The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2016-06-27 - Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Packet Yorba Linda '" ' t :r District AGENDA YORBA LINDA WATER DISTRICT CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING Monday, June 27, 2016, 8:30 AM 1717 E Miraloma Ave, Placentia CA 92870 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL COMMITTEE MEMBERS Lindon Baker Fred Hebein Carl Boznanski Joe Holdren Rick Buck Modesto Llanos Bill Guse Cheryl Borden 3. INTRODUCTIONS AND PRESENTATIONS 3.1. Orange County Water Rate Analysis - Presented by Mr. Ben Parker, Resident 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS Any individual wishing to address the committee is requested to identify themselves and state the matter on which they wish to comment. If the matter is on this agenda, the committee Chair will recognize the individual for their comment when the item is considered. No action will be taken on matters not listed on this agenda. Comments are limited to matters of public interest and matters within the jurisdiction of the Water District. Comments are limited to three minutes. 5. DISCUSSION ITEMS This portion of the agenda is for matters such as technical presentations, drafts of proposed policies, or similar items for which staff is seeking the advice and counsel of the Committee members. This portion of the agenda may also include items for information only. 5.1. Conservation Update and Monthly Water Supply Report 5.2. Director's Report 5.3. Future Agenda Items 6. ADJOURNMENT 6.1. The next Citizens Advisory Committee meeting is scheduled to be held Monday, July 25, 2016 at 8:30 a.m. Items Distributed to the Committee Less Than 72 Hours Prior to the Meeting- Pursuant to Government Code section 54957.5, non-exempt public records that relate to open session agenda items and are distributed to a majority of the Committee less than seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting will be available for public inspection in the lobby of the District's business office located at 1717 E. Miraloma Avenue, Placentia, CA 92870, during regular business hours. When practical, these public records will also be made available on the District's internet website accessible at http://www.ylwd.com/. Accommodations for the Disabled Any person may make a request for a disability-related modification or accommodation needed for that person to be able to participate in the public meeting by telephoning the Executive Secretary at 714-701-3020, or writing to Yorba Linda Water District, P.O. Box 309, Yorba Linda, CA 92885-0309. Requests must specify the nature of the disability and the type of accommodation requested. A telephone number or other contact information should be included so the District staff may discuss appropriate arrangements. Persons requesting a disability-related accommodation should make the request with adequate time before the meeting for the District to provide the requested accommodation. ITEM NO. 3.1 AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: June 27, 2016 Subject: Orange County Water Rate Analysis - Presented by Mr. Ben Parker, Resident ATTACHMENTS: Description: Type: Ben Parker Presentation.pdf Backup Material Backup Material Orange County Water Rate Analysis - Presented by Mr. Ben Parker, Resident Local Water Distributors Comparison of: 1) Actual Rates; and 2) Rates Adjusted for: A) Tax Subsidy B) Taxes Paid C) Return to Owners BP DRAFT 6/23/2016 YLWD Residential Rates (As of 6/1/16) Monthly Meter Rates Volumetric Rate Per Unit (748 Gallons) • .625 inch $26.29 • .750 inch $26.29 $2 70 • 1.00 inch $41.57 • 1.50 inch $79.77 • 2.00 inch $125.61 Source: ylwd.com/your-water-service/water-rates-fees BP DRAFT 6/23/2016 Orange County Water Rate Analysis - Presented by Mr. Ben Parker, Resident East Orange County Water District Residential Rates (as of 6/1/16) Monthly Meter Rates Volumetric Rate Per Unit (748 Gallons) • .625 inch $18.10 • .750 inch $20.50 • $2.67 • 1.00 inch $34.25 • 1.50 inch $52.00 • 2.00 inch $90.75 Source:http://www.eocwd.com/media/agenda/RZ_Rate_Sheet__Effective_8-21- 14.pdf BP DRAFT 6/23/2016 El Toro Water District Residential Rates (as of 6/1/16) Monthly Meter Rates and Replacement and Refurbishment Charge Volumetric Rate Per Unit (748 Gallons) • .625 inch $18.10 + $4.66 = $22.76 • First 10 Units: $2.46 • .750 inch $20.50+ $4.66 = $25.16 • Second 6 Units: $2.83 • 1.00 inch $34.25 + $7.78 = $42.03 - 17 and above: $5.04 • 1.50 inch $52.00+ $18.91 = $70.91 • 2.00 inch $90.75 + $47.47 = $138.22 Source:etwd.com/governance/rate-structure/ BP DRAFT 6/23/2016 Orange County Water Rate Analysis - Presented by Mr. Ben Parker, Resident Santa Margarita Water District Residential Rates (as of 6/1/16) Monthly Meter Rates Volumetric Rate Per Unit (748 Gallons) • .625 inch Not Available (See Footnote 1) • .750 inch $14.89 • 1.00 inch $20.59 • 1.50 inch $29.01 • 2.00 inch $42.03 Source:http://www.smwd.com/your-water/water-and-sewer-rates/ Footnote(1).SMWD has a complex scheme of budgeted rates.While the monthly meter rate is easily determined,the volumetric rate is calculated using a number of factors such as number of persons in the household,lot size,evapotranspiration rate during the billing period along with multiple types of variances that can be applied for by any ratepayer with special circumstance(e.g.livestock that need extra water,large acreage,etc.)To calculate a typical volumetric rate would require too many assumptions. BP DRAFT 6/23/2016 Mesa Water District Residential Rates (as of 6/1/16) Monthly Meter Rates Volumetric Rate Per Unit (748 Gallons) • .625 inch $11.25 • $3.51 (Footnote 2) • .750 inch $16.75 • 1.00 inch $27.75 • 1.50 inch $55.75 • 2.00 inch $89.25 Footnote 2)Per unit charge includes:Water Supply.-$1.53;Water Quality- 12;Water System-$.51;Capital improvements-$1.00 ;and Energy-$35. Source: htto://www.mesawater.org/odf/water-rates-1-1-16.odf BP DRAFT 6/23/2016 Orange County Water Rate Analysis - Presented by Mr. Ben Parker, Resident South Coast Water District Residential Rates (as of 6/1/16) Monthly Meter Rates Volumetric Rate Per Unit (748 Gallons) • .625 inch Not Available 1-5 units $2.25 • .750 inch $24.52 6-13 units $4.18 • 14-25 units $6.27 • 1.00 inch $44.13 26-62 units $8.36 • 1.50 inch Not Available 63 plus units $10.45 • 2.00 inch Not Available Source: http://www.scwd.org/myaccount/rates/residential/default.asp BP DRAFT 6/23/201, Irvine Ranch Water District Residential Rates (as of 6/1/16) Monthly Meter Rate Volumetric Rate Per Unit (748 Gallons) (Footnote 3) (Footnote 3) • .625 inch $10.30 • .750 inch $15.45 0-5 units $1.11 • 6-11 units $1.62 • 1.00 inch $25.75 • 12-15 units $3.92 • 1.50 inch $52.50 16+ units $14.93 • 2.00 inch $82.40 Source: http://www.irwd.com/images/pdf/rates/RatesCharges.pdf Footnote 3:IRWD rates are budget based and required assumptions about size of yard and size of household. The above rates assume a 1300 sq ft watering area and 4 persons in the household. BP DRAFT 6/23/2016 Orange County Water Rate Analysis - Presented by Mr. Ben Parker, Resident Golden State Water Company Proposed Residential Rates (as of 6/1/16) Region 3 ( Yorba Linda, Orange County) Monthly Meter Rates Volumetric Rate Per Unit (748 Gallons) • .625 inch $16.19 0-10 units $3.124 750 inch $24.25 11-19 units $3.436 • 20-45 units $3.780 • 1.00 inch $40.40 46+ units $4.158 • 1.50 inch $80.75 • 2.00 inch $129.00 Source: http://www.ggswater.com/download/2014%20GRC%2OApplication%20- %20APP%20FINAL.pdf BP DRAFT 6/23/2016 The Following Slides Show The Rates from the Slides Above Adjusted for Certain Differences during Fiscal Year Ended in 2015: • Tax Revenue Received (property tax) • Taxes Paid (federal and state income tax; property tax) • Return on Investment for Owners (dividends; retained earnings) BP DRAFT 6/23/2016 Orange County Water Rate Analysis - Presented by Mr. Ben Parker, Resident Relative Advantage of Revenue from Property Tax Revenue from Revenue from Property Tax Entity Water Dollars Percent YLWD 27,758,853 1,496,489 5.39 EOCWD 6,677,454 1,085,641 16.26 ETWD 23,124,200 815,554 3.53 SMWD 34,142,144 6,071,301 17.78 MESA 33,249,888 0 0.00 SCWD 30,739,473 5,626,192 18.30 IRWD 70,110,000 40,227,000 57.38 GSW 328,511,000 0 0.00 Source: For each Water District,the figures were obtained from its CAFR for the FYE 06/30/15.For Golden State Water the figures were obtained from the AWR 10-K for the FYE 12/31/15. BP DRAFT 6/23/2016 Relative Disadvantage of Tax Expense (Property Tax, State Income Tax and Federal Income Tax) Revenue from Property and Income Tax Expense Entity Water Dollars Percent YLWD 27,758,853 0 0.00 EOCWD 6,677,454 0 0.00 ETWD 23,124,200 0 0.00 SMWD 34,142,144 0 0.00 M ESA 33,249,888 0 0.00 SCWD 30,739,473 0 0.00 IRWD 70,110,000 0 0.00 GSW 328,511,000 44,552,000 (13.56) Source: For each Water District,the figures were obtained from its CAFR for the FYE 06/30/15.For Golden State Water the figures were obtained from the AWR 10-K for the FYE 12/31/15. BP DRAFT 6/23/2016 Orange County Water Rate Analysis - Presented by Mr. Ben Parker, Resident Relative Disadvantage Due to Return to Shareholder Requirement Revenue from Dividends & Retained Earnings Entity Water Dollars Percent YLWD 27,758,853 0 0.00 EOCWD 6,677,454 0 0.00 ETWD 23,124,200 0 0.00 SMWD 34,142,144 0 0.00 M ESA 33,249,888 0 0.00 SCWD 30,739,473 0 0.00 IRWD 70,110,000 0 0.00 GSW 328,511,000 44,655,000 (13.59) Source: For each Water District,the figures were obtained from its CAFR for the HE 06/30/15.For Golden State Water the figures were obtained from the AWR 10-K for the HE 12/31/15. BP DRAFT 6/23/207(: Aggregate Percentage Advantage/(Disadvantage) Revenue from Advantage /(Disadvantage) Entity Water Dollars Percent YLWD 27,758,853 1,496,489 5.39 EOCWD 6,677,454 1,085,641 16.26 ETWD 23,124,200 815,554 03.53 SMWD 34,142,144 6,071,301 17.78 MESA 33,249,888 0 0.00 SCWD 30,739,473 5,626,192 18.30 IRWD 70,110,000 40,227,000 57.38 GSW 328,511,000 (89,207,000) (27.15) Source: For each Water District,the figures were obtained from its CAFR for the HE 06/30/15.For Golden State Water the figures were obtained from the AWR 10-K for the FYE 12/31/15. BP DRAFT 6/23/2016 Orange County Water Rate Analysis - Presented by Mr. Ben Parker, Resident Golden State Water Company Adjusted Residential Rates (as of 6/1/16) Region 3 ( Yorba Linda, Orange County) Monthly Meter Rates Volumetric Rate Per Unit (748 Gallons) • .625 inch - $16.19 * .7285 = $11.79 • 0-10 units $3.124 * .7285 = $2.28 • .750 inch - $24.25 * .7285 = $17.67 • 11-19 units $3.436 * .7285 = $2.50 • 1.00 inch - $40.40 * .7285 = $29.43 • 20-45 units $3.780 * .7285 = $2.75 • 1.50 inch - $80.75 * .7285 = $58.83 • 46+ units $4.158 * .7285 = $3.03 • 2.00 inch - $129.00 * .7285 = $93.98 BP DRAFT 6/23/2016 Adjusted YLWD Residential Rates (As of 6/1/16) Monthly Meter Rates Volumetric Rate Per Unit (748 Gallons) • .625 inch - $26.29 * 1.0539 = $27.71 • .750 inch - $26.29 * 1.0539 = $27.71 • $2.70 * 1.0539 = $2.85 • 1.00 inch - $41.57 * 1.0539 = $43.81 • 1.50 inch - $79.77 * 1.0539 = $84.07 • 2.00 inch - $125.61 * 1.0539=$132.38 BP DRAFT 6/23/2016 Orange County Water Rate Analysis - Presented by Mr. Ben Parker, Resident East Orange County Water District Adjusted Residential Rates (as of 6/1/16) Monthly Meter Rates Volumetric Rate Per Unit (748 Gallons) • .625 inch - $18.10 * 1.1626 = $21.04 $2.67 * 1.1626 = $3.11 • .750 inch - $20.50 * 1.1626 = $23.83 • 1.00 inch - $34.25 * 1.1626 = $39.19 • 1.50 inch - $52.00 * 1.1626 = $60.46 • 2.00 inch - $90.75 * 1.1626 = $105.51 BP DRAFT 6/23/2016 El Toro Water District Adjusted Residential Rates (as of 6/1/16) Monthly Meter Rates and Replacement and Refurbishment Charge Volumetric Rate Per Unit (748 Gallons) • .625 inch - $22.76 * 1.0353 = $23.56 • 1 - 10 Units: $2.46 * 1.0353 = $2.55 • .750 inch - $25.16 * 1.0353 = $26.05 • 11 - 16 Units: $2.83 * 1.0353 = $2.93 • 1.00 inch - $42.03 * 1.0353 = $43.51 - 17 +: $5.04 * 1.0353 = $5.22 • 1.50 inch - $70.91 * 1.0353 = $43.53 • 2.00 inch - $138.22 * 1.0353 = $143.10 BP DRAFT 6/23/2016 Orange County Water Rate Analysis - Presented by Mr. Ben Parker, Resident Mesa Water District Adjusted Residential Rates (as of 6/1/16) Monthly Meter Rates Volumetric Rate Per Unit (748 Gallons) • .625 inch - $11.25 * 1.00 = $11.25 $3.51 * 1.00 = $3.51 • .750 inch - $16.75 * 1.00 = $16.75 • 1.00 inch - $27.75 * 1.00 = $27.75 • 1.50 inch - $55.75 * 1.00 = $55.75 • 2.00 inch - $89.25 * 1.00 = $89.25 BP DRAFT 6/23/2016 Adjusted Residential Monthly Rates - 1" Meter 10 Units Adjusted Adjusted Adjusted Meter Volumetric Total Entity Charge Charge Charge • GSW $29.43 $22.80 $52.23 • YLW D $43.81 $28.50 $72.31 • EOCWD $39.19 $31.10 $70.29 • ETWD $43.51 $25.50 $69.01 • MESA $27.75 $35.10 $62.85 BP DRAFT 6/23/2016 Orange County Water Rate Analysis - Presented by Mr. Ben Parker, Resident Adjusted Residential Monthly Rates — 1" Meter 15 Units Adjusted Adjusted Adjusted Meter Volumetric Total Entity Charge Charge Charge • GSW $29.43 $35.30 $64.73 • YLW D $43.81 $42.72 $86.53 • EOCWD $39.19 $46.65 $85.84 • ETW D $43.51 $39.65 $83.16 • MESA $27.75 $52.65 $80.40 BP DRAFT 6/23/2016 Adjusted Residential Monthly Rates — 1" Meter 20 Units Adjusted Adjusted Adjusted Meter Volumetric Total Entity Charge Charge Charge • GSW $29.43 $48.05 $77.48 • YLWD $43.81 $57.00 $100.81 • EOCWD $39.19 $62.20 $101.39 • ETWD $43.51 $64.64 $108.15 • MESA $27.75 $70.20 $97.95 BP DRAFT 6/23/2016 ITEM NO. 5.1 AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: June 27, 2016 Subject: Conservation Update and Monthly Water Supply Report ATTACHMENTS: Description: Type: Water Supply Report- BB.pdf Backup Material Backup Material MUNICIPAL WATER • DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY Memorandum DATE: June 2, 2016 TO: Member Agencies - MWDOC Division One FROM: Brett R. Barbre, Director- Division One SUBJECT: Monthly Water Usage Data, Tier 2 Projection & Water Supply Information The attached figures show the recent trend of water consumption in Orange County (OC), an estimate of Tier 2 volume for MWDOC, and selected water supply information. Fig. 1 OC Water Usage, Monthly by Supply OCWD Groundwater water was the main supply in April. Fig. 2 OC Water Usage, Monthly, Comparison to Previous Years Water usage in April 2016 was about low compared to the last 5 years. Lower usage is primarily due to strong conservation efforts and mandatory restrictions set by the governor. Rainfall for April 2016 was below the historical average and temperatures were slightly above average. Fig. 3 Historical OC Water Consumption OC water consumption was 571,000 AF in FY 2014-15 (this includes -17 TAF of agricultural usage and non-retail water agency Usage). This is about 50,000 AF less than FY 2013-14 but is about 16,000 AF higher than FY 2010-11 (Fiscal year with lowest usage). Water usage per person was the lowest it has been for Orange County at 164 gallons per day. Although OC population has increased 20% over the past two decades, water usage has not increased, on average. A long-term decrease in per-capita water usage is attributed mostly to Water Use Efficiency (water conservation) efforts. High Temperature, precipitation and the economy all remain indicators to O.C. water consumption. Fig. 4 MWDOC "Firm" Water Purchases, 2016 "Firm" water above the Tier 1 limit will be charged at the higher Tier 2 rate. Our current projection of Tier 2 purchases is zero in 2016. Water Supply Information Includes data on: Rainfall in OC; the OCWD Basin overdraft; Northern California and Colorado River Basin hydrologic data; the State Water Project (SWP) Allocation, and regional storage volumes. The data has implications for the magnitude of supplies from the three watersheds that are the principal sources of water for OC. Note that a hydrologic year is Oct. 1 st through Sept. 30t" • Orange County's accumulated rainfall through May was well below average for this period. This continues the impact of the previous four hydrologic years' below- normal rainfall in reducing those local supplies that are derived from local runoff. El Nino conditions are weakening and unfortunately there has not been the large amounts of precipitation for Southern California that was anticipated. • Northern California accumulated precipitation in May was around 119% of normal for this period. The Northern California snowpack is 97% of normal as of April 1 st. This follows three below-average hydrologic years. The State of California has been in a declared Drought Emergency since January 2014. The State Water Project Contractors Table A Allocation is only 60% as of the end of May. • Colorado River Basin accumulated precipitation in March was 102% average for this period. The Upper Colorado Basin snowpack was 85% of normal as of April 15tH This follows two below-average hydrologic years, and this watershed is in a long- term drought. Lake Mead and Lake Powell combined have about 59% of their average storage volume for this time of year. If Lake Mead's level falls below a "trigger" limit at the end of a calendar year, then a shortage will be declared by the US Bureau of Reclamation (USBR), impacting Colorado River water deliveries for the Lower Basin states. As of Late May Lake Mead Levels were hovering around the "trigger" limit but fortunately levels are expecting to increase from the large amounts of precipitation that hit the Colorado River Basin this summer and spring. The USBR predicts that the "trigger" level will not be hit by the end of 2016. Surface Water Non-OCWD Groundwater WATER Fig. Monthly b 1A OC Water Usage,oFTR.=T 9• 9 Y Y Supply 1111111111111IRecycled (Non Potable) =Import[1] =o��n with projection to end of fiscal year =projected [3] oOCWD Basin [2] Rainfall 60,000 3.0 50,000 2.5 W ^ w40,000 2.0 (D � U U � a 30,000 1 .5 c� 20,000 1 .0 10,000 0.5 0 0.0 LO LO LO LO LO LO co co co co co co � 67 Q M Q Q fn O z 0 LL 2! Q [1] Imported water for consumptive use. Includes"In-Lieu"deliveries and CUP water extraction. Excludes"Direct Replenishment"deliveries of spreading water,"Barrier Replenishment"deliveries,and deliveries into Irvine Lake. [2] GW for consumptive use only. Excludes In-Lieu water deliveries and CUP water extraction that are counted with Import. BPP in FY'15-16 is 75%. [3] MWDOC's estimate of monthly demand is based on the projected FY 15-16"Retail"water demand and historical monthly demand patterns. [4] Total water usage includes IRW D groundwater agricutural use and usage by non-retail water agencies. MI.IN. - L Surface Water =Non-OCWD Groundwater WATER Fig. 1 B OC Water Usage, Monthly by Supply =Recycled (Non Potable) _Import[1] 015TRICT COUNTY with projection to end of fiscal year =OCWD Basin [2] =protected [3] --o—Hi h Temp 60,000 95 90 50,000 85 w co 440,000 - 80 N w Q 75 E a 30,000 - — [a) 70 -c 20,000 - 65 = a� 60 co 10,000 - L 55 Q 0 50 U') U') LO U') U') U') (0 (0 co CD co (0 6) L +r L L Q ru7 O z 0 LL 2t Q 2 [1] Imported water for consumptive use. Includes"In-Lieu"deliveries and CUP water extraction. Excludes"Direct Replenishment"deliveries of spreading water, "Barrier Replenishment"deliveries,and deliveries into Irvine Lake. [2] GW for consumptive use only. Excludes In-Lieu water deliveries and CUP water extraction that are counted with Import. BPP in FY'15-16 is 75%. [3] MWDOC's estimate of monthly demand is based on the projected FY 15-16"Retail"water demand and historical monthly demand patterns. [4] Total water usage includes IRWD groundwater agricutural use and usage by non-retail water agencies. --- ---- MUNICIPAL WATER Fig. A OC Monthly Water Usage 1 : Comparison to Last 4 Fiscal Partial Year DISTRICT g. Y 9 L l p ORANGE COUN Subtotals TY Years 70,000 700,000 60,000 600,000 50,000 500,000 LL 40,000 400,000 W LU W � LL a 30,000 300,000 a 20,000 200,000 10,000 100,000 +r L L > U N Q >+ Q cn O Z c) LL 2 Q ❑FY 11-12 ❑ FY 12-13 ❑FY 13-14 ® FY 14-15 ❑FY 15-16 [1 j Sum of Imported water for consumptive use(includes"in-Lieu"deliveries; excludes"Direct Replenishment"and'Barrier Replenishment')and Local water for consumptive use (includes recycled and non-potable water; excludes GWRS production,groundwater pumped to waste, and waste brine from water treatment projects.) Recent months numbers include some estimation. -- MUNICIPAL WATER OR ORANGE NGE Fig. 213 Orange County Cumulative Monthly Consumptive Water Usage [1]: COUNTY present year compared to last 4 calendar years 650,000 600,000 - CY 2012, 588 TAF 550,000 CY 2013, 605 TAF CY 2014, 612 TAF 500,000 ♦ CY 2015, 515 TAF 450,000 ICY 2016, ??? TAF 400,000 w LL 350,000 LL L) 300,000 250,000 200,000 , ., • 150,000 100,000 50,000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec [1] Sum of Imported water for consumptive use(includes"In-Lieu"deliveries; excludes"Direct Replenishment"and'Barrier Replenishment')and Local water for consumptive use (includes recycled and non-potable water; excludes GWRS production and waste brine from water quality pumping projects). MUNICIPAL °STp'°T FI 3A HISTORICAL WATER CONSUMPTION[l] AND POPULATION[2] IN OC Consumptive Water Use �` g' --o-Population AN�E couNTv 800,000 3.50 Strong Economy 750,000 3.00 700,000 2.50 Z' Weak Economy 2 w 650,000 Dry Year rn 2.00 z0 w Q 600,000 Dry Year Wet Year Dry Year J Wet Year Wet Year 1.500 550,000 Wet Year a Wet Year Wet Year 1.00 500,000 450,000 0.50 400,000 0.00 190 -'91 -'92 -'93 -'94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 -'02 -'03 -'04 -'05 -'06 '07 -'08 -'09 10 11 12 13 14 15 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 -11 -12 -13 -14 -15 -16 Fiscal Year [1] Consumption includes potable, recycled and non-potable usage; excludes Barrier and Spreading water. The most recent data involve some estimation. [2] Population estimates in the 2000s decade were revised by the State Dept.of Finance to reflect the 2010 Census counts. [3] Projection of FY 15-16 water use estimated by MWDOC based on partial-year data. MUNICIPAL WATER l[2] Consumptive Water Use CISTRICT Fig. 313 HISTORICAL WATER CONSUMPTION�1]AND Annual Rainfal o CDUNNTY IN OC S.A.Rainfall 750,000 35 Strong Economy 700,000 30 650,000 A Weak-Economy 25 w y Q W w C Cl) 600,000 - 20 w � Q � 550,000 - 15 500,000 - - - 10 450,000 - - - 5 400,000 0 190 -'91 92 93 -'94 -'95 -'96 -'97 -'98 -'99 -'00 -'01 -'02 -'03 -'04 -'05 -'06 -'07 -'08 -'09 10 11 12 13 14 15 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 -11 -12 -13 -14 -15 -16 Fiscal Year [1] Consumption includes potable, recycled and non-potable usage; excludes Barrier and Spreading water. The most recent data involve some estimation. [2] Rainfall data from Santa Ana Station#121 " MUNICIPAL Fig. 3C HISTORICAL WATER CONSUMPTION[1] AND Annual Average High o Usesumptive Water .... --0— High Temp ORANG.E Temperature[2] IN OC 750,000 85 Strong Economy 84 700,000 83 82 650,000 81 ea c V 80 i LU 79 M 600,000 i W 78 w £ a 77 550,000 - - - - - 76 X 75 500,000 - - Q J/D, 74 73 450,000 72 71 400,000 LILt 1 i 70 90 -'91 -'92 -'93 -'94 -'95 -'96 '97 '98 -199 -100 -101 -'02 -'03 -'04 -'05 -'06 -'07 -'08 -'09 10 11 12 13 14 15 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 -11 -12 -13 -14 -15 -16 Fiscal Year [1] Consumption includes potable, recycled and non-potable usage; excludes Barrier and Spreading water. The most recent data involve some estimation. [2] Temperature data is from Santa Ana Fire Station, elevation 135' """N'DISTR Fig. 3D HISTORICAL WATER CONSUMPTION[l] AND Average Unemployment[2] IN WATER ICT OF ORANGE O C Eki COUNTY 750,000 0% o Consumptive Water Use Strong Economy 1% �Unemployment% . � 700,000 2% Weak Economy 3% 650,000 101, 4% Q 5% o D 600,000 6/° g 7o a 8% 550,000 9% c 10% £ 500,000 - - - W 11% r 12% 450,000 - 13% 14% 400,000 15% 190 -191 92 93 -'94 95 -'96 -'97 -'98 -'99 -'00 01 02 -'03 -'04 -'05 -'06 207 -'08 209 10 11 12 13 14 15 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 -11 -12 -13 -14 -15 -16 Fiscal Year [1] Consumption includes potable, recycled and non-potable usage; excludes Barrier and Spreading water. The most recent data involve some estimation. [2] Employment Data source Bureau of Labor Statistic for Long Beach-L.A.-Santa Ana Metro Area http://WWW.bls.gov/Iau/ - MLINIDIPAL osrAICT Fig. 3E HISTORICAL WATER CONSUMPTION[1] AND POPULATION DENSITY[2] IN OC DF ORANGE --- COUNTY 750,000 4,000 o Consumptive Water Use Strong Economy 00,000 Population D 7 ensity Dry Year Dry Year 3,750 Weak Emannnmy 650,000 LL �_ Q NWet Year In 7 600,000 - - Dry Year W at Year Wet Year y (D 3,500 F a Q Wet Year 0 550,000 - - - - Q Wet Year Wet Year T Z 500,000 - - - (D 3,250 Z �-" O 450,000 a 0 400,000 3,000 a 190 -'91 -'92 -'93 -'94 -'95 -'96 -'97 -'98 -'99 -'00 -'01 -'02 -'03 -'04 -'05 -106 -107 -108 -109 10 11 12 13 14 15 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 -11 -12 -13 -14 -15 -16 Fiscal Year [1] Consumption includes potable, recycled and non-potable usage; excludes Barrier and Spreading water. The most recent data involve some estimation. [2] Population estimates in the 2000s decade were revised by the State Dept. of Finance to reflect the 2010 Census counts. WA Ep'PAL Fig. 3F HISTORICAL WATER CONSUMPTION[l] AND GPCD [2] IN 0 °Consumptive Water Use -" - GisTw�cr GRANGE �GPCD COUNTY 750,000 240 Strong Economy 230 700,000 220 Weak Economy 210 _650,000 0 "Q 200 a w 0 600,000 190 w 180 a 550,000 - 1011 170 160 500,000 i 150 450,000 140 130 400,000 120 190 -'91 -'92 -'93 -'94 -'95 -'96 -'97 -'98 -'99 -'00 -'01 -'02 -'03 -'04 -'05 -'06 -'07 -'08 -'09 10 11 12 13 14 15 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 -11 -12 -13 -14 -15 -16 Fiscal Year [1] Consumption includes potable, recycled and non-potable usage; excludes Barrier and Spreading water. The most recent data involve some estimation. [2] Gallon per Capita Daily(includes all types of water usage and all type of water users). Fig. 4 MWDOC's Firm Water Purchases in CY 2016 oUntreated Total Treated Monthly Actual and Projected to CY Total =Proj Monthly Purchases Cumulative Actual 30,000 350,000 ---------- Tier I do 300,000 25,000 s .� 60 250,000 20,000 - Projected go 00 � • 6 Year Monthly MAX O LL 00 op 6 Year Monthly Avg #0 200,000 �o 6 Year Monthly Low ��`i � 15,000 i� �� a) op 01 >_ 0 �� 150,000 i s � E do do 0 010,000 do 0 00� 0 dO 100,000 o 5,000 ®iop ..�0 50,000 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 Dec-16 Notes 1. "Firm"includes Full Service(both Treated and Untreated)and Barrier water. 2. Basin Pumping Percentage(BPP)is the percentage of a retail water agency's total water demand that they are limited to pump from the OCWD-managed groundwater basin. BPP pertains to Basin agencies only. For example,if a Basin agency's total demand is 10,000 AF/yr and OCWD sets the BPP at 72%,then the agency is limited to 7,200 AF of groundwater that year. There may be certain exceptions and/or adjustments to that simple calculation. OCWD sets the BPP for the Basin agencies,usually as of July 1st. MUNICIPAL WATER prepared by the Municipal Water District of Orange County printdate 6/1/2016 DISTRICT OF *numbers are subject to change ORANGE COUNTY Accumulated Precipitation for the Oct.-Sep, water year, through late May 2016 ❑This Year to date ■ Average to date D Average End of Year = Percent of Average to Date 60 120% 55 CA Snowpack 50 on 4/1/2016 Colorado 45 Snowpack on 4/15/2016 L, 40 CV 35 97% - 30 102% 25 20 85% 15 10 49 5 0 ORANGE N. SIERRAS 8- NORTHERN UPPER BASIN UPPER BASIN COUNTY STATION INDEX CALIF. COLORADO COLORADO (SANTA ANA) SNOWPACK PRECIP. SNOWPACK IR Th e date of maximum snowpack accumulation (April 1st in Northern Calif., April 15th in the G Upper Colorado Basin) is used for year to year comparison. Tv MUNICIPAL OF RICT SWP TABLE A ALLOCATION ORANG6 COUNTY FOR STATE WATER PROJECT CONTRACTORS 65% 65% Final 2012: 65% 60% 60°/ 60% 60°/ 60% 60% 0% 50% Final 2016: ??? 40% 40% 40% 5 0 35% 350/ 35% 35% Final 2013: 35% 30° 0° 20% 20% 20% 20% X15° 15% Final 2015: 20% 15% 10% 10% 101- 0 10% 5% 5% Final 2014: 5% ° 0/ ° 5% % 0% ° Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. =Water Year 2012 mWater Year 2013 -Water Year 2014 - mWater Year 2015 -Water Year 2016 ws�N Imported Water Deliveries Vs. California Population Growth 2003,CRA QSA is signed lowering 45 _ o CRA usage to 4.4 MAF 00 500 ° 40 x = 400 Q 35 = o 300 - 30 > - a •- o 200 2008,ESA results in Delta Pumping 25 a restrictions 1C c 100 20 ,o CL E U 0 15 =CA Population —Total SWP Deliveries —CRA Deliveries to MWD —CRA Deliveries to CA SWP Allocation % Vs. Station 8 Accumulated Rainfall been'00%[once shnce tNe 100% year 2000 100% +oor 100 � 90/ 100% o % so% so% so% 90 m s t00% 80% 80 O Z 70% 70% 70 C O 65% 65% N .2 60% 60% 60° 0 O t p 50% 50% 50% 50 M as% 40% 40 ii i a 40% 39% 35% 20% d1 i �: 30% 30% 35% 30 a .� CO -0 0 20 o Natural Accumulated Run 20 M U 10% Off 10 E 0% si 0 v °°��1°N°a�N°��'Al�°-k��`b° °sbq�°bN�o�`b,°�o�g86��p° °°� °qN��o (:b5 °°`��°°N,L°°�O,L°°4' °N° °,� �� °�0 a =Station 8 Accumulated Rainfall (Inches) -=-SWP Allocation % State Water Project, Colorado River, and MWD Reservoir Storage 25 - as of May 26th,2016 20 - Lake Shasta 4 0 Lake Oroville 15 - LL 4.0 3.0 LL 3.0 - LL 10 2 o .0 94% ' 48% 2. 69 0 a 92% 1.0 5 1.0 0.0 - 0 —r 0.0 I - ------- F 25 San Luis Resv. s {i 2.0 - Lake Mathews 1.5 a! g p 1.0 0.5 450' :5 Lake Mead 7� _ o.0 25 Diamond Valley 20 v 0.5 I/ III III' 0.0 10 • 0 of Capacity 5 36% ° • of Historical Avg. 0 MIJN,O,PAL. ER O.C. Basin Accumulated Overdraft WAT GI$TRICT OF OPANOE Annual, 1969 to Present - COLJNTV A 374,000 AF end of April 2016 50,000 Basin Full in 1969 AW 100,000 150,000 i 200,000 250,000 a 300,000 { 350,000 400,000 450,000 sin volume filled with %i— GWRS Online Jan 2008 500,000 0) O rl N rn V Ln W r\ 00 01 O -4 N M Ln to r` 00 01 O eq N rn V Ln LD r` 00 01 O c'1 N rn Ln %D r, 00 01 O rl N M Ln W LD r` r` r` r\ r` r` r\ r\ r\ r` 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Q1 Q1 Ot Q1 T Q1 T T Q1 T O O O O O O O O O O �q N N N N N N 01 0) 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 O1 (n M 0) M M M 01 01 M M O 0 0 O Cn 0 M 01 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O -4 rl rl -1 -4 -1 -4 -4 rl rl N N 'i -1 -1 -, N a-1 a-1 ai rl a-1 a-1 N ei a-1 a-4 N ei ei N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Accumulated Overdraft (dewatered volume)shown as white area,excluding the volume stored by Metropolitan.source:OCWD Acre-Feet V" A A w w N N CD to O to O to O to O In O O O FF O O O O O O O O O _ ii O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 1969 I Oano£3 1970 C z m- . i� 1°n n m v 1971 1 D 1972 1973 - 1974 1975 { • W 1976 v n 1977 m T 1978 a 1979 OEM n 1980 1981 n 0 1982 n 1983 ------ a 1984 D 0 1985 :5 rt ni Q. 1987 � O ° 1988 1° a 1989 fD ° 1990 �= Q c � 1991 ° lu rD 1992 1993 C ° 1994 Ln 1995 D 0 1996 1997 `_'------ 1998 Y� .rte=.� 01 1999 -- > 2000 lb 2001 3 2002 =� - 0) lb 2003 2004 _ n - - ta 2005 2006 ------------ 2007 w 1 I °- 2008 N 2009 _ a oo ,� a 2010 p < 2011 Z' O T v o r 2012 ------ �, m - rn a 0 2013 = „ 0, N 2014 ~ 2015 2016 - . . ., .. .. ... ...................... O O n O n O V Annual Rainfall(inches) O.C. Basin Accumulated Overdraft Vs. BPP % �Stored Vol(AF) MATER of TR1°" O Dewatered Vol(AF) ORANGE �/ COUNTY Annual, 1999 to Present —0—BPP% w — 90% 80% 50,000 80% 100,000 ----K -K-1`` 69% i��Y � 69% 70% 72 ��!' 70% 66% 66% 64% '"r 65/0 150,000 60% 200,000 50% w 250,000 a CL Q m 40% 300,000 30% 350,000 20% 400,000 450,000 O.C. GWRS Online Jan 2008 10% •fille with water 500,000 0% G1 O N N M R 111 tD P 00 M O N N M -T Ln tD G1 O O O O O O O O O O rl N H H H N a-1 O) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a-I N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Accumulated Overdraft (dewatered volume)shown as white area,excluding the volume stored by Metropolitan.source:OCWD LMUNICIPAL Stored Vol(AF) MST CT O.C. Basin Accumulated Overdraft Vs. Annual Rainfall oRAN�E O Dewatered Vol(AF) I COUNTY Annual, 1999 t0 Present —c;—Annual Rainfall(Inches) ^ 35 i. 50,000 30 100,000 y 150,000 25 200,000 A ► \ 20 L 250,000 300,000 1 \ C 350,000 \4• i j i 10 400,000 \ 5 450,000 volum filled O.C. Basin volume Online Jan 2008 500,000 AL 0 M O .—I N M -e N W P 00 0) O ai N M T' Ln t0 0) O O O O O O O O O O ati ai ai ci 14 N N 01 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Accumulated Overdraft (dewatered volume)shown as white area,excluding the volume stored by Metropolitan.source:OCW D ^- MUNICIPAL Lake Mead Historical Water Elevation Level = WATER DISTRICT OF ORANGE "'-""--- COUNTY 1,250 Historic Peak July 1983 @ 1,225 Feet 1,200 1,150 v LL v 1,100 Shortage Trigger 1,075 Feet v un v ------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------- 0 a 1,050 0 CU - 1,000 Historical Low(Since Filled) 950 June 2015 @ 1,076 Feet 900 ti01� ti�N3 ti�Nl� tiCO3 tiCO� tiC�`, ti�6� ti()113 tioj� p$'3 ti()$" ti(:01 ti(:P' tiQP1 tiQp" tiQN1 tiOA�