent with the prudent protection of the District’s investments. This investment policy has been prepared in conformance with all pertinent existing laws of the State of California. SECTION 2: SCOPE 2.1 This Investment Policy applies to all funds and investment activities of the District, except for the proceeds from capital project financing instruments, which are invested in accordance with provisions of their specific documents. These funds are accounted for as Enterprise Funds and are identified in the District’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. SECTION 3: DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY 3.1 The authority of the Board of Directors to invest funds is derived from Section 53601 of the California Government Code (“CGC”). Section 53607 of the CGC grants the Board of Directors the authority to delegate that authority, for a one-year period, to the District’s Treasurer. Therefore, management responsibility for the investment program is hereby delegated to the District’s Treasurer, who shall be responsible for all transactions undertaken and shall establish a system of controls to regulate the activities of subordinate officials and their procedures in the absence of the Treasurer. The Treasurer shall establish procedures for the management of investment activities, including the activities of staff consistent with this Policy. 3.2 The Treasurer may retain the services of an outside investment advisor or manager as approved by the Board to assist with the District’s investment program. Any investment advisor selected shall make all investment Investment Policy – May 2013 2 decisions and transactions in strict accordance with State law, and this Policy. SECTION 4: INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES 4.1 The primary objectives, in priority order, of the District’s investment activities shall be: 4.1.1 Safety: Safety and preservation of principal is the foremost objective of the investment program. Investments shall be selected in a manner that seeks to ensure the preservation of capital in the District’s overall portfolio. This will be accomplished through a program of diversification, more fully described in Section 11, and maturity limitations, more fully described in section 12Section 13, in order that potential losses on individual securities do not exceed the income generated from the remainder of the portfolio. 4.1.2 Liquidity: The District’s investment portfolio will remain sufficiently liquid to enable the District to meet all operating requirements which might be reasonably anticipated. Securities should mature concurrent with cash needs to meet anticipated demands. 4.1.3 Return on Investments: The District’s investment portfolio shall be designed with the objective of attaining the best yield or returns on investments, taking into account the investment risk constraints and liquidity needs. Return on investment is of secondary importance compared to the safety and liquidity objectives. SECTION 5: PRUDENCE 5.1 The standard of prudence to be used by the designated representative shall be the “prudent investor” standard and shall be applied in the context of managing the overall portfolio. The meaning of the standard of prudent investor is explained in CGC Section 53600.3, which states that “when investing, reinvesting, purchasing, acquiring, exchanging, selling or managing public funds, a trustee shall act with care, skill, prudence, and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing, including, but not limited to, the general economic conditions and the anticipated needs of the agency, that a prudent person acting in a like capacity and familiarity with those Investment Policy – May 2013 3 matters would use in the conduct of funds of a like character and with like aims, to safeguard the principal and maintain the liquidity needs of the agency.” 5.2 The Treasurer and delegated investment officers, acting in accordance with District procedures and the Policy and exercising due diligence, shall be relieved of personal responsibility for an individual security’s credit risk or market price changes, provided deviations from expectations are reported in a timely fashion and appropriate action is taken to control adverse developments. 5.3 Investments shall be made with judgment and care - under circumstances then prevailing - which persons of prudence, discretion and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived. SECTION 6.0: ETHICS AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST 6.1 Officers and employees involved in the investment process shall refrain from personal business activity that could conflict with proper execution of the investment program, or which could impair their ability to make impartial investment decisions. Employees and investment officials shall disclose to the District’s General Manager any material financial interests in financial institutions that conduct business with the District’s boundaries, and they shall further disclose any large personal financial/investment positions that could be related to the performance of the District. SECTION 7: AUTHORIZED BROKER/DEALERS 7.1 The Treasurer will maintain a list of authorized broker/dealers and financial institutions that are approved for investment purposes. Broker/dealers will be selected for credit worthiness and must be authorized to provide investment services in the State of California. These may include “primary” dealers or regional dealers that qualify under Securities & Exchange Commission Rule 15(C)3-1 (uniform net capital rule). No public deposit will be made by the broker/dealer except in a qualified public depository as established by the established state laws. Before a financial institution or broker/dealer is used, they are subject to investigation and approval by the Investment Policy – May 2013 4 Treasurer or his/her designated representative, and must submit the following: 7.1.1 Certification of having read and understood this investment policy resolution and agreeing to comply with the District’s investment policy; 7.1.2 Proof of Federal Investment Regulatory Authority certification; 7.1.3 Proof of State of California registration; 7.1.4 Audited financial statements for the institution’s three (3) most recent fiscal years; 7.1.5 References of other public-sector clients that similar services are provided to. 7.2 If a third party investment advisor is authorized to conduct investment transactions on the District’s behalf, the investment advisor may use their own list of approved independent broker/dealers and financial institutions. The investment advisor’s approved list must be made available to the District upon request. SECTION 8: AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS 8.1 The District is provided a broad spectrum of eligible investments under the CGC Sections 53684 and 53601 et seq.53601 et seq. Authorized investments shall also include, in accordance with CGC section 16429.1 et seq., investments into the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) and the Orange County Treasurer’s Commingled Investment Pool in accordance with CGC section 53684. Within the investments permitted by the CGC, the District seeks to further restrict eligible investment to the investments listed in Section 8.3 below. Percentage holding limits listed in this section apply at the time the security is purchased. Ratings, where shown, specify the minimum credit rating category required at purchased without regard to +/- or 1,2,3 modifiers, if any. 8.2 The purchase of any investment permitted by the CGC, but not listed as an authorized investment in this Policy is prohibited without the prior approval of the Board of Directors. Investment Policy – May 2013 5 8.3 Within the context of these limitations, the following investments are authorized: TABLE 1 Permitted Investments*/ Deposits CA Government Code % of Portfolio Limits / Maturity Limits YLWD % of Portfolio Limits / Maturity Limits Collateralized Bank Deposits# No % limit, 5 years No % limit, 5 years Certificates of DepositCD Placement Service# No 30% limit, 5 years No 30% limit, 5 years Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)^ No % or maturity limit No % or maturity limit County Pooled Investment Funds^ No % or maturity limit No % or maturity limit Joint Powers Authority Funds (CalTRUST & CAMP)^ No % or maturity limit No % or maturity limit U.S. Treasury Obligations No % limit, 5 years No % limit, 5 years U.S. Agency Obligations No % limit, 5 years No % limit, 5 years Negotiable Certificates of Deposit# 30% portfolio, 5 years 30% portfolio, 5 years Money Market Funds* 20%, 10% per issuer, no limit 20%, 10% per issuer, no limit Medium-Term (or Corporate) Notes* 30% portfolio, 5 years 30% portfolio, 5 years Bankers Acceptances* 40%, 30% per issuer, 180 days 10% max, 5% per issuer, 180 days Commercial Paper* 25%, 10% per issuer, 270 25% max, 5% per issuer, 270 Formatted: Font: Calibri, 11 pt, Not Bold Investment Policy – May 2013 6 days days * Please see Appendix A for more detailed descriptions and additional restrictions ^ Please see Section 10 for additional restrictions # Please see Section 11 for additional restrictions SECTION 9: REVIEW OF INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO 9.1 The securities held by the District must be in compliance with Section 8 Authorized Investments at the time of purchase. The Treasurer shall at least quarterly review the portfolio to verify that all securities are in compliance with Section 8 Authorized Investments. In the event a security held by the District is subject to a credit rating change that brings it below the minimum credit ratings specified in Section 8Appendix A Authorized Investments, the Treasurer should notify the Finance-Accounting Committee - and through the Committee’s minutes, the Board - of the change. The course of action to be followed will then be decided on a case -by-case basis, considering such factors as the reason for the change, prognosis for recovery or further rate drops, and the market price of the security. SECTION 10: INVESTMENT POOLS 10.1 A thorough investigation of any investment pool or mutual fund is required prior to investing, and on a continual basis. The investigation will, at a minimum, obtain the following information: 10.1.1 A description of eligible investment securities, and a written statement of investment policy and objectives; 10.1.2 A description of interest calculations and how it is distributed, and how gains and losses are treated; 10.1.3 A description of how the securities are safeguarded (included the settlement processes), and how often the securities are priced and the program audited; 10.1.4 A description of who may invest in the program, how often and what size deposit and withdrawal are allowed; 10.1.5 A schedule for receiving statements and portfolio listings; Formatted: Font: 14 pt Formatted: Indent: Left: 0", First line: 0", Tab stops: Not at 0.5" Investment Policy – May 2013 7 10.1.6 Are reserves, retained earnings, etc. utilized by the pool/fund; 10.1.7 A fee schedule and when and how it is assessed; 10.1.8 Is the pool/fund eligible for bond proceeds and/or will it accept such proceeds. SECTION 11: COLLATERALIZATION 11.1 Bank Deposits: Under provisions of the CGC, California banks and savings and loan associations are required to secure the District’s deposits by pledging governmenteligible securities with a value of 110% of principal and accrued interest. State law also allows financial institutions to secure District deposits by pledging first trust deed mortgage notes having a value of 150% of the District’s total deposits. 11.2 CertificatesWaiver of Deposit/Negotiable Certificates of DepositSecurity: The market value of securities that underlay certificates of deposit shall be valued at 110% of the market value of principal and accrued interest. The Treasurer, at his/her discretion and in accordance with CGC section 53653, may waive the collateral requirementsecurity for the portion of any deposits upas is insured pursuant to the maximum dollar amount which are covered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporationfederal law. SECTION 12: SAFEKEEPING AND CUSTODY 12.1 All security transactions entered into by the District shall be conducted on a delivery-versus-payment (DVP) basis. Securities will be held by a third party custodian designated by the Treasurer and evidenced by safekeeping receipts. The only exception to the foregoing shall be depository accounts and securities purchases made with (i) local government investment pools, and (ii) money market mutual funds, since those purchased securities are not deliverable. SECTION 13: DIVERSIFICATION AND MAXIMUM MATURITIES 13.1 The District will diversify its investments by security type and institution. With the exception of U.S. Treasuries, U.S. Agency Securities, FDIC Investment Policy – May 2013 8 Insured Certificates of Deposit and authorized pools, no more than 30% of the District’s total investment portfolio will be invested in a single security type or with a single financial institution. 13.2 To the extent possible, the districtDistrict will attempt to match its investments with anticipated cash flow requirements. Unless matched to a specific cash flow and approved in advance by the Board of Directors, the District will not directly invest in securities maturing more than 5 years from the date of purchase. SECTION 14: INTERNAL CONTROLS 14.1 The external auditors will annually review the investments and general activities associated with the investment program. This review will provide internal control by assuring compliance with the Investment Policy and District policies and procedures. SECTION 15: PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 15.1 The investment portfolio will be designed with the objective of obtaining a rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles, commensurate with the investment risk constraints and the cash flow needs. 15.2 The District’s investment strategy is passive. The performance of the District’s investment portfolio will be evaluated and compared to an appropriate benchmark in order to assess the success of the investment portfolio relative to the District’s Safety, Liquidity and Return on Investments objectives. This review will be conducted annually with the Finance-Accounting Committee. SECTION 16: REPORTING 16.1 Subject to the CGC Section 41004,sections 53607 and 53646(b), the Treasurer will provide monthly investment reports to the District’s Finance- Accounting Committee (and through the Committee’s minutes, to the Board of Directors) and quarterly reports to the Board of Directors which provide a clear picture of the status of the current investment portfolio. The report should include comments on market conditions, discussions regarding changes in portfolio balances and possible changes in the portfolio structure going forward. Schedules in the monthly reports should include at a Investment Policy – May 2013 9 minimum the following: The reports shall comply with the reporting requirements of CGC sections 53607 and 53646(b), respectively. 16.1.1 A list of individual securities held at the end of the previous reporting period by authorized investment category; 16.1.2 Average life and final maturity of all investments listed; 16.1.3 Interest rates on said investments; 16.1.4 Par value, amortized book value and market value; 16.1.5 Percentage of the portfolio represented by each investment category. SECTION 17: INVESTMENT POLICY ADOPTION 17.1 The District’s Investment Policy will be adopted by resolution of the Board of Directors. The policy will be reviewed on an annual basis and modification, if any, must be approved by the Board of Directors. Formatted: Font: Bold, Underline Formatted: Indent: Left: 0", First line: 0", No widow/orphan control, Don't adjust space between Latin and Asian text, Don't adjust space between Asian text and numbers Investment Policy – May 2013 10 APPENDIX “A” DESCRIPTION OF AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS The following descriptions of authorized investments, maximum maturities and limits are included here to assist in the administration of this policy. 1) COLLATERALIZED BANK DEPOSITS Cash will be deposited only in Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (FSLIC) insured institutions or fully collateralized certificates of deposit. Collateral for a given investment must be 110 percent of principal for government securities collateral and 150 percent of principal for first mortgage collateral. The institution must maintain a net worth to asset ratio of at least 3.0 percent, and a positive earnings record. The bank or savings and loan must be located in California.The District may make bank deposits in accordance with California Government Code section 53630 et seq., which requires collateral. Per California Government Code Section, there are three classes of deposits: (a) inactive deposits, (b) active deposits and (c) interest-bearing active deposits. The collateral requirements apply to both active deposits (checking and savings accounts) and inactive deposits (non-negotiable time certificates of deposit). The maximum maturity shall be five years. No limit will be placed on the percentage total invested in this category. 2) CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSITCD PLACEMENT SERVICE – Government Code SectionSections 53601.8 and 53653.8 The District may invest in collateralized certificates of deposits issued by commercial banks and savings and loans (Government Code Sections 53601(h) and 53635(h)). A written depository contract is requiredin accordance with all institutions that hold District deposits. Securities placed in a collateral pool must provide coverage for at least 110 percent of all deposits that are placedthe requirements in the institution. Acceptable pooled collateral is governed by California Government Code Section 53651. All banks are required to provide the District with a regular statementSections 53601.8 and 53635.8. Purchases of certificates of pooled collateral. This report will state that they are meeting the 110 percent collateral rule (Government Code Section 53652(a)), a listing of all collateral with location Investment Policy – May 2013 11 and market value, plus an accountability of the total amount of deposits secured by the pool. Deposits of up to $250,000 are allowed in any institution that insures its deposits with the FDIC, regardless of Moody’s Investors Service or Standard and Poor’s Corporation ratings. As per section 53638 of the California Government Code, any deposit pursuant to Government Code Sections 53601.8, 53653.8, and 53601 shall not, in total, exceed that total paid-up capital and surplus of any depository bank, nor shall the deposit exceed the total net worth of any institution. As long as deposits are within FDIC limits, no limit will be placed on the percentage total invested in this category30 percent of District’s investment portfolio. The maximum maturity is limited to five years. 3) THE STATE LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF) – Government Code Section 16429.1 The LAIF is a special fund in the California State Treasury and an investment alternative for California’s local governments and special districts created and governed pursuant to CGC Section 16429.1 et seq. and managed by the State Treasurer’s Office. The District, with the consent of the Board of Directors, is authorized to remit money not required for the District’s immediate need, to the State Treasurer for deposit in this fund for the purpose of investment. Principal may be withdrawn on one day’s notice. The fees charged by LAIF are limited by statute. Investment of District funds in LAIF shall be subject to investigation and due diligence prior to investing, and on a continual basis to a level of review described in Section 10 Investment Pools. No limit will be placed on the percentage total in this category. 4) ORANGE COUNTY TREASURER’S COMMINGELDCOMMINGLED INVESTMENT POOL (OCCIP) – Government Code Section 53684 The OCCIP is a money market investment pool managed by the Orange County Treasurer’s Office. OCCIP is more fully described in the glossary at Appendix B. The District has no funds invested in OCCIP at this time. Investment of District funds in OCCIP would be subject to investigation and due diligence prior to investing, and on a continual basis to a level of review Investment Policy – May 2013 12 described in Section 10 Investment Pools. There is no maturity limit. No limit will be placed on the percentage total in this category. 5) THE INVESTMENT TRUST OF CALIFORNIA (CALTRUST) – Government Code Section 53601(p) The Investment Trust of California (CalTRUST) is a local government investment pool organized as a joint powers authority pursuant to California Government Code Section 6509.7. Wells Capital Management, a wholly- owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo, is the portfolio manager for each of the CalTRUST funds. Investment of District funds in CalTRUST shall be subject to investigation and due diligence prior to investing, and on a continual basis to a level of review described in Section 10 Investment Pools. No limit will be placed on the percentage total in this category. 6) CALIFORNIA ASSSET MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CAMP) – Government Code Section 53601(p) The Trust is currently governed by a Board of five Trustees, all of whom are officials or employees of Public Agencies. The Trustees are responsible for setting overall policies and procedures for the Trust. The Program’s Investment Adviser and Administrator is Public Financial Management, Inc. The amounts deposited in this category shall be limited to bond proceeds and are to be invested for the purpose of arbitrage management only. The District has no funds invested in CAMP at this time. Investment of District funds in OCCIP would be subject to investigation and due diligence prior to investing, and on a continual basis to a level of review described in Section 10 Investment Pools. Proceeds may be invested in the Treasury Portfolio and/or the Money Market Portfolio. There is no maturity limit. No limit will be placed on the percentage total in this category. 7) U.S. TREASURY OBLIGATIONS – Government Code Section 53601(b-d) United States Treasury notes, bonds, bills or certificates of indebtedness, or those for which the faith and credit of the United States are pledged for the payment of principal and interest. The maximum maturity shall be limited to five years. No limit will be placed on the percentage total invested in this category. 8) U.S. AGENCY OBLIGATIONS – Government Code Section 53601(f) Investment Policy – May 2013 13 Federal agency or United States government-sponsored enterprise senior debt obligations, participations, mortgaged-backed securities or other instruments, including those issued by or fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by Federal agencies or United States government-sponsored enterprises. Examples of these securities include Federal National Mortgage Association, Federal Farm Credit Bank, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and Federal Home Loan Bank. The maximum maturity shall be limited to five years with no limit placed on the percentage total in this investment category. Formatted: Font: Bold Formatted: Left, Indent: Left: 0", First line: 0" Investment Policy – May 2013 14 9) NEGOTIABLE CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT – Government Code Section 53601(i) Investments are limited to deposits issued by a nationally or state-chartered bank, a savings association or a federal association (as defined by Section 5102 of the Financial Code), a state or federal credit union, or by a state - licensed branch of a foreign bank. Individual investments shall be limited to Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation-insured limits of $250,000. Purchases of certificates of deposit pursuant to Government Code Sections 53601.8, 53653.8, and 53601 shall not, in total, exceed 30 percent of District’s investment portfolio. The maximum maturity is limited to five years and the maximum percentage allowable for investment is 30 percent of the investment portfolio in the aggregate. Investment Policy – May 2013 15 10) MONEY MARKET FUNDS – Government Code Section 53601(l)(2) Shares of a beneficial interest issued by diversified management companies that are money market funds registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The company shall have met either of the following criteria: (A) attained the highest ranking or the highest letter and numerical rating provided by not less than two nationally recognized rating services and (B) retained an investment adviser registered or exempt from registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission with not less than five years of experience managing money market mutual funds with assets under management in excess of five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000). There is no maturity limit. A maximum of 20 percent of the portfolio may be invested in this category, and a maximum of 10 percent of the portfolio may be invested in any single issuer. If the District has funds invested in a money market fund, a copy of the fund’s information statement shall be maintained on file. In addition, the Treasurer should review the fund’s summary holdings on a quarterly basis. Formatted: Font: Bold Formatted: Left, Indent: Left: 0" Investment Policy – May 2013 16 11) MEDIUM-TERM (OR CORPORATE) NOTES – Government Code Section 53601(k) Medium-term notes are defined as all corporate and depository institution debt securities with a maximum remaining maturity of five years or less. The corporation must be domestic, the notes must be domestic and the notes must be issued in the United States. The corporation must be rated A or its equivalent or better by a nationally recognized rating service. The maximum maturity is limited to five years and the maximum percentage allowable for investment is 30 percent of the investment portfolio in the aggregate. 12) BANKERS’ ACCEPTANCES – Government Code Section 53601 (g) Bankers’ acceptances, otherwise known as bills of exchange or time drafts, are drawn on and accepted by a commercial bank. Purchases are limited to bankers’ acceptances issued by domestic or foreign banks, which are eligible for purchase by the Federal Reserve System. Eligible bankers’ acceptances are restricted to issuing financial institutions with a short-term debt rating of at least ” “A-1” or its equivalent by a nationally recognized rating service. The maximum term may not exceed 180 days and the maximum percentage allowable for investment is 3010 percent of the portfolio in the aggregate, and 5% for an individual issuer. 13) COMMERCIAL PAPER – Government Code Section 53601(h) Commercial paper rated the highest ranking or of the highest letter and number ratings as provided for by a nationally recognized rating service. The entity that issues the commercial paper shall meet either of the following two sets of criteria: (1) The corporation shall be organized and operating within the United States, shall have total assets in excess of $500,000,000, and shall issuehave debt, other than commercial paper, if any, that is rated A or higher by a nationally recognized rating service. (2) The corporation shall be organized within the United States as a special purpose corporation, trust, or limited liability company, has program wide credit enhancements including, but not limited to, over collateralization, letters of credit, or surety bond; has commercial paper that is rated “A-1” or higher, or equivalent by a nationally recognized statistical-rating organization. Eligible commercial paper may not exceed 270 days’ Investment Policy – May 2013 17 maturity and may not represent more than the 25 percent of the investment portfolio in the aggregate, and 5% for an individual issuer. Investment Policy – May 2013 18 APPENDIX “B” GLOSSARY AGENCIES: Federal agency securities and/or Government-sponsored enterprises. ASKED: The price at which securities are offered. BANKERS’ ACCEPTANCE (BA): A draft or bill or exchange accepted by a bank or trust company. The accepting institution guarantees payment of the bill, as well as the issuer. BENCHMARK: A comparative base for measuring the performance or risk tolerance of the investment portfolio. A benchmark should represent a close correlation to the level of risk and the average duration of the portfolio’s investments. BID: The price offered by a buyer of securities. (When you are selling securities, you ask for a bid.) See Offer. BROKER: A broker brings buyers and sellers together for a commission. CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT (CD): A time deposit with a specific maturity evidenced by a Certificate. Large-denomination CD’s are typically negotiable. COLLATERAL: Securities, evidence of deposit or other property, which a borrower pledges to secure repayment of a loan. Also refers to securities pledged by a bank to secure deposits of public monies. COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT (CAFR): The official annual report of the District. It includes five combined statements for each individual fund and account group prepared in conformity with GAAP. It also includes supporting schedules necessary to demonstrate compliance with finance- related legal and contractual provisions, extensive introductory material, and a detailed Statistical Section. Investment Policy – May 2013 19 COUPON: (a) The annual rate of interest that a bond’s issuer promises to pay the bondholder on the bond’s face value. (b) A certificate attached to a bond evidencing interest due on a payment date. DEALER: A dealer, as opposed to a broker, acts as a principal in all transactions, buying and selling for his own account. DEBENTURE: A bond secured only by the general credit of the issuer. DELIVERY VERSUS PAYMENT: There are two methods of delivery of securities: delivery versus payment and delivery versus receipt. Delivery versus payment is delivery of securities with an exchange of money for the securities. Delivery versus receipt is delivery of securities with an exchange of a signed receipt for the securities. DERIVATIVES: (1) Financial instruments whose return profile is linked to, or derived from, the movement of one or more underlying index or security, and may include a leveraging factor, or (2) financial contracts based upon notional amounts whose value is derived from an underlying index or security (interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equities or commodities). DISCOUNT: The difference between the cost price of a security and its maturity when quoted at lower than face value. A security selling below original offering price shortly after sale also is considered to be at a discount. DISCOUNT SECURITIES: Non-interest bearing money market instruments that are issued a discount and redeemed at maturity for full face value (e.g., U.S. Treasury Bills.) DIVERSIFICATION: Dividing investment funds among a variety of securities offering independent returns. DURATION: A measure of the sensitivity of the price (the value of principal) of a fixed-income investment to a change in interest rates. Duration is expressed as a number of years. Rising interest rates mean falling bond prices, while declining interest rates mean rising bond prices. FEDERAL CREDIT AGENCIES: Agencies of the Federal government set up to supply credit to various classes of institutions and individuals, e.g., S&L’s, small business firms, students, farmers, farm cooperatives, and exporters. Investment Policy – May 2013 20 FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION (FDIC): A federal agency that insures bank deposits, currently up to $250,000 per entity. FEDERAL FUNDS RATE: The rate of interest at which Fed funds are traded. This rate is currently pegged by the Federal Reserve through open-market operations. FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS (FHLB): Government sponsored wholesale banks (currently 12 regional banks), which lend funds and provide correspondent banking services to member commercial banks, thrift institutions, credit unions and insurance companies. The mission of the FHLBs is to liquefy the housing related assets of its members who must purchase stock in their district Bank. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION (FNMA): FNMA, like GNMA was chartered under the Federal National Mortgage Association Act in 1938. FNMA is a federal corporation working under the auspices of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). It is the largest single provider of residential mortgage funds in the United States. Fannie Mae, as the corporation is called, is a private stockholder-owned corporation. The corporation’s purchases include a variety of adjustable mortgages and second loans, in addition to fixed-rate mortgages. FNMA’s securities are also highly liquid and are widely accepted. FNMA assumes and guarantees that all security holders will receive timely payment of principal and interest. FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM: The central bank of the United States created by Congress and consisting of a seven member Board of Governors in Washington, D.C., 12 regional banks and about 5,700 commercial banks are members of the system. GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION (GNMA or Ginnie Mae): Securities influencing the volume of bank credit guaranteed by GNMA and issued by mortgage bankers, commercial banks, savings and loan associations, and other institutions. Security holder is protected by full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. Ginnie Mae securities are backed by the FHA, VA or FHA mortgages. The term “pass-throughs” is often used to describe Ginnie Maes. LIQUIDITY: A liquid asset is one that can be converted easily and rapidly into cash without a substantial loss of value. In the money market, a security is said to Investment Policy – May 2013 21 be liquid if the spread between bid and asked prices is narrow and reasonable size can be done at those quotes. LOCAL GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT POOL (LGIP): The aggregate of all funds from political subdivisions that are placed in the custody of the State Treasurer for investment and reinvestment. MARKET VALUE: The price at which a security is trading and could presumably be purchased or sold. MASTER REPURCHASE AGREEMENT: A written contract covering all future transactions between the parties to repurchase—reverse repurchase agreements that establishes each party’s rights in the transactions. A master agreement will often specify, among other things, the right of the buyer -lender to liquidate the underlying securities in the event of default by the seller borrower. MATURITY: The date upon which the principal or stated value of an investment becomes due and payable. MONEY MARKET: The market in which short-term debt instruments (bills, commercial paper, bankers’ acceptances, etc.) are issued and traded. OFFER: The price asked by a seller of securities. (When you are buying securities, you ask for an offer.) See Asked and Bid. OPEN MARKET OPERATIONS: Purchases and sales of government and certain other securities in the open market by the New York Federal Reserve Bank as directed by the FOMC in order to influence the volume of money and credit in the economy. Purchases inject reserves into the bank system and stimulate growth of money and credit; sales have the opposite effect. Open market operations are the Federal Reserve’s most important and most flexible monetary policy tool. PORTFOLIO: Collection of securities held by an investor. PRIMARY DEALER: A group of government securities dealers who submit daily reports of market activity and positions and monthly financial statements to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and are subject to its informal oversight. Primary dealers include Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)-registered securities broker-dealers, banks, and a few unregulated firms. Investment Policy – May 2013 22 Investment Policy – May 2013 23 PRUDENT PERSON RULE: An investment standard. In some states the law requires that a fiduciary, such as a trustee, may invest money only in a list of securities selected by the custody state—the so-called legal list. In other states the trustee may invest in a security if it is one which would be bought by a prudent person of discretion and intelligence who is seeking a reasonable income and preservation of capital. QUALIFIED PUBLIC DEPOSITORIES: A financial institution which does not claim exemption from the payment of any sales or compensating use or ad valorem taxes under the laws of this state, which has segregated for the benefit of the commission eligible collateral having a value of not less than its maximum liability and which has been approved by the Public Deposit P rotection Commission to hold public deposits. RATE OF RETURN: The yield obtainable on a security based on its purchase price or its current market price. This may be the amortized yield to maturity on a bond the current income return. REPURCHASE AGREEMENT (REPO): A holder of securities sells these securities to an investor with an agreement to repurchase them at a fixed price on a fixed date. The security “buyer” in effect lends the “seller” money for the period of the agreement, and the terms of the agreement are structured to compensate him for this. SAFEKEEPING: A service to customers rendered by banks for a fee whereby securities and valuables of all types and descriptions are held in the bank’s vaults for protection. SECONDARY MARKET: A market made for the purchase and sale of outstanding issues following the initial distribution. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION: Agency created by Congress to protect investors in securities transactions by administering securities legislation. SEC RULE 15(C)3-1: See Uniform Net Capital Rule. Investment Policy – May 2013 24 STRUCTURED NOTES: Notes issued by Government Sponsored Enterprises (FHLB, FNMA, SLMA, etc.) and Corporations, which have imbedded options (e.g., call features, step-up coupons, floating rate coupons, and derivative-based returns) into their debt structure. Their market performance is impacted by the fluctuation of interest rates, the volatility of the imbedded options and shifts in the shape of the yield curve. TREASURY BILLS: A non-interest bearing discount security issued by the U.S. Treasury to finance the national debt. Most bills are issued to mature in three months, six months, or one year. TREASURY BONDS: Long-term coupon-bearing U.S. Treasury securities issued as direct obligations of the U.S. Government and having initial maturities of more than 10 years. TREASURY NOTES: Medium-term coupon-bearing U.S. Treasury securities issued as direct obligations of the U.S. Government and having initial maturities from two to 10 years. UNIFORM NET CAPITAL RULE: Securities and Exchange Commission requirement that member firms as well as nonmember broker-dealers in securities maintain a maximum ratio of indebtedness to liquid capital of 15 to 1; also called net capital rule and net capital ratio. Indebtedness covers all money owed to a firm, including margin loans and commitments to purchase securities, one reason new public issues are spread among members of underwriting syndicates. Liquid capital includes cash and assets easily converted into cash. YIELD: The rate of annual income return on an investment, expressed as a percentage. (a) INCOME YIELD is obtained by dividing the current dollar income by the current market price for the security. (b) NET YIELD or YIELD TO MATURITY is the current income yield minus any premium above par or plus any discount from par in purchase price, with the adjustment spread over the period from the date of purchase to the date of maturity of the bond. Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, 14 pt, Bold Formatted: Justified, Space After: 0 pt, Line spacing: single, Don't adjust space between Latin and Asian text, Don't adjust space between Asian text and numbers ITEM NO. 10.1 AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: May 9, 2013 Budgeted:No To:Board of Directors Cost Estimate:$30,000 Funding Source:Water Capital Reserves From:Steve Conklin, Acting General Manager Presented By:John DeCriscio, Operations Manager Dept:Operations Reviewed by Legal:N/A Prepared By:John DeCriscio, Operations Manager CEQA Compliance:N/A Subject:Well #18 Engine Overhaul SUMMARY: Per District Resolution No. 13-03, District staff must inform the Board of Directors when it is necessary to perform Non-Scheduled Capital Assets Repairs and staff will be charging those costs to the Maintenance Reserve Account. Such work is needed for the natural-gas engine powering Well #18. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: This matter will be discussed with the Planning-Engineering-Operations Committee at its May 6, 2013 meeting and their comments will be provided to the Board. DISCUSSION: In August 2012, Well #18 stationary gas engine was taken off line for repair work. Both cylinder heads were replaced and the cylinder liner walls were inspected. Wear in the cylinder liner walls indicated piston and liner replacements would be necessary in about 8000 hours or approximately one year depending on the amount of run time of this well. Currently Well #18 is out of service due to one of the cylinder heads having failed. In August 2012 a complete overhaul was considered but because of budget constraints staff elected to replace just the cylinder heads at a cost of $11,500 versus $27,000 -$30,000 for an overhaul. The original repair cost was charged to Operations Stationary Gas Engine expense account. Normally cylinder heads last about 12,000- 20,000 hours and an engine overhaul interval is about 50,000 hours. Staff determined that the stationary gas engine should be overhauled now at 45,000 hours because it's possible that worn cylinder liners might cause premature failure of the cylinder head. Replacing just one cylinder head at this time may not provide the reliability we want for summer pumping needs. Further due to the cost, staff will be charging this overhaul to the Maintenance Reserve Account, which was established for these type of necessary but unanticipated repairs. ITEM NO. 12.2 AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: May 9, 2013 Subject:Finance-Accounting Committee (Hawkins/Melton) · Minutes of meeting held April 22, 2013 at 12:00 p.m. · Meeting scheduled May 31, 2013 at 8:30 a.m. ATTACHMENTS: Name:Description:Type: 042213_FA_-_Minutes.doc FA Mtg Minutes 04/22/13 Minutes 1 MINUTES OF THE YORBA LINDA WATER DISTRICT FINANCE-ACCOUNTING COMMITTEE MEETING Monday, April 22, 2013 12:00 p.m. 1717 E Miraloma Ave, Placentia CA 92870 1. CALL TO ORDER The April 22, 2013 meeting of the Yorba Linda Water District’s Finance- Accounting Committee was called to order by Director Hawkins at 12:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Admin Conference Room at the District’s Administration Building located at 1717 East Miraloma Avenue in Placentia, California 92870. 2. ROLL CALL COMMITTEE STAFF Director Phil Hawkins, Chair Steve Conklin, Acting General Manager Director Gary T. Melton Stephen Parker, Finance Manager 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS None. 4. ACTION CALENDAR 4.1. Investment Report for Period Ending March 31, 2013 Mr. Parker presented the March Investment Report to the Committee. Mr. Parker covered the changes in the current month – primarily a semi- annual debt service payment, and pointed out that the current yield was 0.63%. The Committee had a few other questions that Mr. Parker answered, and the Committee supported the investment Report going to the full Board on the Consent calendar. 4.2. Adopting a Public Investment Policy Mr. Parker explained that this fiscal year the California Municipal Treasurer’s Association (CMTA) began an Investment Policy Certification Program. As staff looked into the requirements, it was determined that the District’s investment policy had not had a large-scale updating in over a decade, and a number of best practices established by CMTA were not in place. As such, staff spent a considerable amount of time updating the District’s policy so that it could be submitted for the Certification Program. While significant changes were made to the policy, Mr. Parker described the majority of them as clarifying policies and procedures and conforming to best practices, rather than changing what investments the District might participate in. 2 Mr. Parker noted that the only investment added in the policy from the previous version was authorizing investments in Certificates of Deposit, which while not specifically authorized, had already been used by the District as an investment option. Mr. Parker further noted that Legal Counsel had not yet completed their review of the policy, and if significant changes were proposed by legal counsel, Mr. Parker would come back to the Committee with the changes. If not, Mr. Parker would present any legal counsel-recommended changes to the full Board along with this a resolution and investment policy. The Committee supported moving the Investment Policy on to the full Board at the next meeting after Legal Counsel’s review. 5. DISCUSSION ITEMS 5.1. March 2013 Budget to Actual Results Mr. Parker presented the March Budget to Actual Results. Mr. Parker pointed out that Water Other-Non-Operating Revenues were above the annual budget this month due to the MWDOC refund received. In addition, Water Supplies and Services are trending at budget, while Sewer Supplies and Services are over budget due to a couple of Maintenance Expense items (Asphalt Paving and Line Repairs). The remaining items were similar to prior months. The Committee had a few other questions that Mr. Parker answered. 5.2. Draft Reserve Policy for FY 2013/14 Mr. Parker explained the revision to the reserve policy from what had previously been submitted to the Committee. As he was preparing for the Budget Workshop, Mr. Parker noticed that the reserves detailed in the Reserve Policy did not include a reserve currently utilized by the District – the Debt Service Reserve. Mr. Parker proposed that the Reserve Policy be updated to include a Debt Service Reserve, and that it be established at an amount of one year’s debt service payments. As the District is currently funding the annual needs in their rates, this change would not propose an increase in annual funding. To establish the reserve initially, money would be moved over from the Operating Reserve. The inclusion of the reserve in the policy would increase the minimum reserve threshold, but would not increase the annual funding recommendation. The Committee supported the new language, and Mr. Parker stated that the same language would come back to the Committee in the following meeting as an Action Item before going on to the full Board. 5.3. Broker Dealer Approval Mr. Parker informed the Committee that staff had vetted Peter Becker with Time Value Investments, Inc. as a broker/dealer. He added that once the proposed investment policy was adopted, he would begin using the District’s four vetted broker/dealers to begin diversifying the District’s portfolio. The Committee approved this. 3 5.4. CalPERS Rate Increase (Verbal Report) Mr. Parker reported that the CalPERS Pensions and Health Benefits Committee voted last week to adopt staff recommended revisions to Amortization Periods and Smoothing Methods for Retirement Trust Funds. This item will go to the full CalPERS Board for a vote on Wednesday, April 24th, and if adopted, will increase rates for employers. The employer increases will amount to a little less than 50% over the next 7 years. It was explained that approximately half of that increase was previously known from last years’ decision to change the investment return assumption from 7.75% to 7.5%. Mr. Parker added that the District’s low pension benefit might allow it to see an even lower increase, and stated that he would provide more information to the Board as it became available. 5.5. Future Agenda Items and Staff Tasks None 6. ADJOURNMENT 6.1. The meeting was adjourned at 1:10 p.m. The next Finance-Accounting Committee meeting is scheduled to be held Friday, May 31, 2013 at 8:30 a.m. ITEM NO. 14.1 AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: May 9, 2013 Subject:Meetings from May 10, 2013 - June 30, 2013 ATTACHMENTS: Name:Description:Type: BOD_-_Activities_Calendar.pdf Backup Material Backup Material Event Date Attendance by: May 2013 Personnel-Risk Management Committee MeetingTue, May 14Collett/Beverage MWDOC BoardWed, May 15Melton OCWD BoardWed, May 15Kiley Yorba Linda Planning CommissionWed, May 15Melton Harassment Prevention TrainingThu, May 16Beverage/Melton Harassment Prevention TrainingThu, May 16Collett OC Water SummitFri, May 17Collett/Kiley/Melton Citizens Advisory Committee MeetingMon, May 20Beverage Exec-Admin-Organizational Committee MeetingTue, May 21Melton/Kiley Yorba Linda City CouncilTue, May 21Collett Pub Affairs-Communications-Tech Committee MeetingWed, May 22Beverage/Collett Board of Directors Regular MeetingThu, May 23 District Offices ClosedMon, May 27 Joint Committee Meeting with MWDOC and OCWDTue, May 28Beverage/Melton Yorba Linda Planning CommissionWed, May 29Hawkins ISDOCThu, May 30Collett Finance-Accounting Committee MeetingFri, May 31Hawkins/Melton June 2013 Pub Affairs-Communications-Tech Committee MeetingMon, Jun 3Beverage/Collett Yorba Linda City CouncilTue, Jun 4Kiley MWDOC/MWD WorkshopWed, Jun 5Melton OCWD BoardWed, Jun 5Kiley Planning-Engineering-Operations Committee MeetingThu, Jun 6Kiley/Hawkins WACOFri, Jun 7Hawkins/Kiley Personnel-Risk Management Committee MeetingTue, Jun 11Collett/Beverage Yorba Linda Planning CommissionWed, Jun 12Melton Board of Directors Regular MeetingThu, Jun 13 Joint Committee Meeting with City of PlacentiaMon, Jun 17Melton/Hawkins Exec-Admin-Organizational Committee MeetingTue, Jun 18Melton/Kiley Yorba Linda City CouncilTue, Jun 18Collett MWDOC BoardWed, Jun 19Melton LAFCOWed, Jun 19Beverage OCWD BoardWed, Jun 19Kiley Joint Committee Meeting with City of Yorba LindaWed, Jun 19Kiley/Beverage Citizens Advisory Committee MeetingMon, Jun 24Beverage Finance-Accounting Committee MeetingMon, Jun 24Hawkins/Melton Yorba Linda Planning CommissionWed, Jun 26Hawkins Board of Directors Regular MeetingThu, Jun 27 7:00PM 8:30AM 8:30AM 8:30AM 5:30PM 6:00PM 8:30AM 12:00PM 4:00PM 7:00PM 8:30AM 9:30AM 4:00PM 6:30PM 4:00PM 6:30PM 8:30AM 5:30PM 3:00PM 7:30AM 4:00PM 7:00PM 11:30AM 8:30AM 8:30AM 4:00PM 6:30PM 3:00PM 8:30AM 7:00AM 8:30AM 5:30PM 7:00PM 10:00AM 1:00PM 7:30AM Board of Directors Activity Calendar Time 4:00PM 5/2/2013 7:29:08 AM ITEM NO. 14.2. Request to add the following item to the agenda as there is a need to take immediate action on this item and the need for action came to staff’s attention subsequent to the agenda being posted. 14.2. CONFERENCES, SEMINARS, AND SPECIAL EVENTS City of Placentia Green Business Expo – May 18, 2013 OCWD 80th Anniversary Legislative Reception – June 3, 2013 Recommendation: That the Board of Directors authorize Director attendance at these events if desired. Backup Material Distributed Less Than 72 Hours Prior to the Meeting ITEM NO. 14.2. Backup Material Distributed Less Than 72 Hours Prior to the Meeting ITEM NO. 14.2. Backup Material Distributed Less Than 72 Hours Prior to the Meeting