HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-02-22 - Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Packet Yorba Linda
Hater District
AGENDA
YORBA LINDA WATER DISTRICT
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING
Monday, February 22, 2016, 8:30 AM
1717 E Miraloma Ave, Placentia CA 92870
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
COMMITTEE MEMBERS
Daniel Mole, Chair Fred Hebein
Rick Buck, Vice Chair Joe Holdren
Lindon Baker Modesto Llanos
Carl Boznanski Cheryl Spencer-Borden
Bill Guse
3. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Any individual wishing to address the committee is requested to identify themselves and state the matter on
which they wish to comment. If the matter is on this agenda, the committee Chair will recognize the individual for
their comment when the item is considered. No action will be taken on matters not listed on this agenda.
Comments are limited to matters of public interest and matters within the jurisdiction of the Water District.
Comments are limited to three minutes.
4. ACTION CALENDAR
This portion of the agenda is for items where staff presentations and committee discussions are needed prior to
formal committee action.
4.1. Committee Structure and Reorganization
5. DISCUSSION ITEMS
This portion of the agenda is for matters such as technical presentations, drafts of proposed policies, or similar
items for which staff is seeking the advice and counsel of the Committee members. This portion of the agenda
may also include items for information only.
5.1. Extension of State Drought Regulations
5.2. Conservation Update and Monthly Water Supply Report
5.3. Director's Report
5.4. Future Agenda Items
6. ADJOURNMENT
6.1. The next Citizens Advisory Committee meeting is scheduled to be held Monday, March
28, 2016 at 8:30 a.m.
Items Distributed to the Committee Less Than 72 Hours Prior to the Meeting
Pursuant to Government Code section 54957.5, non-exempt public records that relate to open session agenda items
and are distributed to a majority of the Committee less than seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting will be available
for public inspection in the lobby of the District's business office located at 1717 E. Miraloma Avenue, Placentia, CA
92870, during regular business hours. When practical, these public records will also be made available on the District's
internet website accessible at http://www.ylwd.com/.
Accommodations for the Disabled
Any person may make a request for a disability-related modification or accommodation needed for that person to be
able to participate in the public meeting by telephoning the Executive Secretary at 714-701-3020, or writing to Yorba
Linda Water District, P.O. Box 309, Yorba Linda, CA 92885-0309. Requests must specify the nature of the disability and
the type of accommodation requested. A telephone number or other contact information should be included so the
District staff may discuss appropriate arrangements. Persons requesting a disability-related accommodation should
make the request with adequate time before the meeting for the District to provide the requested accommodation.
ITEM NO. 5.1
AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: February 22, 2016
To: Citizens Advisory Committee
From: Damon Micalizzi, Public
Information Manager
Subject: Extension of State Drought Regulations
SUMMARY:
Although celebrated, recent precipitation in the State certainly has not meant the end of the
unprecedented drought in California or strict water conservation measures as the State Water
Resources Control Board voted on February 2, 2016 to continue emergency regulation to promote
further water conservation in 2016.
The regulation also responds somewhat to calls for greater consideration of factors that play a role
in water use throughout California, including climate, population growth and significant investments
in new local, drought resilient water sources.
ATTACHMENTS:
Name: Description: Type:
SWRCB FACT SHEET.pdf Extended Water Conservation Regulation Backup Material
!77.��- o Fact Sheet
Water Boards
Extended Water Conservation Regulation
Submitting Information to Adjust a Supplier's Conservation
Standard
With California still experiencing severe drought despite recent rains, on February 2, 2016 the
State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) adopted a revised emergency
regulation to ensure that urban water conservation continues in 2016. The February 2016
Emergency Regulation essentially extends the existing May 2015 Emergency Regulation
through October 2016 and maintains many of the same requirements. However, the
February 2016 Emergency Regulation also provides suppliers with more flexibility in meeting
their conservation requirements through adjustments and credits that allow a supplier to modify
its conservation standard up to eight percentage points.
1. Climate Adjustment: considers the climatic differences experienced throughout the
state;
2. Growth Adjustment: considers water-efficient growth experienced by urban areas; and
3. New, Local, Drought-Resilient Supply Credit: considers significant investments that
have been made by some suppliers toward creating new, local, drought-resilient
sources of potable water supply.
This fact sheet provides information to urban water suppliers on how to receive a conservation
standard adjustment, and the data required for the adjustments and credit.
How to Receive a Conservation Standard Adjustment
Conservation standards may be adjusted by submitting required information for verification
through the new on-line reporting tool at the DRINC Portal. The tool will be available beginning
the week of February 8, 2016 and will remain open through March 15, 2016. Suppliers may
submit information supporting any or all of the available credits and adjustments, though
adjustments and credits may be rejected where the information submitted does not support
them. The maximum reduction to a supplier's conservation standard through the combined
climate, growth, and new, local, drought-resilient water supply adjustments and credits is
capped at an eight percentage point reduction from any one supplier's otherwise-applicable
conservation standard, with no suppliers dropping below an eight percent conservation
standard. Information supporting adjustments to conservation standards must be
received on or before March 15, 2016.
The adjustments described below will be applied to a supplier's conservation standard
beginning March 2016 if the supplier has provided State Water Board staff all the necessary
data by February 22, 2016. For information received after February 22, 2016 but before
STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
1001 1 Street,Sacramento,CA 95814-916-341-5254-Mailing Address:P.O.Box 1DD,Sacramento,GA 95812-0100•www.waterboards.ca.gov
Fact Sheet Ni
March 15, 2016, adjustments will be applied beginning April 2016. Information submitted after
March 15, 2016 will not be reviewed. All information supporting conservation standard
adjustments is subject to State Water Board review and conservation standard adjustments
may be rejected if the information does not support the adjustment or credit as identified in the
emergency regulation. Final conservation standards for the February 2016 Emergency
Regulation compliance period will be posted on the Emergency Water Conservation
website in April 2016.
Overview of Conservation Standards
The conservation standards continue to be based on increasing levels of residential gallons
per capita per day (R-GPCD) water use. This approach considers the relative per capita water
usage of each suppliers' service area and requires that those areas with higher per capita use
achieve proportionally greater reductions than those with low use, while lessening the
disparities in reduction requirements between agencies that have similar levels of water
consumption. Suppliers have been assigned a revised conservation standard that ranges
between eight percent and 36 percent based on their R-GPCD for the months of July -
September, 2014. These three months reflect the amount of water used for summer outdoor
irrigation, which provides the greatest opportunity for conservation savings. The revised
emergency regulation continues the reserved four percent conservation tier for those
suppliers meeting specific criteria relating to not experiencing drought conditions.
Conservation Standard Adjustments
1. Climate Adjustment
The climate adjustment accounts for the climatic differences experienced throughout the
state. The adjustment may reduce the conservation standard of those suppliers located in
the warmer regions of the State by up to four percentage points. The adjustment is
calculated as the percent deviation of the supplier's average service area
evapotranspiration (ETo) for the months of July - September from the statewide average for
the same months. The State Water Board calculated the statewide average ETo as
6.34 inches, which is the arithmetic mean of all suppliers' service area ETo for those
months. The climate adjustment ranges from a two to four percentage point decrease in an
urban water supplier's conservation standard as follows:
To Deviation BY supplier's service 9 Vercentage Point
Area • from the Statewide Reduction
Average ETo Conservation Standard
>20% 4%
10 to 20% 3%
5 to <10% 2%
The State Water Board has calculated default climate adjustments for all urban water
suppliers, which are available on this draft list. The default climate adjustments use the
average service area average July - September ETo, as determined by the California
Irrigation Management Information System (CIMIS) Mapped ETo Zone for which the
supplier's service area has the greatest overlap. If a supplier chooses to use the default
climate adjustment, no further action is needed.
2
Mi
Fact Sheet
A supplier may choose to apply for an in-lieu climate adjustment. This means that in lieu of
using the State Water Board-determined service area average July - September ETo, each
supplier has the option to refine its service area ETo by using data from qualifying CIMIS
stations located within its service area. If no CIMIS station exists within the supplier's
service area, a weather station of comparable accuracy, meeting the period of record
requirements noted below, may be used. CIMIS data are available here.
What to Submit: To qualify for the in-lieu climate adjustment, the supplier needs to submit:
a. Calculated monthly average ETo values:
i. Service Area Average ETo July;
ii. Service Area Average ETo August;
iii. Service Area Average ETo September;
b. Supporting documentation for each station that includes:
i. Station ID number;
ii. Station location (coordinates);
iii. Monthly evapotranspiration, in inches per month, for July, August, and
September for each year used for either the five-year period of record or the
three-year continuous period of record;
iv. If the station is not CIMIS, provide evidence that the alternative weather station
is of comparable accuracy to CIMIS.
Supporting documentation must be provided to qualify for the in-lieu climate adjustment.
Supporting documentation provided by February 22, 2016 may be used to modify a water
supplier's conservation standard for March 2016. However, State Water Board staff may
delay the adjustment to April 2016 if the documentation provided is incomplete or subject to
further review. The State Water Board will use data reported by the supplier to calculate the
adjustment. The table below provides an example of the in-lieu climate adjustment
calculation.
Original Conservation Standard 36 %
Supplier Reports:
Service Area Average ETo July 9.92 inches
Service Area Average ETo Aug. 8.68 inches
Service Area Average ETo Sept. 6.6 inches
State Water Board Provided Value:
Statewide Average ETo July-Sept. 6.34 inches
Calculated by State Water Board:
Service Area Average ETo July-Sept.
= (9.92 + 8.68 + 6.6)/3 8.4 inches
Service Area % Deviation from Average ETo 0.32 or 32 %
_ (8.4 - 6.34)/6.34
Climate Adjustment - 4 %
Adjusted Conservation Standard 32 %
3
'%_ 0 Fact Sheet
Water Boards
2. Growth Adjustment
The growth adjustment accounts for water efficient growth experienced in a supplier's
service area since 2013. The adjustment is calculated as the product of the supplier's
conservation standard and the supplier's percent change in potable water production due to
growth since 2013, rounded to the nearest whole percentage point. The total volume of
water attributed to growth since 2013 is calculated as the sum of the number of new
permanent residents added since 2013 multiplied by the average residential water use per
person during February - October 2015 multiplied by 270 days (the duration of the
emergency regulation); and the sum of the number of new commercial, industrial and
institutional (CII) connections added since 2013 multiplied by the average CII water use per
connection during February - October 2015.
What to submit: To qualify for the growth adjustment a supplier needs to submit:
a. Number of new permanent residents added since January 1 , 2013;
b. Number of new CII connections added since January 1 , 2013;
c. Average CII water use per CII connection February - October 2015.
Supporting documentation must be made available upon request and may be uploaded to
the DRINC Portal. The State Water Board will use data reported by the supplier to calculate
the adjustment. As with the climate adjustment, satisfactory data supplied by February 22,
2016 for State Water Board staff review will be used to adjust a supplier's conservation
standard for March 2016. Incomplete information or information submitted after
February 22, 2016 will be used to adjust a supplier's conservation standard beginning in
April 2016.The table below provides an example of the growth adjustment calculation.
Original Conservation Standard 36 %
Supplier Reports:
Number of New Permanent Residents Added since 6,000 people
Jan. 1, 2013
Number of New CII Connections Added since Jan. 1, 2013 700 connections
Average CII Water Use per CII Connection
Feb. - Oct. 2015 900,000 gallons/connection
Pulled from Feb. - Oct. 2015 Reports, as Submitted by Jan. 1, 2016 (by State Water Board):
Residential Gallons per Capita per Day (R-GPCD) 100 gallons/people-day
Feb. - Oct. 2015
Baseline Total Water Production Feb. - Oct. 2013 16,000,000,000 gallons
Calculated by State Water Board:
Volume of Water Attributed to New Permanent Residents 162,000,000 gallons
= 6,000 eo le 100 allons/ eo le-da 270 days]
Volume of Water Attributed to New CII Connections 630,000,000 gallons
_ [700 connections] *[900,000 gallons/connection]
Total Volume of Water Attributed to Growth since 2013 792,000,000 gallons
= 162,000,000 gallons] + 630,000,000 gallons]
Percent Change in Potable Water Production Due to Growth 0.05 or 5 %
since 2013=[792,000,000 gallons]/[16,000,000,000 gallons]
Adjusted Conservation Standard = 36% *[1 - 0.05] 34 %
4
Fact Sheet
Water Boards
do mmm�
3. New, Local, Drought-Resilient Supply Credit
Any supplier that obtains at least one percent of its total potable water production from a
qualifying new local, drought-resilient water supply, including those suppliers that contract
for, or otherwise financially invest in, water from a new local, drought-resilient source of
supply, developed after 2013, is eligible for a reduction to its conservation standard. The
adjustment is calculated as a one percentage point reduction to an urban water supplier's
conservation standard, up to an eight percentage point maximum reduction, for each
percent of the urban water supplier's total potable water production that comes from a
qualifying new local, drought-resilient water supply. The supplier must demonstrate that
the use of that supply does not reduce the water available to another legal user of water or
the environment. One example is indirect potable reuse of wastewater in coastal regions
where the water would not have otherwise been discharged into a water body that others
use as a source of supply.
Where a supplier financially invests in a shared new, local, drought-resilient source of
supply but does not actually receive water from that source--instead freeing that water up
for another supplier to use--the agency that does not actually receive the water may also be
eligible for this credit. In no case will the total amount of credits exceed what would have
been available had all suppliers received credit only for water actually received.
What to submit: To qualify for the drought-resilient source credit a supplier shall:
a. Report the total annual potable water production from a local, drought-resilient
source of supply (developed after January 1 , 2013), in gallons;
b. Submit a certification (a short-form that is signed by the supplier's general manager
or equivalent) with supporting documents that verifies the following:
i. A description of the local, drought-resilient source of supply, e.g., how water is
produced, the owner of the facility. If the supplier is not receiving water directly
from the facility, but is applying based on being an investor, provide evidence
of the amount and portion of the investment being made by the supplier,
relative to the whole project.
ii. Total amount of water supplied in gallons. This amount must be pro-rated as a
percent of the total production of the source/facility if there is more than one
supplier using the same source/facility. The pro-rated portions of all suppliers
claiming adjustments for a single source/facility may not add up to more than
100 percent.
iii. The date the water supply started providing water to suppliers and became an
operational facility.
iv. Evidence that the use of that supply does not reduce the water available to
another legal user of water or the environment
Supporting documentation must be provided by March 15, 2016 to qualify for the new,
local, drought resilient water supply credit. (This credit will not be available to adjust
March 2016 conservation standards).The State Water Board will use data and supporting
documentation reported by the supplier to calculate the adjustment. The table below
provides an example of the in-lieu climate adjustment calculation.
5
9
Supply Fact Sheet
Water Boards
�Example Calculation of New, Local, Drought-Resilient Water
Original Conservation Standard 36 %
Supplier Reports:
Total Annual Potable Water Production from a Drought 1,120,000,000 gallons
Resilient-Source of Supply (Developed after Jan. 11 2013)
Pulled from Jan. - Dec. 2015 Reports, as Submitted by Jan. 15, 2016
(by State Water Board):
Baseline Total Water Production Jan. - Dec. 2013 16,000,000,000 gallons
Calculated by State Water Board:
% Total Potable Water Production from a Drought-Resilient
Source of Supply 0.07 or 7 %
_ [1,120,000,000 gallons]/[16,000,000,000 gallons]
Adjusted Conservation Standard 29
= 36% - 7%
For more information on the February 2016 Emergency Regulation, please visit the
Emergency Water Conservation website.
(This fact sheet was last updated on February 5, 2016)
6
ITEM NO. 5.2
AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: February 22, 2016
Subject: Conservation Update and Monthly Water Supply Report
ATTACHMENTS:
Description: Type:
Feb Water Supply Report- BB.pdf Monthly Water Supply Report Backup Material
MUNICIPAL
WATER
• DISTRICT
OF
ORANGE
COUNTY
Memorandum
DATE: February 17, 2016
TO: Member Agencies — MWDOC Division One
FROM: Brett R. Barbre, Director— Division One
SUBJECT: Monthly Water Usage Data, Tier 2 Projection & Water Supply Information
The attached figures show the recent trend of water consumption in Orange County (OC),
an estimate of Tier 2 volume for MWDOC, and selected water supply information.
Fig. 1 OC Water Usage, Monthly by Supply OCWD Groundwater water was the
main supply in November.
Fig. 2 OC Water Usage, Monthly, Comparison to Previous Years Water usage in
December 2015 was about average compared to the last 5 years. Lower
usage is primarily due to strong conservation efforts and mandatory
restrictions set by the governor. Rainfall for December 2015 was well below
the historical average.
Fig. 3 Historical OC Water Consumption OC water consumption was 571,000 AF in
FY 2014-15. This is about 50,000 AF less than FY 2013-14 but is about
16,000 AF higher than FY 2010-11 (Fiscal year with lowest usage). Water
usage per person was the lowest it has been for Orange County at 164
gallons per day. Although OC population has increased 20% over the past
two decades, water usage has not increased, on average. A long-term
decrease in per-capita water usage is attributed mostly to Water Use
Efficiency (water conservation) efforts. High Temperature, precipitation and
the economy all remain indicators to O.C. water consumption.
Fig. 4 MWDOC "Firm" Water Purchases, 2015 "Firm" water above the Tier 1 limit
will be charged at the higher Tier 2 rate. Our current projection of Tier 2
purchases is zero in 2016.
Water Supply Information Includes data on: Rainfall in OC; the OCWD Basin overdraft.,
Northern California and Colorado River Basin hydrologic data; the State Water Project
(SWP) Allocation, and regional storage volumes. The data has implications for the
magnitude of supplies from the three watersheds that are the principal sources of water for
OC. Note that a hydrologic year is Oct. 1 st through Sept. 30th.
• Orange County's accumulated rainfall through January was below average for this
period. This continues the impact of the previous three hydrologic years' below-
normal rainfall in reducing those local supplies that are derived from local runoff. El
Nino conditions are present and 2015-16 winter/spring is still expected to see large
amounts of precipitation.
• Northern California accumulated precipitation in January was around 121% of
normal for this period. The Northern California snowpack is 120% of normal. This
follows three below-average hydrologic years. The State of California has been in a
declared Drought Emergency since January 2014. The State Water Project
Contractors Table A Allocation is only 15% as of the end of January.
• Colorado River Basin accumulated precipitation in January was 102% average for
this period. The Upper Colorado Basin snowpack was 105% of average as of April
15th. However, this follows two below-average hydrologic years, and this watershed
is in a long-term drought. Lake Mead and Lake Powell combined have about 61% of
their average storage volume for this time of year. If Lake Mead's level falls below a
"trigger" limit at the end of a calendar year, then a shortage will be declared by the
US Bureau of Reclamation (USBR), impacting Colorado River water deliveries for
the Lower Basin states. As of Late July Lake Mead Levels were hovering around the
"trigger" limit but fortunately levels are expecting to increase from the large amounts
of precipitation that hit the Colorado River Basin this summer and spring. The USBR
predicts that the "trigger" level will not be hit by the end of 2016.
w1`4MUNICIPAL
WATER
ORANGE
COUNTY
60,000
50,000
LU
Lu 40,000
W
U
a
30,000
20,000
10,000
0
Fig. 1A OC Water Usage, Monthly by Supply
with projection to end of fiscal year
Surface Water Non -OCWD Groundwater
Recycled (Non Potable) Import [1]
®projected [3] �OCWD Basin [2]
3.0
2.5
Cn
2.0
U
1.5
c�
1.0
ry
111 �
11
[1] Imported water for consumptive use. Includes "In- Lieu" deliveries and CUP water extraction. Excludes "Direct Replenishment" deliveries of spreading water, "Barrier
Replenishment" deliveries, and deliveries into Irvine Lake.
[2] GW for consumptive use only. Excludes In -Lieu water deliveries and CUP water extraction that are counted with Import. BPP in FY '14 -15 is 72 %.
[3] MWDOC's estimate of monthly demand is based on the projected FY 15 -16 "Retail" water demand and historical monthly demand patterns.
L
L
Q
(n
Z
0
U_
Q
2.5
Cn
2.0
U
1.5
c�
1.0
ry
111 �
11
[1] Imported water for consumptive use. Includes "In- Lieu" deliveries and CUP water extraction. Excludes "Direct Replenishment" deliveries of spreading water, "Barrier
Replenishment" deliveries, and deliveries into Irvine Lake.
[2] GW for consumptive use only. Excludes In -Lieu water deliveries and CUP water extraction that are counted with Import. BPP in FY '14 -15 is 72 %.
[3] MWDOC's estimate of monthly demand is based on the projected FY 15 -16 "Retail" water demand and historical monthly demand patterns.
WATER
o�sTR�cr
' OF
_ ORANGE
- couwry
•1 111
50,000
W
ur 40,000
W
U
a
30,000
20,000
10,000
Fig. 1 B OC Water Usage, Monthly by Supply
with projection to end of fiscal year
oSurface Water oNon -OCWD Groundwater
Recycled (Non Potable) oImport [1]
oOCWD Basin [2] F---1 projected [3]
—High Temp
95
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
,
,
,
,
�--�
L
L
Q
(n
Z
0
U_
Q
90 U_
85
c�
80
CL
75 E
9
70 =
0)
65 =
a�
60
L
55 Q
50
[1] Imported water for consumptive use. Includes "In- Lieu" deliveries and CUP water extraction. Excludes "Direct Replenishment" deliveries of spreading water, "Barrier
Replenishment" deliveries, and deliveries into Irvine Lake.
[2] GW for consumptive use only. Excludes In -Lieu water deliveries and CUP water extraction that are counted with Import. BPP in FY '14 -15 is 72 %.
[3] MWDOC's estimate of monthly demand is based on the projected FY 15 -16 "Retail" water demand and historical monthly demand patterns.
Fig. 2A OC Monthly Water Usage [1]: Comparison to Last 4 Fiscal Years
❑ FY 11 -12 ❑ FY 12 -13 o FY 13 -14 ■ FY 14 -15 ❑ FY 15 -16
+ L L
� U1 Q U >
Q CO O Z 0 li Q
Partial Year
Subtotals
700,000
600,000
500,000
W 400,000
W
LL
300,000
a
200,000
100,000
0
[1 ] Sum of Imported water for consumptive use (includes "In- Lieu" deliveries; excludes "Direct Replenishment "and "Barrier Replenishment') and Local water for consumptive use
(includes recycled and non - potable water; excludes GWRS production, groundwater pumped to waste, and waste brine from water treatment projects.) Recent months numbers
include some estimation.
MI.INICIPAL
WATER
DISTRICT
OF
ORANGE
COUNTY
70,000
60,000
50,000
w
Lu 40,000
w
a 30,000
20,000
10,000
Fig. 2A OC Monthly Water Usage [1]: Comparison to Last 4 Fiscal Years
❑ FY 11 -12 ❑ FY 12 -13 o FY 13 -14 ■ FY 14 -15 ❑ FY 15 -16
+ L L
� U1 Q U >
Q CO O Z 0 li Q
Partial Year
Subtotals
700,000
600,000
500,000
W 400,000
W
LL
300,000
a
200,000
100,000
0
[1 ] Sum of Imported water for consumptive use (includes "In- Lieu" deliveries; excludes "Direct Replenishment "and "Barrier Replenishment') and Local water for consumptive use
(includes recycled and non - potable water; excludes GWRS production, groundwater pumped to waste, and waste brine from water treatment projects.) Recent months numbers
include some estimation.
------ -- MUNICIPAL
WATER
DISTRICT
OF
ORANGE
650,000
600,000
550,000
500,000
450,000
400,000
w
w
4 350,000
w
a 300,000
250,000
200,000
150,000
100,000
50,000
Fig. 213 Orange County Cumulative Monthly Consumptive Water Usage [1]:
present year compared to last 4 calendar years
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
[1 ] Sum of Imported water for consumptive use (includes "In- Lieu" deliveries; excludes "Direct Replenishment "and "Barrier Replenishment') and Local water for consumptive use
(includes recycled and non - potable water; excludes GWRS production and waste brine from water quality pumping projects).
MUNICIPAL
- WATER
olsrPlcr
OF
COUNTY
Fig. 3A
HISTORICAL WATER CONSUMPTION[1] AND POPULATION[2] IN OC
800,000
750,000
700,000
LL
Q
CO 650,000
M
w
a 600,000
550,000
500,000
450,000
400,000
'90
91
o Consumptive Water Use
—0 Population
91 -'92 -'93 -'94 -'95 -'96 -'97 -'98 '99 -'00 -'01 -'02 -'03 -'04 -'05 -'06 -'07 -'08 -'09 - 10 11 12 13 14 15
92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 -11 -12 -13 -14 -15 -16
Fiscal Year
[1 ] Consumption includes potable, recycled and non - potable usage; excludes Barrier and Spreading water. The most recent data involve some estimation.
[2] Population estimates in the 2000s decade were revised by the State Dept. of Finance to reflect the 2010 Census counts.
[3] Projection of FY 15 -16 water use estimated by MWDOC based on partial -year data.
3.50
C1II17
2.50 c
O
2.00 0
J
1.500-
n
11
0.50
ZION
MUNICIPAL
WATER
OIBTRICT
OF
ORANGE
COUNTY
700,000
675,000
650,000
625,000
Q 600,000
W 575,000
U)
D550,000
W
>Q 525,000
500,000
475,000
450,000
425,000
400,000
=ig. 313 HISTORICAL WATER CONSUMPTION[1] AND Annual Rainfall[
IN OC
'08 -09 109 -10 10 -11 11 -12 12 -13 13 -14 14 -15 15 -16
Fiscal Year
[1 ] Consumption includes potable, recycled and non - potable usage; excludes Barrier and Spreading water. The most recent data involve some estimation.
[2] Rainfall data from Santa Ana Station #121
25
20
N
N
s
15
w
10
0
MLINIOIPAL Fig. 3C HISTORICAL WATER CONSUMPTION[1] AND Annual Average High Temperature[2] IN
- WATER
OIBTGICT
OF OCORANGE
COUNTY
80.93
700,000
� Consumptive
Water Use
675,000
--0-- High Temp
650,000
625,000
79.17
78.02
Q600,000
<
77.63
76.93
LW 575,000
76.38
550,000
75.50
W
>Q 525,000
500,000
25 Year Low
for Water
475,000
Usage in O.C.
450,000
425,000
400,000
'08 -09 109 -10 10 -11 11 -12 12 -13 13 -14
Fiscal Year
14 -15
Projected
15 -16
[1] Consumption includes potable, recycled and non - potable usage; excludes Barrier and Spreading water. The most recent data involve some estimation.
[2] Temperature data is from Santa Ana Fire Station, elevation 135'
81
80
79
78 M
L
77
a
CL
76 E
H
75
Ch
74 ¢'
73
72
71
MUNICIPAL
WATER
DISTRICT
OF
ORANGE
COUNTY
800, 000
750.000
700,000
LL
Q
w 650,000
U)
600,000
550,000
500,000
450,000
400.000
Fig. 3D HISTORICAL WATER CONSUMPTION[l] AND Average Unemployment[2] IN
OC
190 -'91 -'92 -'93 -'94 -'95 -'96 -'97 -'98 -'99 -'00 -'01 -'02 -'03 -'04 -'05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15
91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 -11 -12 -13 -14 -15 -16
Fiscal Year
[1] Consumption includes potable, recycled and non - potable usage; excludes Barrier and Spreading water. The most recent data involve some estimation.
[2] Employment Data source Bureau of Labor Statistic for Long Beach - L.A. -Santa Ana Metro Area
http://www.bIs.gov/1au/
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5% ` O
a
6%
Q
J
7% e
8% N
9%
10% E
a
11% S
12%
13%
14%
15%
MUNICIPAL
CWFTER Fig. 3E HISTORICAL WATER CONSUMPTION[1] AND POPULATION DENSITY[2] IN OC
DISTRICT
ORANGE
COUNTY
800,000
750,000
700,000
LL
Q
w 650,000
CO
M
M
... 600,000
Q
550,000
500,000
450,000
400,000
190 -'91 -'92 -'93 -'94 -'95 -'96 -'97 -'98 -'99 -'00 -'01 -'02 -'03 -'04 -'05 -'06 -'07 -'08 -109 - 10 11 12 13 14 15
91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 -11 -12 -13 -14 -15 -16
Fiscal Year
[1] Consumption includes potable, recycled and non - potable usage; excludes Barrier and Spreading water. The most recent data involve some estimation.
[2] Population estimates in the 2000s decade were revised by the State Dept. of Finance to reflect the 2010 Census counts.
4,000
3,750
a
2
a
CO
a
a
3,500.2
CL
0
a
a
V!
C
N
3,250 z
O
3
M
a
O
n
c CIO,
DImuNicip STRICT Fig. 3F HISTORICAL WATER CONSUMPTION[l] AND GPCD [2] IN OC
WATER
DISTRICT
ORANGE
"- - COUNTY
800,000
750,000
700,000
Q
w 650,000
U)
... 600,000
Q
550,000
500.000
450,000
400, 000
90 -'91 -'92 -'93 -'94 -'95 -'96 -'97 -'98 -'99 -'00 -'01 -'02 -'03 -'04 -'05 06 07 08 09 10
91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 -11
Fiscal Year
o Consumptive Water Use
GPCD
11 12 13 14 15
-12 -13 -14 -15 -16
[1] Consumption includes potable, recycled and non - potable usage; excludes Barrier and Spreading water. The most recent data involve some estimation.
[2] Gallon per Capita Daily (includes all types of water usage and all type of water users).
240
230
220
210
200 a
0
190
180
170
160
150
140
130
120
30,000
25,000
20,000
Q 15,000
m
0
F-
t
c
0 10,000
5,000
Fig. 4 MWDOC's Firm Water Purchases in CY 2016
Monthly Actual and Projected to CY Total
oUntreated Total Treated
=Prof Monthly Purchases — Cumulative Actual
300,000
Jan -15 Feb -15 Mar -15 Apr -15 May -15 Jun -15 Jul -15 Aug -15 Sep -15 Oct -15 Nov -15 Dec -15
250,000
200,000
Q
m
0
F-
150,000
E
U
100,000
50,000
Notes
1. "Firm" includes Full Service (both Treated and Untreated) and Barrier water.
2. Basin Pumping Percentage (BPP) is the percentage of a retail water agency's total water demand that they are limited to pump from the OCWD- managed groundwater basin. BPP pertains to Basin agencies only. For
example, if a Basin agency's total demand is 10,000 AF /yr and OCWD sets the BPP at 72 %, then the agency is limited to 7,200 AF of groundwater that year. There may be certain exceptions and /or adjustments to that
simple calculation. OCWD sets the BPP for the Basin agencies, usually as of July 1st.
MUNICIPAL
WATER prepared by the Municipal Water District of Orange County printdate 2/2/2016
DISTRICT
OF *numbers are subject to change
ORANGE
COUNTY
Accumulated Precipitation
for the Oct. -Sep. water year, through January 2016
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5 56%
0
This Year to date ■ Average to date Average End of Year
% = Percent of Average to Date
ORANGE
COUNTY
(SANTA ANA)
WATER
OISTFi1CT
CIF
ORANGE
r-MUM TY
CA Snowpack
121% on 2/01/2016
00
120%
102%
N. SIERRAS 8- NORTHERN UPPER BASIN
STATION INDEX CALIF. COLORADO
_ SNOWPACK PRECIP.
Colorado
Snowpack on
1/25/2016
105%
UPPER BASIN
COLORADO
SNOWPACK
* The date of maximum snowpack accumulation (April 1st in Northern Calif. , April 15th in the
Upper Colorado Basin) is used for year to year comparison.
MUNI GIPAL
WATER
DISTRICT
OF
ORANGE
COUNTY
SWP TABLE A ALLOCATION
FOR STATE WATER PROJECT CONTRACTORS
Final 2016: ? ??
65% 65% Final 2012: 65%
60% 60%. 60% 60%
0% 50%
40% 40% 40%
35% 35% 35% 35%
Final 2013: 35%
20% 20% 20% 20%
15% 15% Final 2015: 20%
10% 10% 10% 5°
10° 5%
10% 5% °
5% % o% 0% 5 ° Final 2014: 5%
5%
Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun.
m mWater Year 2012 m mWater Year 2013 m mWater Year 2014 m mWater Year 2015 m mWater Year 2016
0
°0 500
0
U 400
Q
rn
a� 300
•L
0 200
a�
c 100
CL
E
0
CA Population Total SWP Deliveries }CRA Deliveries to MWD +CRA Deliveries to CA
SWP Allocation % Vs. Station 8 Accumulated Rainfall rbeen % tonceshnce the
100% ear 2000
100%
90% 100% 100% 90% 90% 90%
100% 90�
80%
70% 70%
65% 65%
60% 60%
cc
p 50% 50% so%
45%
Q 40% 39% 40%
>d 35% 20%
30% 30% 35%
(n Due to drought conditions and California
20°/ population growth Southern California is
o receiving very little waterfrom the State Water
Natural Accumulated Run Project.
10% Off
s%
=Station 8 Accumulated Rainfall (Inches) —SWP Allocation %
40
rn
r_
O
35
r_
30.2
cc
M
Q
250
20 0
15
cc
U
100
90
80 O
Z
70 a
60
o�
50
.Q
40 E
L L
30 °
20 U
0 s
E
0
a
MUNER ICI PAL
WPT
pISTRIET
OF
ORANGE
GCI.JNTY
O.C. Basin Accumulated Overdraft
50,000 , Basin Full in 1969
100,000
150,000
450,000
Annual, 1969 to Present w%' ��`
394,000 Al end of December
2015
500,000
cn O a-I N M Ln lD r, co cn O a-I N M Ln lD r, co cn O a-I N M Ln lD r, co cn O a-I N M -* N lD r, co cn O a-I N M -* N lD
�D I� n n n n n n n n n W 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol O O O O O O O O O O a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I
Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol M M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Accumulated Overdraft (dewatered volume) shown as white area, excluding the volume stored by Metropolitan. source: OCWD
Stored Vol (aF)
O.C. Basin Accumulated Overdraft Vs. Annual Rainfall E
Dewatered Vol (AF
o�srcxicr
_ ._. ORANGE Annual, 1969 to Present -C, Annual Rainfall (inches)
COUNTY
35
50,000 Basin Full in 1969 -
30
100,000
` 394,000 AF end of
150,000
200,000
v
w 250,000
Q
300,000
350,000
400,000
450,000
I M \ I u
0
\ 1
5
1/ 1
1/ 1
500,000 1 0
cn O a-I N M Ln l0 r, co cn O a-I N M Ln l0 r, co cn O a-I N M Ln l0 r, co cn O a-I N M -* N l0 r, co cn O a-I N M -* N l0
�O I� n n n n n n n n n W 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol O O O O O O O O O O a-I a-I a-I a-I a-4 a-4 a-4
Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol M M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Accumulated Overdraft (dewatered volume) shown as white area, excluding the volume stored by Metropolitan. source: OCW D
December 2015
25
II
11
I1
1
I
t
20 c
1
15
I
Aj
10
I M \ I u
0
\ 1
5
1/ 1
1/ 1
500,000 1 0
cn O a-I N M Ln l0 r, co cn O a-I N M Ln l0 r, co cn O a-I N M Ln l0 r, co cn O a-I N M -* N l0 r, co cn O a-I N M -* N l0
�O I� n n n n n n n n n W 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol O O O O O O O O O O a-I a-I a-I a-I a-4 a-4 a-4
Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol M M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Accumulated Overdraft (dewatered volume) shown as white area, excluding the volume stored by Metropolitan. source: OCW D
` MUNICIPAL
WATER
Ole TRIC =T
of
ORANGE
� � �
O C Basin Accumulated Overdraft Vs BPP %
D Dewatered Vl (AF)
7Dew teredVol
a,;
COUNTY
Annual, 1999 to Present
-0- BPP%
r
90%
80% .
50,000
75% 74% ♦ .
80%
100,000 ♦♦ 69% ��. �♦ 69%
�♦♦
68% !0%
66% 66q 64% "yam ♦'i♦
-
65% _i ► -�
70%
150,000
60%
200,000
v
50%
L 250,000
a
a
40%
300,000
30%
350,000
400,000
20%
1111 v.♦.. va���� vv�u���c �
' rWRS nnlinP Ian BOOR., =
500,000 � 0%
Cn O a-I N rn Ln W I, 00 Cn O a-I N rn Ln W
Cn O O O O O O O O O O a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I a-I
Cn O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
a-I N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Accumulated Overdraft (dewatered volume) shown as white area, excluding the volume stored by Metropolitan. source: OCWD
O.C. Basin Accumulated Overdraft Vs. Annual Rainfall
Annual, 1999 to Present
50,000
100,000 �K
150,000
200,000
v
w 250,000
Q
300,000
350,000
400,000
450,000
500, 000
Ql
Ql
Ql
a-I
Stored Vol (AF)
D Dewatered Vol (AF)
—O— Annual Rainfall (Inches)
35
' A
30
25
20
c
?. c
15 3
� c
� Q
10
i
i
O a-4 N M N W r, 00 Cn O a-4 N M N W
O O O O O O O O O O a-4 a-4 a-4 a-4 a-4 a-4 a-4
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
^'Accumulated Overdraft (dewatered volume) shown as white area, excluding the volume stored by Metropolitan. source: OCWD
0
Lake Mead
WMATEUN -P-
R
OISTR ICT
OF
ORANGE
„„�; COUNTY
1,090
1,085
Me
1,075
LL
C
4, 1,070
m
J
N
W
1,065
1,060
1,055
1,050
Jul 15
Lake Mead Levels: Historical and Projected
projection per USBR 24 -Month Study
I
❑ Historical ❑ Projected
Jan 16
Jul 16
Jan 17
Jul 17
1,250
1,200
1,150
�L
1,100
0
a 1,050
0
a�
-1,000
950
•II
Lake Mead Historical Water Elevation Level
Historic Peak July 1983 @
1,225 Feet
tiOJ$O ti0j�' ti0joio ti0 (), tipoo tipo� ti���
WATER PAL
WATER
OISTRIGT
OF
ORANGE
COUNTY
tiOJ$O ti0j�' ti0joio ti0 (), tipoo tipo� ti���